AN APOLOGY FOR HEATHENISM;

especially as contrasted with practical atheism, which, truth to tell,

is the contradictory sort of religion most universally professed among

the moderns: working out the idea, that any-how it is better to have

many objects of veneration than none, and that, although idol-worship is

a dreadful sin, still it is not so utterly hopeless as actual

ungodliness. That, among the heathens, temporal judgment ever vindicated

the true Divinity; whereas the consummation of the more modern

unworshiping world will be an eternal one: so, by the difference in

punishments comparing that of their criminalities. Showing also that,

however corrupted afterwards by impure rites and fatuous iniquities,

heathenism was, in its most ancient form, little more than the

hieroglyphic dress of truth: this exemplified by Moses and the brazen

serpent, by interpretations of Grecian mythology, shown, after the

manner of perhaps too ingenious Lord Bacon, to be consistent with

philosophy and religion; by the way, in which Egyptian priests satisfied

so good and shrewd, though credulous, a mind as that of Herodotus; by

Hesiod's '_Theogony_;' by the practical testimony of the whole educated

world in earliest times to the deep meaning involved in idolatrous

rites; by the mysteries of Eleusis in particular; by the characters of

all most enlightened heathens--as Cicero, Socrates, and

Plato--(half-convinced of the Godhead's unity, and still afraid to

disavow His plurality,) contrasted with those of the school of Pyrrho,

and Lucretius, and the later Epicureans. The possibility of early

allusions to the Trinity, as "Let us make man," _etc._, having led to

the idea of more than one God; and if so, in some sort, its veniality.

All the above might be applied with some force, and, if so, with no

little value, to modern false semblances of religion, and non-religion;

to Roman Catholicism, with its images, its services in an unknown

tongue, its symbols, its adoption of heathen festivals, its actual

placing of many Gods in the throne of One; to Mammonism, as practically

a religion as if the golden calf of Babylon were standard at Cornhill;

to Voluptatism--if I may fabricate a name for pleasure-hunters,

following still, with Corybantic fury, the orgic revels of Osiris or

Astarte: in brief, to all the shades of human heresy, on this side or on

that of the golden mean, the worship of one true God, as revealed to us

in His three mysterious characters.

But, query? Has not all this, and the very title, for any thing I know,

been done already by another, by a wiser? and, if so, by whom?--Speak,

some friend: it is the misfortune of mere thinkers (and this present

amygdaloid mass, this breccia book, exemplifies it well) to stumble

frequently upon fancies too good not to have been long ago appropriated

by others like-minded. A read, or heard, hint may be the unerring clue,

and we vainly imagine some old labyrinth to be our new discovery:

education renders up the master-key, and we come to regard ancient

treasuries as wealth of our own amassing, from which we deem it our

right to filch as recklessly as he from the mint of Croesus, who so

filled his pockets--ay, his mouth--that we read he [Greek: hebebusto].

Who, in this age of literature, can be fully condemned, or heartily

acquitted of plagiarism? An age--and none so little in advance or in

arrear of it as I--of easy writing and discursive reading, of ideas

unpatented, and books that have outlived copy-right. But this has

detained us long enough: for the present, my brain is quit of its

heathenish exculpations: let us pass on; many regiments are yet to be

reviewed; their uniforms [_Hibernice_] are various, but their flag is

one.

A last serious subject--(they grow tedious)--is a fair field for

ingenious explanation and Oriental poetry,

An Author's Mind : The Book of Title-pages · 第 32 / 75 题