IN GALLERY NO. I.

_The Usual Elderly Lady_ (_who judges every picture solely by

its subject_). "No. 9. Portrait of Mrs. BRYANSTON of Portman. By

GAINSBOROUGH." I don't like that at all. Such a _disagreeable_

expression! I can't think why they exhibit such things. I'm sure

there's no _pleasure_ in looking at them!

_Her Companion_ (_who finds no pleasure in looking at any of them_).

No, I must say I prefer the Academy to these old-fashioned things. I

suppose we can get a cup of _tea_ here, though?

_An Intelligent Person_. "Mrs. BRYANSTON of Portman." Sounds like a

made-up name rather, eh? Portman Square, and all that, y'know!

[Illustration: "My dear fellow, as if it was possible to mistake his

touch!"]

_His Friend_ (_with a touching confidence in the seriousness of the

authorities_). Oh, they wouldn't do that sort of thing _here_!

_A Too-impulsive Enthusiast_. Oh, JOHN, _look_ at that lovely tiger up

there! _Isn't_ the skin marvellously painted, and the eyes so natural

and all! It's a Landseer of _course_!

_John_. Catalogue says STUBBS.

_The Enth._ (_disenchanted_). STUBBS? I never heard of him. But it's

really rather well done.

_The Man who is a bit of a Connoisseur in his way_ (_arriving at a

portrait of Mrs. BILLINGTON_). Not a bad Romney, that.

_His Friend_ (_with Catalogue_). What makes you think it's a Romney?

_The Conn._ My dear fellow, as if it was possible to mistake his

touch. (_Thinks from his friend's expression, that he had better

hedge._) Unless it's a Reynolds. Of course it _might_ be a Sir Joshua,

their manner at one period was very much alike--yes, it might be a

Reynolds, certainly.

_His Friend_. It might be a Holbein--if it didn't happen to be a

Gainsborough.

_The Conn._ (_effecting a masterly retreat_). Didn't I _say_

Gainsborough? Of course that was what I _meant_. Nothing like

Reynolds--nor Romney either. Totally different thing!

Punch, Or The London Charivari, Volume 102, March 12, 1892 · 第 5 / 22 题