Preserving every word in the old copy, I read the passage thus:--

"O! be persuaded. Do not count it holy

To hurt by being just: it is as lawful as

(For we would give much) to commit violent thefts

And rob in the behalf of charity."

"To _count_ violent thefts" here would be sheer nonsense; and when we

recollect how easy it is to mistake _comit_ for _count_, the former word

being almost always thus written and often thus printed, we must, I think,

be convinced that in copying an interlineated MS., the printer _misplaced_

and _misprinted_ that word, and transposed _as_, if the repetition of it be

not also an error.--"For," commencing the parenthesis, "we would give much"

stands for _cause_. The emphasis should, I think, be {387} laid on _for_;

and _commit_ be accented on the first syllable. Thus the line, though of

twelve syllables, is not unmetrical; indeed much less prosaic than with the

old reading of _count_.

This correction, upon the principle which governs Messrs. Collier and

Knight, and which indeed should govern all of us,

"To lose no drop of that immortal man,"

ought to be satisfactory; for it is effected without taking away a letter.

The transposition of two evidently _misplaced_ words, and the correction of

a letter or two palpably misprinted in one of them, is the whole gentle

violence that has been used in a passage which has been, as we see,

considered desperate. But, as Pope sings:

"Our sacred Shakspeare,--comprehensive mind!

Who for all ages writ, and all mankind,

Has been to careless printers oft a prey,

Nor time, nor moth e'er spoil'd as much as they;

Let the right reading drive the cloud away,

And sense breaks on us with resistless day."

Notes and Queries, Number 54, November 9, 1850 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 10 / 72 题