The Romanesque nave was restored in the twelfth century, but this

restoration was apparently a replacement of a great deal of old work,

with only slight modifications of the original inspiration. A large

door, decorated with sculpture and bearing a strong analogy to the

Portail Royal of Chartres, was opened in the middle of the south aisle.

Further changes were made in the early part of the thirteenth century,

when the ancient apses were destroyed, and the admirable choir, as we

now see it, was built--“a masterpiece of effect”--with its encircling

chapels radiating like the petals of a flower. The vaulting approaches

in construction the “cupola inspiration”; but here, as at Angers and

Poitiers, it is an example of only the last traces which remain to us of

the domical design.

Besides the Cathedral there are two churches worthy of note--Notre Dame

de la Coûture, in the eastern quarter of the town, amongst the shops and

markets; and Notre Dame (sometimes called St. Julien) du Pré, across the

river in the far west. The latter church, in spite of having been a good

deal restored, is extremely interesting. In the nave hangs a little

printed history, which tells us that the church was founded by the first

bishop of Le Mans, Saint Julian, sent as a missionary by Saint Peter. In

honour of his great master Julian built a basilica, which was enlarged

by Saint Innocent in the sixth century and restored about 1050. In the

fifteenth century both church and monastery suffered from fire; two

centuries later the pious Benedictines made some alterations, but

during the Revolution the church was sacked and burnt, and the crypt,

together with the tombs of Saint Julian and Saint Hadouin, entirely

destroyed. The task of restoration was left to the faithful in the

nineteenth century. In spite of the modern work, however, the church

contains a great deal that is very interesting and undoubtedly ancient.

The nave pillars especially, with their carved capitals, are worth

individual notice. In those of the north aisle, from west to east, we

find portrayed:

No. 1. Animals caught in a thicket, turning their heads over their

shoulders to free themselves from the branches. Notice here how the

volute at the corner has suggested to the sculptor a human face.

No. 2. Leaves and curiously twisted arabesques.

No. 3. The same in a simpler form.

No. 4. Volutes and grotesque heads at the angles.

No. 5. [South aisle, east to west] gives a kind of rope-work, with

volutes and human-headed dragons.

No. 6. Is much the same as No. 3.

No. 7. Flat _applique_ leaves, volutes and ball-flowers; and in

No. 8. We return to the wild animals. Both aisles are arcaded on their

outer walls; on the north we find arches ornamented with ball-flowers,

on the south an arcade of some interest, as showing the immense

variety of design in its capitals--dragons, fir-cones, arabesques, and,

strangest of all, winged lions, with a most Assyrian air. Apart from the

capitals, the architecture of the church is quite simple, and whoever

rehandled it has done so much in keeping with the old work. The windows

are round-headed: the clerestory consists of single lights, and the

triforium is a blind arcade.

[Illustration: NÔTRE DAME DE LA COÛTURE, LE MANS]

Notre Dame de la Coûture--the name originally referred to the _Cultura

Dei_--is an old Benedictine foundation, dating from the sixth century,

but destroyed during the Revolution; the church, however, remains, with

most of the old work intact, the two square fourteenth-century towers

rising in quaint contrast to the modern buildings around them. Between

the towers a remarkable Last Judgment confronts the visitor from the

west doorway. The central figure, Justice, weighs a sinner in the

balance, and apparently finds him wanting, if one may judge by the angle

of the scales and the expectantly gleeful attitude of a devil amongst

the “goats” on the left hand. Of the interior, the choir is the oldest

part, and here we find eleventh-century work, especially in the crypt,

which contains the tomb of the founder, Saint Bertrand, and shows the

rudely carved capitals and square-edged arches of an age before

architects had blossomed out into beauty of sculpture and design. The

same simplicity characterises the choir, which has four bays and a

_chevet_ of five-round arches, with massive piers, and the abacus square

and voluted at the angles. The vaulting of the _chevet_ is terminated by

figures of saints, which rest upon the shafts of the clerestory windows.

There is no triforium, its position being taken throughout the church by

corbel tables in the form of human and animal faces. The nave consists

of a single wide body without aisles, and set in the blank wall are

three large bays of relieving arches, their space being filled in with

curious old tapestry, in which appears a medley of Biblical subjects,

pastoral and hunting scenes, and Chinese pagodas.

This quiet little church was in the very centre of the furious street

fighting which followed the first rush into the city of the Prussian

troops, and fulfilled its sacred mission of giving shelter to the

wounded and comfort to the dying who lay stretched in the neighbouring

streets of the town. “We entered,” says the war correspondent of _The

Times_, “the picturesque old church of Notre Dame de la Coûture,

interesting from its quaint mixed architecture, its old choir and

vaulted walls, and were told by the meek-looking priest who sadly showed

us over it, and was busy cleaning it as we entered, that no fewer than

six hundred wounded had passed the night in it.”

Chapter Nine

ANGERS

If Le Mans marks the first stage from Normandy upon the southward road,

Angers may certainly be counted as another stepping-stone to the lands

of the Loire--another landmark in our own history--another city upon a

hill, and yet differing from all the hill cities before it. We are now

in what Freeman calls “before all things the land and the city of

counts,” the city which gave to history the name of Fulk the Black,

warrior and pilgrim and enemy of Odo of Chartres; of Geoffrey the

Hammer, who strove with the Conqueror at Domfront and Alençon; of René

the minstrel and of Margaret his daughter, who carried to England the

spirit of the old Angevin line, and fought with the strength of two for

the inheritance of her husband, meek, scholarly Henry of Windsor, for

whom the shield of faith had more significance than the shield of the

warrior.

The house of Anjou cannot but have an interest to an Englishman, since

it is the parent stock of our longest dynasty. Long before it came

through Normandy into contact with England it held its own, however, in

Gaul, Roman and Frankish. The Andecavi, who settled on the Maine, were

an important tribe, and their city was of equal importance. In 464 the

Saxons wandered down from Normandy and overran Anjou, but their

occupation was merely temporary, and left no traces in city or people,

as did the Saxon colonies at Bayeux and in England; and when this one

cloud has cleared off, an open field is left for the history of the

counts. Now the Counts of Anjou may be said to stand very near the head

of the list of all the rulers in France at this early time--a long list,

which numbers many important names, Hughs and Roberts of Paris, Williams

and Richards of Normandy, Thibauts of Champagne--yet against whose feats

of arms and feats of policy the Angevins can measure theirs almost one

by one. “The restless spirit of the race showed itself sometimes for

good and sometimes for evil, but there was no Count of Anjou who could

be called a fool, a coward, or a _fainéant_.”

The first count, Ingelgar, received his dominion from Charles the Bald,

in about 870. After him comes Fulk the Red, who enlarged his father’s

borders beyond the river; Fulk the Good, the scholar who defended his

learning with the well-known proverb, “An unlettered king is but a

crownéd ass,” a saying which spread beyond his own realm and found

favour at the court of England; and the warlike Geoffrey of the Grey

Tunic, who repelled the Breton and Aquitanian incursions and fought in

Frankish and German wars besides. Geoffrey it was who gave to the line

the famous Fulk the Black, the first count who appears to any great

extent in French history--the history, that is, of France proper, at

that time apart from the great duchies on her boundaries. His wars with

Odo filled a great part of his reign, and brought him down as far as the

Loire, where, through the alliance of a count of Périgueux, Tours became

his for a short time; also Saumur, after the victory of Pontlevois. On

two occasions he turned pilgrim; and he is also found at Rome, applying

to the Pope for consecration of his new monastery near Loches, which

Hugh of Tours, whose see Fulk had robbed, refused to consecrate unless

the stolen lands were restored. Naturally the Gallican Church resented

this destruction of their privileges; the full wrath of the episcopate

was pronounced against the recreant count, and a legend adds that in

further punishment a wind came from heaven and blew down his newly-built

church. How this uncanonical behaviour must have vexed the shades of

Fulk the pious! Fulk Nerra was followed by Geoffrey, self-christened

the Hammer. He rebelled against his father during his lifetime, but

after his death continued the war with Chartres, and actually got

possession of Tours, the one city for which every Angevin strove. Count

Thibaut was formally deprived of the city by royal command, and it was

handed over to Geoffrey, under the favour, the superstitious chroniclers

make haste to add, of Saint Martin. Notwithstanding this royal grant,

Henry, the Frank king, seems to have been perpetually at war with

Geoffrey, and even to have called in feudal service of the Norman duke

to aid him against the Angevin count. William himself was no friend to

Anjou. The mastery over Maine was a bone of contention to the two great

powers on its north and south borders; and when Geoffrey obtained the

guardianship of little Count Hugh, and came into immediate contact with

Normandy, a definite struggle arose. Geoffrey aimed at the two outposts

of William’s territory, Alençon and Domfront. Alençon, through the

treachery of its lord, surrendered to him; Domfront was also

disaffected, and for a moment it seemed as though the land of the great

Norman were to be invaded by his southern neighbour. But William was

prepared for any emergency. He marched straight to Domfront, where

Geoffrey had already stationed his troops, and laid siege to it. He

remained before the town for some time before news came of the advance

of Geoffrey himself; and when the Count at last arrived, he sent word of

his readiness to give battle. But when the morning broke upon the Norman

host, drawn up before the fortress all expectant of a battle with the

Angevins, lo! no enemy was to be seen. Geoffrey, whose surname of Hammer

by no means maligned his prudence, had thought better of the scheme in

the night, and retired with all his men. The Norman writers, of course,

set this down to cowardice. But one would like to hear the other side of

the story. “Here, and throughout the war, the lions stand in need of a

painter, or rather their painters suddenly refuse to do their duty. We

have no Angevin account of the siege of Domfront to set against our

evidently highly coloured Norman picture.”

“The French yearning to make everything new” has done its work in

Angers, but though Fulk, Geoffrey, René, and the rest would be at a loss

to recognise their old capital in the trim modern town, enough remains

to show us what has been. No city standing as Angers does on rising

ground above a wide river, with a mass of castle bastions sloping up the

hill, could fail to have made history in its day. The modern town may be

disposed of in a few words--it is clean and full of life, and

altogether very far removed from the “black Angers” known to our

ancestors. This mediæval and grim-sounding title, reminiscent of

dungeons and tyrant princes, probably either meant that the ancient town

was closely and squalidly built, or else referred to the dark slate with

which the country abounds, and which might well have been used for

building purposes all over the town, as we still see it in some houses

by the river.

The attractive side of Angers is that facing the water, and the river is

quite worthy of the town on its banks, though Mr. Henry James does

censure the “perversity in a town lying near a great river, and yet not

upon it.” It is true that Angers has not got as far as the Loire; but it

has what is next best, a tributary of the great river--a wide placid

flow, which makes no mean show here, spanned as it is by three fine

bridges. Looking upstream from the lowest bridge one sees the old and

the new together; the clean well-to-do water-front, pleasant boulevards,

and a bright little quay with every house the pattern of its neighbour;

and above this the black mass of the castle, whose solid hugeness makes

the crowning towers of Saint Maurice look as if they were cut out of

paper, so delicately and sharply defined are they against the sky. Down

river there is a long and sunny path, broad green meadows and a stretch

of country beyond, and little fishing boats dotted about on the water.

But what Angers has of the best is its castle, though it be “the work of

intruding Kings,” Philip Augustus and Louis IX., and not of the Angevin

counts. It is, indeed, more massive than picturesque--“it has no beauty,

no grace, no detail, nothing that charms or detains you; it is simply

very old and very big--so big and so old that this simple impression is

enough, and it takes its place in your recollections as a perfect

specimen of a superannuated stronghold.” The huge grim bastions, girded

with iron bands as though to give added strength to their already

giant-like solidity, and the deep moat, filled in old days by the waters

of the Maine, stood there for a very real and terrible use, and even now

are a splendid example of how men in the Middle Ages defended themselves

against all comers. The very steepness and plainness of the vast walls

prevented an enemy from gaining any foothold, even supposing him to have

crossed the moat in safety. But this great house of defence now gives on

to a modern boulevard; a kitchen-garden occupies the moat, and sends the

scent of thyme and rosemary up through those loop-hole windows, whose

most peaceful prospect of old was the black, silent water below, and

whose usual occupants were armed men with cross-bows, or boiling lead,

or something equally quieting to the unwary spirit attempting to scale

those unscalable ramparts.

In the heart of the town is a very comfortable little inn at the sign of

the “Cheval Blanc.” The house has a quiet and rather old-fashioned

atmosphere, perhaps a relic of past days, as the inn itself has stood

there since the sixteenth century, though the present building is quite

modern. Another relic--though the term hardly suits such a hale and

hearty person--is a delightful old waiter, who has been at the Cheval

Blanc for forty years, and wears on his coat with the greatest pride a

minute piece of _tricolor_--the recognition of thirty years’ service.

Close to the Cheval Blanc is the Préfecture, and this contains a hidden

treasure in the shape of an old cloister, which runs along one side of

the court. This cloister was not discovered until 1836, but the remains

themselves date from the twelfth century, and are of extraordinary

interest, not merely from their antiquity, but also from the immense

variety of subject sculpture which adorns them. There are several bays

of round-headed arches, and from their capitals and mouldings dragons

and toads, snakes and winged lions, glare and wriggle at the visitor in

a grotesque medley. In some cases Scriptural subjects are

represented--there is notably the murder of the Innocents, a

marvellously preserved and realistic fresco, reminiscent both in

treatment and colour scheme of some of the Bayeux tapestry; the killing

of Goliath by David, and the presentation of his head to Saul; and

inside a very modern council-room, a wonderful allegory representing the

defeat of Vice by Virtue. The Lamb, enhaloed, is in the centre; beneath

are two lions tearing apart a wild boar; and in the jambs are virtues,

armed with shield and sword, trampling upon demon vices--men struggling

with wild beasts--and adoring angels swinging censers. This is partly

coloured, and the sculpture is very fine, great attention being given to

detail.

[Illustration: ANGERS]

Freeman declares the city of Angers to be the headquarters of the

Angevin style of architecture, and quotes as a noticeable example of

that style the Cathedral of St. Maurice, which differs at least as

widely from that of the French churches as from that of Normandy. The

object of the Angevin architect was breadth, and he has sacrificed both

length and height to the attainment of his end. The view from the west

doorway of St. Maurice shows a well-known example of what is termed the

“hall plan”--a single wide nave, having choir and transepts, but without

ambulatories or aisles. That the church originally had aisles, however,

is evident from a plan of Saint Maurice given in Mr. Lethaby’s “Mediæval

Art”; they were removed, it is assumed, in order to simplify the

construction of the vault. The great relieving arches of the nave as it

now stands are divided into three bays only. “In everything,” Freeman

says, “the tendency is to have a few large members rather than many

small ones. There is a certain boldness and simplicity about this kind

of treatment; but there is also a certain bareness, and an Angevin

church looks both lower and shorter than it really is.” The vaulting of

the roof here follows the same sub-domical design as that of Notre Dame

de la Coûture at Le Mans. The stained glass is perhaps the best feature

of the church as far as actual beauty goes; some of it dates from the

twelfth and thirteenth centuries, and both in nave and choir it is very

fine, particularly in the windows of the apse and in the rose window of

the north transept. The tapestry which hangs in the nave and transepts

represents scenes from the Apocalypse, and is very fine Arras work of

the fourteenth century.

Chapter Ten

TOURS AND BLOIS

So much has been said and written of the Loire country during the past

fifty years that the modern writer has very little ground left to him,

unless it be to avoid calling it the “Garden of France.” Yet

over-written as it may be, Touraine has not lost any of the charm and

romance which must always attach to a wide sunny land, watered by a

great river, and “peopled”--one might almost say--by châteaux, every one

of which has set its mark upon French history. Certainly there is

something very delightful, because so unlike anything else in France, in

the endless vista of grey-green levels--here and there a group of slim

shivering poplars or a flash of sunlight upon the wide waters of the

Loire, which winds in and out of the flats like a great lazy shining

serpent--flying sometimes into a sudden rage and flooding the land, or

subsiding sulkily amongst high banks and stretches of dry sand.

It is these moods and tempers of the great river that prevent any

navigation upon its waters; other smaller rivers--the Seine, for

instance, and our own Thames--are alive with craft of every kind; but

here, on the great boundary stream between north and south, which seems

made for a waterway to the sea, no busy steamers ply up and down with

the tide--no barges and market boats disturb the calm of its wide

reaches. There never was, for its size, such an erratic and useless

river; yet we can afford to forgive it, for the sake of the land which

it waters and the cities on its banks.

The impression one carries away from Tours is one of wideness, and

brightness, and sunshine--shaded by one or two ancient corners. It is

above all things a town really lived in and appreciated by its

inhabitants, many of whom are English. Tours is, or used to be, a famous

educational centre, and for the sake of education, or economy, or both,

whole families have migrated there, besides the unmistakably English

students who have been grafted on to a family to learn French. And the

river-side shows, if not a strenuously busy, at least a very sociable

side of the town life, especially in the summer evenings, when the

Tourangeaux, native and adopted, leave the white houses and busy

streets, and use their river bank for a pleasant walk.

It is curious how in France each step towards the south seems to be a

step further in French history. First there is Normandy, the land of the

early Northern warriors, with the fierce blood untamed in their veins;

then Maine and Anjou, recalling the days of our own Plantagenet kings,

and the close connection of France with England; while Touraine brings

back to us the craft of Louis XI. and the magnificence of François

Ier. Tours itself, however, has never been content to lie fallow for

long; ever since some Roman emperor transported it from the right bank

of the Loire to the left, and made it the capital of Lugdunensis Tertia,

the town has had an important part assigned to it, and has played out

that part to the full. Though in old days Tours was only half of the

place, the _cité_, the _bourg_, built round the tomb and shrine of Saint

Martin and first called by his name, was of equal if not greater

importance, from the many pilgrimages to the resting-place of the great

saint. This is easily understood when one considers in what veneration

Saint Martin was held by the Gauls and their descendants. Saint

Gatianus, the first bishop of Tours, began the good work in the third

century, but to Martin is due the subsequent spread of Christianity, not

only in Touraine but all over France, so that he really shares with

Saint Denis the honour of patron saint. Born of pagan parents in

Pannonia, Martin became a catechumen at ten years old, and five years

later was forced, much against his will, to enter the army. After his

final conversion and baptism, however, he left it to become the eager

disciple and co-worker of Hilary, Bishop of Poitiers; and in 371 he was

consecrated Bishop of Tours. The legend of Martin’s conversion is well

known (at any rate it may be found commemorated in the painted windows

of churches all over France)--how the young soldier stationed outside

the gate of Amiens shared his cloak with a passing beggar, and how the

following night Christ appeared to him in a vision, making known to the

angels of Heaven this thing done to Himself as to one of “the least of

these.”

[Illustration: TOUR DE L’HORLOGE, TOURS]

After Martin’s death at Candes his relics were brought to Tours, and in

the fifth century Saint Perpetuus built a splendid basilica round the

shrine. This church became the nucleus of the _bourg_ of Martinopolis,

known to the Middle Ages as Châteauneuf. Side by side with the church a

monastery sprang up, and in the reign of Charlemagne the famous scholar

Alcuin became abbot and founded there his school of theology. Late in

the tenth century the basilica was destroyed by fire; two centuries

later saw the completion of its successor, but this again, after

suffering many evils from Huguenot and Revolutionist hands, disappeared

under the First Empire to make a passage-way for the Rue des Halles.

Two towers--the church originally had five--now look mournfully at one

another across the busy, narrow street: the Tour de l’Horloge, square

and solid, with a leaded roof capped by a small eighteenth-century dome,

and the taller Tour Charlemagne, so called for the rather insufficient

reason that Charlemagne buried his third wife, Luitgarde, beneath its

base. These are the sole relics of the ancient _culte_ of Saint Martin;

though to his memory in latter days a new basilica has reared itself on

the other side of the street.

Cathedral Cities of France · 第 6 / 15 段