O. S.

"THE YOUNG PERSON IN PINK."

What the chair-man said about _The Young Person in Pink_ who had been

hanging about the Park every morning for a week was that nowadays you

couldn't really tell. He thought on the whole she was all right. The

balloon-woman was certain that with boots like that she must be a 'ussy;

but then she had refused to buy a balloon. As a matter of fact she

couldn't, being broke to the world. And worse. For she had arrived at

Victoria Station unable to remember who she was or where she came from,

ticketless, a few shillings in her purse. She had murmured "Season" at the

barrier and had taken rooms at the Carlton because she had a queer feeling

she had been there before. Her things had a coronet on them. The rest was a

blank.

Of course nobody believed her; the women were scornful, the men not quite

nice, till very young _Lord Stevenage_, the one that was engaged to a

notorious baby-snatcher, _Lady Tonbridge_--in a high fever he'd

unfortunately said "Yes"--meets her, and you guess the rest. No, you don't.

You couldn't possibly guess _Mrs. Badger_, relict of an undertaker and now

in the old-clothes line, who has social ambitions. (I must here say in

parenthesis that _Mrs. Badger_ is a double stroke of genius on the part

both of Miss JENNINGS the author and of Miss SYDNEY FAIRBROTHER. You don't

know which to admire most, the things she says [Miss J.] or the way she

says them [Miss S. B.]. Honours divided and high honours at that.)

_Lady Tonbridge_ had advertised for a clergyman's widow to render some

secretarial service, and the ambitious _Mrs. Badger_ had applied, duly

weeded. Meanwhile the elderly _Lady T._ had seen her _fiance_ and with the

young person in pink, and it was a brilliant and base afterthought to bribe

the clergyman's widow to claim the girl as her long-missing daughter

(invented). Both the young Lord and the young person, too much in love

perhaps to be critical, accept the situation; but you haven't quite got

_Mrs. Badger_ if you think she's the sort of person one would precisely

jump at for a mother-in-law.

At the supreme moment when _Mrs. B._, after an interview with the whisky

bottle, forgets her part and, lapsing into the mere widow of the

undertaker, gives it to the intriguing _Lady Tonbridge_ in the neck with a

wealth of imagery, a command of slightly slurred invective and a range of

facial expression beyond adequate description, she is perhaps less

attractive in the capacity of mother-by-marriage than ever, even if the

interlude prove the goodness of her heart. But it is just at that moment

that the young person is recognised by her maid. The daughter of the

_Duchess of Hampshire_, no less! So all is well.

Not that Miss JENNINGS' plot matters. She freely accepts the absurdities

which her bizarre outline demands, but doesn't shirk the pains to make her

situations possible within the pleasantly impossible frame. What is

all-important is that she does shake the house with genuinely explosive

humour.

If they were Miss JENNINGS' bombs, Miss FAIRBROTHER threw the most and the

best of them with a perfect aim. The rest of the platoon helped in varying

degrees. I hope I don't irretrievably damage Miss JOYCE CAREY'S reputation

as a modern when I say that she looked so pretty and innocent that I don't

believe even sour old spinsters would have doubted her. A charming and

capable performance. Mr. DONALD CALTHROP made love quite admirably on the

lighter note; a little awkwardly, perhaps, on the more serious. Miss SYBIL

CARLISLE handled an unpromising part with great skill. Miss ELLIS JEFFREYS

as the ineffable _Lady Tonbridge_ was as competent as ever, and had a coat

and skirt in the Third Act which filled the female breast with envy. Looks

like a long run.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 158, 1920-04-07 · 第 26 / 33 题