Mr. MACQUISTEN: Yes, I have laboured in the docks."

That is it, you see. Sweating is the great criterion of usefulness to-day.

If you cannot show that you have sweated in the past, you must at least

show that you are sweating now, or have every intention of sweating in a

moment or two. Personally, as a private secretary, I find it very

difficult, though I do my best. As a private secretary I labour in a rich

house in the notoriously idle neighbourhood of South Kensington, where

nobody would believe that anybody laboured, much less perspired over it. So

when I pass, on the way to my rich house, a builder's labourer or a milkman

or a dustman, I have to exhibit as clearly as I can all the signs of a

harsh employment and industrial fatigue. I take great pains about this; I

walk much faster; I frown heavily and I look as pale as possible. In the

Tube I close my eyes. I hope all this is effective, but as far as I can see

the milkman never looks at me, and the builder is always saying to another

builder, "'E says to me, 'Wot abaht it?' 'e says, and I says to 'im, 'Yus,

wot abaht it?' I says." But it is worth the effort.

Well, that is why that poor man was carrying a typewriter. I wonder why

everybody else in the Tube carries an "attache-case." It has been

calculated that if all the attache-cases which get on to the train at

Hammersmith at 9 A.M. were left on the platform, six men or twelve women or

three horses could take their place in every car. That means about ninety

more men or one-hundred-and-eighty more women or forty-five more horses

could leave Hammersmith between 9 A.M. and 9.30. So that if attache-cases

were forbidden the traffic problem would be practically solved.

Why shouldn't they be forbidden? It depends, of course, on what is inside

the cases; and nobody knows that for certain. But one can guess. I have

been guessing for a long time. At first I thought they were full of very

confidential papers. In the old days the attache-case was the peculiar

trademark of private secretaries and diplomats and high-up people like

that. Even attaches carried them sometimes. The very lowest a man with an

attache-case could be was a First-Class Civil Servant; and one was

justified in imagining confidential papers inside, or, at any rate,

home-work of the first importance. But nowadays there are too many of them

for that. The attache-case has been degraded; it is universal. This might

be because there is practically no male person alive just now who has not

been an adjutant at one time or another, and pinched at least one

attache-case from the orderly-room. But most of the cases in the Tube are

carried by females, so that theory is no good.

Well, then, I imagined sandwiches or knitting or powder-puffs or tea; but

those also are rotten hypotheses. I have too much faith in the good sense

of my fellow-countrywomen to believe that they would cart a horrible thing

like a cheap attache-case about simply in order to convey a sandwich or a

powder-puff from one end of London to the other. So I had to fall back on

my own experience.

I know, at any rate, what is inside mine. There are some rather grubby

envelopes which I borrowed from the House of Commons, and some very grubby

blotting-paper from the same source, and either a ream of foolscap or a

quire of foolscap, whichever is which; some pipe-cleaners and a few pieces

of milk-chocolate; and a letter from the Amalgamated Association of

Fish-Friers which ought to have been answered a long time ago; and a

memorandum on Hog-Importing which I am always going to read while waiting

at the station; and a nice piece of thick string with which I have tied a

bowline on a bight; and two broken pencils and some more envelopes; and a

Parliamentary Whip of last year and a stationery bill of the year before;

and several bills of my employer, not to mention a cheque for ninety-seven

pounds which I suppose he would like me to send to the bank; and a great

deal of fluff and a pipe or two and four or five stamped letters which it

is now too late to post. That is all there is in my case.

But I carry it backwards and forwards, in and out, to and fro, day after

day; and the only time it is ever opened at either end of the journey is

when, in addition to the articles previously mentioned, it contains

bottles. But I do not carry it for the sake of bottles; far from it. I am

one of those men who do not mind going about with a comparatively naked

bottle. I carry it simply because it is the tool of my trade, and because,

if you don't carry a tool of some kind on the Underground, at any moment

you may be taken for an idle rich, if not actually a parasite, who never

sweated in his life.

And that, I am persuaded, is why everybody else carries theirs.

But this is a very serious conclusion. It will be a terrible thing if

everyone is going to carry the tools of his trade about with him to show

that he has a trade; the barrister his briefs, the doctor his stethoscope

or his shiny black bag; the butcher his chopper; the dentist--but no, we

cannot have that. There must be other ways. We might wear badges, as we did

in the War, only they would be office badges and trade badges, instead of

regimental badges or discharged badges. Then we should have again the dear

old war-game of trying to read what was on them without being rude. That is

what one really misses in public places in these days of Peace--that and

the uniforms.

It was easy to make conversation in a restaurant in the old days, when

people kept on coming in in curious uniforms, and the ladies wondered what

they were and the men pretended they knew all about them. But all that is

dead now, and I think these sweat-badges would supply a serious want.

But what will the author wear? And who will believe that he ever breaks

into beads of perspiration at his labour?

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 158, 1920-04-07 · 第 10 / 33 题