DR. WILEY'S POISON SQUAD.

Napoleon Bonaparte said that "soldiers march and fight on their

stomachs." If our soldiers, fed on "embalmed" beef and other chemically

treated food, had had much marching and fighting to do, Spain might

have won. As it was, the American soldiers who were killed or

invalided during that war, were martyrs to a nobler cause than that

of humiliating poor Spain. It was their sufferings that, as already

intimated, led to the national revolt against the wholesale poisoners

and adulterators for commercial profit.

As a matter of course, the parties accused showed fight. One of the

earliest battles was fought over borax, and it was in this battle that

Dr. Wiley first came before the general public prominently. During

the months from December, 1902, to July 1, 1903, he made a series of

experiments on twelve young men in Washington as to the influence

on the health of food containing boric acid or borax. Some of the

conclusions reached were thus summed up briefly:

When boric acid or its equivalent in borax is taken in food

in quantities not exceeding a half gram daily, no immediate

effects are observed; after a time there occur occasional

loss of appetite, a feeling of fullness in the head, gastric

discomfort, and general ill-feeling. Only the more sensitive

persons develop symptoms from the amounts named. When the

drug is given in larger and increasing doses, these symptoms

in accentuated form develop more rapidly; most common is

persistent headache with slight clouding of the mental

processes. The quantity of boric acid required to produce

definite symptoms varies greatly with different individuals.

In some, one to two grams daily produce decided distress;

in others, three grams cause little if any discomfort.

Conclusions regarding the use of less than half a gram daily

were not reached, but from the effect of the larger quantities

taken for a short time, it is reasonable to infer that smaller

doses during an extended period would also prove injurious.

The results in general indicate that it is not advisable

to use borax in articles of food intended for common and

continuous use. When placed in foods used only occasionally

and in small amounts, the quantity of the contained

preservative should be stated plainly, that the consumer may

know what he is eating.

One of the most interesting facts, and one known to few, in connection

with these experiments, is that Dr. Wiley actually began them with a

bias in favor of borax. He did not believe, he said, that borax was

a harmful preservative, but he was going to find out. This statement

aroused my suspicion. Knowing how much "graft" and "politics" there are

apt to be in such investigations, I made up my mind that Dr. Wiley was

a fraud and that he would undoubtedly give a verdict in favor of borax.

While in this frame of mind I wrote the following editorial for the New

York "Evening Post" (April 8, 1903):

Dr. Wiley, of the Department of Agriculture, seems to require

a long time to decide whether his "brigade of poison eaters,"

as the Washington wits have dubbed his free boarders, are

really eating poison or only harmless food preservatives

unjustly suspected of being injurious. It needed no elaborate

experiments to prove that drugged food may be eaten without

serious harm. Many of us are probably eating more or less

of drugged food all the time without actually having to be

taken to the hospital; but many others do suffer in health,

vitality and capacity for work from eating it. In regard to

salicylic acid and formaldehyde, Dr. Wiley himself wrote in

"Leslie's Weekly" two years ago that there is no doubt of the

pernicious influence of these preservatives in some cases.

He also said, truly, that "the public supervision should

look after the weak and diseased digestive systems rather

than the strong and vigorous." Why, nevertheless, he chose

to make his Washington experiments on the strongest young

men he could find is a mystery he has not explained. In the

"Lancet" of Nov. 30, 1901, an account was given of a series

of experiments with boric acid made by Dr. Rinehart, in which

the symptoms of poisoning disappeared as soon as the use of

the drug was given up. Further evidence is furnished in the

"Münchener Medicinische Wochenschrift" of Jan. 26. Dr. G.

Merkel, of Nuremberg, experimented with boric acid on eleven

patients, seven of whom promptly showed disturbance of the

gastro-intestinal tract. The inevitable inference from such

facts is either that the use of boric acid as a preservative

of food should be prohibited by law, or, at least, that the

law should require mention of its use on the label of

canned goods, and in butter, cream, milk and meat, in order

that those whose digestion is not as robust as that of Dr.

Wiley's select boarders may take warning.

[Illustration: HARVEY W. WILEY]

The fact that these remarks were widely copied showed that many other

editors shared my suspicions. Then came Dr. Wiley's verdict, which

proclaimed him the honest, bold, incorruptible champion of truth who

was soon to become respected, admired, and idolized by the whole

American public, with the exception of those who had commercial reasons

for disliking him.

Perhaps I may be pardoned for inserting here a reference to an amusing

incident that occurred during this controversy. Another article of

mine, in which I had spoken disrespectfully of borax, resulted the

following day in a visit to the office of the "Evening Post" by a

man who wanted to see the "borax editor." He was shown to my room,

and promptly proceeded to inform me that I was entirely mistaken in

thinking borax harmful. I replied that I considered borax one of the

most useful things in the world, the greatest of "dirt-chasers,"

indispensable on the wash stand and in the wash house; but as for

internal use, I had had days of discomfort which made me look on it

with feelings of genuine alarm.

"I'll tell you what I'll do!" retorted the man, who represented one of

the large borax companies. "I am willing to take a glass of water, put

in a tablespoonful of borax and drink it right before you." "That's

nothing," I replied; "I wouldn't hesitate to do the same thing. Borax

is not a deadly drug like arsenic or strychnine, it is a chemical

which, taken into the stomach in small doses day after day, week after

week, and month after month, acts as a cumulative poison, gradually

weakening even the strongest stomach; and, inasmuch as the stomach

is the source of most diseases, thus paving the way for all sorts of

troubles."[1]

Food and Flavor: A Gastronomic Guide to Health and Good Living · 第 66 / 219 题