LOOKING DOWN ON OTHERS.

In my career as a musical critic I have found that I could do much more

toward improving the artistic doings of singers and players by praising

their best things than by finding fault with their poorest.

In the culinary art, likewise, the reader will find that far better

results are reached by praising the cook for her successes than by

never speaking to her except to find fault. It makes her try to _earn

more praise_, not only in the making of that particular dish but in the

making of others.

Above all things, a mistress who expects artistic dishes from a

superior cook should never appear to be looking down on her.

This looking down business, perhaps more than anything else, stands in

the way of our getting good cooks.

At the same time, perhaps more than anything else, it shows what fools

these mortals be.

All over the country, but particularly in the West, I have found that

most families look down on other families. It is chiefly a question of

money. Those who have an income of $3,000 look down on those who have

only $1,000 or $1,500, while those who have $10,000 do all they can

to show their superiority to three-thousanders, only to be, in turn,

snubbed by those whose income is $20,000; and so on.

One day in a California village where I was spending the winter, I was

surprised at the rudeness of a storekeeper with whom I had had some

pleasant chats. He hardly answered my questions; in fact, he snubbed

me. I found out next day that he had just inherited a large fortune, a

piece of luck which he celebrated by promptly looking down on everybody

he knew.

As a rule, however, I regret to say, the women are more addicted than

the men to this preposterously silly habit of looking down on others.

Not to speak of its being extremely ill-mannered it is the most deadly

obstacle to the solution of the problem of domestic help.

We shall never have a sufficient supply of good helpers until

mistresses recognize the fact that cooking is a fine art, and that

those who practise it should be treated, not as servants, but as

practitioners of the most important profession in the world--a

profession which stands to the medical in the relation of prevention

to cure; and that prevention is better than cure we all know. It's

cheaper, too.

An old English writer has justly remarked that "the kitchen is the best

pharmacopœia."

F. W. Hackwood calls attention to the suggestive fact that all the best

old cookery books in the English language were written by medical men.

Sir Kenelm Digby and Dr. Mayerne in the seventeenth century, Dr. Mill

and Dr. Hunter in the eighteenth, and Dr. Kitchiner in the nineteenth

gave to the world "the best English cookery books of their respective

eras."

Queen Anne's physician, Dr. Lister, declared that "no man can be a good

physician who has not a competent knowledge of cookery."

That is the opinion prevalent among the best medical men of to-day, who

hold correct advice in regard to diet and the proper cooking of the

food recommended to be usually of more importance than drugs.

Many thousands of invalids have been killed by improper or badly cooked

food.

The foolish factory and shop girls who look down on kitchen work should

be reminded of the fact that none of the contributors to the pages of

the various women's journals are more honored than those who are famed

for their skill in cooking and giving others the benefit of their

experience. Some of these women, like Mrs. Rorer, Marion Harland, Mrs.

Lincoln, Christine Terhune Herrick, Janet MacKenzie Hill, Mary Ronald,

and Helen S. Wright, have won international repute.

It is a curious fact that whereas in Europe most of the cook books have

been written by men, in America the authors of such books are mostly

women. From American women, with their keen intelligence and good

taste, great things may be expected in the way of gastronomic progress.

After the appearance in the "Century Magazine" of my brief remarks on

the nobility of the art of cookery I heard of a wealthy young lady

(I hope and believe there were many others) who was impelled, after

reading them, to take up cooking and found it so fascinating that she

neglected all her other pet diversions. I know educated young ladies

who would rather cook than do anything else except, perhaps, go to the

theater; they find it "so entertaining and engrossing."

Many anecdotes might be related of women known to fame who love kitchen

work. To take only one case: Mrs. Champ Clark, who came so near being

first lady of the land, is a noted cook and domestic science expert.

One who knows her writes that "she does much of her own cooking,

especially when intimate friends dine with her and they rave over

her dishes. It has the good old Southern taste, and is minus the

fingle-fangle garnishments often employed to cover up inferiority.

Mrs. Clark's bread is a delight, and when she has the opportunity she

always bakes it herself. She took first prize in a bread-baking contest

once. She holds that such labor is not undignified for any of the first

ladies of the land. The word 'servant' has been much abused, its early

meaning 'to serve' being beautiful, and certainly there is nothing

better than to do something for somebody."

There are signs that the ladies of our time will take up the culinary

art as a fashionable cult, as did the ladies of the French aristocracy

in the seventeenth century.

Many American society women are expert cooks and delight in inventing

and concocting diverse dishes. One of the wealthiest women in the

world is Mrs. George J. Gould. In summer, in her Adirondack camp, she

spends much time in the kitchen helping to cook and to make preserves

and jams. She has, it is said, "a perfect genius for combining things

and creating new sensations of taste." Her children, boys as well as

girls, understand cooking in all its branches. Grace Aspinwall, in

the "National Food Magazine" (May, 1910) gives details regarding the

culinary doings of other society women--Mrs. Philip Lydig, Mrs. Joseph

Widener, Mrs. Norman de R. Whitehouse, Mrs. Oliver Harriman and Mrs. W.

K. Vanderbilt, Jr.

Mrs. Woodrow Wilson is also fond of cooking, and after her husband was

elected President of the United States the newspapers printed pictures

of her at work in the kitchen.

Food and Flavor: A Gastronomic Guide to Health and Good Living · 第 104 / 219 题