TAXATION NO BURDEN.

According to returns made by the Census Bureau to the Secretary of the

Treasury, the gross value of the productions of the United States for

1860 was $3,900,000,000: namely,--the product of Manufactures, the

Mechanic Arts, Mining, and the Fisheries, $1,900,000,000; the product

of Agriculture, $2,000,000,000.

It is a well-understood principle of political economy, that the

annual product of a country is the source from which internal taxes

are to be derived.

The nation is to be considered a partnership, the several members

engaged in the various departments of business, and producing annually

products of the value of $3,900,000,000, which are distributed among

the partners, affording to each a certain share of profit. The firm is

out of debt, but a sudden emergency compels an investment, in a new

and not immediately profitable branch of business, of $1,500,000,000,

which sum the firm borrows. As the consequence of this liability, the

firm must afterward incur an annual additional expense as follows:

$100,000,000 for the payment of members not engaged in productive

labor, $90,000,000 for interest upon the debt incurred, and $60,000,000

for a sinking-fund which shall pay the debt in less than twenty years.

It is absolutely necessary for the future prosperity of the business of

the firm, that this immense investment, so unexpectedly called for,

shall be made to pay. How shall this problem be solved?

Large sums are confusing, and tend to prevent a clear understanding of

the matter; therefore let the nation be represented by Uncle Sam, an

active, middle-aged man, owning a farm and a factory, of which the

annual product is $40,000. The largest and best portion of his farm is

very badly cultivated; no intelligent laborers can be induced to remain

upon it, owing to certain causes, easily removable, but which, being

an easy-going man, well satisfied with his income as it has been,

Uncle Sam has been unwilling to take hold of with any determination.

Suddenly and without notice, he is compelled to borrow $15,000, and

spend it upon this portion of his farm; and he then finds, while

expending the money for another object and not a profitable one, he can

remove the only obstacle which prevented his obtaining a full supply

of the best and most intelligent labor, and that he can very soon

increase his annual product to $42,500. The increase of $2,500 each

year will enable him to pay his additional clerks, to meet the interest

on his liabilities, and to accumulate a sinking-fund sufficient to pay

his debts before his children come of age. He will be able to take some

comfort and satisfaction in his agricultural laborers; he will have a

larger amount of cotton to spin and to sell than ever before, and so

much wool, that, instead of being obliged to buy one-third the amount

required by his factory, as he has heretofore done, he will have more

than he can spin; and lastly, he will be able to raise fruit, to make

wine, to produce indigo, cochineal, and a great variety of articles

never produced on his farm before.

What sound business-man would not thus regulate his investment, when

compelled to make it, even though he had been unwilling to borrow the

money for the simple purpose of making such an improvement?

If a farm and factory, which badly managed produce $40,000 annually,

can by good management be made to produce $42,500, and can be very

much increased in value and ease of management by the process, the

owner had better borrow $15,000 to accomplish the object, and the tax

upon him of $2,500 required to meet the interest and sink the principal

will be no burden. That is the whole problem,--no more, no less.

We have been driven into a war to maintain the boundaries of our farm;

in so doing we shall probably spend $1,500,000,000. It behooves us not

only to meet the expenditure promptly, but to make the investment pay.

We have but to increase the annual product of the country six and

one-half per cent, and we shall meet the tax for expenses, interest,

and sinking-fund, and be as well off as we now are, provided the tax be

equitably assessed.

This increase can be made without any increase in the number of

laborers, by securing a larger return from those now employed, and by

the permanent occupation of the fertile soil of the South by a large

portion of the Union army, as settlers and cultivators, who have

heretofore spent their energies upon the comparatively unproductive

soil of the North.

Slavery is the one obstacle to be removed in order to render this war a

paying operation.

Under the false pretence that the climate of the South is too hot for

white men to labor in the fields, the degradation involved in

field-labor in a Slave State excludes intelligent cultivators from the

cotton-fields, a very large portion of which have a climate less hot

and less unsuitable for white men than that of Philadelphia, while

there is not a river-bottom in the whole South in which the extremes of

heat during the summer are so great as in St. Louis. Slave-labor

cultivates, in a miserable, shiftless manner, less than two per cent,

of the area of the Cotton States; and upon this insignificant portion a

crop of cotton has been raised in one year worth over $200,000,000.

There is ample and conclusive evidence to be found in the statistics of

the few well-managed and well-cultivated cotton-plantations, that

skilful, educated farmers can get more than double the product to the

hand or to the acre that is usually obtained as the result of

slave-labor.

Again, it will be admitted that $350 per annum is more than an average

return for the work of a common laborer on an average New England farm,

including his own support.

It is capable of demonstration from, actual facts that an average

laborer, well directed, can produce a gross value of $1,000 per annum,

upon the uplands of Georgia and South Carolina, in the cultivation of

cotton and grain. Negro slaves under a negro driver, with no white man

on the premises, have produced this result in Hancock County, Georgia,

upon lands previously considered worthless, with a system of

cultivation singular and exceptional in that region, but common in all

well-cultivated sections, namely, a simple rotation of crops and a

moderate amount of manure.

Elevate the negro from a state of slavery to the dignity of a free

laborer, and his consumption of manufactured goods increases

enormously. In proof of this may be cited the trade with Hayti, and the

immense increase in the import of manufactured goods into the British

West Indies since emancipation. Slaves are furnished with two suits of

clothes in a year, made from the coarsest and cheapest materials: it is

safe to estimate, that, if the fair proportion of their earnings were

paid them, their demand upon the North for staple articles would be

doubled, while the importations of silks, velvets, and other foreign

luxuries, upon which their earnings have been heretofore lavished by

their masters, would decrease.

The commonly received view of the position of the cotton-planter is

that he is in a chronic state of debt. Such is the fact; not, however,

because he does not make a large amount of profit,--for cotton-planting

is the most profitable branch of agriculture in the United States,--but

because his standard of value is a negro, and not a dollar, and, in the

words of a Southern writer, "He is constantly buying more land to make

more cotton to buy more negroes to cultivate more land to raise more

cotton to buy more negroes," and for every negro he buys he gets

trusted for another. Both himself and his hands are of the least

possible value to the community. By maintaining his system he excludes

cheap labor from the cultivation of cotton,--slave-labor being the

most wasteful and the most expensive of any. He purchases for his

laborers the least possible amount of manufactured articles, and he

wastes his own expenditure in the purchase of foreign luxuries.

Reference has been made to the increase to be expected in the product

of wool, after the removal or destruction of Slavery.

We import annually 30,000,000 pounds of wool, and make little or no use

of the best region for growing wool in the whole country,--the western

slope of the Alleghany and Cumberland Mountains and of the Blue Ridge.

Free laborers will not go there, although few slaves are there to be

found; for they well know that there is no respect or standing for the

free laborer in any Slave State.

Again, throughout the uplands of Georgia, the Carolinas, and Alabama,

it has been proved that sheep can be raised upon the English system

with the greatest success. Upon their light lands, (selling at less

than $1 per acre,) turnips can be raised in great abundance and fed to

sheep in the field, and by the process the fields brought to a point of

fertility, for cotton or grain, equal to the best bottom-lands of

Mississippi or Louisiana. This fact has been sufficiently proved by the

experience of the very few good farmers in Georgia.

The climate of these sections is wonderfully healthy, and is far

better adapted to the production of wool than that of England, the

extremes of heat and cold being far greater, and yet the cold not being

sufficient to prevent the raising of turnips or feeding from the field

in winter. To produce fine fleece-wool, a warm summer and a cool

winter are requisite.

Let any one examine Southern writings upon agriculture, and note the

experience of the few working, sensible cultivators, who, by a system

of rewards and premiums partially equivalent to the payment of wages

to their slaves, have obtained the best results of which Slavery is

capable, and he will realize the immense increase to be expected when

free and intelligent labor shall be applied to Southern agriculture.

We hold, therefore, that by the destruction of Slavery, and by that

only, this war can be made to pay, and taxation become no burden.

By free labor upon Southern soil we shall add to the annual product of

the country a sum more than equal to the whole tax which will be

required to pay interest and expenses, and to accumulate a sinking-fund

which will pay the debt in less than twenty years; while to the North

will come the immensely increased demand for manufactured articles

required by a thrifty and prosperous middle class, instead of the small

demand for coarse, cheap articles required by slaves, and the demand

for foreign luxuries called for by the masters.

The addition of $250,000,000 to the product of the country would be a

gain to every branch of industry; and if the equable system of taxation

by a stamp-tax on all sales were adopted, the burden would not be

felt. The additional product being mostly from an improved system of

agriculture at the South, a much larger demand would exist for the

manufactures of the North, and a much larger body of distributors

would be required.

Let us glance for a moment at the alternative,--the restoration of the

Union without the removal of Slavery.

The system of slave-labor has been shaken to its foundation, and for

years to come its aggregate product will be far less than it has been,

thus throwing upon the North the whole burden of the taxes with no

compensating gain in resources.

Only the refuse of our army could remain in the Slave States, to

become to us in the future an element of danger and not of

security,--the industrious and respectable portion would come back to

the North, to find their places filled and a return to the pursuits of

peace difficult to accomplish.

With Slavery removed, the best part of our army will remain upon the

fertile soil and in the genial climate of the South, forming

communities, retaining their arms, keeping peace and good order with

no need of a standing army, and constituting the _nuclei_ around

which the poor-white trash of the South would gather to be educated in

the labor-system of the North, and thus, and thus only, to become loyal

citizens.

The mass of the white population of the South are ignorant and deluded;

they need leaders, and will have them.

We have allowed them to be led by slaveholders, and are reaping our

reward. Remove Slavery, and their present leaders are crushed out

forever.

Give them new leaders from among the earnest and industrious portion of

our army, and we increase our resources and render taxation no burden,

and we restore the Union in fact and not simply in name.

Leave Slavery in existence, and we decrease our resources, throw the

whole tax upon the North, reinforce the Secession element with the

refuse of our army, and bequeath to our children the shadow of a Union,

a mockery and a derision to all honest men.

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 10, No. 57, July, 1862 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 33 / 41 题