AUTHORSHIP

As befits the paucity of their known literary productions, the authors

of these poems have in common chiefly their anonymity, or a degree of

obscurity approaching it. The authors of =Philos and Licia= and of H.

A's =The Scourge= are unknown. Though the authors of the other poems are

known, little is known about them. The mystery of the authorship of

=The Scourge= was compounded in the nineteenth century by its incorrect

attribution to one Henry Austin. Grosart, for example, argued that the

H. A. on the title page and on the address "To the Reader" of the 1614

impression, and the A. H. on the corresponding pages of the 1620

impression, =STC= 970, was the Austin denounced by Thomas Heywood for

stealing his translations of Ovid's =Ars Amatoria= and =De Remedio

Amoris=. Arthur Melville Clark, in correcting this error, pointed out

that these stolen translations of Ovid should not be confused with =The

Scourge=, an original poetic composition based on Book X of a quite

different work by Ovid, =The Metamorphoses=. Clark concluded that "H. A.

or A. H. was probably the editor, not the author, although he may have

made certain corrections and additions, as the title-page of the

second edition states."[7]

However, H. A.--not A. H.--was almost certainly the author of =The

Scourge=, as evidenced, among other details, by the title page of the

1613 =Scourge=,[8] unknown to Clark, which unequivocally states:

"Written by =H. A.=" As to the initials H. A. appended to the address

"To the Reader" of the 1614 impression and the A. H. on the title and

address pages of the 1620 impression, they were probably printer's

errors, arising in the 1614 impression from the printer's careless

assumption that the address "To the Reader" was the work of the author

rather than the bookseller, and in the impression of 1620 from a

simple typographical metathesis of the letters H and A.[9]

The authorship of the remaining five poems, together with such

relevant facts of the authors' lives as are known, is as follows.

=Pyramus and Thisbe= is by one Dunstan Gale (fl. 1596), about whom

nothing else is known. =Dom Diego and Ginevra= has long been attributed

to Richard Lynche (fl. 1601), otherwise chiefly known for his =Diella=,

a conventional sonnet sequence accompanying =Dom Diego=, and for his

translation of Cartari's =Le Imagini=, Englished as =The Fountaine of

Ancient Fiction= (1599). =Mirrha= and =Hiren= are by William Barksted (fl.

1611), "one of the servants of his Majesties Revels," as the title

page of =Hiren= proclaims. Barksted is believed to have completed =The

Insatiate Countess= after Marston's withdrawal from the stage in 1608

or 1609. This play, bearing Barksted's name in one issue of the 1631

edition, contains a number of lines and phrases identical with lines

and phrases in =Mirrha= and =Hiren=.[10]

=Amos and Laura= has been attributed, probably correctly, to Samuel

Page (1574-1630),[11] who is mentioned by Meres as "most passionate

among us to bewaile and bemoane the perplexities of Love,"[12] and by

his fellow-Oxonian Anthony a Wood as long-time Vicar of Deptford.[13]

Although a few additional facts are known about these authors, none

seems to contribute to an understanding of the poems reprinted, and

all may be found under the appropriate authors' names in the =DNB=.

Seven Minor Epics of the English Renaissance (1596-1624) · 第 12 / 28 题