Paul W. Miller

_Wittenberg University

Springfield, Ohio

December, 1965_

Footnotes:

[1] See in this connection my article "The Elizabethan Minor Epic,"

=SP=, LV (1958), 31-38, answered by Walter Allen, Jr., pp. 515-518. My

chief concern in this article was to show that the kind of poetry

described therein, though in years past loosely and variously referred

to by such terms as "Ovidian poetry" or "mythological love poetry,"

and often lumped together indiscriminately with other kinds such as

the complaint, the tragical history, and the verse romance, actually

constitutes a distinct genre recognized in practice by Renaissance

poets. Whether or not there is classical authority for use of the term

"epyllion," though a significant point of scholarship, is not the main

issue here. Either the term "minor epic" or "epyllion" is

satisfactory, provided its referent is clear, and accurately

described.

[2] Published with I. C's [John Chalkhill's?] =Alcilia, Philoparthens

Loving Folly. Whereunto is Added Pigmalion's Image ... and Also

Epigrammes by Sir I. H.= [John Harington] =and Others=, STC 4275.

[3] =Bibliographical Collections and Notes, 1893-1903= (London, 1903;

reprinted 1961 by Burt Franklin), p. 301.

[4] Or Linche's.

[5] Actually Grosart edited the second impression of =The Scourge=, STC

969 (1614), the earliest impression he knew at the time, though by

1883 he had become aware of the unique Huth copy of the 1613 edition.

(See pp. 49-50 issued with copy no. 38 of Grosart's edition of =The

Scourge=.)

[6] =Philos and Licia= was probably not composed much before Oct. 2,

1606, when it was entered in =A Transcript of the Registers ...

1554-1640=, ed. Arber, III (London, 1876), 330. I have placed it first,

however, because of the undeserved neglect from which it has suffered

over the years and because of its literary superiority to the other

poems in the collection. I have placed =Pyramus and Thisbe= second

because, though not known to have been published prior to 1617, it was

doubtless composed by Nov. 25, 1596, the date given in the dedication,

and probably printed shortly thereafter in an edition now lost.

[7] "Thomas Heywood's =Art of Love= Lost and Found," =The Library=, III

(1922), 212.

[8] The Francis Freeling-Henry Huth-W. A. White copy, here reproduced

by courtesy of the Folger Shakespeare Library.

[9] These evident errors appear to have been corrected in ink on the

Bodleian copy of the 1620 impression, of which I have seen a

microfilm.

[10] Gerald Eades Bentley has gleaned and summarized a few additional

facts about Barksted in =The Jacobean and Caroline Stage=, II (Oxford,

1941), 357-358. For an account of the correspondences between =The

Insatiate Countess= and the poems, see R. A. Small, "The Authorship and

Date of =The Insatiate Countess=," =Harvard Studies and Notes in

Philology and Literature=, V (1896), 279-282. For a more recent survey

of Barksted's probable contribution to =The Insatiate Countess= see A.

J. Axelrad, =Un Malcontent Elizabethain: John Marston= (Paris, 1955),

pp. 86-90.

[11] The attribution was made by Thomas Corser in =Collectanea

Anglo-Poetica=, LII (Manchester, 1860), 24-25, and has been generally

accepted. In further support of Corser's attribution, one might

mention the anecdote in =Amos and Laura= about a merchant seaman,

followed by a vivid description of a storm at sea (pp. 228-229). Such

a tale and description are appropriate in a poem by Page, who had been

a naval chaplain and who published several sermons and other

devotional works for seamen.

[12] Francis Meres, =Palladis Tamia= (1598). Introduction by Don Cameron

Allen (New York, 1938), p. 284.

[13] Anthony a Wood, =Athenae Oxonienses and Fasti Oxonienses=, 2 vols.

in one (London, 1691), 467. Page was vicar of St. Nicholas Church in

Deptford from 1597 until his death in 1630.

[14] =Shakespeare's Ovid Being Arthur Golding's Translation of the

Metamorphoses=, ed. W. H. D. Rouse (London, 1904; reprinted Carbondale,

Ill. 1961), IV, 67-201; X. 327-605.

[15] Not Orpheus, as stated by Professor Douglas Bush in =Mythology and

the Renaissance Tradition= (Minneapolis, 1932), p. 183.

[16] =Shakespeare's Ovid=, X, 343-346.

[17] Despite these departures from Ovid, the British Museum Catalogue

continues to list this as a "translation" of Ovid's =Metamorphoses=, X.

For a somewhat later example of an actual translation of this tale,

considerably amplified, see James Gresham's (not Graham's, as in =STC=)

=The Picture of Incest, STC= 18969 (1626), ed. Grosart (Manchester,

1876). In idiomatic English, occasionally ornamented with such triple

epithets as "azure-veyned necke" and "Nectar-candied-words," Gresham

expands Golding's Ovid by more than 300 lines. Although he invents a

suitable brief description of Mirrha's nurse, whom he calls "old

trott," and throws in a few erotic tid-bits quite in the spirit of the

minor epic, he never departs from Ovid's story line and never

introduces descriptive detail of which there is not at least a hint in

Ovid.

[18] No. 95 in the edition cited below.

[19] Mary A. Scott, =Elizabethan Translations from the Italian= (Boston,

1916), pp. 20, 144.

[20] =Poems by Richard Linche, Gentleman= (=1596=), ed. Grosart, p. x; =The

Love of Dom Diego and Gynevra=, ed. Arber in =An English Garner=, VII

(Birmingham, 1883), 209.

[21] "The Source of Richard Lynche's 'Amorous Poeme of Dom Diego and

Ginevra,'" =PMLA=, LVIII (1943), 579-580.

[22] William Painter, =The Palace of Pleasure=, IV (London, 1929), 74.

(Actually, "Catheloigne" in Painter.)

[23] =Certain Tragical Discourses of Bandello=, trans. Geffraie Fenton

anno 1567. Introd. by Robert Langton Douglas, II (London, 1898), 239.

[24] Painter, I, No. 40, 153-158.

[25] Painter, I, 156.

[26] Painter, I, 157.

[27] Bush, p. 139.

[28] Two (=Philos and Licia, Amos and Laura=) employ the Marlovian

couplet, two (=Dom Diego= and =The Scourge=) the Shakespearean sixain, and

Barksted's two employ eight-line stanzas, with =Mirrha= rhyming

=_ababccdd_= (the Shakespearean stanza plus a couplet), and =Hiren=

rhyming =_ababbcac_=, a more tightly knit departure from Shakespeare's

stanza. The last, =Pyramus and Thisbe=, suggests its debt to both

masters--or plays both ends against the middle--by employing a 12

(2x6)-line stanza composed of couplets, with the last couplet having a

double rhyme probably designed to echo the concluding couplet of the

Shakespearean sixain.

[29] Thomas Lodge, =Scillaes Metamorphosis= in =Elizabethan Minor Epics=,

ed. Donno, p. 35, stanza 71.

[30] Yet =Dom Diego= seems not to have been previously identified as a

minor epic. The late C. S. Lewis, a few pages before his brilliant

discussion of =Hero and Leander= as an epyllion, refers to Lynche's poem

as a "stanzaic =novella=." See Lewis' =English Literature in the

Sixteenth Century Excluding Drama= (Oxford, 1954), p. 479, pp. 486-488.

[31] For a complete list of Burton's books in the Bodleian and Christ

Church libraries, numbering 581 and 473 items respectively, see "Lists

of Burton's Library," ed. F. Madan, =Oxford Bibliographical Society

Proceedings & Papers=, I, Part 3 (1925; printed 1926), 222-246.

[32] No. 376 in Ronald B. McKerrow, =Printers' & Publishers' Devices in

England & Scotland 1485-1640= (London, 1913), p. 144. According to

McKerrow, the bird in this handsome device, with the word "wick" in

its bill, is probably a smew, with a pun intended on the name of the

owner of the device, Smethwick.

[33] For these notes I am indebted to an excellent article, "The

library of Robert Burton," ed. F. Madan, p. 185 especially, in the

=Oxford Bibliographical Society= volume listed above.

[34] No. 240 in McKerrow, =Printers' Devices=, p. 92. "Framed device of

a lion passant crowned and collared, a mullet for difference, on an

anchor; with =Desir n'a repos=, and the date 1586."

[35] =A Dictionary of Printers and Booksellers=, ed. R. B. McKerrow

(London, 1910), p. 151.

[36] Ibid., p. 199.

[37] Arber, =A Transcript=, IV, 149.

[38] Contributing to the unattractive appearance of the Bodleian copy

of =Mirrha=, which Grosart consulted, is the close cropping of its upper

margins.

[39] =The poems of William Barksted=, ed. Grosart (Manchester, 1876), p.

x.

[40] Barksted, p. xiv.

[41] Henry Plomer, =A Short History of English Printing= (London, 1900),

p. 163.

[42] The Oxford and Folger copies, of which only the first is listed

in the STC. There is a third, imperfect copy at Trinity College,

Cambridge, from the Edward Capell collection. According to Mr. L.W.

Hanson, Keeper of Printed Books at the Bodleian, the tipping of the

type in the Bodleian copy represents a fault at binding.

[43] Though the printer's name is not given, the printer's device, a

fleur-de-lis, no. 251 in McKerrow, was used by Okes about this time.

[44] Grosart, p. xiii, n. 17, stanza 20, line 7, which has

"adoration[e]" in both the original and Grosart's "corrected" version,

and p. xiii, n. 19, stanza 41, line 6, "graces" in both copies.

[45] The printer was Thomas Creede, as revealed by the printer's

device, no. 299 in McKerrow, p. 117: "Framed device of Truth being

scourged by a hand from the clouds. Between her feet the initials T.

C. The motto Viressit vulnere veritas."

[46] The presence of these dedicatory verses in the Huntington copy

has been noted by Franklin Williams in his =Index of Dedications and

Commendatory Verses= (London, 1962), p. 193.

[47] The Folger copy, here reproduced, is complete except for Sig. L4

(pp. 235-236), which have been supplied from another copy.

[48] This error goes back to the first entry in =A Catalogue of the

Library of Henry Huth= (London, 1880), which says the second edition is

the same as the first.

[49] The first word of the next stanza is changed from "And" in the

1613 edition to "Then" in the second impression.

[50] Rather surprisingly, in view of its silent emulation of Marlowe's

poem, =Philos and Licia= pays lavish tribute to Sidney. But since

tributes to Sidney were common in the period, this one may be no more

than a conventional recognition of his greatness.

[51] Occasionally, though, it introduces odd off-rhymes such as

"forth" and "mouth" (p. 5), "vaines" and "streames" (p. 6), "either"

and "fairer" (p. 8).

A

PLEASANT

AND DELIGHTFVLL

POEME OF

two Louers,

PHILOS

and

_LICIA_.

Seven Minor Epics of the English Renaissance (1596-1624) · 第 17 / 28 题