“The Lord reigning for evermore, who disposes and governs all things by

his unspeakable power, who wonderfully determines the changes of times

and of men, and justly brings them to an uncertain end, according to

his pleasure; and who from the secret mysteries of nature mercifully

teaches us, how lasting, instead of fleeting and transitory, kingdoms

are to be obtained by the assistance of God: wherefore I Canute king

of England, and governor and ruler of the adjacent nations, by the

counsel and decree of our archbishop Ethelnoth, and of all the priests

of God, and by the advice of our nobility, do, for the love of heaven,

and the pardon of my sins, and the remission of the transgressions of

my brother, king Edmund, grant to the church of the holy mother of God,

Mary, at Glastonbury, its rights and customs throughout my kingdom, and

all forfeitures throughout its possessions, and that its lands shall

be free from all claim and vexation as my own are. Moreover, I inhibit

more especially, by the authority of the Almighty Father, Son, and

Holy Spirit, and the curse of the eternal Virgin, and so command it to

be observed by the judges and primates of my kingdom as they tender

their safety, every person, be they of what order or dignity they may,

from entering, on any account, that island;[239] but all causes,

ecclesiastical as well as secular, shall await the sole judgment of

the abbat and convent, in like manner as my predecessors have ratified

and confirmed by charters; that is to say, Kentwin, Ina, Cuthred,

Alfred, Edward, Ethelred, Athelstan, the most glorious Edmund, and the

equally glorious Edgar. And should any one hereafter endeavour, on any

occasion, to break in upon, or make void the enactment of this grant,

let him be driven from the communion of the righteous by the fan of

the last judgment; but should any person endeavour diligently, with

benevolent intention, to perform these things, to approve, and defend

them, may God increase his portion in the land of the living, through

the intercession of the most holy mother of God, Mary, and the rest of

the saints. The grant of this immunity was written and published in the

Wooden Church, in the presence of king Canute, in the year of our Lord

1032, the second indiction.”

By the advice of the said archbishop also, the king, sending money

to foreign churches, very much enriched Chartres, where at that time

flourished bishop Fulbert, most renowned for sanctity and learning.

Who, among other demonstrations of his diligence, very magnificently

completed the church of our lady St. Mary, the foundations of which he

had laid: and which moreover, in his zeal to do every thing he could

for its honour, he rendered celebrated by many musical modulations. The

man who has heard his chants, breathing only celestial vows, is best

able to conceive the love he manifested in honour of the Virgin. Among

his other works, a volume of epistles is extant; in one of which,[240]

he thanks that most magnificent king Canute, for pouring out the bowels

of his generosity in donations to the church of Chartres.

In the fifteenth year of Canute’s reign, Robert king of France, of

whom we have before briefly spoken, departed this life: a man so much

given to alms, that when, on festival days, he was either dressing, or

putting off the royal robes, if he had nothing else at hand, he would

give even these to the poor, if his attendants did not purposely drive

away the needy who were importuning him. He had two sons, Odo, and

Henry: the elder, Odo,[241] was dull: the other crafty and impetuous.

Each parent had severally divided their affections on their children:

the father loved the first-born, often saying that he should succeed

him: the mother regarded the younger, to whom the sovereignty was

justly due, if not for his age, yet certainly for his ability. It

happened, as women are persevering in their designs, that she did

not cease until, by means of presents, and large promises, she had

gotten to her side all the chief nobility who are subject to the power

of France. In consequence, Henry, chiefly through the assistance of

Robert the Norman, was crowned ere his father had well breathed his

last. Mindful of this kindness, when, as I before related, Robert went

to Jerusalem, Henry most strenuously espoused the cause of William,

his son, then a youth, against those who attempted to throw off his

yoke. In the meantime Canute, finishing his earthly career, died at

Shaftesbury, and was buried at Winchester.

CHAP. XII.

_Of king Harold and Hardecanute._ [A.D. 1036-1042.]

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1036.] HAROLD AND HARDECANUTE.]

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1041.] EXPULSION OF A BISHOP.]

In the year of our Lord’s incarnation 1036,[242] Harold, whom fame[243]

reported to be the son of Canute, by the daughter of earl Elfelm,

succeeded, and reigned four years and as many months. He was elected

by the Danes and the citizens of London, who, from long intercourse

with these barbarians, had almost entirely adopted their customs. The

English resisted for a long time, rather wishing to have one of the

sons of Ethelred, who were then in Normandy, or else Hardecanute, the

son of Canute by Emma, at that time in Denmark, for their king. The

greatest stickler for justice, at this juncture, was earl Godwin; who

professing himself the defender of the fatherless, and having queen

Emma and the royal treasures in his custody, for some time restrained

his opponents by the power of his name: but at last, overcome by

numbers and by violence, he was obliged to give way. Harold, secure in

his sovereignty, drove his mother-in-law into exile. Not thinking she

should be safe in Normandy, where, her brother and nephews being dead,

disgust at the rule of a deserted orphan created great disorders, she

passed over into Flanders, to earl Baldwin, a man of tried integrity:

who afterwards, when king Henry died leaving a young son, Philip,

for some years nobly governed the kingdom of France, and faithfully

restored it to him, for he had married his aunt, when he came of age.

Emma passed three years securely under the protection of this man,

at the expiration of which, Harold dying at Oxford, in the month of

April,[244] was buried at Westminster. The Danes and the English

then uniting in one common sentiment of sending for Hardecanute, he

came, by way of Normandy, into England in the month of August. For

Ethelred’s sons were held in contempt nearly by all, more from the

recollection of their father’s indolence, than the power of the Danes.

Hardecanute, reigning two years except ten days, lost his life amid

his cups at Lambeth nigh London, and was buried near his father at

Winchester: a young man who evinced great affection towards his brother

and sister. For his brother, Edward, wearied with continual wandering,

revisiting his native land in the hope of fraternal kindness, was

received by him with open arms, and entertained most affectionately.

He was rash, however, in other respects, and at the instigation of

Elfric, archbishop of York, and of others whom I am loath to name, he

ordered the dead body of Harold to be dug up, the head to be cut off,

and thrown into the Thames, a pitiable spectacle to men! but it was

dragged up again in a fisherman’s net, and buried in the cemetery of

the Danes at London. He imposed a rigid, and intolerable tribute upon

England, in order that he might pay, according to his promise, twenty

marks to the soldiers of each of his vessels. While this was harshly

levied throughout the kingdom, two of the collectors, discharging

their office rather too rigorously, were killed by the citizens of

Worcester; upon which, burning and depopulating the city by means of

his commanders, and plundering the property of the citizens, he cast a

blemish on his fame and diminished the love of his subjects. But here

I will not pass over in silence, what tattlers report of Alfred the

first-born of Ethelred. Doubtful what to do between Harold’s death and

the arrival of Hardecanute, he came into the kingdom, and was deprived

of his eyes by the treachery of his countrymen, and chiefly of Godwin,

at Gillingham: from thence being sent to the monastery of Ely, he

supported, for a little time, a wretched subsistence upon homely food;

all his companions, with the exception of the tenth, being beheaded:

for by lot every tenth man was saved.[245] I have mentioned these

circumstances, because such is the report; but as the Chronicles are

silent, I do not assert them for fact. For this reason, Hardecanute,

enraged against Living, bishop of Crediton, whom public opinion pointed

out as author of the transaction, expelled him from his see: but,

soothed with money, he restored him within the year. Looking angrily

too upon Godwin, he obliged him to clear himself by oath; but he, to

recover his favour entirely, added to his plighted oath a present of

the most rich and beautiful kind; it was a ship beaked with gold,

having eighty soldiers on board, who had two bracelets on either arm,

each weighing sixteen ounces of gold; on their heads were gilt helmets;

on their left shoulder they carried a Danish axe, with an iron spear in

their right hand; and, not to enumerate everything, they were equipped

with such arms, as that splendour vying with terror, might conceal

the steel beneath the gold. But farther, as I had begun to relate,

his sister Gunhilda, the daughter of Canute by Emma, a young woman of

exquisite beauty, who was sighed for, but not obtained, by many lovers

in her father’s time, was by Hardecanute given in marriage to Henry,

emperor of the Germans. The splendour of the nuptial pageant was very

striking, and is even in our times frequently sung in ballads about

the streets: where while this renowned lady was being conducted to the

ship, all the nobility of England were crowding around and contributing

to her charges whatever was contained in the general purse, or royal

treasury. Proceeding in this manner to her husband, she cherished for

a long time the conjugal tie; at length being accused of adultery,

she opposed in single combat to her accuser, a man of gigantic size,

a young lad of her brother’s[246] establishment, whom she had brought

from England, while her other attendants held back in cowardly

apprehension. When, therefore, they engaged, the impeacher, through

the miraculous interposition of God, was worsted, by being ham-strung.

Gunhilda, exulting at her unexpected success, renounced the marriage

contract with her husband; nor could she be induced either by threats

or by endearments again to share his bed: but taking the veil of a nun,

she calmly grew old in the service of God.

This emperor possessed many and great virtues; and nearly surpassed

in military skill all his predecessors: so much so, that he subdued

the Vindelici and the Leutici,[247] and the other nations bordering

on the Suevi, who alone, even to the present day, lust after pagan

superstitions: for the Saracens and Turks worship God the Creator,

looking upon Mahomet not as God, but as his prophet. But the Vindelici

worship fortune, and putting her idol in the most eminent situation,

they place a horn in her right hand, filled with that beverage, made

of honey and water, which by a Greek term we call “hydromel.” St.

Jerome proves, in his eighteenth book on Isaiah, that the Egyptians

and almost all the eastern nations do the same. Wherefore on the last

day of November, sitting round in a circle, they all taste it; and if

they find the horn full, they applaud with loud clamours: because in

the ensuing year, plenty with her brimming horn will fulfil their

wishes in everything: but if it be otherwise, they lament. Henry made

these nations in such wise tributary to him, that upon every solemnity

on which he wore his crown, four of their kings were obliged to carry

a cauldron in which flesh was boiled, upon their shoulders, to the

kitchen, by means of levers passed through rings.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1041.] ANECDOTES OF EMPEROR HENRY III.]

Frequently, when disengaged from the turmoils of his empire, Henry

gave himself up to good fellowship and merriment, and was replete with

humour; this may be sufficiently proved by two instances. He was so

extremely fond of his sister, who was a nun, that he never suffered

her to be from his side, and her chamber was always next his own. As

he was on a certain time, in consequence of a winter remarkable for

severe frost and snow, detained for a long while in the same place, a

certain clerk[248] about the court, became too familiar with the girl,

and often passed the greatest part of the night in her chamber. And

although he attempted to conceal his crime by numberless subterfuges,

yet some one perceived it, for it is difficult not to betray guilt

either by look or action, and the affair becoming notorious, the

emperor was the only person in ignorance, and who still believed

his sister to be chaste. On one particular night, however, as they

were enjoying their fond embraces, and continuing their pleasures

longer than usual, the morning dawned upon them, and behold snow

had completely covered the ground. The clerk fearing that he should

be discovered by his track in the snow, persuades his mistress to

extricate him from his difficulty by carrying him on her back. She,

regardless of modesty so that she might escape exposure, took her

paramour on her back, and carried him out of the palace. It happened at

that moment, that the emperor had risen for a necessary purpose, and

looking through the window of his chamber, beheld the clerk mounted. He

was stupified at the first sight, but observing still more narrowly,

he became mute with shame and indignation. While he was hesitating

whether he should pass over the crime unpunished, or openly reprehend

the delinquents, there happened an opportunity for him to give a vacant

bishopric to the clerk, which he did: but at the same time whispered in

his ear, “Take the bishopric, but be careful you do not let women carry

you any more.” At the same time he gave his sister the rule over a

company of nuns, “Be an abbess,” said he, “but carry clerks no longer.”

Both of them were confused, and feeling themselves grievously stricken

by so grave an injunction, they desisted from a crime which they

thought revealed by God.

He had also a clergyman about his palace, who abused the depth of his

learning and the melody of his voice by the vicious propensities of

the flesh, being extremely attached to a girl of bad character, in the

town; with whom having passed one festival night, he stood next morning

before the emperor at mass, with countenance unabashed. The emperor

concealing his knowledge of the transaction, commanded him to prepare

himself to read the gospel, that he might be gratified with the melody

of his voice: for he was a deacon. Conscious of his crime, he made use

of a multitude of subterfuges, while the emperor, to try his constancy,

still pressed him with messages. Refusing, however, to the very last,

the emperor said, “Since you will not obey me in so easy a command, I

banish you from the whole of my territories.” The deacon, yielding to

the sentence, departed directly. Servants were sent to follow him, and

in case he should persist in going, to bring him back after he had left

the city. Gathering, therefore, immediately all his effects together,

and packing them up, he had already gone a considerable distance,

when he was brought back, not without extreme violence, and placed in

the presence of Henry, who smiled and said: “You have done well, and

I applaud your integrity for valuing the fear of God more than your

country, and regarding the displeasure of heaven more than my threats.

Accept, therefore, the first bishopric, which shall be vacant in my

empire; only renounce your dishonourable amour.”

As nothing however is lasting in human enjoyments, I shall not pass

over in silence a certain dreadful portent which happened in his time.

The monastery of Fulda, in Saxony, is celebrated for containing the

body of St. Gall, and is enriched with very ample territories. The

abbat of this place furnishes the emperor with sixty thousand warriors

against his enemies; and possesses from ancient times the privilege

of sitting at his right hand on the most distinguished festivals.

This Henry we are speaking of was celebrating Pentecost at Mentz. A

little before mass, while the seats were preparing in the church, a

quarrel arose between the attendants of the abbat, and those of the

archbishop, which of their masters should sit next the sovereign: one

party alleging the dignity of the prelate, the other ancient usage.

When words made but little for peace, as the Germans and Teutonians

possess untractable spirits, they came to blows. Some snatched up

staves, others threw stones, while the rest unsheathed their swords:

finally each used the weapon that his anger first supplied. Thus

furiously contending in the church, the pavement soon streamed with

blood: but the bishops hastening forward, peace was restored amid

the remains of the contending parties. The church was cleansed, and

mass performed with joyful sound. But now comes the wonder: when

the sequence was chanted, and the choir paused at that verse, “Thou

hast made this day glorious:” a voice in the air replied aloud, “I

have made this day contentious.” All the others were motionless with

horror, but the emperor the more diligently attended to his occupation,

and perceiving the satisfaction of the enemy: “You,” said he, “the

inventor and also the instigator of all wickedness, have made this day

contentious and sorrowful to the proud; but we, by the grace of God,

who made it glorious, will make it gracious to the poor.” Beginning the

sequence afresh, they implored the grace of the Holy Spirit by solemn

lamentation. You might suppose he had come upon them, for some were

singing, others weeping, and all beating their breasts. When mass was

over, assembling the poor by means of his officers, he gave them the

whole of the entertainment which had been prepared for himself and his

courtiers: the emperor placing the dishes before them, standing at a

distance according to the custom of servants, and clearing away the

fragments.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1042.] HENRY’S BENEFICENCE.]

In the time of his father, Conrad, he had received a silver pipe, such

as boys in sport spirt water with, from a certain clerk, covenanting to

give him a bishopric, when he should become emperor. This, when he was

of man’s estate, on his application he readily gave to him. Soon after

he was confined to his bed with severe sickness: his malady increasing,

he lay for three days insensible and speechless, while the vital breath

only palpitated in his breast: nor was there any other sign of life,

than the perception of a small degree of breathing, on applying the

hand to his nostrils. The bishops being present, enjoined a fast for

three days, and entreated heaven with tears and vows, for the life of

the king. Recovering by these remedies, as it is right to think, he

sent for the bishop whom he had so improperly appointed, and deposed

him by the judgment of a council: confessing, that for three whole days

he saw malignant demons blowing fire upon him through a pipe; fire so

furious that ours in comparison would be deemed a jest, and have no

heat: that afterwards there came a young man half scorched, bearing a

golden cup of immense size, full of water; and that being soothed by

the sight of him, and bathed by the water, the flame was extinguished,

and he recovered his health: that this young man was St. Laurence, the

roof of whose church he had restored when gone to decay; and, among

other presents, had honoured it with a golden chalice.

Here many extraordinary things occur, which are reported of this man;

for instance, of a stag, which took him on its back, when flying from

his enemies, and carried him over an unfordable river: and some others

which I pass by because I am unwilling to go beyond the reader’s

belief. He died when he had completed the eighteenth year of his

empire, and was buried at Spires, which he re-built, and called by that

name, on the site of the very ancient and ruined Nemetum: his epitaph

is as follows:

Cæsar, as was the world once great,

Lies here, confin’d in compass straight.

Hence let each mortal learn his doom;

No glory can escape the tomb.

The flower of empire, erst so gay,

Falls with its Cæsar to decay,

And all the odours which it gave

Sink prematurely to the grave.

The laws which sapient fathers made,

A listless race had dared evade,

But thou reforming by the school

Of Rome, restor’dst the ancient rule.

Nations and regions, wide and far,

Whom none could subjugate by war,

Quell’d by thy sword’s resistless strife,

Turn’d to the arts of civil life.

What grief severe must Rome engross,

Widow’d at first by Leo’s loss,

And next by Cæsar’s mournful night,

Reft of her other shining light;

Living, what region did not dread,

What country not lament thee, dead?

So kind to nations once subdued,

So fierce to the barbarians rude,

That, those who fear’d not, must bewail,

And such as griev’d not, fears assail.

Rome, thy departed glory moan,

And weep thy luminaries gone.

This Leo, of whom the epitaph speaks, had been Roman pontiff, called to

that eminence from being Bruno bishop of Spires. He was a man of great

and admirable sanctity; and the Romans celebrate many of his miracles.

He died before Henry, when he had been five years pope.

CHAP. XIII.

_Of St. Edward, son of king Ethelred._ [A.D. 1042-1066.]

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1042, 1043.] EDWARD THE CONFESSOR.]

In the year of our Lord’s incarnation 1042, St. Edward, the son of

Ethelred, assumed the sovereignty, and held it not quite twenty-four

years; he was a man from the simplicity of his manners little

calculated to govern; but devoted to God, and in consequence directed

by him. For while he continued to reign, there arose no popular

commotions, which were not immediately quelled; no foreign war; all was

calm and peaceable both at home and abroad; which is the more an object

of wonder, because he conducted himself so mildly, that he would not

even utter a word of reproach to the meanest person. For when he had

once gone out to hunt, and a countryman had overturned the standings by

which the deer are driven into the toils, struck with noble indignation

he exclaimed, “By God and his mother, I will serve you just such a

turn, if ever it come in my way.” Here was a noble mind, who forgot

that he was a king, under such circumstances, and could not think

himself allowed to injure a man even of the lowest condition. In the

meantime, the regard his subjects entertained for him was extreme,

as was also the fear of foreigners; for God assisted his simplicity,

that he might be feared, for he knew not how to be angry. But however

indolent or unassuming himself might be esteemed, he had nobles capable

of elevating him to the highest pitch: for instance, Siward, earl of

the Northumbrians; who, at his command, engaging with Macbeth, the

Scottish king, deprived him both of life and of his kingdom, and placed

on the throne Malcolm, who was the son of the king of Cumbria:[249]

again, Leofric, of Hereford; he, with liberal regard, defended him

against the enmity of Godwin, who trusting to the consciousness of his

own merits, paid little reverence to the king. Leofric and his wife

Godifa, generous in their deeds towards God, built many monasteries,

as, Coventry, St. Mary’s at Stow, Wenlock, Leon, and some others; to

the rest he gave ornaments and estates; to Coventry he consigned his

body, with a very large donation of gold and silver. Harold too, of

the West Saxons, the son of Godwin; who by his abilities destroyed

two brothers, kings of the Welsh, Rees and Griffin; and reduced all

that barbarous country to the state of a province under fealty to the

king. Nevertheless, there were some things which obscured the glory of

Edward’s times: the monasteries were deprived of their monks; false

sentences were passed by depraved men; his mother’s property, at his

command, was almost entirely taken from her. But the injustice of these

transactions was extenuated by his favourers in the following manner:

the ruin of the monasteries, and the iniquity of the judges, are said

to have taken place without his knowledge, through the insolence of

Godwin and his sons, who used to laugh at the easiness of the king:

but afterwards, on being apprised of this, he severely avenged it by

their banishment: his mother had for a long time mocked at the needy

state of her son, nor ever assisted him; transferring her hereditary

hatred of the father to the child; for she had both loved Canute more

when living, and more commended him when dead: besides, accumulating

money by every method, she had hoarded it, regardless of the poor,

to whom she would give nothing, for fear of diminishing her heap.

Wherefore that which had been so unjustly gathered together, was not

improperly taken away, that it might be of service to the poor, and

replenish the king’s exchequer. Though much credit is to be attached

to those who relate these circumstances, yet I find her to have been

a religiously-disposed woman, and to have expended her property on

ornaments for the church of Winchester, and probably upon others.[250]

But to return: Edward receiving the mournful intelligence of the death

of Hardecanute, was lost in uncertainty what to do, or whither to

betake himself. While he was revolving many things in his mind, it

occurred as the better plan to submit his situation to the opinion

of Godwin. To Godwin therefore he sent messengers, requesting, that

he might in security have a conference with him. Godwin, though for

a long time hesitating and reflecting, at length assented, and when

Edward came to him and endeavoured to fall at his feet, he raised

him up; and when relating the death of Hardecanute, and begging his

assistance to effect his return to Normandy, Godwin made him the

greatest promises. He said, it was better for him to live with credit

in power, than to die ingloriously in exile: that he was the son of

Ethelred, the grandson of Edgar: that the kingdom was his due: that

he was come to mature age, disciplined by difficulties, conversant in

the art of well-governing from his years, and knowing, from his former

poverty, how to feel for the miseries of the people: if he thought

fit to rely on him, there could be no obstacle; for his authority so

preponderated in England, that wherever he inclined, there fortune was

sure to favour: if he assisted him, none would dare to murmur; and just

so was the contrary side of the question: let him then only covenant a

firm friendship with himself; undiminished honours for his sons, and a

marriage with his daughter, and he who was now shipwrecked almost of

life and hope, and imploring the assistance of another, should shortly

see himself a king.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1043.] EARL GODWIN.]

There was nothing which Edward would not promise, from the exigency of

the moment: so, pledging fidelity on both sides, he confirmed by oath

every thing which was demanded. Soon after convening an assembly at

Gillingham, Godwin, unfolding his reasons, caused him to be received

as king, and homage was paid to him by all. He was a man of ready

wit, and spoke fluently in the vernacular tongue; powerful in speech,

powerful in bringing over the people to whatever he desired. Some

yielded to his authority; some were influenced by presents; others

admitted the right of Edward; and the few who resisted in defiance of

justice and equity, were carefully marked, and afterwards driven out of

England.

Edward was crowned with great pomp at Winchester, on Easter-day, and

was instructed by Eadsine,[251] the archbishop, in the sacred duties

of governing. This, at the time, he treasured up with readiness in

his memory, and afterwards displayed in the holiness of his conduct.

The above-mentioned Eadsine, in the following year, falling into

an incurable disease, appointed as his successor Siward, abbat of

Abingdon; communicating his design only to the king and the earl, lest

any improper person should aspire to so great an eminence, either by

solicitation or by purchase. Shortly after the king took Edgitha, the

daughter of Godwin, to wife; a woman whose bosom was the school of

every liberal art, though little skilled in earthly matters: on seeing

her, if you were amazed at her erudition, you must absolutely languish

for the purity of her mind, and the beauty of her person. Both in her

husband’s life-time, and afterwards, she was not entirely free from

suspicion of dishonour; but when dying, in the time of king William,

she voluntarily satisfied the by-standers of her unimpaired chastity,

by an oath. When she became his wife, the king acted towards her so

delicately, that he neither removed her from his bed, nor knew her

after the manner of men. I have not been able to discover, whether he

acted thus from dislike to her family, which he prudently dissembled

from the exigency of the times, or out of pure regard to chastity: yet

it is most notoriously affirmed, that he never violated his purity by

connexion with any woman.

But since I have gotten thus far, I wish to admonish my reader, that

the track of my history is here but dubious, because the truth of

the facts hangs in suspense. It is to be observed, that the king had

sent for several Normans, who had formerly slightly ministered to

his wants when in exile. Among these was Robert, whom, from being a

monk of Jumièges, he had appointed bishop of London, and afterwards

archbishop of Canterbury. The English of our times vilify this person,

together with the rest, as being the impeacher of Godwin and his sons;

the sower of discord; the purchaser of the archbishopric: they say

too, that Godwin and his sons were men of liberal mind, the stedfast

promoters and defenders of the government of Edward; and that it was

not to be wondered at, if they were hurt at seeing men of yesterday,

and strangers, preferred to themselves: still, that they never uttered

even a harsh word against the king, whom they had formerly exalted to

the throne. On the opposite hand the Normans thus defended themselves:

they allege, that both himself and his sons acted with the greatest

want of respect, as well as fidelity, to the king and his party; aiming

at equal sovereignty with him; often ridiculing his simplicity; often

hurling the shafts of their wit against him: that the Normans could not

endure this, but endeavoured to weaken their power as much as possible;

and that God manifested, at last, with what kind of purity Godwin had

served him. For, after his piratical ravages, of which we shall speak

hereafter, when he had been reinstated in his original favour, and was

sitting with the king at table, the conversation turning on Alfred,

the king’s brother, “I perceive,” said he, “O king, that on every

recollection of your brother, you regard me with angry countenance; but

God forbid that I should swallow this morsel, if I am conscious of any

thing which might tend, either to his danger or your disadvantage.” On

saying this, he was choked with the piece he had put into his mouth,

and closed his eyes in death: being dragged from under the table by

Harold his son, who stood near the king, he was buried in the cathedral

of Winchester.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1044-1052.] PARTIES AND FEUDS.]

On account of these feuds, as I have observed, my narrative labours

under difficulties, for I cannot precisely ascertain the truth, by

reason either of the natural dislike of these nations for each other,

or because the English disdainfully bear with a superior, and the

Normans cannot endure an equal. In the following book, however, when

the opportunity occurs for relating the arrival of the Normans in

England, I shall proceed to speak of their habits; at present I shall

glance, with all possible truth, at the grudge of the king against

Godwin and his sons.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1050.] GODWIN BANISHED.]

Eustace,[252] earl of Boulogne, the father of Godfrey and Baldwin, who,

in our times, were kings of Jerusalem, had married the king’s sister,

Goda, who had borne a son, named Ralph, to her former husband, Walter

of Mantes. This son, at that time earl of Hereford, was both indolent

and cowardly; he had been beaten in battle by the Welsh, and left his

county and the city, together with the bishop, to be consumed with fire

by the enemy; the disgrace of which transaction was wiped off by the

valour of Harold, who arrived opportunely. Eustace, therefore, crossing

the channel, from Whitsand to Dover, went to king Edward on some

unknown business. When the conference was over, and he had obtained his

request, he was returning through Canterbury,[253] where one of his

harbingers, dealing too fiercely with a citizen, and demanding quarters

with blows, rather than entreaty or remuneration, irritated him to

such a degree, that he put him to death. Eustace, on being informed

of the fact, proceeded with all his retinue to revenge the murder of

his servant, and killed the perpetrator of the crime, together with

eighteen others: but the citizens flying to arms, he lost twenty-one

of his people, and had multitudes wounded; himself and one more with

difficulty making their escape during the confusion. Thence returning

to court and procuring a secret audience, he made the most of his own

story, and excited the anger of the king against the English. Godwin,

being summoned by messengers, arrived at the palace. When the business

was related, and the king was dwelling more particularly on the

insolence of the citizens of Canterbury, this intelligent man perceived

that sentence ought not to be pronounced, since the allegations had

only been heard on one side of the question. In consequence, though the

king ordered him directly to proceed with an army into Kent, to take

signal vengeance on the people of Canterbury, still he refused: both

because he saw with displeasure, that all foreigners were gaining fast

upon the favour of the king; and because he was desirous of evincing

his regard to his countrymen. Besides, his opinion was more accordant,

as it should seem, with equity, which was, that the principal people

of that town should be mildly summoned to the king’s court, on account

of the tumult; if they could exculpate themselves, they should depart

unhurt; but if they could not, they must make atonement, either by

money, or by corporal punishment, to the king, whose peace they had

broken, and to the earl, whom they had injured: moreover, that it

appeared unjust to pass sentence on those people unheard, who had a

more especial right to protection. After this the conference broke

up; Godwin paying little attention to the indignation of the king, as

merely momentary. In consequence of this, the nobility of the whole

kingdom were commanded to meet at Gloucester, that the business might

there be canvassed in full assembly. Thither came those, at that time,

most renowned Northumbrian earls, Siward and Leofric, and all the

nobility of England. Godwin and his sons alone, who knew that they

were suspected, not deeming it prudent to be present unarmed, halted

with a strong force at Beverstone, giving out that they had assembled

an army to restrain the Welsh, who, meditating independence on the

king, had fortified a town in the county of Hereford, where Sweyn,

one of the sons of Godwin, was at that time in command. The Welsh,

however, who had come beforehand to the conference, had accused them of

a conspiracy, and rendered them odious to the whole court; so that a

rumour prevailed, that the king’s army would attack them in that very

place. Godwin, hearing this, sounded the alarm to his party; told them

that they should not purposely withstand their sovereign lord; but

if it came to hostilities, they should not retreat without avenging

themselves. And, if better counsels had not intervened, a dreadful

scene of misery, and a worse than civil war, would have ensued. Some

small share of tranquillity, however, being restored, it was ordered

that the council should be again assembled at London; and that Sweyn,

the son of Godwin, should appease the king’s anger by withdrawing

himself: that Godwin and Harold should come as speedily as possible to

the council, with this condition: that they should be unarmed, bring

with them only twelve men, and deliver up to the king the command of

the troops which they had throughout England. This on the other hand

they refused; observing, that they could not go to a party-meeting

without sureties and pledges; that they would obey their lord in the

surrender of the soldiers, as well as in every thing else, except

risking their lives and reputation: should they come unarmed, the loss

of life might be apprehended; if attended with few followers, it would

detract from their glory. The king had made up his mind too firmly, to

listen to the entreaties of those who interceded with him; wherefore an

edict was published, that they should depart from England within five

days. Godwin and Sweyn retired to Flanders, and Harold to Ireland. His

earldom was given to Elgar, the son of Leofric, a man of active habits;

who, receiving, governed it with ability, and readily restored it to

him on his return; and afterwards, on the death of Godwin, when Harold

had obtained the dukedom of his father, he boldly reclaimed it, though,

by the accusation of his enemies, he was banished for a time. All

the property of the queen was seized, and herself delivered into the

custody of the king’s sister at Wherwell, lest she alone should be void

of care, whilst all her relations were sighing for their country.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1051.] RETURN OF GODWIN.]

The following year, the exiles, each emerging from his station,

were now cruising the British sea, infesting the coast with piracy,

and carrying off rich booty from the substance of their countrymen.

Against these, on the king’s part, more than sixty sail lay at anchor.

Earls Odo and Ralph, relations of the king, were commanders of the

fleet. Nor did this emergency find Edward himself inactive; since

he would pass the night on ship-board, and watch the sallies of the

plunderers; diligently compensating, by the wisdom of his counsel,

for that personal service which age and infirmity denied. But when

they had approached each other, and the conflict was on the eve of

commencing, a very thick mist arose, which in a moment obscured the

sight of the opponents, and repressed the pitiable audacity of men.

At last Godwin and his companions were driven, by the impetuosity of

the wind, to the port they had left; and not long after returning to

their own country with pacific dispositions, they found the king at

London, and were received by him on soliciting pardon. The old man,

skilled in leading the minds of his audience by his reputation and his

eloquence, dexterously exculpated himself from every thing laid to

his charge; and in a short time prevailed so far, as to recover his

honours, undiminished, for himself and for his children; to drive all

the Normans, branded with ignominy, from England; and to get sentence

passed on Robert, the archbishop, and his accomplices, for disturbing

the order of the kingdom and stimulating the royal mind against his

subjects. But he, not waiting for violent measures, had fled of his

own accord while the peace was in agitation, and proceeding to Rome,

and appealing to the apostolical see on his case, as he was returning

through Jumièges, he died there, and was buried in the church of St.

Mary, which he chiefly had built at vast expense. While he was yet

living, Stigand, who was bishop of Winchester, forthwith invaded the

archbishopric of Canterbury: a prelate of notorious ambition, who

sought after honours too keenly, and who, through desire of a higher

dignity, deserting the bishopric of the South Saxons, had occupied

Winchester, which he held with the archbishopric. For this reason he

was never honoured with the pall by the papal see, except that one

Benedict, the usurper, as it were, of the papacy, sent him one; either

corrupted by money to grant a thing of this kind, or else because bad

people are pleased to gratify others of the same description. But

he, through the zeal of the faithful, being expelled by Nicholas,

who legally assumed the papacy from being bishop of Florence, laid

aside the title he so little deserved. Stigand, moreover, in the

time of king William, degraded by the Roman cardinals and condemned

to perpetual imprisonment, could not fill up the measure of his

insatiable avidity even in death. For on his decease, a small key was

discovered among his secret recesses, which on being applied to the

lock of a chamber-cabinet, gave evidence of papers, describing immense

treasures, and in which were noted both the quality and the quantity of

the precious metals which this greedy pilferer had hidden on all his

estates: but of this hereafter: I shall now complete the history of

Godwin which I had begun.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1065.] GODWIN’S FAMILY.]

When he was a young man he had Canute’s sister to wife, by whom he

had a son, who in his early youth, while proudly curveting on a horse

which his grandfather had given him, was carried into the Thames,

and perished in the stream: his mother, too, paid the penalty of her

cruelty; being killed by a stroke of lightning. For it is reported,

that she was in the habit of purchasing companies of slaves in England,

and sending them into Denmark; more especially girls, whose beauty and

age rendered them more valuable, that she might accumulate money by

this horrid traffic. After her death, he married another wife,[254]

whose descent I have not been able to trace; by her he had Harold,

Sweyn, Wulnod, Tosty, Girth, and Leofwine. Harold became king for a few

months after Edward; and being overcome by William at Hastings, there

lost his life and kingdom, together with his two younger brothers.

Wulnod, given by his father as an hostage, was sent over to Normandy

by king Edward, where he remained all that king’s time in inextricable

captivity; and being sent back into England during William’s reign,

grew old in confinement at Salisbury: Sweyn being of an obstinate

disposition, and faithless to the king, frequently revolted from his

father, and his brother Harold, and turning pirate, tarnished the

virtues of his forefathers, by his depredations on the coast: at last

struck with remorse for the murder of Bruno,[255] a relation, or as

some say, his brother, he went to Jerusalem, and returning thence was

surprised by the Saracens, and put to death: Tosty, after the death of

Siward, was preferred to the earldom of Northumbria by king Edward,

and presided over that province for nearly ten years; at the end of

which he impelled the Northumbrians to rebel, by the asperity of his

manners. For finding him unattended, they drove him from the district;

not deeming it proper to kill him, from respect to his dignity: but

they put to death his attendants both English and Danes, appropriating

to their own use, his horses, his arms, and his effects. As soon as

this rumour, and the distracted state of the country reached the king,

Harold set forward to avenge the outrage. The Northumbrians, though not

inferior in point of numbers, yet preferring peace, excused themselves

to him for the transaction; averring, that they were a people

free-born, and freely educated, and unable to put up with the cruelty

of any prince; that they had been taught by their ancestors either to

be free, or to die; did the king wish them to be obedient, he should

appoint Morcar, the son of Elgar, to preside over them, who would

experience how cheerfully they could obey, provided they were treated

with gentleness. On hearing this, Harold, who regarded the quiet of

the country more than the advantage of his brother, recalled his

army, and, after waiting on the king, settled the earldom on Morcar.

Tosty, enraged against every one, retired with his wife and children

to Flanders, and continued there till the death of Edward: but this I

shall delay mentioning, while I record what, as I have learned from

ancient men, happened in his time at Rome.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1065.] CHARACTER OF GREGORY VI.]

Pope Gregory the Sixth,[256] first called Gratian, was a man of equal

piety and strictness. He found the power of the Roman pontificate so

reduced by the negligence of his predecessors, that, with the exception

of a few neighbouring towns, and the offerings of the faithful, he had

scarcely anything whereon to subsist. The cities and possessions at a

distance, which were the property of the church, were forcibly seized

by plunderers; the public roads and highways throughout all Italy were

thronged with robbers to such a degree, that no pilgrim could pass in

safety unless strongly guarded. Swarms of thieves beset every path,

nor could the traveller devise any method of escaping them. Their rage

was equally bent against the poor and the rich; entreaty or resistance

were alike unavailing. The journey to Rome was discontinued by every

nation, as each had much rather contribute his money to the churches in

his own country, than feed a set of plunderers with the produce of his

labours. And what was the state of that city which of old was the only

dwelling-place of holiness? Why there an abandoned set of knaves and

assassins thronged the very forum. If any one by stratagem eluded the

people who lay in wait upon the road, from a desire even at the peril

of destruction to see the church of the apostle; yet then, encountering

these robbers, he was never able to return home without the loss either

of property or of life. Even over the very bodies of the holy apostles

and martyrs, even on the sacred altars were swords unsheathed, and the

offerings of pilgrims, ere well laid out of their hands, were snatched

away and consumed in drunkenness and fornication. By such evils was

the papacy of Gregory beset. At first he began to deal gently with his

subjects; and, as became a pontiff, rather by love than by terror; he

repressed the delinquents more by words than by blows; he entreated

the townsmen to abstain from the molestation of pilgrims, and the

plunder of sacred offerings. The one, he said, was contrary to nature,

that the man who breathed the common air could not enjoy the common

peace; that Christians surely ought to have liberty of proceeding

whither they pleased among Christians, since they were all of the same

household, all united by the tie of the same blood, redeemed by the

same price: the other, he said, was contrary to the command of God,

who had ordained, that “they who served at the altar, should live by

the altar;” moreover, that “the house of God ought to be the house of

prayer, not a den of thieves,” nor an assembly of gladiators; that

they should allow the offerings to go to the use of the priests, or

the support of the poor; that he would provide for those persons whom

want had compelled to plunder, by giving them some honest employment to

procure their subsistence; that such as were instigated by avaricious

desire, should desist immediately for the love of God and the credit of

the world. He invited, by mandates and epistles, those who had invaded

the patrimony of the church, to restore what did not belong to them, or

else to prove in the Roman senate, that they held it justly; if they

would do neither, they must be told that they were no longer members

of the church, since they opposed St. Peter, the head of the church,

and his vicar. Perpetually haranguing to this effect, and little or

nothing profiting by it, he endeavoured to cure the inveterate disorder

by having recourse to harsher remedies. He then separated from the body

of the church, by the brand of excommunication, all who were guilty of

such practices, and even those who associated or conversed with the

delinquents. Though he acted strictly according to his duty, yet his

diligence in this business had well nigh proved his destruction; for

as one says, “He who accuses a mocker, makes himself an enemy,” so the

abandoned crew began to kick against this gentle admonition; to utter

their threats aloud; to clash their arms around the walls of the city,

so as nearly even to kill the pope. Finding it now absolutely necessary

to cut short the evil, he procured arms and horses from every side,

and equipped troops of horse and foot. Taking possession, in the first

place, of the church of St. Peter, he either killed or put to flight

the plunderers of the oblations. As fortune appeared to favour his

designs, he proceeded farther; and despatching all who dared resist,

restored to their original jurisdiction all the estates and towns which

had been for a considerable time lost, In this manner, peace, which

had been long driven into banishment by the negligence of many, was

restored to the country by the exertions of an individual. Pilgrims now

began securely to travel on the public ways, which had been deserted;

they feasted their eyes with pleasure on the ancient wonders within

the city; and, having made their offerings, they returned home with

songs of joy. In the meantime the common people of Rome, who had been

accustomed to live by theft, began to call him sanguinary, and not

worthy to offer sacrifice to God, since he was stained by so many

murders; and, as it generally happens that the contagion of slander

spreads universally, even the cardinals themselves joined in the

sentiments of the people; so that, when this holy man was confined by

the sickness which proved his death, they, after consulting among

themselves, with matchless insolence recommended him not to think of

ordering himself to be buried in the church of St. Peter with the rest

of the popes, since he had polluted his office by being accessory

to the death of so many men. Resuming spirit, however, and sternly

regarding them, he addressed them in the following manner:

“If you possessed either a single spark of human reason, or of the

knowledge of divine truth, you would hardly have approached your

pontiff with so inconsiderate an address; for, throughout my whole

life, I have dissipated my own patrimony for your advantage, and at

last have sacrificed the applause of the world for your rescue. If any

other persons were to allege what you urge in defamation of me, it

would become you to silence them by explaining away the false opinions

of fools. For whom, I pray you, have I laid up treasure? For myself

perhaps? and yet I already possessed the treasures of my predecessors,

which were enough for any man’s covetousness. To whom have I restored

safety and liberty? You will reply, to myself perhaps? And yet I

was adored by the people, and did, without restraint, whatever I

pleased; entire orations teemed with my praises; every day resounded

my applause. These praises and these applauses have been lost to me,

through my concern for your poverty. Towards you I turned my thoughts;

and found that I must adopt severer measures. A sacrilegious robber

fattened on the produce of your property, while your subsistence was

only from day to day. He, from the offerings belonging to you, was clad

in costly silk; while you, in mean and tattered clothing, absolutely

grieved my sight. In consequence, when I could endure this no longer, I

acted with hostility to others, that I might get credit for the clergy,

though at the loss of the citizens. However, I now find I have lavished

my favours on the ungrateful; for you publicly proclaim what others

mutter only in secret. I approve, indeed, your freedom, but I look

in vain for your affection. A dying parent is persecuted by his sons

concerning his burial. Will you deny me the house common to all living?

The harlot, the usurer, the robber, are not forbidden an entrance

to the church, and do you refuse it to the pope? What signifies it

whether the dead or the living enter the sanctuary, except it be, that

the living is subject to many temptations, so that he cannot be free

from spot even in the church; often finding matter of sin in the very

place where he had come to wash it away; whereas the dead knows not

how, nay, he who wants only his last sad office, has not the power to

sin. What savage barbarity then is it to exclude from the house of God

him in whom both the inclination and the power of sinning have ceased!

Repent, then, my sons, of your precipitate boldness, if perchance God

may forgive you this crime, for you have spoken both foolishly and

bitterly even to this present hour. But that you may not suppose me to

rest merely on my own authority, listen to reason. Every act of man

ought to be considered according to the intention of his heart, that

the examination of the deed may proceed to that point whence the design

originated; I am deceived if the Truth does not say the same; ‘If thine

eye be simple thy whole body shall be full of light; if evil, all thy

body shall be dark.’ A wretched pauper hath often come to me to relieve

his distress. As I knew not what was about to happen, I have presented

him with divers pieces of money, and dismissed him. On his departure

he has met with a thief on the public road, has incautiously fallen

into conversation with him, proclaimed the kindness of the apostolical

see, and, to prove the truth of his words, produced the purse. On

their journey the way has been beguiled with various discourse, until

the dissembler, loitering somewhat behind, has felled the stranger

with a club, and immediately despatched him; and, after carrying off

his money, has boasted of a murder which his thirst for plunder had

excited. Can you, therefore, justly accuse me for giving that to a

stranger which was the cause of his death? for even the most cruel

person would not murder a man unless he hoped to fill his pockets with

the money. What shall I say of civil and ecclesiastical laws? By these

is not the self-same fact both punished and approved under different

circumstances? The thief is punished for murdering a man in secret,

whereas the soldier is applauded who destroys his enemy in battle; the

homicide, then, is ignominious in one and laudable in the other, as

the latter committed it for the safety of his country, the former for

the gratification of his desire for plunder. My predecessor Adrian the

First, of renowned memory, was applauded for giving up the investiture

of the churches to Charles the Great; so that no person elected could

be consecrated by the bishop till the king had first dignified him with

the ring and staff: on the other hand the pontiffs of our time have

got credit for taking away these appointments from the princes. What

at that time, then, might reasonably be granted, may at the present

be reasonably taken away. But why so? Because the mind of Charles the

Great was not assailable by avarice, nor could any person easily find

access unless he entered by the door. Besides, at so vast a distance,

it could not be required of the papal see to grant its consent to each

person elected, so long as there was a king at hand who disposed of

nothing through avarice, but always appointed religious persons to

the churches, according to the sacred ordinances of the canons. At

the present time luxury and ambition have beset every king’s palace;

wherefore the spouse of Christ deservedly asserts her liberty, lest

a tyrant should prostitute to an ambitious usurper. Thus, on either

side, may my cause be denied or affirmed; it is not the office of a

bishop either himself to fight, or to command others to do so; but it

belongs to a bishop’s function, if he see innocence made shipwreck of,

to oppose both hand and tongue. Ezekiel accuses the priests for not

strongly opposing and holding forth a shield for the house of Israel in

the day of the Lord. Now there are two persons in the church of God,

appointed for the purpose of repressing crimes; one who can rebuke

sharply; the other, who can wield the sword. I, as you can witness for

me, have not neglected my part; as far as I saw it could profit, I

did rebuke sharply. I sent a message to him whose business it was to

bear the sword; he wrote me word back, that he was occupied in his war

with the Vandals, entreating me not to spare my labour nor his expense

in breaking up the meetings of the plunderers. If I had refused,

what excuse could I offer to God after the emperor had delegated his

office to me? Could I see the murder of the townspeople, the robbery

of the pilgrims, and slumber on? But he who spares a thief, kills the

innocent. Yet it will be objected that it is not the part of a priest

to defile himself with the blood of any one: I grant it. But he does

not defile himself, who frees the innocent by the destruction of the

guilty. Blessed, truly blessed, are they who always keep judgment and

do justice. Phineas and Mattathias were priests most renowned in fame,

both crowned with the sacred mitre, and both habited in sacerdotal

garb; and yet they both punished the wicked with their own hands. The

one transfixed the guilty couple with a javelin: the other mingled the

blood of the sacrificer with the sacrifice. If then those persons,

regarding, as it were, the thick darkness of the law, were, through

divine zeal, transported for mysteries, the shadows only of those which

were to be; shall we, who see the truth with perfect clearness, suffer

our sacred things to be profaned? Azarias the priest drove away king

Ozias, when offering incense, and no doubt would have killed him, had

he not quickly departed; the divine vengeance, however, anticipated

the hand of the priest, for a leprosy preyed on the body of the man

whose mind had coveted unlawful things; the devotion of a king was

disturbed, and shall not the desires of a thief be so? It is not enough

to excuse, I even applaud this my conduct; indeed I have conferred a

benefit on the very persons I seem to have destroyed. I have diminished

their punishment in accelerating their deaths. The longer a wicked man

lives the more he will sin, unless he be such as God hath graciously

reserved for a singular example. Death in general is good for all;

for by it the just man finds repose in heaven,--the unjust ceases

from his crimes,--the bad man puts an end to his guilt,--the good

proceeds to his reward,--the saint approaches to the palm,--the sinner

looks forward to pardon, because death has fixed a boundary to his

transgressions. They then surely ought to thank me, who through my

conduct have been exempted from so many sufferings. I have urged these

matters in my own defence, and to invalidate your assertions: however,

since both your reasoning and mine may be fallacious, let us commit

all to the decision of God. Place my body, when laid out in the manner

of my predecessors, before the gates of the church; and let them be

secured with locks and bars. If God be willing that I should enter, you

will hail a miracle; if not, do with my dead body according to your

inclination.”

Struck by this address, when he had breathed his last, they carried

out the remains of the departed prelate before the doors, which were

strongly fastened; and presently a whirlwind, sent by God, broke every

opposing bolt, and drove the very doors, with the utmost violence,

against the walls. The surrounding people applaud with joy, and the

body of the pontiff was interred, with all due respect, by the side of

the other popes.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1065.] STORY OF THE BERKELEY WITCH.]

At the same time something similar occurred in England, not by divine

miracle, but by infernal craft; which when I shall have related,

the credit of the narrative will not be shaken, though the minds of

the hearers should be incredulous; for I have heard it from a man

of such character, who swore he had seen it, that I should blush to

disbelieve. There resided at Berkeley a woman addicted to witchcraft,

as it afterwards appeared, and skilled in ancient augury: she was

excessively gluttonous, perfectly lascivious, setting no bounds to

her debaucheries, as she was not old, though fast declining in life.

On a certain day, as she was regaling, a jack-daw, which was a very

great favourite, chattered a little more loudly than usual. On hearing

which the woman’s knife fell from her hand, her countenance grew pale,

and deeply groaning, “This day,” said she, “my plough has completed

its last furrow; to-day I shall hear of, and suffer, some dreadful

calamity.” While yet speaking, the messenger of her misfortunes

arrived; and being asked, why he approached with so distressed an air?

“I bring news,” said he, “from that village,” naming the place, “of

the death of your son, and of the whole family, by a sudden accident.”

At this intelligence, the woman, sorely afflicted, immediately took to

her bed, and perceiving the disorder rapidly approaching the vitals,

she summoned her surviving children, a monk, and a nun, by hasty

letters; and, when they arrived, with faltering voice, addressed them

thus: “Formerly, my children, I constantly administered to my wretched

circumstances by demoniacal arts: I have been the sink of every vice,

the teacher of every allurement: yet, while practising these crimes, I

was accustomed to soothe my hapless soul with the hope of your piety.

Despairing of myself, I rested my expectations on you; I advanced

you as my defenders against evil spirits, my safeguards against my

strongest foes. Now, since I have approached the end of my life, and

shall have those eager to punish, who lured me to sin, I entreat you

by your mother’s breasts, if you have any regard, any affection, at

least to endeavour to alleviate my torments; and, although you cannot

revoke the sentence already passed upon my soul, yet you may, perhaps,

rescue my body, by these means: sew up my corpse in the skin of a stag;

lay it on its back in a stone coffin; fasten down the lid with lead

and iron; on this lay a stone, bound round with three iron chains of

enormous weight; let there be psalms sung for fifty nights, and masses

said for an equal number of days, to allay the ferocious attacks of my

adversaries. If I lie thus secure for three nights, on the fourth day

bury your mother in the ground; although I fear, lest the earth, which

has been so often burdened with my crimes, should refuse to receive

and cherish me in her bosom.” They did their utmost to comply with her

injunctions: but alas! vain were pious tears, vows, or entreaties; so

great was the woman’s guilt, so great the devil’s violence. For on

the first two nights, while the choir of priests was singing psalms

around the body, the devils, one by one, with the utmost ease bursting

open the door of the church, though closed with an immense bolt, broke

asunder the two outer chains; the middle one being more laboriously

wrought, remained entire. On the third night, about cock-crow, the

whole monastery seemed to be overthrown from its very foundation, by

the clamour of the approaching enemy. One devil, more terrible in

appearance than the rest, and of loftier stature, broke the gates to

shivers by the violence of his attack. The priests grew motionless with

fear,[257] their hair stood on end, and they became speechless. He

proceeded, as it appeared, with haughty step towards the coffin, and

calling on the woman by name, commanded her to rise. She replying that

she could not on account of the chains: “You shall be loosed,” said he,

“and to your cost:” and directly he broke the chain, which had mocked

the ferocity of the others, with as little exertion as though it had

been made of flax. He also beat down the cover of the coffin with his

foot, and taking her by the hand, before them all, he dragged her out

of the church. At the doors appeared a black horse, proudly neighing,

with iron hooks projecting over his whole back; on which the wretched

creature was placed, and, immediately, with the whole party, vanished

from the eyes of the beholders; her pitiable cries, however, for

assistance, were heard for nearly the space of four miles. No person

will deem this incredible, who has read St. Gregory’s Dialogues;[258]

who tells, in his fourth book, of a wicked man that had been buried

in a church, and was cast out of doors again by devils. Among the

French also, what I am about to relate is frequently mentioned. Charles

Martel, a man of renowned valour, who obliged the Saracens, when they

had invaded France, to retire to Spain, was, at his death, buried in

the church of St. Denys; but as he had seized much of the property of

almost all the monasteries in France for the purpose of paying his

soldiers, he was visibly taken away from his tomb by evil spirits, and

has nowhere been seen to his day. At length this was revealed to the

bishop of Orleans, and by him publicly made known.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1137.] THE PRIEST PALUMBUS.]

But to return to Rome: there was a citizen of this place, youthful,

rich, and of senatorial rank, who had recently married; and, who

calling together his companions, had made a plentiful entertainment.

After the repast, when by moderate drinking they had excited hilarity,

they went out into the field to promote digestion, either by leaping,

or hurling, or some other exercise. The master of the banquet, who was

leader of the game, called for a ball to play with, and in the meantime

placed the wedding ring on the outstretched finger of a brazen statue

which stood close at hand. But when almost all the others had attacked

him alone, tired with the violence of the exercise, he left off playing

first, and going to resume his ring, he saw the finger of the statue

clenched fast in the palm. Finding, after many attempts, that he was

unable either to force it off, or to break the finger, he retired in

silence; concealing the matter from his companions, lest they should

laugh at him at the moment, or deprive him of the ring when he was

gone. Returning thither with some servants in the dead of night, he was

surprised to find the finger again extended, and the ring taken away.

Dissembling his loss, he was soothed by the blandishments of his bride.

When the hour of rest arrived, and he had placed himself by the side

of his spouse, he was conscious of something dense, and cloud-like,

rolling between them, which might be felt, though not seen, and by

this means was impeded in his embraces: he heard a voice too, saying,

“Embrace me, since you wedded me to-day; I am Venus, on whose finger

you put the ring; I have it, nor will I restore it.” Terrified at such

a prodigy, he had neither courage, nor ability to reply, and passed a

sleepless night in silent reflection upon the matter. A considerable

space of time elapsed in this way: as often as he was desirous of the

embraces of his wife, the same circumstance ever occurred; though

in other respects, he was perfectly equal to any avocation, civil

or military. At length, urged by the complaints of his consort, he

detailed the matter to her parents; who, after deliberating for a time,

disclosed it to one Palumbus, a suburban priest. This man was skilled

in necromancy, could raise up magical figures, terrify devils, and

impel them to do anything he chose. Making an agreement, that he should

fill his purse most plentifully, provided he succeeded in rendering

the lovers happy, he called up all the powers of his art, and gave the

young man a letter which he had prepared; saying, “Go, at such an hour

of the night, into the high road, where it divides into four several

ways, and stand there in silent expectation. There will pass by human

figures of either sex, of every age, rank, and condition; some on

horseback, some on foot; some with countenances dejected, others elated

with full-swollen insolence; in short, you will perceive in their

looks and gestures, every symptom both of joy and of grief: though

these should address you, enter into conversation with none of them.

This company will be followed by a person taller, and more corpulent

than the rest, sitting in a chariot; to him you will, in silence, give

the letter to read, and immediately your wish will be accomplished,

provided you act with resolution.” The young man took the road he was

commanded; and, at night, standing in the open air, experienced the

truth of the priest’s assertion by everything which he saw; there

was nothing but what was completed to a tittle. Among other passing

figures, he beheld a woman, in meretricious garb, riding on a mule; her

hair, which was bound above in a golden fillet, floated unconfined on

her shoulders; in her hand was a golden wand, with which she directed

the progress of her beast; she was so thinly clad, as to be almost

naked, and her gestures were wonderfully indecent. But what need of

more? At last came the chief, in appearance, who, from his chariot

adorned with emeralds and pearls, fixing his eyes most sternly on the

young man, demanded the cause of his presence. He made no reply, but

stretching out his hand, gave him the letter. The demon, not daring to

despise the well-known seal, read the epistle, and immediately, lifting

up his hands to heaven, “Almighty God,” said he, “in whose sight every

transgression is as a noisome smell, how long wilt thou endure the

crimes of the priest Palumbus?” The devil then directly sent some of

those about him to take the ring by force from Venus, who restored it

at last, though with great reluctance. The young man thus obtaining his

object, became possessed of his long desired pleasures without farther

obstacle; but Palumbus, on hearing of the devil’s complaint to God

concerning him, understood that the close of his days was predicted. In

consequence, making a pitiable atonement by voluntarily cutting off all

his limbs, he confessed unheard-of crimes to the pope in the presence

of the Roman people.

At that time the body of Pallas, the son of Evander, of whom Virgil

speaks, was found entire at Rome, to the great astonishment of all, for

having escaped corruption so many ages. Such, however, is the nature of

bodies embalmed, that, when the flesh decays, the skin preserves the

nerves, and the nerves the bones. The gash which Turnus had made in the

middle of his breast measured four feet and a half. His epitaph was

found to this effect,

Pallas, Evander’s son, lies buried here

In order due, transfix’d by Turnus’ spear.

Which epitaph I should not think made at the time, though Carmentis the

mother of Evander is reported to have discovered the Roman letters, but

that it was composed by Ennius, or some other ancient poet.[259] There

was a burning lamp at his head, constructed by magical art; so that no

violent blast, no dripping of water could extinguish it. While many

were lost in admiration at this, one person, as there are always some

people expert in mischief, made an aperture beneath the flame with an

iron style, which introducing the air, the light vanished. The body,

when set up against the wall, surpassed it in height, but some days

afterwards, being drenched with the drip of the eves, it acknowledged

the corruption common to mortals; the skin and the nerves dissolving.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1065.] PRODIGY NEAR NORMANDY.]

At that time too, on the confines of Brittany and Normandy, a prodigy

was seen in one, or more properly speaking, in two women: there were

two heads, four arms, and every other part two-fold to the navel;

beneath, were two legs, two feet, and all other parts single. While

one was laughing, eating, or speaking, the other would cry, fast, or

remain silent: though both mouths ate, yet the excrement was discharged

by only one passage. At last, one dying, the other survived, and the

living carried about the dead, for the space of three years, till she

died also, through the fatigue of the weight, and the stench of the

dead carcass.[260] Many were of opinion, and some even have written,

that these women represented England and Normandy, which, though

separated by position, are yet united under one master. Whatever wealth

these countries greedily absorb, flows into one common receptacle,

which is either the covetousness of princes, or the ferocity of

surrounding nations. England, yet vigorous, supports with her wealth

Normandy now dead and almost decayed, until she herself perhaps shall

fall through the violence of spoilers. Happy, if she shall ever again

breathe that liberty, the mere shadow of which she has long pursued!

She now mourns, borne down with calamity, and oppressed with exactions;

the causes of which misery I shall relate, after I have despatched some

things pertaining to my subject. For since I have hitherto recorded

the civil and military transactions of the kings of England, I may be

allowed to expatiate somewhat on the sanctity of certain of them; and

at the same time to contemplate what splendour of divine love beamed

on this people, from the first dawning of their faith: since I believe

you can no where find the bodies of so many saints entire after death,

typifying the state of final incorruption. I imagine this to have

taken place by God’s agency, in order that a nation, situated, as it

were, almost out of the world, should more confidently embrace the

hope of a resurrection from the contemplation of the incorruption of

the saints. There are, altogether, five which I have known of, though

the residents in many places boast of more; Saint Etheldrida,[261] and

Werburga, virgins; king Edmund; archbishop Elphege;[262] Cuthbert the

ancient father: who with skin and flesh unwasted, and their joints

flexile, appear to have a certain vital warmth about them, and to be

merely sleeping. Who can enumerate all the other saints, of different

ranks and professions? whose names and lives, singly to describe, I

have neither intention nor leisure: yet oh that I might hereafter have

leisure! But I will be silent, lest I should seem to promise more than

I can perform. In consequence, it is not necessary to mention any of

the commonalty, but merely, not to go out of the path of my subject

history, the male and female scions of the royal stock, most of them

innocently murdered; and who have been consecrated martyrs, not by

human conjecture, but by divine acknowledgment. Hence may be known how

little indulgence they gave to the lust of pleasure, who inherited

eternal glory by means of so easy a death.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1035.] OSWALD, KING AND MARTYR.]

In the former book, my history dwelt for some time on the praises of

the most holy Oswald, king and martyr; among whose other marks of

sanctity, was this, which, according to some copies, is related in the

History of the Angles.[263] In the monastery at Selsey, which Wilfrid

of holy memory had filled with Northumbrian monks, a dreadful malady

broke out, and destroyed numbers; the remainder endeavoured to avert

the pestilence by a fast of three days. On the second day of the fast,

the blessed apostles Peter and Paul, appearing to a youth who was sick

with the disorder, animated him by observing: “That he should not fear

approaching death, as it would be a termination of his present illness,

and an entrance into eternal life; that no other person of that

monastery would die of this disorder, because God had granted this to

the merits of the noble king Oswald, who was that very day supplicating

for his countrymen: for it was on this day that the king, murdered by

the faithless, had in a moment ascended to the heavenly tribunal: that

they should search, therefore, in the scroll, in which the names of

the dead were written, and if they found it so, they should put an end

to the fast, give loose to security and joy, and sing solemn masses

to God, and to the holy king.” This vision being quickly followed by

the death of the boy, and the anniversary of the martyr being found in

the martyrology, and at the same time the cessation of the disorder

being attested by the whole province, the name of Oswald was from that

period inserted among the martyrs, which before, on account of his

recent death, had only been admitted into the list of the faithful.

Deservedly, I say, then, deservedly is he to be celebrated, whose glory

the divine approbation so signally manifested, as to order him to be

dignified with masses, in a manner, as I think, not usual among men.

The undoubted veracity of the historian precludes the possibility of

supposing this matter to be false; as does also the blessed bishop

Acca,[264] who was the friend of the author.

Egbert, king of Kent, the son of Erconbert, whom I have mentioned

before, had some very near relations, descended from the royal line;

their names were Ethelred[265] and Ethelbert, the sons of Ermenred his

uncle. Apprehensive that they might grow up with notions of succeeding

to the kingdom, and fearful for his safety, he kept them about him for

some time, with very homely entertainment: and, at last, grudging them

his regards, he removed them from his court. Soon after, when they had

been secretly despatched by one of his servants named Thunre, which

signifies Thunder, he buried them under heaps of rubbish, thinking

that a murder perpetrated in privacy would escape detection. The eye

of God however, which no secrets of the heart can deceive, brought

the innocents to light, vouchsafing many cures upon the spot; until

the neighbours, being roused, dug up the unsightly heaps of turf

and rubbish cast upon their bodies, and forming a trench after the

manner of a sepulchre, they erected a small church over it. There they

remained till the time of king Edgar, when they were taken up by St.

Oswald, archbishop[266] of Worcester, and conveyed to the monastery of

Ramsey; from which period, granting the petitions of the suppliant,

they have manifested themselves by many miracles.

Offa king of the Mercians murdered many persons of consequence for

the security, as he supposed, of his kingdom, without any distinction

of friend or foe; among these was king Ethelbert;[267] thereby being

guilty of an atrocious outrage against the suitor of his daughter.

His unmerited death, however, is thought to have been amply avenged

by the short reign of Offa’s son. Indeed God signalised his sanctity

by such evident tokens, that at this very day the episcopal church of

Hereford is consecrated to his name. Nor should any thing appear idle

or irrelevant, which our pious and religious ancestors have either

tolerated by their silence, or confirmed by their authority.

What shall my pen here trace worthy of St. Kenelm, a youth of tender

age? Kenulf, king of the Mercians, his father, had consigned him, when

seven years old, to his sister Quendrida, for the purpose of education.

But she, falsely entertaining hopes of the kingdom for herself, gave

her little brother in charge to a servant of her household, with an

order to despatch him. Taking out the innocent, under pretence of

hunting for his amusement or recreation, he murdered and hid him in

a thicket. But strange to tell, the crime which had been so secretly

committed in England, gained publicity in Rome, by God’s agency: for

a dove, from heaven, bore a parchment scroll to the altar of St.

Peter, containing an exact account both of his death and place of

burial. As this was written in the English language it was vainly

attempted to be read by the Romans and men of other nations who were

present. Fortunately, however, and opportunely, an Englishman was at

hand, who translated the writing to the Roman people, into Latin,

and gave occasion to the pope to write a letter to the kings of

England, acquainting them with the martyrdom of their countryman. In

consequence of this the body of the innocent was taken up in presence

of a numerous assembly, and removed to Winchcomb. The murderous woman

was so indignant at the vocal chaunt of the priests and loud applause

of the laity, that she thrust out her head from the window of the

chamber where she was standing, and, by chance, having in her hands a

psalter, she came in course of reading to the psalm “O God my praise,”

which, for I know not what charm, reading backwards, she endeavoured

to drown the joy of the choristers. At that moment, her eyes, torn

by divine vengeance from their hollow sockets, scattered blood upon

the verse which runs, “This is the work of them who defame me to the

Lord, and who speak evil against my soul.” The marks of her blood are

still extant, proving the cruelty of the woman, and the vengeance

of God. The body of the little saint is very generally adored, and

there is hardly any place in England more venerated, or where greater

numbers of persons attend at the festival; and this arising from the

long-continued belief of his sanctity, and the constant exhibition of

miracles.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1065.] SAINT WISTAN.]

Nor shall my history be wanting in thy praise, Wistan,[268] blessed

youth, son of Wimund, son of Withlaf king of the Mercians, and of

Elfleda, daughter of Ceolwulf, who was the uncle of Kenelm; I will

not, I say, pass thee over in silence, whom Berfert thy relation so

atrociously murdered. And let posterity know, if they deem this history

worthy of perusal, that there was nothing earthly more praiseworthy

than your disposition; at which a deadly assassin becoming irritated,

despatched you: nor was there any thing more innocent than your purity

towards God; invited by which, the secret Judge deemed it fitting to

honour you: for a pillar of light, sent down from heaven, piercing the

sable robe of night, revealed the wickedness of the deep cavern, and

brought to view the crime of the murderer. In consequence, Wistan’s

venerable remains were taken up, and by the care of his relations

conveyed to Rependun;[269] at that time a famous monastery, now a villa

belonging to the earl of Chester, and its glory grown obsolete with

age; but at present thou dwellest at Evesham, kindly favouring the

petitions of such as regard thee.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1065.] CHARACTER OF ST. EDMUND.]

Bede has related many anecdotes of the sanctity of the kings of the

East Saxons, and East Angles, whose genealogy I have in the first book

of this work traced briefly; because I could no where find a complete

history of the kings. I shall however, dilate somewhat on St. Edmund,

who held dominion in East Anglia, and to whom the time of Bede did

not extend. This province, on the south and east, is surrounded by

the ocean; on the north, by deep lakes, and stagnant pools, which,

stretching out a vast distance in length, with a breadth of two or

three miles, afford abundance of fish for the use of the inhabitants;

on the west it is continuous with the rest of the island, but defended

by the earth’s being thrown up in the form of a rampart.[270] The soil

is admirable for pasture, and for hunting; it is full of monasteries,

and large bodies of monks are settled on the islands of these stagnant

waters; the people are a merry, pleasant, jovial race, though apt

to carry their jokes to excess. Here, then, reigned Edmund; a man

devoted to God, ennobled by his descent from ancient kings, and though

he presided over the province in peace for several years, yet never

through the effeminacy of the times did he relax his virtue. Hingwar

and Hubba, two leaders of the Danes, came over to depopulate the

provinces of the Northumbrians and East Angles. The former of these

seized the unresisting king, who had cast away his arms and was lying

on the ground in prayer, and, after the infliction of tortures,[271]

beheaded him. On the death of this saintly man, the purity of his past

life was evidenced by unheard-of miracles. The Danes had cast away the

head, when severed from the body by the cruelty of the executioners,

and it had been hidden in a thicket. While his subjects, who had

tracked the footsteps of the enemy as they departed, were seeking it,

intending to solemnize with due honour the funeral rites of their

king, they were struck with the pleasing intervention of God: for the

lifeless head uttered a voice, inviting all who were in search of it

to approach. A wolf, a beast accustomed to prey upon dead carcasses,

was holding it in its paws, and guarding it untouched; which animal

also, after the manner of a tame creature, gently followed the bearers

to the tomb, and neither did nor received any injury. The sacred body

was then, for a time, committed to the earth; turf was placed over it,

and a wooden chapel, of trifling cost, erected. The negligent natives,

however, were soon made sensible of the virtue of the martyr, which

excited their listless minds to reverence him, by the miracles which

he performed. And though perhaps the first proof of his power may

appear weak and trivial, yet nevertheless I shall subjoin it. He bound,

with invisible bands, some thieves who had endeavoured to break into

the church by night: this was done in the very attempt; a pleasant

spectacle enough, to see the plunder hold fast the thief, so that he

could neither desist from the enterprise, nor complete the design. In

consequence, Theodred bishop of London, who lies at St. Paul’s, removed

the lasting disgrace of so mean a structure, by building a nobler

edifice over those sacred limbs, which evidenced the glory of his

unspotted soul, by surprising soundness, and a kind of milky whiteness.

The head, which was formerly divided from the neck, is again united to

the rest of the body showing only the sign of martyrdom by a purple

seam. One circumstance indeed surpasses human miracles, which is, that

the hair and nails of the dead man continue to grow: these, Oswen, a

holy woman, used yearly to clip and cut, that they might be objects of

veneration to posterity. Truly this was a holy temerity, for a woman

to contemplate and handle limbs superior to the whole of this world.

Not so Leofstan, a youth of bold and untamed insolence, who, with many

impertinent threats, commanded the body of the martyr to be shown to

him; for he was desirous, as he said, of settling the uncertainty of

report by the testimony of his own eyesight. He paid dearly, however,

for his audacious experiment; for he became insane, and shortly after,

died, swarming with vermin. He felt indeed that Edmund was now capable

of doing, what he before used to do; that is,

“To spare the suppliant, but confound the proud,”

by which means he so completely engaged the inhabitants of all Britain

to him, that every person looked upon himself as particularly happy,

in contributing either money or gifts to St. Edmund’s monastery:

even kings themselves, who rule others, used to boast of being his

servants, and sent him their royal crown; redeeming it, if they wished

to use it, at a great price. The exactors of taxes also, who, in other

places, gave loose to injustice, were there suppliant, and ceased their

cavilling at St. Edmund’s boundary,[272] admonished thereto by the

punishment of others who had presumed to overpass it.

My commendations shall also glance at the names of some maidens of the

royal race, though I must claim indulgence for being brief upon the

subject, not through fastidiousness, but because I am unacquainted

with their miracles. Anna king of the East Angles had three daughters,

Etheldrida, Ethelberga, and Sexberga. Etheldrida, though married to two

husbands, yet by means of saintly continence, as Bede relates, without

any diminution of modesty, without a single lustful inclination,

triumphantly displayed to heaven the palm of perpetual virginity.

Ethelberga, first a nun, and afterwards abbess, in a monastery in

France called Brigis,[273] was celebrated for unblemished chastity;

and it is well worthy of remark, that as both sisters had subdued the

lusts of the flesh while living, so, when dead, their bodies remained

uncorrupt, the one in England, and the other in France; insomuch, that

their sanctity, which is abundantly resplendent, may suffice

“To cast its radiance over both the poles.”

Sexberga was married to Erconbert king of Kent, and, after his death,

took the veil in the same monastery where her sister Etheldrida was

proclaimed a saint. She had two daughters by king Erconbert, Earcongota

and Ermenhilda. Of Ercongota, such as wish for information will find

it in Bede;[274] Ermenhilda married Wulfhere, king of the Mercians,

and had a daughter, Werburga, a most holy virgin. Both are saints: the

mother, that is to say, St. Ermenhilda, rests at Ely, where she was

abbess after her mother, Sexberga; and the daughter lies at Chester, in

the monastery of that city, which Hugo earl of Chester, ejecting a few

canons who resided there in a mean and irregular manner, has recently

erected. The praises and miracles of both these women, and particularly

of the younger, are there extolled and held in veneration; and though

they are favourable to all petitions without delay, yet are they more

especially kind and assistant to the supplications of women and youths.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1065.] SAINTS MILDRITHA AND MILBURGA.]

Merewald the brother of Wulfhere, by Ermenburga, the daughter of

Ermenred brother of Erconbert king of Kent, had two daughters:

Mildritha and Milburga. Mildritha, dedicating herself to celibacy,

ended her days in the Isle of Thanet in Kent, which king Egbert

had given to her mother, to atone for the murder of her brothers,

Ethelred and Ethelbert.[275] In after times, being transferred to St.

Augustine’s monastery at Canterbury, she is there honoured by the

marked attention of the monks, and celebrated equally for her kindness

and affability to all, as her name[276] implies. And although almost

every corner of that monastery is filled with the bodies of saints of

great name and merit, any one of which would be of itself sufficient to

irradiate all England, yet no one is there more revered, more loved,

or more gratefully remembered; and she, turning a deaf ear to none who

love her, is present to them in the salvation of their souls.

Milburga reposes at Wenlock:[277] formerly well known to the

neighbouring inhabitants; but for some time after the arrival of

the Normans, through ignorance of the place of her burial, she was

neglected. Lately, however, a convent of Clugniac monks being

established there, while a new church was erecting, a certain boy

running violently along the pavement, broke into the hollow of the

vault, and discovered the body of the virgin; when a balsamic odour

pervading the whole church, she was taken up, and performed so many

miracles, that the people flocked thither in great multitudes. Large

spreading plains could hardly contain the troops of pilgrims, while

rich and poor came side by side, one common faith impelling all. Nor

did the event deceive their expectations: for no one departed, without

either a perfect cure, or considerable abatement of his malady, and

some were even healed of the king’s evil, by the merits of this virgin,

when medical assistance was unavailing.

Edward the Elder, of whom I have before spoken at large, had by his

wife Edgiva, several daughters. Among these was Eadburga, who, when

she was scarcely three years old, gave a singular indication of her

future sanctity. Her father was inclined to try whether the little

girl was inclined to God, or to the world, and had placed in a chamber

the symbols of different professions; on one side a chalice, and the

gospels; on the other, bracelets and necklaces. Hither the child was

brought in the arms of her indulgent attendant, and, sitting on her

father’s knee, was desired to choose which she pleased. Rejecting the

earthly ornaments with stern regard, she instantly fell prostrate

before the chalice and the gospels, and worshipped them with infant

adoration. The company present exclaimed aloud, and fondly hailed

the prospect of the child’s future sanctity; her father embraced the

infant in a manner still more endearing. “Go,” said he, “whither the

Divinity calls thee; follow with prosperous steps the spouse whom thou

hast chosen, and truly blessed shall my wife and myself be, if we are

surpassed in holiness by our daughter.” When clothed in the garb of

a nun, she gained the affection of all her female companions, in the

city of Winchester, by the marked attention she paid them. Nor did the

greatness of her birth elevate her; as she esteemed it noble to stoop

to the service of Christ. Her sanctity increased with her years, her

humility kept pace with her growth; so that she used secretly to steal

away the socks of the several nuns at night, and, carefully washing and

anointing them, lay them again upon their beds. Wherefore, though God

signalized her, while living, by many miracles, yet I more particularly

bring forward this circumstance, to show that charity began all her

works, and humility completed them: and finally, many miracles in her

life-time, and since her death, confirm the devotion of her heart and

the incorruptness of her body, which the attendants at her churches at

Winchester and Pershore relate to such as are unacquainted with them.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1065.] ST. EDITHA’S CHASTITY.]

St. Editha, the daughter of king Edgar, ennobles, with her relics, the

monastery of Wilton, where she was buried, and cherishes that place

with her regard, where, trained from her infancy in the school of

the Lord, she gained his favour by unsullied virginity, and constant

watchings: repressing the pride of her high birth by her humility. I

have heard one circumstance of her, from persons of elder days, which

greatly staggered the opinions of men: for she led them into false

conclusions from the splendour of her costly dress; being always

habited in richer garb than the sanctity of her profession seemed

to require. On this account, being openly rebuked by St. Ethelwold,

she is reported to have answered with equal point and wit, that

the judgment of God was true and irrefragable, while that of man,

alone, was fallible; for pride might exist even under the garb of

wretchedness: wherefore, “I think,” said she, “that a mind may be as

pure beneath these vestments, as under your tattered furs.” The bishop

was deeply struck by this speech; admitting its truth by his silence,

and blushing with pleasure that he had been chastised by the sparkling

repartee of the lady, he held his peace. St. Dunstan had observed her,

at the consecration of the church of St. Denys, which she had built

out of affection to that martyr, frequently stretching out her right

thumb, and making the sign of the cross upon her forehead; and being

extremely delighted at it, “May this finger,” he exclaimed, “never see

corruption:” and immediately, while celebrating mass, he burst into

such a flood of tears, that he alarmed with his faltering voice an

assistant standing near him; who inquiring the reason of it, “Soon,”

said he, “shall this blooming rose wither; soon shall this beloved bird

take its flight to God, after the expiration of six weeks from this

time.” The truth of the prelate’s prophecy was very shortly fulfilled;

for on the appointed day, this noble, firmly-minded lady, expired in

her prime, at the age of twenty-three years. Soon after, the same saint

saw, in a dream, St. Denys kindly taking the virgin by the hand, and

strictly enjoining, by divine command, that she should be honoured by

her servants on earth, in the same manner as she was venerated by her

spouse and master in heaven. Miracles multiplying at her tomb, it was

ordered, that her virgin body should be taken up, and exalted in a

shrine; when the whole of it was found resolved into dust, except the

finger, with the abdomen and parts adjacent. In consequence of which,

some debate arising, the virgin herself appeared, in a dream, to one

of those who had seen her remains, saying, “It was no wonder, if the

other parts of the body had decayed, since it was customary for dead

bodies to moulder to their native dust, and she, perhaps, as a girl,

had sinned with those members; but it was highly just, that the abdomen

should see no corruption which had never felt the sting of lust; as she

had been entirely free from gluttony or carnal copulation.”

Truly both these virgins support their respective monasteries by their

merits; each of them being filled with large assemblies of nuns, who

answer obediently to the call of their mistresses and patronesses,

inviting them to virtue. Happy the man, who becomes partaker of those

virgin orisons which the Lord Jesus favours with kind regard. For, as I

have remarked of the nuns of Shaftesbury, all virtues have long since

quitted the earth, and retired to heaven; or, if any where, (but this I

must say with the permission of holy men,) are to be found only in the

hearts of nuns; and surely those women are highly to be praised, who,

regardless of the weakness of their sex, vie with each other in the

preservation of their continence, and by such means ascend, triumphant,

to heaven.

I think it of importance to have been acquainted with many of the

royal family of either sex; as it may be gathered from thence that

king Edward, concerning whom I was speaking before I digressed, by

no means degenerated from the virtues of his ancestors. In fact he

was famed both for miracles, and for the spirit of prophecy, as I

shall hereafter relate. In the exaction of taxes he was sparing, and

he abominated the insolence of collectors: in eating and drinking he

was free from the voluptuousness which his state allowed: on the

more solemn festivals, though dressed in robes interwoven with gold,

which the queen had most splendidly embroidered, yet still he had such

forbearance, as to be sufficiently majestic, without being haughty;

considering in such matters, rather the bounty of God, than the pomp

of the world. There was one earthly enjoyment in which he chiefly

delighted; which was, hunting with fleet hounds, whose opening in the

woods he used with pleasure to encourage: and again, with the pouncing

of birds, whose nature it is to prey on their kindred species. In these

exercises, after hearing divine service in the morning, he employed

himself whole days. In other respects he was a man by choice devoted

to God, and lived the life of an angel in the administration of his

kingdom. To the poor and to the stranger, more especially foreigners

and men of religious orders, he was kind in invitation, munificent in

his presents, and constantly exciting the monks of his own country to

imitate their holiness. He was of a becoming stature; his beard and

hair milk-white; his countenance florid; fair throughout his whole

person; and his form of admirable proportion.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1065.] ORIGIN OF THE ROYAL TOUCH.]

The happiness of his times had been revealed in a dream to Brithwin

bishop of Wilton, who had made it public. For in the time of Canute,

when, at Glastonbury, he was once intent on heavenly watchings, and

the thought of the near extinction of the royal race of the Angles,

which frequently distressed him, came into his mind, sleep stole upon

him thus meditating; when behold! he was rapt on high, and saw Peter,

the chief of the apostles, consecrating Edward, who at that time was

an exile in Normandy, king; his chaste life too was pointed out, and

the exact period of his reign, twenty-four years, determined; and, when

inquiring about his posterity, it was answered, “The kingdom of the

English belongs to God; after you he will provide a king according to

his pleasure.”

But now to speak of his miracles. A young woman had married a husband

of her own age, but having no issue by the union, the humours

collecting abundantly about her neck, she had contracted a sore

disorder; the glands swelling in a dreadful manner. Admonished in

a dream to have the part affected washed by the king, she entered

the palace, and the king himself fulfilled this labour of love, by

rubbing the woman’s neck with his fingers dipped in water. Joyous

health followed his healing hand: the lurid skin opened, so that worms

flowed out with the purulent matter, and the tumour subsided. But as

the orifice of the ulcers was large and unsightly, he commanded her to

be supported at the royal expense till she should be perfectly cured.

However, before a week was expired, a fair, new skin returned, and

hid the scars so completely, that nothing of the original wound could

be discovered: and within a year becoming the mother of twins, she

increased the admiration of Edward’s holiness. Those who knew him more

intimately, affirm that he often cured this complaint in Normandy:

whence appears how false is their notion, who in our times assert, that

the cure of this disease does not proceed from personal sanctity, but

from hereditary virtue in the royal line.

A certain man, blind from some unknown mischance, had persisted in

asserting about the palace, that he should be cured, if he could touch

his eyes with the water in which the king’s hands had been washed. This

was frequently related to Edward, who derided it, and looked angrily

on the persons who mentioned it; confessing himself a sinner, and that

the works of holy men did not belong to him. But the servants, thinking

this a matter not to be neglected, tried the experiment when he was

ignorant of it, and was praying in church. The instant the blind man

was washed with the water, the long-enduring darkness fled from his

eyes, and they were filled with joyful light; and the king, inquiring

the cause of the grateful clamour of the by-standers, was informed of

the fact. Presently afterwards, when, by thrusting his fingers towards

the eyes of the man he had cured, and perceiving him draw back his

head to avoid them, he had made proof of his sight, he, with uplifted

hands, returned thanks to God. In the same way he cured a blind man at

Lincoln, who survived him many years, a proof of the royal miracle.

That you may know the perfect virtue of this prince, in the power of

healing more especially, I shall add something which will excite your

wonder. Wulwin, surnamed Spillecorn, the son of Wulmar of Nutgareshale,

was one day cutting timber in the wood of Bruelle, and indulging in a

long sleep after his labour, he lost his sight for seventeen years,

from the blood, as I imagine, stagnating about his eyes: at the end of

this time, he was admonished in a dream to go round to eighty-seven

churches, and earnestly entreat a cure of his blindness from the

saints. At last he came to the king’s court, where he remained for a

long time, in vain, in opposition to the attendants, at the vestibule

of his chamber. He still continued importunate, however, without being

deterred, till at last, after much difficulty, he was admitted by order

of the king. When he had heard the dream, he mildly answered, “By my

lady St. Mary, I shall be truly grateful, if God, through my means,

shall choose to take pity upon a wretched creature.” In consequence,

though he had no confidence in himself, with respect to miracles,

yet, at the instigation of his servants, he placed his hand, dipped

in water, on the blind man. In a moment the blood dripped plentifully

from his eyes, and the man, restored to sight, exclaimed with rapture,

“I see you, O king! I see you, O king!” In this recovered state, he

had charge of the royal palace at Windsor, for there the cure had been

performed, for a long time; surviving his restorer several years. On

the same day, from the same water, three blind men, and a man with

one eye, who were supported on the royal arms, received a cure; the

servants administering the healing water with perfect confidence.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1065.] KING EDWARD’S VISIONS.]

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1065.] POPES AND EMPERORS.]

On Easter-day, he was sitting at table at Westminster, with the crown

on his head, and surrounded by a crowd of nobles. While the rest were

greedily eating, and making up for the long fast of Lent by the newly

provided viands, he, with mind abstracted from earthly things, was

absorbed in the contemplation of some divine matter, when presently he

excited the attention of the guests by bursting into profuse laughter:

and as none presumed to inquire into the cause of his joy, he remained

silent as before, till satiety had put an end to the banquet. After

the tables were removed, and as he was unrobing in his chamber, three

persons of rank followed him; of these earl Harold was one, the second

was an abbat, and the third a bishop, who presuming on their intimacy

asked the cause of his laughter, observing, that it seemed just matter

of astonishment to see him, in such perfect tranquillity both of time

and occupation, burst into a vulgar laugh, while all others were

silent. “I saw something wonderful,” said he, “and therefore I did

not laugh without a cause.” At this, as is the custom of mankind,

they began to inquire and search into the matter more earnestly,

entreating that he would condescend to disclose it to them. After

much reluctance, he yielded to their persevering solicitations, and

related the following wonderful circumstance, saying, that the Seven

Sleepers in mount Cœlius had now lain for two hundred years on their

right side, but that, at the very hour of his laughter, they turned

upon their left; that they would continue to lie in this manner

for seventy-four years, which would be a dreadful omen to wretched

mortals. For every thing would come to pass, in these seventy-four

years, which the Lord had foretold to his disciples concerning the

end of the world; nation would rise against nation, and kingdom

against kingdom; earthquakes would be in divers places; pestilence

and famine, terrors from heaven and great signs; changes in kingdoms;

wars of the gentiles against the Christians, and also victories of the

Christians over the pagans. Relating these matters to his wondering

audience, he descanted on the passion of these sleepers, and the make

of their bodies, though totally unnoticed in history, as readily as

though he had lived in daily intercourse with them. On hearing this

the earl sent a knight; the bishop a clergyman; and the abbat a monk,

to Maniches the Constantinopolitan emperor, to investigate the truth

of his declaration; adding letters and presents from the king. After

being kindly entertained, Maniches sent them to the bishop of Ephesus,

giving them at the same time what is called a holy letter, that the

martyr-relics of the Seven Sleepers should be shown to the delegates of

the king of England.[278] It fell out that the presage of king Edward

was proved by all the Greeks, who could swear they had heard from their

fathers that the men were lying on their right side; but after the

entrance of the English into the vault, they published the truth of

the foreign prophecy to their countrymen. Nor was it long before the

predicted evils came to pass; for the Hagarens, and Arabs, and Turks,

nations averse to Christ, making havoc of the Christians, overran

Syria, and Lycia, and Asia Minor altogether, devastating many cities

too of Asia Major, among which was Ephesus, and even Jerusalem itself.

At the same time, on the death of Maniches emperor of Constantinople,

Diogenes, and Michaelius, and Bucinacius, and Alexius, in turn hurled

each other headlong from the throne; the last of whom, continuing till

our time, left for heir his son John more noted for cunning and deceit

than worth. He contrived many hurtful plots against the pilgrims on

their sacred journey; but venerating the fidelity of the English,

he showed them every civility, and transmitted his regard for them

to his son.[279] In the next seven years were three popes, Victor,

Stephen, Nicholas,[280] who diminished the vigour of the papacy by

their successive deaths. Almost immediately afterwards too died Henry,

the pious emperor of the Romans, and had for successor Henry his son,

who brought many calamities on the city of Rome by his folly and his

wickedness. The same year Henry, king of France, a good and active

warrior, died by poison. Soon after a comet, a star denoting, as they

say, change in kingdoms, appeared trailing its extended and fiery

train along the sky. Wherefore a certain monk of our monastery,[281]

by name Elmer, bowing down with terror at the sight of the brilliant

star, wisely exclaimed, “Thou art come! a matter of lamentation to

many a mother art thou come; I have seen thee long since; but I now

behold thee much more terrible, threatening to hurl destruction on this

country.” He was a man of good learning for those times, of mature age,

and in his early youth had hazarded an attempt of singular temerity.

He had by some contrivance fastened wings to his hands and feet, in

order that, looking upon the fable as true, he might fly like Dædalus,

and collecting the air on the summit of a tower, had flown for more

than the distance of a furlong; but, agitated by the violence of the

wind and the current of air, as well as by the consciousness of his

rash attempt, he fell and broke his legs, and was lame ever after. He

used to relate as the cause of his failure, his forgetting to provide

himself a tail.

Another prophecy similar to this, Edward uttered when dying, which I

shall here anticipate. When he had lain two days speechless, on the

third, sadly and deeply sighing as he awoke from his torpor, “Almighty

God,” said he, “as this shall be a real vision, or a vain illusion,

which I have seen, grant me the power of explaining it, or not, to the

by-standers.” Soon after speaking fluently, “I saw just now,” continued

he, “two monks near me, whom formerly, when a youth in Normandy, I knew

both to have lived in a most religious manner, and to have died like

perfect Christians. These men, announcing themselves as the messengers

of God, spake to the following effect: ‘Since the chiefs of England,

the dukes, bishops, and abbats, are not the ministers of God, but of

the devil, God, after your death, has delivered this kingdom for a year

and a day, into the hand of the enemy, and devils shall wander over all

the land.’ And when I said that I would show these things to my people;

and promised that they should liberate themselves by repentance, after

the old example of the Ninevites; ‘Neither of these,’ said they, ‘shall

take place; for they will not repent, nor will God have mercy on them.’

When then, said I, may cessation from such great calamities be hoped

for? They replied, ‘Whenever a green tree shall be cut through the

middle, and the part cut off, being carried the space of three acres

from the trunk, shall, without any assistance, become again united to

its stem, bud out with flowers, and stretch forth its fruit, as before,

from the sap again uniting; then may a cessation of such evils be at

last expected.’”

Though others were apprehensive of the truth of this prediction, yet

Stigand, at that time archbishop, received it with laughter; saying,

that the old man doted through disease. We, however, find the truth

of the presage experimentally; for England is become the residence of

foreigners, and the property of strangers: at the present time, there

is no Englishman, either earl, bishop, or abbat; strangers all, they

prey upon the riches and vitals of England; nor is there any hope of

a termination to this misery. The cause of which evil, as I have long

since promised, it is now high time that my narrative should endeavour

briefly to disclose.

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1065.] DEATH OF EDWARD.]

[Sidenote: [A.D. 1066.] HAROLD.]

King Edward declining into years, as he had no children himself, and

saw the sons of Godwin growing in power, despatched messengers to the

king of Hungary, to send over Edward, the son of his brother Edmund,

with all his family: intending, as he declared, that either he, or his

sons, should succeed to the hereditary kingdom of England, and that his

own want of issue should be supplied by that of his kindred. Edward

came in consequence, but died almost immediately at St. Paul’s[282]

in London: he was neither valiant, nor a man of abilities. He left

three surviving children; that is to say, Edgar, who, after the death

of Harold, was by some elected king; and who, after many revolutions

of fortune, is now living wholly retired in the country, in extreme

old age: Christina, who grew old at Romsey in the habit of a nun:

Margaret, whom Malcolm king of the Scots espoused. Blessed with a

numerous offspring, her sons were Edgar, and Alexander, who reigned

in Scotland after their father in due succession: for the eldest,

Edward, had fallen in battle with his father; the youngest, David,

noted for his meekness and discretion, is at present king of Scotland.

Her daughters were, Matilda, whom in our time king Henry has married,

and Maria, whom Eustace the younger, earl of Boulogne, espoused. The

king, in consequence of the death of his relation, losing his first

hope of support, gave the succession of England to William earl of

Normandy.[283] He was well worthy of such a gift, being a young man

of superior mind, who had raised himself to the highest eminence by

his unwearied exertion: moreover, he was his nearest relation by

consanguinity, as he was the son of Robert, the son of Richard the

second, whom we have repeatedly mentioned as the brother of Emma,

Edward’s mother. Some affirm that Harold himself was sent into Normandy

by the king for this purpose: others, who knew Harold’s more secret

intentions, say, that being driven thither against his will, by the

violence of the wind, he imagined this device, in order to extricate

himself. This, as it appears nearest the truth, I shall relate. Harold

being at his country-seat at Boseham,[284] went for recreation on

board a fishing boat, and, for the purpose of prolonging his sport,

put out to sea; when a sudden tempest arising, he was driven with his

companions on the coast of Ponthieu. The people of that district, as

was their native custom, immediately assembled from all quarters; and

Harold’s company, unarmed and few in number, were, as it easily might

be, quickly overpowered by an armed multitude, and bound hand and

foot. Harold, craftily meditating a remedy for this mischance, sent a

person, whom he had allured by very great promises, to William, to say,

that he had been sent into Normandy by the king, for the purpose of

expressly confirming, in person, the message which had been imperfectly

delivered by people of less authority; but that he was detained in

fetters by Guy earl of Ponthieu, and could not execute his embassy:

that it was the barbarous and inveterate custom of the country, that

such as had escaped destruction at sea, should meet with perils on

shore: that it well became a man of his dignity, not to let this pass

unpunished: that to suffer those to be laden with chains, who appealed

to his protection, detracted somewhat from his own greatness: and that

if his captivity must be terminated by money, he would gladly give

it to earl William, but not to the contemptible Guy. By these means,

Harold was liberated at William’s command, and conducted to Normandy

by Guy in person. The earl entertained him with much respect, both in

banqueting and in vesture, according to the custom of his country; and

the better to learn his disposition, and at the same time to try his

courage, took him with him in an expedition he at that time led against

Brittany. There, Harold, well proved both in ability and courage, won

the heart of the Norman; and, still more to ingratiate himself, he of

his own accord, confirmed to him by oath the castle of Dover, which was

under his jurisdiction, and the kingdom of England, after the death

of Edward. Wherefore, he was honoured both by having his daughter,

then a child, betrothed to him, and by the confirmation of his ample

patrimony, and was received into the strictest intimacy. Not long after

his return home, the king was crowned[285] at London on Christmas-day,

and being there seized with the disorder of which he was sensible he

should die, he commanded the church of Westminster to be dedicated on

Innocents-day.[286] Thus, full of years and of glory, he surrendered

his pure spirit to heaven, and was buried on the day of the Epiphany,

in the said church, which he, first in England, had erected after that

kind of style which, now, almost all attempt to rival at enormous

expense. The race of the West Saxons, which had reigned in Britain five

hundred and seventy-one years, from the time of Cerdic, and two hundred

and sixty-one from Egbert, in him ceased altogether to rule. For while

the grief for the king’s death was yet fresh, Harold, on the very

day of the Epiphany, seized the diadem, and extorted from the nobles

their consent; though the English say, that it was granted him by the

king: but I conceive it alleged, more through regard to Harold, than

through sound judgment, that Edward should transfer his inheritance to

a man of whose power he had always been jealous. Still, not to conceal

the truth, Harold would have governed the kingdom with prudence and

with courage, in the character he had assumed, had he undertaken it

lawfully. Indeed, during Edward’s lifetime, he had quelled, by his

valour, whatever wars were excited against him; wishing to signalize

himself with his countrymen, and looking forward with anxious hope

to the crown. He first vanquished Griffin king of the Welsh, as I

have before related, in battle; and, afterwards, when he was again

making formidable efforts to recover his power, deprived him of his

head; appointing as his successors, two of his own adherents, that is,

the brothers of this Griffin, Blegent and Rivallo, who had obtained

his favour by their submission. The same year Tosty arrived on the

Humber, from Flanders, with a fleet of sixty ships, and infested with

piratical depredations those parts which were adjacent to the mouth

of the river; but being quickly driven from the province by the joint

force of the brothers, Edwin and Morcar, he set sail towards Scotland;

where meeting with Harold Harfager king of Norway, then meditating an

attack on England with three hundred ships, he put himself under his

command. Both, then, with united forces, laid waste the country beyond

the Humber; and falling on the brothers, reposing after their recent

victory and suspecting no attack of the kind, they first routed, and

then shut them up in York. Harold, on hearing this, proceeded thither

with all his forces, and, each nation making every possible exertion, a

bloody encounter followed: but the English obtained the advantage, and

put the Norwegians to flight. Yet, however reluctantly posterity may

believe it, one single Norwegian for a long time delayed the triumph

of so many, and such great men. For standing on the entrance of the

bridge, which is called Standford Brigge,[287] after having killed

several of our party, he prevented the whole from passing over. Being

invited to surrender, with the assurance that a man of such courage

should experience the amplest clemency from the English, he derided

those who entreated him; and immediately, with stern countenance,

reproached the set of cowards who were unable to resist an individual.

No one approaching nearer, as they thought it unadvisable to come to

close quarters with a man who had desperately rejected every means

of safety, one of the king’s followers aimed an iron javelin at him

from a distance; and transfixed him as he was boastfully flourishing

about, and too incautious from his security, so that he yielded the

victory to the English. The army immediately passing over without

opposition, destroyed the dispersed and flying Norwegians. King

Harfager and Tosty were slain; the king’s son, with all the ships, was

kindly sent back to his own country. Harold, elated by his successful

enterprise, vouchsafed no part of the spoil to his soldiers. Wherefore

many, as they found opportunity, stealing away, deserted the king, as

he was proceeding to the battle of Hastings. For with the exception

of his stipendiary and mercenary soldiers, he had very few of the

people[288] with him; on which account, circumvented by a stratagem of

William’s, he was routed, with the army he headed, after possessing

the kingdom nine months and some days. The effect of war in this

affair was trifling; it was brought about by the secret and wonderful

counsel of God: since the Angles never again, in any general battle,

made a struggle for liberty, as if the whole strength of England had

fallen with Harold, who certainly might and ought to pay the penalty

of his perfidy, even though it were at the hands of the most unwarlike

people. Nor in saying this, do I at all derogate from the valour of

the Normans, to whom I am strongly bound, both by my descent, and for

the privileges I enjoy. Still[289] those persons appear to me to err,

who augment the numbers of the English, and underrate their courage;

who, while they design to extol the Normans, load them with ignominy. A

mighty commendation indeed! that a very warlike nation should conquer

a set of people who were obstructed by their multitude, and fearful

through cowardice! On the contrary, they were few in number and brave

in the extreme; and sacrificing every regard to their bodies, poured

forth their spirit for their country. But, however, as these matters

await a more detailed narrative, I shall now put a period to my second

book, that I may return to my composition, and my readers to the

perusal of it, with fresh ardour.

William of Malmesbury's Chronicle of the Kings of England From the earliest period to the reign of King Stephen · 第 5 / 13 章