The address delivered by Prof. Michael Foster, as president this year

of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, was not as

long or elaborate as such addresses are wont to be, but it contained

many thoughts of great value. After sketching the vast advances in

scientific knowledge made within the present century, he observed,

with great truth, that "the very story of the past which tells of the

triumphs of science puts away all thoughts of vainglory." Why? In the

first place, because no one can study the history of science without

being made to feel how very near, in many cases, the men of the past

came to anticipating some of the most famous discoveries and

generalizations of later years. Translate the language of an earlier

age into modern terms, and you often find that you have expressed the

most advanced scientific doctrine of to-day. In the second place, if

we find a certain lack of definiteness and truth to fact in the ideas

of the past, how can we be at all sure how _our_ ideas will look when

confronted with the fuller knowledge which doubtless our successors

will possess? Lastly, "there is written clearly on each page of the

history of science the lesson that no scientific truth is born anew,

coming by itself and of itself. Each new truth is always the offspring

of something which has gone before, becoming in turn the parent of

something coming after." However great the work of a man of science

may be, "it is not wholly his own; it is in part the outcome of the

work of men who have gone before." In this respect Professor Foster

sees a striking difference between the man of science and the poet. We

always know whence the former came, but the latter is almost as devoid

of visible ancestry as Melchizedek. When the man of science dies the

results which he achieved remain, and his work is taken up where he

left it off; whereas the poet, strictly speaking, has no continuators.

The Homeridæ do not represent Homer, nor do Dryden and Congreve take

the place of Shakespeare.

The story of natural knowledge or science, we are reminded, is a story

of continued progress. "There is in it not so much as a hint of

falling back--not even of standing still." The enemies of science

sometimes seek to turn against it the fact that each age revises the

conclusions of the preceding one. They ask, What dependence can be

placed upon opinions or theories that are thus subject to change? The

answer is that the science of each age is the nearest approximation

which that age can make to the truth, and upon some points represents

the truth with a great approach to finality of interpretation. The law

of gravitation, for example, as formulated by Newton, lies at the

foundation of the physics of to-day. The circulation of the blood was

discovered once for all by Harvey. The true theory of the solar system

was given once for all by Kepler. It is the glory of science that

whatever of imperfection may lurk in a scientific theory is sure to be

brought to light and corrected by subsequent observation and analysis.

The learned professor dwelt briefly but forcibly upon the qualities of

the scientific mind. In the first place, the scientific mind must

"vibrate in unison with that of which it is in search." It is in

search of truth, and it must therefore vibrate in unison with truth.

The follower of science must have a truthfulness beyond that of the

ordinary man, who does not set a great price upon exactness in his

observations or conclusions, and readily confounds things which,

superficially similar, are fundamentally different. Nature resents

even the most trifling inexactness, and the careless student will find

that the further he carries his inquiries the further he goes astray.

The scientific mind must also be alert. The indications and hints

which Nature gives are sometimes very slight, and only one who is

watchful in the extreme and attentive to the smallest things will

catch them. Then the problems which Nature sets are often complicated,

and call for a high degree of courage and perseverance. An inquiry

which seemed easy at first will suddenly become overcast by what seems

the most hopeless obscurity, and the scientific worker, unless he

possesses the necessary moral as well as intellectual qualities, will

fail in his quest. Considering the characteristics which the pursuit

of science tends to develop in its votaries, and considering that

scientific method is now and has been for many years past a

wonderfully devised system for carrying on research, Professor Foster

is surprised that the progress of science is not even more rapid than

it is. He fears that perhaps Science does not get the best minds

enrolled in her service, and rather hints that our institutions of

education are responsible for turning aside many who might lend great

aid in the advancement of real knowledge to less profitable pursuits.

In words of almost precisely similar import to some that we used in

these columns not very long ago, he observes that "that teaching is

one-sided, and therefore misleading, which deals with the doings of

man only and is silent about the works of Nature, in the sight of

which he and his doings shrink almost to nothing." The whole address

is stamped with the high thoughtfulness which so eminently

distinguishes its author, and deserves to be carefully pondered by all

who would understand the character and mission of science and the

intellectual needs of the present age.

_THE LATE WILLIAM H. APPLETON._

As many of our readers will have learned through the daily press, Mr.

William H. Appleton, long the head of the well-known publishing house

of D. Appleton and Company, passed away at his home in Riverdale on

the Hudson, October 19, 1899, having reached the advanced age of

eighty-five years. As one of the founders of this magazine, who from

the start was in close sympathy with its aims, kept up an active

interest in its management, and was ever ready to aid its conductors

with advice and encouragement, it is fitting that a few memorial words

should be spoken of him in these columns.

The career of Mr. Appleton was a marked one in many respects. Entering

the book business of his father, Mr. Daniel Appleton, at an unusually

early age, he soon developed such an aptitude for affairs that at

twenty-one he went abroad for the purpose of making the acquaintance

of the leading foreign publishers and paving the way for closer

relations with them in the importation and sale of their books in this

country. Three years later, or at the age of twenty-four, his father

made him a partner in the business, which had previously been extended

so as to include the publication as well as the sale of books, and had

now so increased in volume as to compel removal to more commodious

quarters. Ten years of growth and uninterrupted prosperity followed,

when Mr. Daniel Appleton, in 1848, retired from the now

well-established firm, William H. Appleton, at the age of thirty-four,

becoming its head, with his brothers John A. and Daniel Sidney as

partners. In co-operation with these and other brothers who afterward

entered the business, Mr. Appleton guided the operations of the firm

for a period of nearly fifty years, successfully piloting it through

several financial crises and carrying it to a foremost place among the

publishing houses of America.

Besides the routine of an extensive publishing business, the history

of the house during this time includes a number of large undertakings

involving the expenditure of vast sums of money, and years of labor by

many workers, and attended with risks that only the most far-seeing

business sagacity could justify. We may presume that the several

members of the firm shared a common faith in the success of these

great enterprises, but it is fair to infer that as the head of the

house William H. Appleton took a leading part in their origin and

execution. One of these ventures was the publication of the American

Cyclopædia, which in its present revised form represents an outlay of

over a million dollars and some ten years of time. Another

undertaking, and the one that we wish more particularly to speak of

here, was the extension of the business in the line of popular

scientific publications.

Scientific circles in this country have never realized the debt they

owe to D. Appleton and Company, and especially to William H. Appleton,

in this regard. It is no exaggeration to say that the advance of

science in the United States was hastened by more than a quarter of a

century by the enlightened and courageous policy which led the firm to

add this class of books to their lists at the time they did.

Everything apparently was against it--nothing in its favor. Our

scientific literature consisted mainly of a few text-books having only

a limited sale. Science itself was an affair of laboratories and bug

collectors, the one to be shunned and the other commiserated. The few

utterances of scientific men having a bearing on the great questions

of the right interpretation of Nature, man's relations to his fellows

and to the world at large, social betterment, etc., that here and

there arrested public attention were received with contemptuous sneers

or scouted as the rankest infidelity. Few who are not past middle life

will find it possible now to realize that this was the general

attitude toward science forty years ago, but we have only to refer the

reader to the writings of the time for abundant confirmation of our

statements.

It was such conditions as these that the firm was called upon to face

when considering the question of entering this new field of

publication. All ordinary business instincts were against it. Scarcely

a publisher either here or abroad would even listen to the proposal to

risk his capital in such an enterprise. Nevertheless, Mr. Appleton,

lending an appreciative ear to the arguments of the former editor of

this journal and displaying his usual foresight, finally decided in

favor of the project, which afterward resulted in the introduction of

the works of Spencer, Darwin, Huxley, Tyndall, Bain, Romanes, and

other distinguished writers to American readers. A further step in the

same direction, taken later, was the publication of the International

Scientific Series, now numbering some eighty volumes. The scheme as

originated and shaped by Professor Youmans was heartily seconded by

Mr. Appleton, as was also the plan of the Popular Science Monthly.

A distinctive feature of the arrangements for the issue of all these

foreign books, and one which redounds in no small degree to the credit

of the firm, was the voluntary agreement, in the absence of an

international copyright law, to pay their authors the usual royalties,

making no distinction between them and authors at home. Mr. Appleton

had been a lifelong advocate of international copyright, founding his

contention on the simple justice of recognizing the property rights of

the author, no matter where he lived. Although to adopt such a course

was to expose themselves to the possibility of heavy loss through the

issue of reprints by irresponsible parties, a thing which actually

happened in the case of a good many of the volumes, the principle was

faithfully adhered to, thus anticipating by many years the central

provision of our present law.

The storm of denunciation raised abroad by the appearance of the

earlier installments of these writings might well have deterred the

boldest from repeating the experiment of giving them currency in

America. But in spite of solemn warnings that dire consequences would

be visited on the publisher who ventured to issue them here, the books

continued to appear, while the predicted evils never came to pass.

It must not be inferred from the foregoing, however, that Mr. Appleton

was either unmindful or wanting in respect for the opposition which

his course aroused. Much of this had its origin in the religious

convictions of the community, not a little of the criticism, be it

said, emanating directly from the Church or its leading

representatives. But, being a strong churchman himself, actively

furthering the work of the Church with his private means and personal

co-operation, in full sympathy with its purposes, and rejoicing in its

beneficent influence, he was the last one who would wantonly outrage

the sacred beliefs of his fellow-men. Yet, gifted with a

large-mindedness that is at least unusual in the walks of business, he

was enabled to see that the onward march of natural knowledge which

had so often before excited alarm among men of narrow views could have

nothing in it that was inconsistent with a truly religious life;

while, on the other hand, to promote its advance and diffusion was to

contribute by so much to the highest human welfare.

The wisdom of Mr. Appleton's course has been fully justified by the

event. As we look over the last half of the century, which has been so

fruitful in discovery and has witnessed the development of so many

agencies for the amelioration of human ills and so manifold an

increase in man's power for right living, we can see at the various

stages of this evolution how large a part the broadening of thought

fostered by these authors and the new aims and methods in inquiry

suggested by them have contributed to the advance. It could not, in

short, have been made so rapidly or effectively without the stimulus

they gave. For what has been done in this line in this country we

think--when we reflect that it was he who had the courage to bring the

works of those thinkers here, and who made them accessible to students

and the reading public, who constituted the agency through which the

new thoughts and aims were spread--a very important part in the

achievement may fairly be ascribed to Mr. William H. Appleton.

Scientific Literature.

Owing to the increasing demands upon our space, authors and publishers

are notified that hereafter the department of Scientific Literature,

with the exception of Publications Received, will be discontinued.

SPECIAL BOOKS.

The busy pen of Mr. _John Fiske_ has produced another book marked by

the qualities which the public has learned to associate with all his

work--lucidity of expression, felicity of illustration, a large

command of the conventional elements of literary composition, and a

philosophy which, while very free and lightsome in its steps and

paces, always has the luck to fetch up within easy hailing distance of

a moderate orthodoxy. Mr. Fiske undertakes to conduct us on an

excursion _Through Nature to God_,[27] somewhat as Cook, of

international fame, might undertake to see us safe from New York to

the Holy Land. Of the two, we think Cook makes the surer thing of it;

yet no one can deny that Mr. Fiske has done his best to trace the

itinerary and encourage his excursionists to believe that they will

"get there."

[Footnote 27: Through Nature to God. By John Fiske. Boston and New

York: Houghton, Mifflin & Co.]

We may as well candidly confess that we have not much faith in the

method followed in the work before us. The intention is to show that

an analysis of Nature and of Nature's ways yields God; in other words,

that we have only to carry out the processes of thought which an

examination of the external world and of human history sets in motion

in order to find God at the end of the argument. Thus, by searching,

contrary to what Scripture has generally been held to imply, we find

out both that God is and to some extent what he is. We prefer the

older view. The world's greatest Teacher said simply, "God is a

spirit." He did not say that this was a conclusion to which many lines

of argument led. He did not hint at any kind of argument, but assumed

the affirmation of God by the human consciousness. We venture to say

that if Mr. Fiske's method were successful and we could argue

ourselves into a belief in God, the result would be disastrous; for

the God of argument, or even of analogy, is not the God of the human

soul or conscience. We should have one conclusion more of science, but

we should lose that for which no conclusion of science could make

amends--our sense of the infinite and the possibility of faith.

Mr. Fiske discusses, in the early chapters of his book, The Mystery of

Evil. He takes the familiar ground that evil is the necessary

correlative, and in a manner the necessary condition, of good. We are

placed in a universe that abounds in evil in order that by conquering

it we may raise ourselves to a moral level otherwise impossible. On

one page the author goes so far as to say that God, and not the devil,

"is the creator of evil," but elsewhere he relaxes his boldness and

speaks of evil being "permitted." One feels like asking, If good and

evil are equally made by God, then which is which? When we speak of

electricity as positive and negative we do not ascribe any superiority

to one over the other. Nor do we say that centrifugal is a more

commendable form of force than centripetal, or _vice versa_. "For

strong and resolute men and women," we are told, "an Eden would be but

a fool's paradise." This is not complimentary to our first parents in

their primitive condition of innocence, and it puts the curse

pronounced upon them in a somewhat equivocal light. There is also

quite a rehabilitation of the "serpent," who, it seems, knew quite

well what he was talking about and gave excellent advice. We wonder

whether Mr. Fiske is really of opinion that it helps us to solve any

of the practical problems of life to be told that without evil there

could not be good. Men have known for centuries that it is good to

fight evil, though what evil is essentially they have often been in

doubt. Upon the latter point Mr. Fiske does not in the least attempt

to enlighten us; and yet it should be rather a more hopeful enterprise

to attempt to show us what is specifically evil and ought therefore to

be resisted, than to vindicate evil in general as the indispensable

condition of good, and something, therefore, which God was justified

in making.

The second division of the book deals with The Cosmic Roots of Love

and Self-Sacrifice. We can not see that these roots are traced further

back than the mother's affection for her offspring. Mother's love is

doubtless an old story in the world by now, and perhaps as good a

story as earth has to tell; but it seems to us that the "cosmic"

character of it is not very apparent. We may believe that it was

destined to come in the fullness of time, but this can be said equally

of all that exists. "I think it can be shown," says Mr. Fiske, "that

the principles of morality have their roots in the deepest foundations

of the universe; that the cosmic process is ethical in the profoundest

sense; that, in that far-off morning of the world when the stars sang

together and the sons of God shouted for joy, the beauty of

self-sacrifice and disinterested love formed the chief burden of the

mighty theme." All we can say in regard to this is that Mr. Fiske has

_not_ shown it. He has shown just what we all knew before--that love

exists in the world, that it antagonizes selfishness, and that human

beings are endowed with a moral and religious sense--but he has not

made it plain that the meaning of the universe is to be found in these

(as we regard them) higher developments. He has himself acknowledged

that, on a broad view of the world-wide struggle for life, there are

no moral elements to be seen.

Religion, as we hold, is its own justification. There is more of

religion in one verse of the Psalms than in all the Theodicies that

ever were written. "As the hart panteth after the water brooks, so

panteth my soul after thee, O God. My soul thirsteth for God, for the

living God." Here is the whole essence of the matter--the affirmation

of the human heart that there is something or some one beyond and

above the mesh of circumstance and fact in which our lives are

involved; something or some one who authenticates all that is good,

and everlastingly condemns what is evil; something or some one to

which or to whom the soul gravitates as to nothing else in the

universe. When this affirmation is strong, religious life is strong;

when it is weak, religious life is weak; should it cease entirely,

then religion is dead. The book Mr. Fiske has given us is interesting

from first to last--all his books are interesting--but it does not

increase our knowledge, nor does it add to our knowledge faith.

GENERAL NOTICES.

The author of _Extemporaneous Oratory for Professional and Amateur

Speakers_[28] is himself one of the most effective orators, especially

in debate, of the time. He has embodied in this book the results of

ripened thought and successful experience gained in a field in which

he is a master, for the instruction and help of those who would follow

what he regards as the greatest of all arts, including the elements of

all--music in the intonations of the voice, and painting and sculpture

in the life, attitudes, and expression of the speaker. It is an art,

too, which has wielded a more general and important influence than any

other, which is almost universal in its appeals, and which any one may

at any time find useful, when it will be of great advantage to him to

possess the ability "to speak distinctly to the purpose, gracefully,

with genuine fire." Extemporaneous oratory concerns the delivery, in

form and language suggested by the occasion, "of ideas previously

conceived and adopted with more or less fullness and precision,

together with such thoughts and feelings as may arise and obtain

utterance." It has many advantages over other methods of oratory, all

tending to give the speaker greater power over his audience, and

particularly in the fact that the extemporizer is at all times ready

to expound, defend, illustrate, and enforce his opinions. The

extemporaneous speaker must have a full and fluent command of

language, and a full store of facts which he may at any time have to

bring to bear upon the subject of his address and in the vindication

of his opinions. The first place of importance is given to facts of

natural science, which are of increasing utility. "To the educated and

uneducated alike, natural science is now the most interesting of

themes." Next come the facts of history and biography, those of the

special branches bearing on the speaker's theme and purpose, and the

great general conceptions included in the thoughts of the learned; and

he must have settled opinions. At the basis of Dr. Buckley's treatment

of this art and of his advice to those who would perfect themselves in

it is the principle that extemporization is evolution after

involution. This advice, in which the various phases of the subject

are commented upon under a great variety of aspects, concerns the

general preparation for the address, the acquisition of effective

command of language, the exercise and training of the voice, the

intellectual and physical elements that enter into oratory, its

accessories, and the factor of the audience--all plainly and

practically presented, with a facility of style that makes the reading

of the book a pleasure.

[Footnote 28: Extemporaneous Oratory for Professional and Amateur

Speakers. By James M. Buckley. New York: Eaton & Mains. Pp. 480.

Price, $1.50.]

Appletons' Popular Science Monthly, December 1899 Vol. LVI, November, 1899 to April, 1900 · 第 12 / 16 段