No papers require so much reading as those with "nothing in them."

He is a poor citizen who could not edit a paper better than its editor.

Into what La Rochefoucauld would say when he came to deal not with the

readers of papers but with papers themselves, I cannot enter. That is

a different and a vaster matter. But certainly he should include this

_pensee_:--

He is a poor editor who does not know more than the PRIME MINISTER.

* * * * *

Punch, or The London Charivari, Vol. 150, May 31, 1916 · 第 13 / 32 题