VEGETABLES AS A SEPARATE COURSE.

The mess just referred to, which would make a Parisian gourmet shudder,

is only one illustration of the Anglo-American mistaken policy of

serving together foods that are preferable separately. On this point,

too, France has an important lesson to teach us, particularly in the

serving of vegetables.

The making of a menu requires as much taste and judgment as the

arranging of a concert program. Next to variety, contrast is the

most important thing to be considered. A vegetable served separately

provides some of this needful contrast.

An English epicure declares that the secret of the excellence in French

cookery lies in the lavish use of vegetables. "Where we use one kind,

French cooks use twenty."

This point was sufficiently dwelt on in the paragraphs relating to

the making of savory soups and stews. It illustrates Gallic skill in

culinary _orchestration_. But the French know that at a dinner, as at a

concert, a _solo_ piece is desirable, and therefore they always serve

one choice vegetable as a separate course.

As a matter of course the vegetable selected for this distinction--be

it peas, beans, spinach, cauliflower, asparagus, artichoke, carrots,

or whatnot--must be particularly fresh and succulent. It must also,

like the singer's solo number, have an accompaniment, that is to say an

appropriate sauce.

No French cook would spoil the delicate natural flavor of green peas

with mint, as the English do. I once asked a waiter in a London

restaurant why mint was put with the peas. He promptly replied: "Peas

'ave no flavor, sir!"

In France, butter (French butter) is used as the best accompaniment to

a solo vegetable. It makes the string beans and whatever else it goes

with more savory, without obliterating their individual flavor, as the

mint does in the case of peas.

Food and Flavor: A Gastronomic Guide to Health and Good Living · 第 132 / 219 题