CHAPTER VI

THE DISTANCES TRAVELLED BY BIRDS

Not only do the distances of the migration paths of different species

vary considerably, from a trip of a few miles to a voyage from the

Arctic to the Antarctic, but the individuals of one and the same species

do not all travel to the same degree.

The familiar swallow, _Hirundo rustica_, though subject to certain

geographical variations, is found throughout the Palæarctic and Nearctic

regions, nesting throughout Europe to between 63° and 70° north and in

Africa north of the Sahara, where, however, Canon Tristram found it

also wintering in the oases. South of the Sahara to the Cape it is a

winter visitor. In Asia it breeds, according to Seebohm, in Asia Minor,

Persia, Afghanistan, and western Siberia, and winters in Scinde and

western India. One form breeds in and north of the Himalayas, eastward

to China and Japan, and winters in India and Burma, and another ranges

from eastern Siberia across Behring Strait throughout North America,

so far south as Mexico. This form winters in Burma, in Central America

and Brazil, but the Mexican birds are more or less stationary at all

seasons.

Our swallow and its congeners have an almost cosmopolitan range,

summering in the Northern and wintering in the Southern Hemisphere or

comparatively near to the Equator in the Northern. Towards the centre of

its range its migrations are either short or the bird is non-migratory.

Mr W. L. Sclater, addressing the South African Ornithologists' Union

(42), stated that the swallow arrives at Cape Town at the end of

October, and is common from November to March; practically all have

left by the middle of April. Swallows begin to arrive from the south

in Africa north of the Sahara in the latter half of February; early

in March they reach southern Europe, later in the same month they are

in Central Europe and by the middle of April large numbers arrive in

England. Thus swallows leave South Africa actually after they have

arrived in England; the South African birds cannot be the same which are

in North Africa a month earlier! The swallow supports Seebohm's thesis

that the individuals which go farthest to the south in winter, breed

farthest north. A day-migrant and by no means a rapid one, the swallow

may be timed from place to place, and it is not presumption to suggest

that the birds which reach Britain to nest came from lands little south

of the Sahara and well north of the Equator, and that those which pass

through England and along our shores in May and even June are on their

way from Southern Africa to the northernmost limits of their range.

Mr Sclater points out one very interesting fact; when the swallow

reaches South Africa it is in ragged worn plumage, before it begins its

northward journey it passes through its one annual moult.

Waders and shore birds which reach South Africa in autumn--the spring of

the Cape--are moulting into winter dress; before they leave they have

often assumed or partially assumed the breeding dress. When they arrive

the native South African birds are breeding, but though Mr Sclater

thinks that some nest a second time in the south, no satisfactory

evidence has ever been brought forward to support the suggestion.

These long-distance travellers not only move from a zone of moderate

temperature to a warmer one, but many of them pass through the hotter

zone to a country having a similar temperature to the one in which they

bred, thus enjoying summer but not torrid heat all the year round.

There are birds in which the northern and southern forms are distinct.

The wheatear, _Saxicola oenanthe oenanthe_, reaches us early, sometimes

during the second week in March, and speedily settles down to nest.

Towards the middle or end of April a brighter larger bird appears, the

Greenland wheatear, _Saxicola oenanthe leucorrhoa_, which was recognised

in Greenland, Iceland and eastern North America before it was seen

that both forms occurred in Britain. This larger bird loiters through

Britain, for its northern home is not ready for it until the Arctic

spring. We know it breeds farther north than our wheatear, but its

winter range is not fully worked out. The smaller bird is found in north

and north-western Africa, and the larger form farther east, even south

of the equator on the eastern seaboard, and probably, when we know more

about the range of the two we shall find that the form breeding farther

north, winters farther south.

The folly of laying down the law on the strength of the knowledge of

the habits of a few species is shown by the study of the movements

of American birds. Mr Cooke shows that as a rule "the migration is a

synchronous southward movement of the whole species" in autumn, "the

different groups of individuals or colonies retaining in general their

relative position." The black and white creeper _Mnistitta varia_ breeds

from South Carolina to New Brunswick, nesting in the south in April and

reaching the northern limits in the middle of May. In the middle of July

old and young birds have been seen at Key West, 500 miles south of the

breeding range, and towards the end of August they have reached the

north coast of South America. The New Brunswick birds cannot be ready

to leave before the middle of July, and Mr Cooke allows them fifty days

for the trip, bringing them to the Gulf States in September; he argues

that this is proof that the earlier migrants must have been birds from

the southern part of the range. Black-throated blue warblers, _Dendroica

coerulescens_, reach Cuba at about the time that others of the same

species are arriving in North Carolina; the first, he concludes, are

birds from the southern Alleghanies and the others from northern New

England or beyond (20). Other species illustrate the same order which

he calls "normal," but show that it is not an invariable rule.

Southern-bred Maryland yellow-throats, _Geothlypis trichas_, reside

throughout the year in Florida; those in the middle districts of the

range migrate for a short distance only, whilst the Newfoundland

birds pass over the winter home of their southern relatives to the

West Indies. The palm-warblers of the interior of Canada travel 3000

miles to Cuba, passing through the Gulf States early in October; those

from north-eastern Canada travel later and slowly and settle in the

Gulf States, after a journey of only half the distance. He sums up

wisely--"No invariable rule, law, or custom exists in regard to the

direction or distance of migration.... Each species presents a separate

problem, to be solved for the most part only by patient, pains-taking

observation and by the recognition of sub-species."

The order in spring is yet unproved. "With many birds ... the first

individuals to appear in spring at a given locality are supposed to

be old birds that nested there the previous year." These are followed

by those which nested a little farther north, followed later by those

whose homes are in the most northerly part of the range. "If, then,

for any species, the southern nesting birds lead the van in both fall

and spring migration, and the near guard in each case is composed of

northern breeding birds, it follows that some time between October

and April a transposal of their relative positions occurs; and that

the more southern birds pass over the more northern ones, which delay

their migration, knowing that winter still holds sway in their summer

dominions." It is not known where this transposal takes place, nor

whether the northern birds remain in winter quarters till the southern

birds have passed, or start a slow migration, during which the southern

birds pass over them. Later another transposal occurs; the northern

birds cross the southern part of the range, passing birds which are

already nesting. "Spring migration seems to be therefore for some

species a game of leapfrog--the southern birds first passing the

northern, and the northern passing them in turn" (20).

The custom, now fortunately becoming widespread, of marking birds

by affixing a numbered metal ring to one leg, may help to elucidate

this and many other problems, but until a large number of results are

collected it is unwise to draw conclusions. Almost every month the

recovery of some of these marked birds is noted in the scientific

journals, but so far, beyond indicating the minimum distance travelled

by individuals, little can be proved. It is, however, plain that birds

do not invariably act as they ought to do if they obeyed all the laws

which have been invented for them. A few records or results may be

quoted, but any suggestions from these must be treated as suggestions

only; many more must be forth-coming before we can say, proved.

The white stork, _Ciconia alba_, has been systematically ringed in

Rossitten in East Prussia, in Denmark and in Hungary for some years, and

Mr A. L. Thomson gives a brief summary of the interesting results up to

date, in "British Birds" for May, 1911. Ten young birds, taken during

their first autumn journey, show a general south-easterly trend through

Europe. Three east Prussian storks were obtained in Syria, one in the

April after it was marked, the other two in April and July of the second

year; another was taken in Palestine, and one Hungarian stork in Syria.

In the May of the year following that in which it was marked in Prussia

one was obtained at Alexandria. In their first autumn Prussian storks

have been recorded from near Lake Chad in October, from Rosaires on the

Blue Nile in the same month, and from the Victoria Nyanza at the end of

November. A ringed bird is reported from German East Africa, but full

details are wanting, but one shot at Fort Jameson in north-east Rhodesia

in December 1907 had only been hatched in Pomerania a few months before;

it left the nest on August 19th and began its journey south on or about

the 26th. In its first winter a Prussian bird was shot in the Kalahari

Desert.

Seven Prussian and about a dozen Hungarian birds have been obtained

in winter quarters in the Transvaal, Natal, and other parts of south

Africa, and one in German south-west Africa; one, recovered in the July

following the summer in which it was marked, was possibly a weakling

bird which had failed to make the return journey. Storks which had

returned are recorded in their first, second and third summer; most of

them having been found within a few miles of their birthplace. One bird,

marked as a nestling near Brunswick in 1906 was reported in June 1908

from Sorquitten in East Prussia, over 430 miles away. Mr Thomson, from

his reference to this being roughly in the same latitude but reached

by a different "line of flight," suggests that it is an exception;

this will be shown when some hundreds more cases have been collected.

It may, however, be found that some birds deliberately launch forth in

search of new homes, though at present it looks more like a bird which

on approaching the breeding area had banded itself with the wrong local

body of travellers.

A bird marked at Cassel in western Germany has been recorded from

Barcelona in Spain; this so far single record may indicate that storks

get lost, that there is no regular direction, or that there is more than

one, a south-westerly as well as a south-easterly route. That too, we

hope, will be shown in the future.

That much will be learnt from storks is evident, but the lessons will

be only general; each migratory species must be treated separately, and

to some extent this is being done. In the opening chapter I mentioned

the uncertainty about the behaviour of any individual song thrush,

merely as an example. So far, the few records of marked song thrushes

add to rather than solve this problem. Years ago the song thrush was

looked upon as a permanent resident so far as Britain was concerned.

Then it was found to be migratory even in Britain, and it was suggested

that each song thrush performed a short migration, southern British

birds leaving the country, northern British retiring to winter in the

south of England, and northern European birds replacing these as autumn

immigrants. The study of local races quickly altered this opinion; it

was guessed that in Britain there was a sedentary insular race and a

migratory passage race; others, however, saw that some of our home-bred

birds left in autumn. What do we find? A song thrush, marked as a

nestling in July in Northumberland, is found in November in Durham;

another one, marked in Berkshire travels to Norwich and is recorded in

November, but a third, born in Aberdeen takes an autumnal flight of at

least 1500 miles and is found in Portugal. Evidently we cannot yet frame

any rule for our British-bred birds.

It is said that home-bred lapwings are somewhat sedentary, and that the

large winter flocks are composed of Continental immigrants. The frequent

westward migration of lapwings during exceptionally severe winter

weather has led to the supposition that these birds fly for refuge,

under these circumstances, to Ireland. This is true, so far as it goes,

but a lapwing marked as a nestling near Stirling has been found in the

south of France, and two others in Portugal, whilst five have been

recovered in Ireland.

The results of marking sea-birds are interesting, showing that the

young birds often wander northward in search of food before there is

any marked autumnal southward migration. Terns and black-headed gulls

have been found a month or more after they have left the nest to the

north of their breeding colonies in Cumberland and mid-Wales. A bird

from Ravenglass was taken in its first January in Brittany. Rossitten

black-heads have been shot in the Isle of Wight and in Breydon in

Norfolk.

This may only mean that the young blackhead is a confirmed wanderer

in search of food, but the few results with woodcocks, marked as

British-bred nestlings, are puzzling. They have been known to linger in

the neighbourhood of their home until November, and have been found in

Portugal only a month later. Birds marked at Tyrone have been found so

far apart as Cornwall, Harrow and Inverness; what route for the Irish

birds can be guessed at?

Birds marked as adults present further problems, but also provide

interesting evidence. Hooded crows, captured on migration in spring at

Rossitten and then released, have been recovered in autumn actually

in the same place and in other localities in Germany, and one marked

in October was taken two years later, in spring, in Finland. The sum

of these records of crows proves one thing conclusively--the fallacy

of Gätke's due east to west and west to east flight, and supports a

coastwise migration for this species.

Adult teal, captured in decoys, ringed and released in South Denmark

in September and October, were taken in November and December in

Hampshire, Suffolk and the Moray Firth, whilst others from the same

place were recorded from other parts of England and Ireland, from

western France, Holland, the south of Spain and the north of Italy.

Fly-lines, if followed, are divergent and complicated. Four young herons

were marked in one nest in Denmark; one was recorded in Holstein in

June, and another in Mecklenburg in July; the third was killed near

Salisbury in Wiltshire in October, and in the following February the

last was obtained in the north-west of France. Two from another nest

were recovered in Denmark, one in July and the other in February, twelve

months after birth. Another heron reached Andalusia by August. In each

case where there was indication of a direction it was south-westerly.

Many more records might be mentioned, but these are sufficient to show

the value of the method and the present insufficiency of results.

Many of these records show that the speed of the migrating birds, even

in spring, is not great. Mr Cooke proves that most species in North

America travel slowly through the districts where food is plentiful

and during the earlier part of the journey northwards only a few miles

are covered per day; they travel with the slowly advancing vernal

wave, but, as we shall show in the next chapter, many species actually

outstrip it, and travel from warmer to colder climates.

[Illustration: Map showing the range of the American Golden Plover,

with its known migration route.

(From _The National Geographic Magazine._)]

By the kind permission of Mr Cooke I am able to reproduce three of his

maps, illustrating the longest known distance travelled by any bird in a

single flight, and the probable evolution of this extraordinary oversea

voyage (21). This long journey, roughly 2500 miles at a flight, is

used in autumn by several species of American shore birds, and the

particular species most easily recognised, is the American golden

plover, _Charadrius dominicus_, which differs but little from our _C.

pluvialis_. An important point to notice is that the route followed in

the fall is not the one used by the bird in spring, an undoubted proof

that all routes are not identical with the original line of dispersal

of the species. Nor is the route directly from the north to the south,

though there is plenty of evidence to show the fallacy of the notion

that all birds move in this one direction.

The golden plover nests along the Arctic coasts of North America from

Alaska to Hudson Bay. So soon as the young are able to take care of

themselves the birds migrate south-east to Labrador, where for some

weeks they fatten on the autumn harvest of fruits. A short journey

across the Gulf of St Lawrence brings them to Nova Scotia, where they

gather before starting on their oversea flight. The eastward trip to

the food-supplying districts is support of the idea that a route is

originated by passage from food-base to food-base, rather than by any

hasty rush from the dangers of approaching winter. The birds start south

from Nova Scotia for South America!

During this long oversea journey, which Mr G. H. Mackay thinks, with

reason, may be undertaken under favourable conditions at a speed of from

150 to 200 miles an hour by birds with such magnificent power of flight,

the plovers may meet with many different winds. The Cape Cod sportsmen

look for them if the wind is strong from the north-east; the Barbados

gunners expect them when there is squally weather from the south-east,

but when westerly breezes are blowing they will pass so far as 400 miles

east of the Bermudas. Only when the wind is adverse and strong do the

plovers visit the Bermudas or even stop at any of the northern Lesser

Antilles, 600 miles from the coast of South America. In favourable

weather they neglect any of these "emergency stop-overs" and hasten on.

In the Guianas the birds rest and feed, but they soon move on. Across

the Brazils their actual route is uncertain, but they have been met

with in Amazonia, and are known to winter in Argentina, and, it is

suspected, in eastern Patagonia.

[Illustration: Map showing the evolution of the migration route

of the American Golden Plover.

(From _The National Geographic Magazine._)]

The return migration is, so far as it is known, in a steady northerly

direction, rather north-west across Bolivia towards Central America.

From Yucatan they cross the Gulf to Texas, then slowly travel up the

great Mississippi highway and across Canada to their northern breeding

grounds. "Its round trip has taken the form of an enormous ellipse with

a minor axis of 2000 miles and a major axis stretching 8000 miles from

Arctic America to Argentina."

The following is Mr Cooke's suggestion of the origin of this great

ellipse. Towards the close of the glacial era, when the ice began to

recede, the Florida peninsula was submerged and only a small area in the

south-east of the States was free from ice. Plover attempting to follow

up the retreating ice were confined to an all-land route from Central

America through Mexico to the western part of the Mississippi Valley.

As the east gradually became uncovered the route would be extended to

the north-east, until the area stretching to the Great Lakes was fit

for bird-habitation. As the route lengthened and the power of flight

developed, there would be a tendency to shorten the line by cutting off

some of the great curve (No. 1) through Mexico and Texas, and a short

flight across the Gulf (No. 2) would be gradually lengthened, until the

present spring route, then also the autumn route (No. 3), was attained.

As Canada opened out, the routes in spring and autumn diverged; in

autumn the fruits of Labrador were an attraction, but the Chinook winds

made the country east of the Rockies more suitable for spring migration;

the fall route tended eastward (No. 4), the spring route remained

unchanged. When the fall route had worked eastward to the Gulf of St

Lawrence (No. 5), shortening took place in the same way from the great

westward curve, culminating in an ocean flight, short at first (No. 6)

and later extended, the total distance shortened, until the present

route was attained (No. 7).

This reasoning, sound enough, helps to a more difficult problem--how

the Pacific golden plover, _Charadrius fulvus_, found its way to the

Hawaiian Islands, where numbers of the birds winter annually. Roughly

the islands are 2000 miles from California, 2400 from Alaska, whence

the birds fly, and 3700 miles from Japan. Mr Cooke scouts the idea that

any bird flies aimlessly out to sea to find a new winter home, and the

chance colonisation by a storm-swept party is as improbable; if this did

occur it is hardly likely that they would at once depart, in a single

season, from ancient habits and carve out an entirely new migration

route. Probably the origin of the route is as follows. The bird breeds

on the northern shores of eastern Siberia from the Liakof Islands to

Behring Strait, and on the Alaskan side south to the northern base of

the Alaska peninsula. It winters on the mainland of south-eastern Asia,

in eastern Australia, and throughout the Oceanic Islands from Formosa

and the Liu Kiu Islands on the north-west to the Low Archipelago in the

south-east.

[Illustration: Map showing the evolution of the migration route

of the Eastern or Pacific Golden Plover.

(From _The National Geographic Magazine._)]

It is fairly certain that the original route would be roughly north and

south, between Siberia and southern Asia. In time the species spread

eastward in winter, to Australia and to islands farther east, whilst the

breeding area extended to Alaska. If these extensions took place before

any cutting off of corners in the route, Alaska birds would travel

11,000 miles to reach the Low Archipelago, only 5000 miles in a direct

air-route (No. 1). Probably shortening began early among the Pacific

islands, from the northern islands to the Asiatic coast, and finally to

Japan (No. 2). From Palmyra the flight to the nearest of the Marshall

Islands is 2000 miles; thence a journey, provided with several possible

rests, of 3000 miles would bring them to Japan. A thousand-mile drift

through strong winds might cause the birds to reach Hawaii, whence they

would find a chain of islands which would help them, and render the

last flight to Japan no longer than the one they had been accustomed to.

Having once reached the Midway Islands the shortening of the route would

be carried on again by lengthening the oversea journey northwards until

the Aleutian Islands were discovered (No. 4). The present route, now

followed in spring and autumn (No. 5), would be the natural climax of

this long evolution. The two golden plovers, sub-specifically distinct,

nest little more than a hundred miles apart; their migrations and winter

homes are as different as they could be in any two widely divergent

species. It is one of the most striking of the ascertained facts in the

distribution and habits of birds.

* * * * *

The Migration of Birds · 第 6 / 11 章