THE GREAT AFGHAN BLUNDER.

Every war is a blunder; every battle a blot of shame upon human

nature; and the greatest wisdom a successful belligerent can shew,

even when he has been forced into the fray by his beaten antagonist,

is to get out of it as fast as he can. But some wars are viewed, not

as they ought to be, as indications of the slow progress of the human

race from barbarism, but through the medium of the lofty and

chivalrous feelings of the resisting party, or the party which takes

arms against oppression. Hence, war and glory have come to be

associated in the vulgar mind; and hence the mere act of fighting is

termed honourable, although it is obvious that, abstractedly, it

should excite only feelings of shame. Even the late Afghan war is

looked upon as a _calamity_, relieved throughout by flashes of heroism

and gleams of success--a war which, rightly viewed, is either one of

the greatest crimes, or one of the most stupendous blunders recorded

in history!

This war, we observe, has already found a chronicler, and one

peculiarly qualified, both by his knowledge and talent, to do justice

to the subject.[1] Although possessing all the essentials of history,

however, the book has something more, and is therefore not strictly a

history, in the conventional sense of the term; the text as well as

the margin being burdened with letters, diaries, and documents of all

kinds--the crude materials which it is the province of the historian

to digest. The author, notwithstanding, has a clear historical head;

his narrative, when he permits it to flow uninterrupted, is animated;

his reflections generally philosophical; his summaries of individual

character acute and distinct; and so peculiar have been his sources of

information, that henceforward no man will sit down to write upon this

era of the history of India, or of Central Asia, before carefully

consulting the volumes of Mr Kaye.

These volumes, however, comprise between thirteen and fourteen hundred

octavo pages, filled with hard names and minute details, and rendered

more difficult by the unpardonable want of an index. Although a

necessity, therefore, for the more respectable libraries, and a thing

to be hoarded by all collectors as a work of reference, the book has

little chance of being known to the mass of the public; and we

propose, therefore, to arrange the few extracts we are able to give,

in such a way as, with the aid of our own filling up, may convey to

the general reader--what, we suspect, he has never received

before--some distinct idea of one of the most fantastic tricks that

ever made the angels weep.

There is no country in the world more secure from external invasion

than India; but on the west, more especially, nature has interposed

between her and the more civilised powers of Europe and Asia a

succession of rivers, mountains, and deserts, absolutely impassable by

an army of any formidable magnitude. Notwithstanding this, there had

been long an uneasy feeling connected with the idea of the territorial

aggrandisement of Russia, and of late years, by the desire manifested

by that power to interfere in the affairs of Persia. In 1837-38,

therefore, when a Persian army was before Herat, with Russian officers

busy in the camp, it is no wonder that, to previously excited

imaginations, the danger should have seemed to assume a tangible

form. The principality of Herat, although on the other side of

intervening deserts, extending for many hundred miles, was in itself a

fertile and beautiful oasis, where a numerous army might be refreshed

and provisioned, and established as on a vantage-ground. From thence

the Persians, strengthened and officered by the Russians, might roll

on towards Cabool, and there prepare for a descent upon India. This

magnificent but terrible idea was not examined in its details--it was

taken for granted as a thing not only possible but probable; and the

far-distant region of Hindostan, separated as it was by deserts,

mountains, and rivers from the tumult that agitated Central Asia, was

stirred by conflicting feelings of terror and exultation. British

India, from the Himalaya to the sea, is dotted here and there with

native states, which the inconsistent policy of the Company in

Leadenhall Street has preserved in a kind of liberty, as relics and

remembrancers of a past _régime_. But besides these uncertain

protégés, we had to look to the natives in our own provinces, who

seemed to _expect_ that something would happen--they knew not what,

any more than their rulers. 'Among our Mussulman subjects,' says Mr

Kaye, 'the feeling was somewhat akin to that which had unsettled their

minds at the time when the rumoured advent of Zemaun Shah made them

look for the speedy restoration of Mohammedan supremacy in Hindostan.

In their eyes, indeed, the movement beyond the Afghan frontier took

the shape of a Mohammedan invasion; and it was believed that countless

thousands of true believers were about to pour themselves over the

plains of the Punjab and Hindostan, and to wrest all the country

between the Indus and the sea from the hands of the infidel usurpers.

The Mohammedan journals, at this time, teemed with the utterances of

undisguised sedition. There was a decline in the value of public

securities; and it went openly from mouth to mouth, in the streets and

the bazaars, that the Company's Raj was nearly at an end.'

Under these circumstances, it seemed necessary to look to the

intervening country, Afghanistan, which in this summary manner was to

be made a 'platform of observation' for the Perso-Russian army to

prepare for its descent upon Hindostan. The Afghans were tribes of

hardy mountaineers, inhabiting a wild and thinly-peopled country. They

consisted of soldiers, husbandmen, and shepherds, all convertible, at

a moment's notice, into thieves and bandits; and through their

formidable defiles flowed an uncertain stream of commerce, connecting

India with the distant provinces of Persia and Russia. So little was

known of these mountaineers, that in the early part of this century,

their prince, Shah Zemaun, was a formidable bugbear to the Indian

Council, and nothing was thought of for a time but an invasion of the

Afghans. In one of the sudden revolutions, however, so common in

semi-barbarous states, this shah was taken captive, and his eyes

punctured with a lancet--a summary act of deposition in the East, for

a blind man cannot reign. Two of his brothers competed for the vacant

throne; and notwithstanding the efforts of a famous king-making

vizier, Futteh Khan, the prize fell for a time to the lot of him who

is so well known to English readers by the name and style of Shah

Soojah. But his incapacity was soon manifest. Sometimes a king,

sometimes a bandit, and sometimes a fugitive subsisting by the sale of

his jewels, his cause at length became altogether hopeless; and after

being robbed of his last treasure, the Koh-i-Noor--as has already been

detailed in this Journal[2]--he took refuge in the British territory.

Futteh Khan, the king-making vizier, had twenty brothers; but one of

the younger fry he treated with especial neglect. 'The son of a woman

of the Kuzzilbash tribe, looked down upon by the high-bred Douranee

ladies of his father's household, the boy had begun life in the

degrading office of a sweeper at the sacred cenotaph of Lamech.

Permitted, at a later period, to hold a menial office about the person

of the powerful Wuzeer, he served the great man with water, or bore

his pipe; was very zealous in his ministrations; kept long and painful

vigils; saw everything, heard everything in silence; bided his time

patiently, and when the hour came, trod the stage of active life as no

irresolute novice. A stripling of fourteen, in the crowded streets of

Peshawur in broad day, as the buyers and the sellers thronged the

thoroughfares of the city, he slew one of the enemies of Futteh Khan,

and galloped home to report the achievement to the Wuzeer. From that

time his rise was rapid. The neglected younger brother of Futteh Khan

became the favourite of the powerful chief, and following the fortunes

of the warlike minister, soon took his place among the chivalry of the

Douranee Empire.'

The name of this youth is well known in the annals of our time: he was

Dost Mahomed, a gay, bold, frank, daring character, who rose from the

excesses of his early years into something resembling a hero of

romance. One of these excesses was committed when he had taken by

assault the Palace of Herat. It consisted in tearing the jewelled

waistband from the person of the wife of one of the royal princes--a

terrible outrage in the eyes of these _barbarous_ soldiers of the

farther East, who, even when covered with blood, and loaded with

rapine, cast down their eyes before the females of their enemies'

household. In this case, the profaned garment was sent by the lady to

her brother, the son of the then Afghan king, and a bloody vengeance

followed, not upon the author of the outrage, but on the king-making

vizier, who, falling into the hands of the prince whom he had himself

placed upon the throne, was literally hacked to pieces. Dost Mahomed

now rose like a rocket. The base and feeble remains of legitimacy

seemed to die away of its own weakness, and the despised younger son

of the king-making vizier soon reigned supreme at Cabool. Let us note

that this was in 1826. The new king, says Mr Kaye, 'had hitherto lived

the life of a dissolute soldier. His education had been neglected, and

in his very boyhood he had been thrown in the way of pollution of the

foulest kind. From his youth, he had been greatly addicted to wine,

and was often to be seen in public reeling along in a state of

degrading intoxication, or scarcely able to keep his place in the

saddle. All this was now to be reformed. He taught himself to read and

to write, accomplishments which he had before, if at all, scantily

possessed. He studied the Koran, abandoned the use of strong liquors,

became scrupulously abstemious, plain in his attire, assiduous in his

attention to business, urbane and courteous to all.' In 1833, Shah

Soojah, issuing from the British territory, made an abortive attempt

to recover his kingdom; but Runjeet Singh, the ruler of the Sikhs, was

more successful in wresting from him Peshawur, a province of

Afghanistan, and Dost Mahomed, both in rage and terror, began to look

around him for a foreign alliance. His grand aim was to secure the

friendship of the British; but this was scornfully refused. The

governor-general, with exquisite irony, replied to his overture: 'My

friend, you are aware that it is not the practice of the British

government to interfere with the affairs of other independent states!'

and a British envoy to Cabool, while refusing everything that was

important for him to ask, kindly cautioned him to abstain from

connecting himself with any other power.

Such was the position of affairs in Afghanistan when the government of

India, in 1838, was roused to a sense of what seemed immediate danger

by the movements in Central Asia. On the one hand, there was a _de

facto_ king, who had reigned twelve years, who was now struggling in

the grasp of the ruler of the Punjab, and eagerly soliciting the

alliance of the British; while the Russians and Persians, leagued

before Herat, were already negotiating for a footing in his country.

On the other hand, there was a deposed exile, who had tried

repeatedly, and in vain, to recover his throne, whose whole life had

been a tissue of misfortunes and feeblenesses, and who now lived on

the charity of the Company in their own territory. The obvious policy

was to secure the independence of Afghanistan and aid her resources.

How to do this? To embrace the proffered alliance of Dost Mahomed, or

force Shah Soojah upon the country, and prepare for the reception of

the Persians and Russians, by kindling a civil war? The latter was the

course determined on! A league was formed, known in the history of our

time as the Tripartite Treaty--including Runjeet Singh, Shah Soojah,

and the British government. By this document, it was agreed that

certain large portions of the Afghan territory, including Peshawur,

should belong for ever to Runjeet Singh; that the maharajah should

likewise possess the passes both of the Sutlej and the Indus, with

power to bar the way at his pleasure; that the Afghans and Sikhs

should mutually exchange military assistance when required; and that

the friends and enemies of any of the three high contracting parties

should be the friends and enemies of all.

There was not a word in this treaty, it will be seen, of a British war

in Afghanistan; but the Indian government soon came to enlarge its

views, and instead of merely patting Shah Soojah on the back, and

setting him upon his countrymen, it determined to take the field in

such force as would instantaneously settle the whole affair. The

celebrated Simlah manifesto was accordingly drawn up, in which the

governor-general gave 'his most exquisite reasons,' unpolitely

stigmatised by a great portion of the Indian press as a tissue of

falsehoods. With this, however, we have nothing to do; _our_ business

is with the fact, that before this proclamation had obtained general

currency, information had been received that the siege of Herat was

raised, and the Persian army on its retreat. This was awkward. The

occasion of the intended British invasion of Afghanistan was at an

end. No matter. A large and brilliant army was already assembled on

the banks of the Indus, and the war must go on! Many persons from the

first considered the result doubtful; and Shah Soojah himself had his

misgivings, when he found that he was to be forced by Christian

bayonets upon a nation of bigoted Mohammedans!

But although the change in the state of affairs in Central Asia made

no change in the belligerent resolves of the Indian government, it

determined them to reduce the size of the army, and so make a little

war instead of a great one. Scarcely had the Army of the Indus, as it

was called, begun its march through Scinde, when it was beset with

difficulties. 'Between Sukkur and Shikarpoor the camels had dropped

down dead by scores. But there was a worse tract of country in

advance. The officers looked at their maps, and traced with dismay the

vast expanse of sandy desert, where no green pasture met the eye, and

no sound of water spoke to the ear. But the season was favourable.

Escaping the arid and pestilential blasts of April and May, and the

noxious exhalations of the four succeeding months, the column advanced

into Cutch. The hard, salt-mixed sand crackled under their horses'

feet, as the general and his staff crossed the desert, on a fine

bright night of early March--so cool, that only when in a full gallop

the riders ceased to long for the warmth of their cloaks. The distance

from Shikarpoor to Dadur is a hundred and forty-six miles. It was

accomplished by the Bengal column in sixteen painful marches. Water

and forage were so scarce, that the cattle suffered terribly on the

way. The camels fell dead by scores on the desert; and further on, the

Beloochee robbers carried them off with appalling dexterity. When the

column reached a cultivated tract of country, the green crops were

used as forage for the horses. The _ryots_ were liberally paid on the

spot; but the agents of the Beloochee chiefs often plundered the

unhappy cultivators of the money that had been paid to them, even in

front of the British camp.' The Bolan Pass was more formidable. 'The

stream of the Bolan river was tainted by the bodies of the camels that

had sunk beneath their loads. The Beloochee freebooters were hovering

about, cutting off our couriers, murdering stragglers, carrying off

our baggage and our cattle. Among the rocks of this stupendous defile,

our men pitched their tents, and toiled on again day after day, over a

wretched road, covered with loose flint-stones, surmounting, at first

by a scarcely perceptible ascent, and afterwards by a difficult

acclivity, the great Brahoo chain of hills. The Bolan Pass is nearly

sixty miles in length. The passage was accomplished in six days. They

were days of drear discomfort, but not of danger. A resolute enemy

might have wrought mighty havoc among Cotton's regiments: but the

enemies with which now they had to contend were the sharp

flint-stones, which lamed our cattle; the scanty pasturage, which

destroyed them; and the marauding tribes, who carried them off. The

way was strewn with baggage, with abandoned tents and stores; and

luxuries, which a few weeks afterwards would have fetched their weight

twice counted in rupees, were left to be trampled down by the cattle

in the rear, or carried off by the plunderers about them.'

These disagreeables were surmounted; Soojah was installed at Candahar;

Ghuznee was captured in gallant style--when fifty prisoners were

hacked to pieces by orders of the shah; Dost Mahomed was beaten

wherever he shewed himself; and, finally, our victorious army arrived

at Cabool. Glorious victories are always highly appreciated in

England. The chief actors in this expedition were rewarded with titles

of earl, baron, baronet, and knight; and 'all went merry as a

marriage-bell.' Not, however, but that there were moments of misgiving

among the conquerors at Cabool. Dost Mahomed, though beaten, was not

subdued, and his repeated small successes made him almost formidable.

But even this was at an end, and the Dost surrendered himself

prisoner.

The British force remained in Cabool two years, where officers and men

alike misconducted themselves, as soldiers always do in a conquered

country. The exasperation of the natives became more and more

manifest: Akbar Khan, a son of Dost Mahomed, hovered about the

country, the evil genius, as it is supposed, of the rising storm; and

at length an insurrection broke out in the city. In this tissue of

surprising blunders, perhaps none is more remarkable than the facts,

that the general selected to command an army so critically placed was

a poor old man, feeble in body and mind, and that the wives and

children of many of the officers were present with their husbands and

fathers, as if the causeless invasion of a country, and the massacre

of thousands of its inhabitants, had been a party of pleasure! The

moment of retreat at length came; snow covered the ground; the dreary

passes of Khoord-Cabool were before them; and as they turned their

backs upon the city, they were saluted with farewell volleys of

musket-bullets.

The story of this fatal retreat has been often told. The result was

communicated in the following manner to the British troops shut up in

Jelalabad: 'At last, on the 13th of January, when the garrison were

busy on the works, toiling with axe and shovel, with their arms piled

and their accoutrements laid out close at hand, a sentry on the

ramparts, looking out towards the Cabool road, saw a solitary

white-faced horseman struggling on towards the fort. The word was

passed; the tidings spread. Presently the ramparts were lined with

officers, looking out, with throbbing hearts, through unsteady

telescopes, or with straining eyes tracing the road. Slowly and

painfully, as though horse and rider both were in an extremity of

mortal weakness, the solitary mounted man came reeling, tottering on.

They saw that he was an Englishman. On a wretched, weary pony,

clinging, as one sick or wounded, to its neck, he sat or rather leant

forward; and there were those who, as they watched his progress,

thought that he could never reach, unaided, the walls of Jelalabad. A

shudder ran through the garrison. That solitary horseman looked like

the messenger of death. Few doubted that he was the bearer of

intelligence that would fill their souls with horror and dismay. Their

worst forebodings seemed confirmed. There was the one man who was to

tell the story of the massacre of a great army. A party of cavalry

were sent out to succour him. They brought him in wounded, exhausted,

half-dead. The messenger was Dr Brydon, and he now reported his belief

that he was the sole survivor of an army of some 16,000 men!'[3] From

this wholesale butchery, which we are not disposed to detail, the

women and children, the general, and the husbands of the ladies, were

rescued by Akbar Khan. They were held for a time by the son of Dost

Mahomed in a sort of captivity; where some of them had leisure to

write narratives of their adventures, while others, with an

inconsistence common and entertaining in melodramatic pieces, amused

themselves with fun and frolic!

And what became of Shah Soojah? 'Rising early on the morning, he

arrayed himself in royal apparel, and, accompanied by a small party

of Hindostanees, proceeded under a salute, in a chair of state,

towards his camp, which had been pitched at Seeah-Sungh. But

Soojah-ool-dowlah, the son of the Newab, had gone out before him, and

placed in ambush a party of Jezailchees. As the shah and his followers

were making their way towards the regal tent, the marksmen fired upon

them. The volley took murderous effect. Several of the bearers and of

the escort were struck down, and the king himself killed on the spot.

A ball had entered his brain. Soojah-ool-dowlah then rode up; and as

he contemplated his bloody work, the body of the unhappy king, vain

and pompous as he was to the very last, was stripped of all the jewels

about it--the jewelled dagger, the jewelled girdle, the jewelled

head-dress--and it was then cast into a ditch.'

It was of course impossible for the Company to suffer the blot upon

their arms to remain: indeed, their safety in India required that no

tarnish of defeat should rest permanently upon their name. The British

troops at Candahar and Jelalabad were ordered to march upon Cabool,

where, as an enduring mark of the retributary visit, in addition to

pillaging the shops, setting fire to the houses, and murdering the

unresisting inhabitants, they destroyed--not the fortress--but the

_bazaar_, the great commercial depôt of Central Asia!

_The objects of the war were now accomplished._ But Shah Soojah was

dead. The king we had driven from the throne, however, was still

alive: Dost Mahomed, therefore, was restored; and nothing remained to

be done, since the grand drama had been brought to a conclusion, but

to celebrate the happy _dénouement_ by a fête. This, accordingly, came

off at Ferozepore. 'Then there was feasting and festivity in the

gigantic tents, hung with silken flags, on which, in polyglot

emblazonments, were the names of the actions that had been fought;

many complimentary effusions, in the shape of after-dinner harangues;

and in the mornings grand field-days, more or less, according to the

"skyey influences." The year--a most eventful one--was closed with a

grand military display. The plain was covered with British and Sikh

troops, and in the presence of Pertaub Singh, the heir-apparent of

Lahore; Dhyan Singh, the minister; the governor-general, the

commander-in-chief, and others of less note, some 40,000 men, with 100

guns, were man[oe]uvred on the great plain. On this grand tableau the

curtain fell; and the year opportunely closed in gaiety and

glitter--in prosperity and parade.'

We have now concluded our task, but without having been able to convey

even a faint idea of the stores of information that are contained in

these valuable volumes. They are destined, however, to retain a

permanent place among the books of reference which enrich our national

literature, and contribute to its advancement.

Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 425 Volume 17, New Series, February 21, 1852 · 第 4 / 19 题