IS COLD STORAGE A BLESSING?

In an editorial entitled "Cold Storage Hardly a Blessing" the New York

"Times" called attention during the holiday season of 1911 to the fact

that the price of cold-storage turkeys was six cents a pound less than

that of the fresh-killed birds. "This difference of almost 25 per

cent. is an admission by the cold-storage people, forced from them by

unalterable public opinion, that their much-wanted wares are to just

about that extent inferior to those which they vociferously declare to

be no better."

Quoting the happy expression that cold-storage fowls taste "as if they

had been buried and dug up again," the same writer remarks: "None of

us really knows how fowls do taste after they have gone through that

process. We can imagine the flavor, however, and do, noses helping

tongues."

Were it not for the storage people, chickens and eggs would come into

our markets fresh, cheap, and in abundance at the time when they are

at their best. But it is precisely when they are at their best and

cheapest that the storage men corner the market and hold the goods

till they are good no more; whereupon they sell them at their own

prices, largely increased through gambling. In view of such facts the

"Times" refers to cold storage as "a baleful invention."

A baleful invention it certainly is--and a needless one, too. To quote

Dr. Wiley again: "Poultry is a food product which under the present

scientific methods of production can be furnished in a fresh state all

the year. The necessity for cold storage, therefore, is not so apparent

in this case as in that of fruit and other perishable foods."

The American public, surely, will not much longer tolerate the present

condition of affairs. There are packers and packers. Some are more

careful and cleanly in their methods than others; but cold-storage fowl

at its best is more or less denatured, and at its worst it is worse

than denatured, putting us almost on a level with the African Bushmen

who, when they kill a sheep, eat the entrails with their contents.

I would no more eat such undrawn storage poultry as is placed daily

before thousands of my countrymen than I would the flesh of a hyena or

a vulture.

It was estimated that, in 1912, $75,000,000 worth of poultry was

consumed in New York City. Of this, only $1,500,000 represented the

business done in live chickens, and nearly all of this went to the

Kosher butchers of the East Side. Surely Christians cannot afford to be

less cleanly than Hebrews in regard to what they put in their stomachs.

The time has come for Christians to gird up their loins and fight for

untainted food on their tables, too. There is encouragement in the

information that in one season 1,100 more cars of live poultry were

shipped to New York City than the season before (1910), and that plants

were being established near the city for providing poultry freshly

slaughtered and dressed. The consumer must, however, make sure that

the fowls are not only freshly killed but drawn within a few days;

the second joint is sometimes tainted on the second day. Butchers

and poultry dealers would make friends if they gave up the habit of

charging for fowl at so much a pound including the intestines. Let them

charge more per pound for the meat alone, refusing under any conditions

to have an undrawn bird in their shops, and the poultry business will

soon be doubled, nay, quintupled.

The fact that fresh fowl costs more than frozen is due to artificial

conditions which can be remedied and _must_ be remedied. For the

present, if you cannot afford a six-pound fowl, try one weighing three

pounds. If your dealer understands--as mine understands--that you will

not under any circumstances eat a cold-storage bird he will supply a

fresh one. What you want is not quantity but quality--particularly the

true chicken Flavor. In the chapter on Savory Cooking it will be shown

how a few pounds of fresh chicken can be made to yield their delicious

flavor to a dish much larger and much cheaper than would be afforded by

a fowl double its size cooked in the usual way.

In Europe, most persons travel third class on the railways because they

cannot afford first or second. In this country, nearly everybody can

afford to travel first class. Americans are always bound to have the

best of everything--if they know how to get it. Only in the gastronomic

world are they--with the exception of the Jews--traveling third

class--eating third-rate poultry prepared by third-rate cooks. This

cannot last. We can afford the best. Let us have it.

Food and Flavor: A Gastronomic Guide to Health and Good Living · 第 83 / 219 题