CHAPTER LXXXV.

1775.

Dunmore's War--Captain Squires--Woodford sent against Dunmore--

Woodford and Henry--Affairs at Great Bridge--Battle of Great

Bridge--Howe assumes Command--Indignity offered Henry--

Committee of Safety--Pendleton--Howe occupies Norfolk.

DUNMORE in the meanwhile had rallied a band of tories, runaway negroes,

and British soldiers, and collected a naval force, and was carrying on a

petty warfare. Captain Squires, of his majesty's sloop Otter, during the

summer cruised in the James and York, plundering the inhabitants and

carrying off slaves. Early in September a tender laden with stores,

being driven ashore near Hampton, Squires (who happened to be in her)

and most of the crew escaped. The sloop was burnt by the inhabitants.

Squires in retaliation threatening Hampton, Major Innes, with a hundred

men, was sent down from Williamsburg to defend it. Squires in the latter

part of October appeared near Hampton with several vessels, and

threatened to land and burn the town. It was defended by a company of

regulars under Captain George Nicholas, a company of minute-men, and

some militia. Upon Squires attempting to land a skirmish ensued, and the

enemy was driven off with some loss. Squires' party returning on the

next day, burnt down a house belonging to a Mr. Cooper. Intelligence of

this affair having reached Williamsburg, a company of riflemen was sent

to Hampton, and Colonel Woodford was despatched to take command there.

Upon their arrival on the next morning, Squires began to fire upon the

town, but was again compelled to retire. These petty hostilities were

the subject of humorous remark in the _Virginia Gazette_.[632:A]

Dunmore, on the 7th of November, 1775, proclaimed martial-law, summoned

all persons capable of bearing arms to his standard, on penalty of being

proclaimed traitors, and offered freedom to all servants and slaves who

should join him. He had now the ascendency in the country around

Norfolk, which abounded in tories. The committee of safety despatched

Woodford with his regiment and two hundred minute-men, amounting in all

to eight hundred men, with orders to cross the James River at Sandy

Point and go in pursuit of Dunmore. Colonel Henry had been desirous to

be employed in this service, and, it was said, solicited it, but the

committee of safety refused, and amid such exciting events he found

himself, eager as he was for action, and ardent and impetuous as was his

nature, still compelled to sit down inactive in Williamsburg, where he

had been quartered since September. At length after the lapse of nearly

another month of tedious inaction, during which he received no regular

communications from Colonel Woodford, Colonel Henry wrote to him thus:

"Not hearing of any despatch from you for a long time, I can no longer

forbear sending to know your situation and what has occurred?" Woodford

on the next day replied from the Great Bridge, near Norfolk, and said:

"When joined I shall always esteem myself immediately under your

command, and will obey accordingly, but when sent to command a separate

and distinct corps, under the immediate instructions of the committee of

safety, whenever that body, or the honorable convention is sitting, I

look upon it as my indispensable duty to address my intelligence to them

as the supreme power in this colony." Thus Colonel Henry's chagrin at

not being permitted to march himself against Dunmore was aggravated by

Colonel Woodford's declining, while detached, to acknowledge his

superiority in command. Woodford, upon approaching Dunmore, found that

he had entrenched himself on the north side of the Elizabeth River, at

the Great Bridge, about twenty miles from Norfolk. Judge Marshall says

that it was necessary for the Provincials to cross it in order to reach

Norfolk, but Thomas Ludwell Lee, writing at the time, says that there

were other ways by which to pass to Norfolk. "Our army has been for some

time arrested in its march to Norfolk by a redoubt, or stockade, or

hog-pen, as they call it here, by way of derision, at the end of this

bridge. Though, by the way, this hog-pen seems filled with a parcel of

wild boars, which we appear not overfond to meddle with." Some of the

more eager patriots were apprehensive that Woodford would be amused at

that post until Dunmore should finish his fortifications at Norfolk,

where he was now entrenching and mounting cannon, some hundreds of

negroes being employed in the work. Added to this the advanced season of

the year and the hourly expectation of the enemy's receiving a

re-enforcement from St. Augustine, as was known by intercepted

intelligence, made a bold movement necessary, "while we walk too

cautiously in the road of prudence."

Dunmore's power on land was confined to the counties of Norfolk and

Princess Anne; his recent course had united the colony with few

exceptions against him, and if the ministry had ransacked the whole

world for the person of all others the best fitted to ruin their cause,

they could not have found a fitter agent than Lord Dunmore. He had just

now proclaimed liberty to the slaves, and declared martial-law.

It was believed that one frigate could capture the whole of his fleet,

and other vessels laden with the floating property of tories, of

enormous value. John Page wished earnestly for a few armed vessels to

keep possession of the rivers, the arteries of commerce, at the least

the upper parts of them. While five thousand men could not defend so

exposed a coast against the depredations of Dunmore's fleet, yet five

hundred in armed vessels could easily take the fleet. But a majority of

the committee of safety and of the convention, held it in vain for

Virginia then to attempt any thing by water.[634:A]

Dunmore had erected a small fort on an oasis surrounded by a morass, not

far from the Dismal Swamp, accessible on either side only by a long

causeway. Woodford encamped within cannon-shot of this post, in mud and

mire, in a village at the southern end of the causeway, across which he

threw up a breast-work, but being destitute of artillery he did not

attack the fort. After a few days Dunmore, hearing by a servant lad, who

had deserted from Woodford's camp, that his force did not exceed three

hundred men, mustered his whole strength and despatched them in the

night to the fort, with orders to force the breast-works early next

morning, or die in the attempt. On the 9th of December, 1775, a little

before sunrise, Captain Fordyce, at the head of sixty grenadiers, who

six abreast led the column, advanced along the causeway. Colonel Bullet

first discovered the enemy, and the alarm being given in Woodford's

camp, a small guard at the breast-works began the fire, others hastened

from their tents, and regardless of order, kept up a fire on the head of

the column. Fordyce, though received so warmly in front, and flanked by

a party posted on a rising ground to his right, rallied his men, and

marched up within twenty yards of the breast-work, when he fell pierced

with bullets. His followers now retreated, and at this juncture Colonel

Woodford arrived, and directed a pursuit of the enemy, who were galled

by a handful of riflemen under Colonel Stephen, but found protection

under cover of the guns of the fort. Woodford declined attempting to

storm the works, although strongly urged to it by the bold and ardent

Bullet and the enthusiastic wishes of the troops.

In the battle of the Great Bridge every grenadier was killed, and the

enemy's killed and wounded amounted to about one hundred. Four officers

were killed, one wounded and made prisoner. The affair has been styled

"a Bunker Hill in miniature:" but there the loss was very heavy on both

sides; whereas here Woodford's troops suffered no loss.

John Marshall, afterwards chief justice, was in this expedition.[635:A]

Richard Kidder Meade, father of Bishop Meade, was also present at the

affair of the Great Bridge. This was the first scene of revolutionary

bloodshed in Virginia. On the night following this action the royalists

evacuated the fort, and Dunmore took refuge on board of his fleet.

Colonel Howe, with five or six hundred North Carolina troops, now joined

Woodford, and assumed command at the Great Bridge, with the consent of

Woodford, who yielded to the seniority of his commission. Colonel Henry

now saw the colonel of the second Virginia regiment, who had refused to

acknowledge his command, submitting himself to an officer of no higher

rank, and of another colony. He found himself, although invested with

the title of commander-in-chief, yet virtually superseded and reduced to

the mere shadow of a name. To nullify his superiority of command the

committee had only to detach his subordinate officers.

On the thirteenth of December a member of the convention wrote to

Colonel Woodford: "I have talked with Colonel Henry about this matter;

he thinks he has been ill-treated, and insists the officers under his

command shall submit to his orders:" and again, "A commander or general,

I suppose, will be sent us by the congress, as it is expected our troops

will be upon continental pay." Mr. Pendleton, chairman of the committee,

in a letter dated December the twenty-fourth, and addressed to Colonel

Woodford, said: "The field-officers to each regiment will be named here

and recommended to congress; in case our army is taken into continental

pay, they will send commissions. A general officer will be chosen

there, I doubt not, and sent us; with that matter I hope we shall

not intermeddle, lest it should be thought propriety requires our

calling, or rather recommending, our present officer to that station."

It appears that Colonel Henry had not owed his military appointment

to those members of the committee of safety who conducted the

correspondence.[636:A] Mr. Pendleton looked upon the appointment of

Henry as an "unlucky step." Pendleton and Woodford were both of the

County of Caroline.

Late in December, Colonel Henry insisting upon a determination of the

question thus raised between him and Colonel Woodford, the committee

passed the following resolution:--

"_Resolved_, Unanimously, that Colonel Woodford, although

acting upon a separate and detached command, ought to

correspond with Colonel Henry, and make returns to him at

proper times of the state and condition of the forces under

his command, and also that he is subject to his orders when

the convention or the committee of safety is not sitting; but

that while either of these bodies is sitting he is to receive

his orders from one of them."

This decision virtually annulled the power of Henry as

commander-in-chief. The clause of the ordinance of convention which

authorized the committee to direct military movements is the

following:--

"_And whereas_ it may be necessary for the public security

that the forces to be raised by virtue of this ordinance

should, as occasion may require, be marched to different parts

of the colony, and that the officers should be subject to a

proper control,--

"_Be it ordained by the authority aforesaid_, That the

officers and soldiers under such command shall, in all things

not otherwise particularly provided for by this ordinance and

the articles established for their regulation, be under the

control and subject to the order of the general committee of

safety."[637:A]

It could hardly be said of Woodford and his men that they were marched

to a different part of the colony; he and Colonel Henry were still in

the same quarter of Virginia, and not far apart. For so numerous a body

as the convention, or even the committee of safety, to assume all the

functions of the commander-in-chief, was incompatible with the unity,

secrecy, and promptitude demanded in the conduct of war. If not, of what

advantage was the appointment of a commander-in-chief at all? If the

committee, by such a construction of their powers, could virtually annul

the authority of the commander-in-chief, he, whose powers were at the

least as ample as theirs, might, by a like construction, have repudiated

their authority. The conduct of the committee toward Colonel Henry was

strongly censured by the people as well as the troops, and they imputed

it to personal envy.[637:B] Those, however, who approved of the

committee's course, attributed it to a want of confidence in Colonel

Henry, as deficient in military experience.[638:A] Other mortifications

were in store for the man of the people.

Shortly after the battle of the Great Bridge the Provincials, under

Howe, took possession of Norfolk, encamped there in the "Town Camp."

FOOTNOTES:

[632:A] John Banister proposing to turn his saw-mill at Petersburg into

a powder-mill, the convention ordered saltpetre and sulphur to be sent

there for him. Richard Bland advised that saltpetre should be made at

Appomattox warehouses, (Petersburg,) fearing that supineness possessed

all ranks, and offering to contribute toward that useful work.

[634:A] Lee Papers, S. Lit. Messr., 1858, p. 254.

[635:A] An account of his visit to Yorktown shortly after the battle,

and his courtship, by John Eston Cooke, is to be found in Historical

Magazine for June, 1859.

[636:A] Wirt's Life of Patrick Henry, 171.

[637:A] Journal of the Convention of 1775.

[637:B] Wirt's Henry, 178.

[638:A] And perhaps as unduly familiar with the men under his command.

As an instance of this it is said that he was seen among them with his

coat off--a grave charge indeed!

History of the Colony and Ancient Dominion of Virginia · 第 60 / 76 章