Now, let me say that the American Missionary Association has always felt

the importance of working in evangelistic lines. It would be nothing if

it had not the church before it as an incentive. It works primarily

through the school; but always with the thought that the school is

secondary, and that the church is the one great aim before it. And

unless this incentive were before it, unless it recognized that its work

was to bring men to Christ, and to bind them together in Christian

churches, there would be but little to call for the great self-denials

of Christian workers in the field and many Christian givers in the

country at large. It is this thought that has ever been held up before

it--the thought that the church and the school go together, and that the

school is simply the handmaid of the church. We recognize the fact that

in Congregationalism especially, out of all forms of religious belief,

we cannot hope to make men earnest, effective Christians, caring for

themselves, managing their own affairs independently, and having in them

the heart to go out and work, unless we cultivate their minds as well.

And so this Association has sought, and this body of Christians that

represent the Association has sought, by gifts and by teaching, to

develop the thought that there always should be an educational work

going forward that there may be something to build upon. Christianity

needs education in order to give it its largest power.

* * * * *

ADDRESS OF REV. THOMAS L. RIGGS.

It was said of Dr. Williamson by an old Indian that he had an Indian

heart. I, too, have an Indian heart, and I can lay claim to that

possession as but few can. It would take but a very little while to go

from here into the very midst of our present Indian field. It took my

father and Dr. Williamson, when they first entered the field, some six

months to reach it. I could start to-morrow morning, and taking the cars

in this city, and reaching Pierre by the following night, could be

farther off by Saturday, farther from the border of the mission field,

than my father and Dr. Williamson could after they had travelled six

months.

I would like to invite you to go with me on a tour of inspection of the

mission field itself. I would take my two ponies and drive out to the

Cheyenne River, and take you to one of our out-stations, and show you

something of the influences at work in the field to-day. As we went up

the valley, we would see the Indian village located there, and in the

midst, on a rising piece of ground, the mission station. Over some of

the houses we would see a red flag flying. That is a prayer, a votive

offering; there are sick in that house, and that is a prayer to the gods

that healing may come, and that death may be kept from them. Over on the

right we would see the dance-house--a great octagonal house with an open

roof, in which the Indians gather night after night to dance to the

monotonous beating of the drum. That is a very common sound out in the

Indian villages, bringing to us always that thought of slavery to evil.

As we go up to the station itself, we would see something more of the

work than you have as yet been able to see. If it be on the Sabbath, as

we go in we would see a young man there, with his audience before him,

not a very large audience--old men, old women, boys and girls--gathered

on the rough benches, and very much as they are in their own homes. Some

of the old women have their hair down over their faces, the boys with

dirty hands, old men with their dirty blankets, and yet they are

gathered around there to hear the word of life. The preacher, as he

stands before them, tells them of God's wonderful love, and takes as his

text that most wonderful verse in the Bible, "God so loved the world

that he gave his only begotten Son."

Then, as you look at the man who is preaching there, you would hardly

recognize in him one who thirteen years ago was a savage, a painted

Indian. As I look at him it seems a most wonderful thing that such a

change has taken place. I knew him as a savage; a splendid fellow he

was, and he is now a more splendid man than ever he was a savage; and he

is teaching the gospel of Christ to his own people. I have been out

there seventeen years, and if there were not another result to show for

those seventeen years of work than the lifting up of this Clarence Ward,

and making of him a man in Christ Jesus, I should be abundantly

satisfied.

There is another influence of which I would speak, the influence of the

home. Here in our happy homes we know but very little of what that means

to the Indian. An Indian has no home, in our sense of the word. Some

years ago I went with a party of Indians 175 miles west of the Missouri

River in the middle of winter. We climbed a mountain and looked away to

the east. We could see, I should think, 150 miles, and the Indian as he

sat there on the edge of a rock, covered his head up in a blanket and

cried. Said he: "This is my country, and we have had to leave it." That

was his idea of home--such a barren stretch as that, the snow glistening

in the sunlight. The Dakota Indian lives in a region, not in a place.

The Christian home coming into the midst of a village carries there an

ideal of which the Indian knows nothing, and he is taught by the power

of example day after day. The Christian woman in that home keeps her

house clean, keeps her children clean, and stands there as a persistent

example of the power of the gospel of soap, just as the man himself

there who has become a Christian no longer steals horses. A party going

out into an enemy's country would go as often for the sake of bringing

back stolen horses, as they would for scalps. The man who has become a

Christian is recognized at once as shut out from that privilege.

Reference has been made to the opening up of the reservation, and the

crisis is now upon us in connection with our Indian work. We have eleven

million acres of land there just west of the Missouri River to be thrown

open for settlement. Do you know what that means? Were any of you down

at Oklahoma this last season? It means the rush of a swarm of people,

good, bad and indifferent--chiefly bad and indifferent--and these

settlers will crowd themselves in as a wedge between the two divisions

of the Indian reservation, and we shall have Indians both to the north

and to the south. They will be exposed to influences from which they

have been kept as yet; influences which will tend to uplift in the

outcome, as well as to degrade. I thank God for it. I thank God that he

is bringing the white man into the midst of the Indian country. It may

seem that this is a heroic remedy. So it is, but it is time for heroic

remedies. We need to meet the question as it comes to us to-day. There

is a ranchman out on Bad River, who tells me that there is no such thing

as an Indian question. "Why," said I, "what are you talking about?"

"There is no such thing," said he. I asked him how he explained it. "The

simple thing to do is just to treat them as men, and that will be all

there is to it. That will settle it, and there will be no such thing as

an Indian question." Treat them as men and make Christians of them, and

we will settle the whole thing.

* * * * *

ADDRESS OF REV. HENRY A. STIMSON, D.D.

Referring to Dr. Goodwin's powerful address, I find myself transported

again to China; but the fact recurs to my mind that this is not a

foreign missionary society, but a home missionary one, and what we have

to do is to open our minds to the conviction that it is possible to do

at home plenty of work for the Chinaman. I am glad to give a little

personal testimony because what we need most of all is to be convinced

of the necessity to give time and strength and labor to win the

individual Chinaman to Christ. Not very long ago there came to my

knowledge in St. Louis an ordinary Chinaman, comparatively a young man.

He joined our church and I knew he desired to be recognized as a

Christian man. About a year before, he had been a member of a

Sunday-school where ladies were teaching Chinese. Before that our

newspapers had created great outcry about a case of leprosy in the city.

This Chinaman appeared at my house in great trepidation. He had been two

or three years in this country, and had been saving his money in order

to go back and see his mother's face before she would die, and he hoped

to be able to return to China in the following fall. He had learned that

there was a Chinaman, unknown to him, lying ill in a little laundry, of

a disease of which nothing was known, without friends and without care.

He took care of this man, leaving his own work for the purpose, and at

length he came to me asking where he could get a physician to attend the

patient. I gave him a note to one of the best physicians in my own

church, who went at once and saw the man, and he seeing it was a strange

form of disease, went to a specialist of skin diseases, who had the man

brought to a hospital in order to watch his disease. Rumors of this

reaching the newspapers, the reporters thought it a good opportunity to

make a story about leprosy, giving the number and street of an imaginary

laundry in the heart of the city. Instantly the patronage of the Chinese

laundries stopped. My Chinese friend was in the greatest distress about

it, and particularly about me, lest I should think he had brought the

contagious disease to my house. I could hardly persuade him to enter,

and then he told me there was no truth in the story of the newspapers,

and asked what he should do. What was the result of the story? The

Chinaman took care of his friend in the house and in the hospital,

paying considerable for his care, and when he recovered sent him to San

Francisco--in fact, spent about $180 on him, the whole sum he had saved

to take himself home to his mother, and he did this for a man who was as

utterly unknown to him as to you or me. He also came to me with a $10

bill to pay the doctor, saying it was not enough, but it was all the

money he had, and he would add to it by and by. All we want is testimony

as to the character of the Chinese. Here was a man not converted by

Moody or by any service, but by the ministry of an unknown Sunday-school

teacher; as the result of that simple agency he found a charity so

Christ-like as to do work like this. That little Chinaman brought to me

some of his companions, asking me to do something to help them to be

Christians, and as the result of his work a large Sunday-school is

to-day in operation. There is abundance of such testimony, I believe, to

be furnished throughout our land, which we should have before our heart as

an answer to the anti-Chinese mania which now and then sweeps over this

country. Help us to carry the gospel to these men of unmeasured

possibilities, whom God in his mercy has brought across the seas to

plead at our doors.

This audience can help the Chinese in a better way than giving them

money. That Chinaman was asked in my house the other day how many hours

he slept, and he said, "Two or three." "Are you ever troubled by

hoodlums?" "Yes, every day. They break the windows. Last week they broke

into my laundry and stole five bundles of clothes, for which I had to

pay customers $20." "Do you get no protection from the police?" I asked

him. He shook his head--yes, sometimes, but they were no good. The

Chinese have the same right to life and liberty that we have, and if we

get them that, they'll get the money fast enough themselves. We owe it

to the Chinese that they get protection.

* * * * *

ADDRESS OF REV. E.P. GOODWIN, D.D.

I rejoice that I can lift my voice at least in a word of commendation,

if such a word seem in any sense to be needed, in the furtherance of

this particular kind of work. I remind myself sometimes that this very

tone of apology is a tone that ought to set some of us, as ministers and

as brethren, to reconsidering our conception of the gospel. Why,

beloved, suppose it were an admitted fact that for the next hundred

years not a solitary Chinaman would be converted. What then? Do you

imagine that that fact would absolve us from allegiance to the commands

of the Lord Jesus Christ? You will remind yourselves--I am sure I remind

myself often--that in respect to our Christian work, the breadth of it

and the particular departments of it, we have absolutely no option

whatsoever: that when our Master said to his disciples, "Go ye into all

the world and preach the gospel to every creature," he made no exception

of those that might have almond eyes and yellow faces, nor of those that

might have black skins and woolly hair; that he took in, in that wide

sweep of his omniscient vision, every nation and kindred under the whole

sky, and that should exist until the kingdom itself should come.

If it could be demonstrated that it required ten times as much work and

ten times as much money to convert the Chinaman as anybody else, then

all the more because of degradation and superstition and idolatry and

hardness of heart--all the more must I storm the Gibraltar of that

paganism. The Master's principle seemed to be, "Give ye them to eat."

The fact of hunger is what lays the law upon the hearts of the

disciples; and by so much as men are more hungered--if there be one

nation more so than another--by so much as they are nearer to starving

for the bread of life, by so much the more are your heart and my heart

called upon in the name and in the sympathy of Jesus Christ, to respond

to that cause. Those disciples of that early day might just as well have

said, "Master, we can not feed all these ten thousand. We will pick out

those around us, the nearest at hand. We won't touch that set of lepers

just over there from Capernaum; we won't have anything to do with that

other set of outcasts and vagabonds drifted in here, some of them from

Samaria; we will have nothing whatever to do with these wretches from

Chorazin--gamblers and abandoned people of every sort."

What do you think would have been his response to that sort of argument?

I think if Peter had given him any such plea as that it would have cut

him off hopelessly from any apostleship. There would have been a new

band of apostles that would have been instituted then and there that

were willing to take the Master's command, take Him as responsible for

the authority and for the result. They knew better; they knew Him

better; and though they had their little scant loaves that would not

give a quarter of a crumb apiece to the great multitude, they said:

"That is not our responsibility; ours is to obey. It is His to furnish

when the resources fail." Brethren, that is my theory of missions.

Do you remember the little anecdote about Francis Xavier, that before he

went abroad as a missionary to China, while he was sleeping with his

room-mate one night, he startled him by rising in his sleep and throwing

out his arms with great urgency, as he said, "Yet more, oh, my God, yet

more!" His comrade wakened him and asked him what he meant. "Why," said

he, "I was having a vision of things in the East. I was seeing

missionaries tortured; some of them were being burned, some of them were

having their flesh torn from their bodies, and in many ways they seemed

to be suffering in their testimony for Christ's sake. And as I looked,

the tears came to my eyes, and a voice said to me, 'That is what it will

cost you if you go on this missionary tour. Are you willing to take the

cost?' And I said, 'Oh, Lord Jesus; yet more, yet more, if I may win

these perishing souls.'"

Brethren, it is the call of the hour. These people may become, in my

judgment, pre-eminently the missionary people. They have been called the

Yankees of the Orient. They are scattered every whither, in every

quarter of the world. I think it ought to shame us to have less

enthusiasm for these for whom Christ died than they of the Romish church

in the palmiest days of its missionary zeal. God help us that we may

stand true upon the Pacific coast and all through our land, and that for

every missionary church abroad there may be a score and a hundred. Dr.

Williams said, after thirty years' knowledge of the Chinese, that we

might evangelize China from one end of the empire to the other in half a

century if we were in earnest. God help us that we may labor and pray

for the coming of such a day.

Now I believe this: That, so far as the facts go, there is just as large

a percentage of results to be shown for work among the Chinese as for

work anywhere. Take it in our city, among some of the Chinese schools;

take it in San Francisco, take it in China itself. I received on

Saturday last a letter from Mr. Gray, of Hong-Kong, speaking of a young

man who had gone out from our church as his assistant in the work there.

Said he to me: "He is one of the most valuable helpers I could have. He

not only stands fast by his work, but he also seems to have spiritual

discernment to meet the peculiar difficulties we have to encounter, and

there are plenty of them. Here is a man, for instance, who says he would

whip his wife to death if he should hear of her accepting Christ. There

is another, a mother, who would let her child starve if she thought it

was being taught the gospel of Jesus Christ. But among this people there

is no more successful laborer that I know of than Sui Chung." I knew him

well. He came into our Chinese Sunday-school, which is held every

Sunday afternoon. I remember him distinctly, as giving, so far as I

could see, clear evidence of being born of the Spirit. And I bear

testimony to these young men now in my church--there are ten or a

dozen of them--that, so far as I know them and so far as I have been

able to talk with them in imperfect English or through Chinese

interpreters, their Christian experience is as satisfactory as that of

any others. Nay, I will say more than that. I will venture to say that

the Chinese brethren in my church are more earnest. They sustain a

Chinese prayer-meeting regularly every Sunday of their own accord in

their own language, and have kept it up ever since there were enough

of them to be united together. I frequently look in and talk with

them; and there is one thing about these Chinese that I greatly

respect--I never saw them pull out their watches while I was speaking

to them. I never saw any of them going to sleep; I never saw a look in

the face of one of them which indicated that he was not profoundly

interested. I was in their meeting last Sunday, and I told them about

Sui Chung. Most of these Chinese can read. Some of them are very

fluent talkers, and some are very intelligent. I suppose we have a

thousand or fifteen hundred in this city, and a very large proportion

of them, they tell me, can read the Chinese Bible.

Now, I have great respect for this people, if for nothing more than for

their history. We have a petty hundred years of history. How many

hundred have they? Any nation that can hold itself together for 4,000

years--or shall I say for more?--and that to-day constitutes nearly

one-quarter of the population of the earth, certainly deserves our

respect. Any people that can take our own handicrafts and beat us at

them--and they will do it in a good many directions, and make money,

even though you may disapprove of their way of living--deserve our

respect. Any people that can furnish diplomates fitted to stand side by

side with Bismarck and Gladstone, and our own embassadors say that they

can, certainly deserve our respect.

One thing more they desire of the Christian church, if it were only a

debt to be paid. I insist upon it, brethren, that at least Christian

England and Christian America ought to pay back to them in missionary

moneys at least an amount equal to that of which we have robbed them by

the infamous opium traffic, and to-day it is people from Christian

lands, more than anything else, who are furnishing the difficulties in

the way of the introduction of the gospel abroad.

* * * * *

ADDRESS OF PRESIDENT ALBERT SALISBURY.

There are values even in this world for which we have no expression, for

which we have no definite standard, and of which we have no very clear

comprehension. They are values, none the less. But there is one standard

of value of which I think it may be safely said the American people have

come into a very clear comprehension, that is, of the weight of the

working power of a dollar.

Most of us know it by pretty thorough experience. We know what a dollar

costs, how hard it is to get, how hard it is to keep, how little we are

liable to receive for it when it goes. And, let me say it, I believe

there are no people on this Western Continent who have any more exact,

definite, clearly defined comprehension of what a dollar is, what it

will do, and what it will not do, than the managers of our missionary

enterprises.

Then, it is sometimes thought and sometimes said that these men who

conduct church work and missionary work do not know much about dollars;

that a dollar, a thousand dollars, or a million dollars, is a very

indefinite thing; and that they ask for a million dollars, or half a

million dollars, with a great deal of nonchalance, as if it were merely

a matter of asking. It is not so. When this Finance Committee indorse

the recommendation of the National Council that half a million of

dollars be raised for the work of this Association during the coming

year, they do it from a business point of view, and when the officers

and managers of this Association second this demand, they know what it

means. They know better than anybody else in the world knows how hard it

is to get half a million of dollars. For some years I went up and down

through the South and West in the service of this Association. I went in

and out of the rooms at No. 56 Reade Street, New York, and I must have

been very dull not to know pretty well the inside workings of this

Association. I have been among workers on the field. I know how closely

everything is reckoned, how carefully every penny is spent; and I know

how the demands of the work and the needs press upon the workers in the

field, so that they look back to those rooms in New York with the

feeling that somehow there is not a very great deal of liberality there,

that those officers pare very closely. But these workers in the field

have no such experience after all as the officers there at the centre of

things. Those members of the Executive Committee, those Secretaries and

the Treasurer, sitting there together, and facing the demands of the old

work and the new, have rolled upon them every day a sense of the value

of money and of the need of economy such as even the workers in the

field can not comprehend. I have been there, I am now outside, and I am

free to say whatever I please; and I make bold to say to you here that

the work which is alive and growing must have the most money. Increased

demands must cost. It is a law of nature. Now, then, when this Finance

Committee come forward to indorse this recommendation that $500,000

instead of $375,000 be raised for the coming year, they do not at all

reach the measure of the need.

There is only one thing necessary to get this money and more. It is a

pretty comprehensive thing. If upon the members of our churches in this

land as clear a sense of the need of what ought to be done and can be

done could be brought as comes to those in contact with the work, the

money would be forthcoming. How to make our people realize the facts in

this matter is the problem. Money will come when our people know how

much it is needed, how profitably it is spent, and how grandly it pays

dividends.

* * * * *

ADDRESS OF REV. WM. M. TAYLOR, D.D.

Last Wednesday evening at the Prayer and Conference Meeting of the

Broadway Tabernacle, one of the office-bearers of the church put this

question to me: "Can we hope to be instrumental in the conversion of the

Jews, so long as the present prejudice against God's ancient people

exists among us?" And that inquiry, taken in connection with the fact

that the Annual Meeting of the American Missionary Association was to be

held here this week, led me to examine the Word of God, that I might

discover what incidental light is thrown on the subject of pride of race

by its histories and other contents, and I mean to-night to put the

result of my examination before you.

The first and most striking instance of its manifestation which we come

upon in Scripture is the treatment given by the Egyptians to the

Israelites. "Every shepherd was an abomination to the Egyptians," so

they counted themselves superior to the Hebrews, and subjected them to

the greatest indignities, grinding them under the harshest oppression,

and exacting from them, by the lash of the task-master, the most arduous

labor. But mark how their pride was rebuked and their cruelty punished,

under the moral and retributive government of God. Their land was

desolated by a series of plagues culminating in the death of the

first-born, and the people whom they had oppressed made their escape

from the most powerful empire then existing in the world, without

themselves striking a single blow. The Lord fought for them. Each of

these ten plagues was a Divine protest against that national pride which

arrogated to itself the exclusive right to power, privilege, immunity

and possession, and which met its merited punishment that day, when "the

Lord saved Israel out of the hand of the Egyptians, and Israel saw the

Egyptians dead upon the seashore."

The American Missionary — Volume 43, No. 12, December, 1889 · 第 7 / 10 段