CHAP. X.

_Concerning the Channel of the Sea, and the Original of it; The

Causes of its irregular Form and unequal Depths: As also of the

Original of Islands, their Situation and other Properties._

We have hitherto given an Account of the subterraneous Regions, and of

their general Form; We now come above Ground to view the Surface of the

Globe, which we find _Terraqueous_, or divided into Sea and Land: These

we must survey, and what is remarkable in them as to their Frame and

Structure, we must give an Account of from our _Hypothesis_, and shew to

be unaccountable from any other yet known.

AS for the Ocean, there are two things considerable in it, the Water and

the Channel that contains it. The Water no doubt is as ancient as the

Earth, and cotemporary with it, and we suppose it to be part of the

great Abyss wherein the World was drown’d; the rest lying cover’d under

the Hollow Fragments of Continents and Islands. But that is not so much

the Subject of our present Discourse as the Channel of the Ocean, that

vast and prodigious Cavity that runs quite round the Globe, and

reacheth, for ought we know, from Pole to Pole, and in many Places is

unsearchably deep: When I present this great Gulf to my Imagination,

emptied of all its Waters, naked and gaping at the Sun, stretching its

Jaws from one End of the Earth to another, it appears to me the most

ghastly thing in Nature. What Hands or Instruments could work a Trench

in the Body of the Earth of this vastness, and lay Mountains and Rocks

on the side of it, as Ramparts to enclose it?

BUT as we justly admire its Greatness, so we cannot at all admire its

Beauty or Elegancy, for ’tis as deform’d and irregular as it is great.

And there appearing nothing of Order, or any regular Design in its

Parts, it seems reasonable to believe that it was not the Work of

Nature, according to her first Intention, or according to the first

Model that was drawn in Measure and Proportion by the Line and by the

Plummet, but a secondary Work, and the best that could be made of broken

Materials. And upon this Supposition ’tis easy to imagine, how upon the

Dissolution of the Primæval Earth, the Channel of the Sea was made, or

that huge Cavity that lies between the several Continents of the Earth;

which shall be more particularly explain’d after we have view’d a little

better the Form of it, and the Islands that lie scatter’d by its Shores.

THERE is no Cavity in the Earth, whether open or subterraneous, that is

comparably so great as that of the Ocean, nor would any appear of that

Deformity if we could see it empty. The Inside of a Cave is rough and

unsightly; the Beds of great Rivers and great Lakes, when they are laid

dry, look very raw and rude, the Valleys of the Earth, if they were

naked, without Trees and without Grass, nothing but bare Ground and bare

Stones, from the tops of their Mountains, would have a ghastly Aspect;

but the Sea-Channel is the Complex of all these; here Caves, empty

Lakes, naked Valleys are represented as in their Original, or rather far

exceeded and out-done as to all their Irregularities; for the Cavity of

the Ocean is universally irregular, both as to the Shores and Borders of

it; as to the uncertain Breadth and the uncertain Depth of its several

Parts, and as to its Ground and Bottom and the whole Mould: If the Sea

had been drawn round the Earth in regular Figures and Borders, it might

have been a great Beauty to our Globe, and we should reasonably have

concluded it a Work of the first Creation, or of Nature’s first

Production; but finding on the contrary all the Marks of Disorder and

Disproportion in it, we may as reasonably conclude, that it did not

belong to the first Order of Things, but was something succedaneous,

when the Degeneracy of Mankind, and the Judgments of God had destroyed

the first World, and subjected the Creation to some kind of Vanity.

NOR can it easily be imagin’d, if the Sea had been always, and the

Earth, in this _Terraqueous_ Form, broke into Continents and Islands,

how Mankind could have been propagated at first thro’ the Face of the

Earth, all from one Head and from one Place. For Navigation was not then

known, at least as to the Grand Ocean, or to pass from Continent to

Continent; and I believe _Noah_’s Ark was the first Ship, or Vessel of

Bulk, that ever was built in the World; how could then the Posterity of

_Adam_ overflow the Earth, and stock the several Parts of the World, if

they had been distant or separate then, as they are now, by the

Interposal of the great Ocean? But this Consideration we will insist

upon more largely in another Place; let us reflect upon the

Irregularities of the Sea-Channel again, and the possible Causes of it.

IF we could imagine the Channel of the Sea to have been made as we may

imagine the Channel of Rivers to have been, by long and insensible

Attrition, the Water wearing by degrees the Ground under it, by the

Force it hath from its Descent and Course, we should not wonder at its

irregular Form; but ’tis not possible this Channel should have had any

such Original; whence should its Water have descended, from what

Mountains, or from what Clouds? Where is the Spring-head of the Sea?

What Force could eat away half the Surface of the Earth; and wear it

hollow to an immeasurable Depth? This must not be from feeble and

lingring Causes, such as the Attrition of Waters, but from some great

Violence offer’d to Nature, such as we suppose to have been in the

general Deluge, when the Frame of the Earth was broken. And after we

have a little survey’d the Sea-Coast, and, so far as we can, the Form of

the Sea-Channel, we shall the more easily believe that they could have

no other Original than what we assign.

THE Shores and Coasts of the Sea are no way equal or uniform, but go in

a Line uncertainly crooked and broke; indented and jagg’d as a thing

torn, as you may see in the Maps of the Coasts and the Sea-charts; and

yet there are innumerable more Inequalities than are taken Notice of in

those Draughts; for they only mark the greater Promontories and Bays;

but there are besides those a Multitude of Creeks and Out-lets, Necks of

Land and Angles, which break the Evenness of the Shore in all manner of

Ways. Then the Height and Level of the Shore is as uncertain as the Line

of it; ’tis sometimes high and sometimes low, sometimes spread in sandy

Plains, as smooth as the Sea it self, and of such an equal Height with

it, that the Waves seem to have no Bounds, but the meer Figure and

Convexity of the Globe; in other Places ’tis rais’d into Banks and

Ramparts of Earth, and in others ’tis wall’d in with Rocks; and all this

without any Order that we can observe, or any other Reason than that

this is what might be expected in a Ruin.

AS to the Depths and Soundings of the Sea, they are under no Rule nor

Equality, any more than the Figures of the Shores; Shallows in some

Places, and Gulphs in others; Beds of Sands sometimes, and sometimes

Rocks under Water; as Navigators have learn’d by a long and dangerous

Experience: And tho’ we that are upon dry Land, are not much concern’d

how the Rocks and the Shelves lie in the Sea, yet a poor

Shipwreckt-Mariner, when he hath run his Vessel upon a Rock in the

middle of the Channel, expostulates bitterly with Nature, who it was

that plac’d that Rock there, and to what purpose? Was there not Room

enough, saith he, upon the Land, or the Shore, to lay your great Stones,

but they must be thrown into the middle of the Sea, as it were in spite

to Navigation? The best Apology that can be made for Nature in this

Case, so far as I know, is to confess, that the whole Business of the

Sea-Channel is but a Ruin, and in a Ruin Things tumble uncertainly, and

commonly lie in Confusion: Tho’ to speak the Truth, it seldom happens,

unless in narrow Seas, that Rocks, or Banks, or Islands, lie in the

middle of them, or very far from the Shores.

HAVING view’d the more visible Parts of the Channel of the Sea, we must

now descend to the Bottom of it, and see the Form and Contrivance of

that; but who shall guide us in our Journey, while we walk, as _Job_

saith, _Chap. xxxviii. 16._ in the search of the Deep? Or who can make a

Description of that which none hath seen? It is reasonable to believe,

that the Bottom of the Sea is much more rugged, broken and irregular

than the Face of the Land. There are Mountains, and Valleys, and Rocks,

and Ridges of Rocks, and all the common Inequalities we see upon Land;

beside these, ’tis very likely there are Caves under Water, and hollow

Passages into the Bowels of the Earth, by which the Seas circulate and

communicate one with another, and with subterraneous Waters; those great

_Eddies_ and infamous _Syrtes_ and Whirpools that are in some Seas, as

the _Baltick_ and the _Mediterranean_, that suck into them and overwhelm

whatever comes within their reach, shew that there is something below

that sucks from them in Proportion, and that drinks up the Sea, as the

Sea drinks up the Rivers. We ought also to imagine the Shores within the

Water to go inclin’d and sloping, but with great Inequality; there are

many Shelves in the way, and Chambers, and sharp Angles; and many broken

Rocks and great Stones lie rolled down to the Bottom.

’TIS true these things affect us little, because they are not expos’d to

our Senses; and we seldom give our selves the trouble to collect from

Reason what the Form of the invisible and inaccessible Parts of the

Earth is; or if we do sometimes, those _Ideas_ are faint and weak, and

make no lasting Impression upon our Imagination and Passions; but if we

should suppose the Ocean dry, and that we look’d down from the Top of

some high Cloud upon the empty Shell, how horridly and barbarously would

it look? And with what Amazement should we see it under us like an open

Hell, or a wide bottomless Pit? So deep, and hollow, and vast; so broken

and confus’d, so every way deform’d and monstrous. This would

effectually waken our Imagination, and make us enquire and wonder how

such a thing came in Nature; from what Causes, by what Force or Engines

could the Earth be torn in this prodigious manner? Did they dig the Sea

with Spades, and carry out the Molds in Hand-baskets? Where are the

Entrails laid? and how did they cleave the Rocks asunder? If as many

Pioneers as the Army of _Xerxes_ had been at Work ever since the

Beginning of the World, they could not have made a Ditch of this

Greatness. Nor is it the Greatness only, but that wild and multifarious

Confusion which we see in the Parts and Fashion of it, that makes it

strange and unaccountable; ’tis another Chaos in its kind; who can paint

the Scenes of it? Gulphs, and Precipices, and Cataracts; Pits within

Pits, and Rocks under Rocks, broken Mountains and ragged Islands, that

look as if they had been Countries pull’d up by the Roots, and planted

in the Sea.

IF we could make true and full Representations of these things to our

selves, I think we should not be so bold as to make them the immediate

Product of Divine Omnipotence; being destitute of all Appearance of Art

or Counsel. The first Orders of things are more perfect and regular; and

this _Decorum_ seems to be observ’d, that Nature doth not fall into

Disorder till Mankind be first degenerate and leads the way. Monsters

have been often made an Argument against Providence; if a Calf have two

Heads, or five Legs, straight there must not be a God in Heaven, or at

least not upon Earth; and yet this is but a Chance that happens once in

many Years, and is of no consequence at all to the rest of the World:

But if we make the standing Frame of Nature monstrous, or deform’d and

disproportion’d, and to have been so not by Corruption and Degeneracy,

but immediately by divine Creation or Formation, it would not be so easy

to answer that Objection against Providence. Let us therefore prevent

this Imputation; and supposing, according to our Theory, that these

Things were not originally thus, let us now explain more distinctly how

they came to pass at the Deluge, or upon the Dissolution of the first

Earth.

AND we will not content our selves with a general Answer to these

Observations concerning the Sea-Channel, as if it was a sufficient

Account of them to say they were the Effects of a Ruin; there are other

things to be consider’d and explain’d beside this Irregularity, as the

vast Hollowness of this Cavity, bigger incomparably than any other

belonging to the Earth; and also the Declivity of the Sides of it, which

lie shelving from Top to Bottom: For notwithstanding all the

Inequalities we have taken Notice of in the Channel of the Sea, it hath

one general Form, which may, though under many Differences, be observed

throughout, and that is, that the Shores and Sides within the Water lie

inclin’d, and you descend by degrees to the deepest Part which is

towards the Middle. This, I know, admits of many Exceptions; for

sometimes upon a rocky Shore, or among rocky Islands, the Sea is very

deep close to the Rocks, and the deeper, commonly the higher and steeper

the Rocks are. Also where the Descent is more leisurely, ’tis often

after a different Manner, in some Coasts more equal and uniform, in

others more broken and interrupted; but still there is a Descent to the

Channel or deepest Part, and this in the deep Ocean is fathomless; and

such a deep Ocean, and such a deep Channel there is always between

Continents. This, I think, is a Property as determinate as any we can

pitch upon in the Channel of the Sea, and with those other two

mention’d; its vast Cavity, and universal Irregularity, is all one can

desire an Account of, as to the Form of it; we will therefore from this

Ground take our Rise and first Measures for the Explication of the

Sea-Channel.

LET us suppose then in the Dissolution of the Earth, when it began to

fall, that it was divided only into three or four Fragments, according

to the Number of our Continents; but those Fragments being vastly great

could not descend at their full Breadth and Expansion, or at least could

not descend so fast in the Middle, as towards the Extremities; because

the Air about the Edges would yield and give Place easily, not having

far to go, to get out of the Way; but the Air that was under the Middle

of the Fragment could not without a very swift Motion get from under the

Concave of it, and consequently its Descent there would be more resisted

and suspended; but the Sides in the mean time would continually descend,

bending the Fragment with their Weight, and so making it of a lesser

Compass and Expansion than it was before: And by this Means there would

be an Interval and Distance made between the two falling Fragments, and

a good Part of the Abyss, after their Descent, would lie uncover’d in

the Middle betwixt them; as may be seen in the annex’d Figure, where the

Fragments A. B. bending downwards in their Extremities, separate as they

go, and after they are faln, leave a good Space in the Abyss betwixt

them altogether uncover’d: This Space is the main Channel of the great

Ocean, lying betwixt two Continents; and the inclining Sides shew the

Declivity of the Shores.

[Illustration: Fragments are starting to break into Continents.]

[Illustration: The Fragments have Fallen like double Doors.]

THIS we have represented here only in a Ring or Circle of the Earth, in

the first Figure; but it may be better represented in a broader Surface,

as in the second Figure, where the two Fragments A. B. that are to make

the two opposite Continents, fall in like double Doors, opening

downwards, the Hinges being towards the Land on either Side, so as at

the Bottom they leave in the Middle betwixt them a deep Channel of

Water, _a. a. a._ such as is betwixt all Continents; and the Water

reaching a good Height upon the Land on either Side, makes Sea there

too, but shallower, and by degrees you descend into the deepest Channel.

[Illustration: The great Disorder in the Chasm between the Fragments.]

THIS gives an Account of two Things that we mention’d to be consider’d

and explain’d as to the Sea, how the great Cavity of its Channel was

made, and how it was made in that general Form of Declivity in its Sides

from the Land: The third Thing was the Irregularities of it, both as to

its various Depths, and as to the Form of the Shores and of the Bottom.

And this is as easily and naturally explain’d from the same Supposition

as the former two; for tho’ we have hitherto represented the Fragments

A. B. as even and regular after their Fall, because that was most

simple, and there was no occasion then to represent them otherwise, yet

we must suppose, that as soon as in their Fall they hit upon the Top or

Bottom of the Abyss, that great Force and Weight with which they

descended broke off all the Edges and Extremities, and so made

innumerable Ruptures and Inequalities in the Shores, and as many within

the Sea, and at the Bottom; where the broken Rocks and Lumps of Earth

would lie in all imaginable Disorder; as you may conceive from the

_third Figure_. For when the Motion came on a sudden to be obstructed,

the Load of the Fragment still pressing it forwards, such a Concussion

arose, as made thousands of lesser Fragments, of all Shapes and

Magnitudes, and in all Postures and Forms, and most of them irregular.

And by these Fractions and secondary Ruins the Line of the Shores was

broken, and the Level of them too: In some Places they would stand high,

in others low, sometimes rough, and sometimes even, and generally

crooked, with Angles and In-lets, and uncertain Windings. The Bottom

also by the same Stroke was diversify’d into all Manner of Forms,

sometimes rocky with Pits and Gulphs, and sometimes spread in plain

Beds, sometimes shallow, and sometimes deep; for those Differences would

depend only upon the Situation of the secondary Fragments; and so it

might come to pass, that some Places near the Shore might be excessive

deep when a Rock or Rocks stood in a steep Posture, as (_Figure 3._) _b.

b. b._ and, on the contrary, sometimes Places much more advanc’d into

the Ocean might be less deep, where a Fragment of Earth lay under Water,

or one bore up another, as _c. c. c._ but these Cases would not be very

frequent. To conclude, There are no Properties of the Sea-channel, that

I know of, nor Differences or Irregularities in the Form of it, which

this _Hypothesis_ doth not give a fair Account of: And having thus far

open’d the Way and laid down the general Grounds for their Explication,

other things that are more minute, we leave to the Curiosity of

particular Genius’s; being unwilling to clog the Theory at first with

things that may seem unnecessary. We proceed now to the Consideration of

Islands.

WE must in the first Place distinguish between _Original_ Islands and

_Fictitious_ Islands: Those I call fictitious, that are not of the same

Date and Antiquity with the Sea, but have been made some at one time,

some at another, by accidental Causes, as the Aggestion of Sands and

Sand-beds, or the Sea leaving the Tops of some shallow Places that lie

high, and yet flowing about the lower Skirts of them; these make sandy

and plain Islands, that have no high Land in them, and are but

Mock-Islands in effect. Others are made by Divulsion from some

Continent, when an Isthmus, or the Neck of a Promontory running into the

Sea, sinks or falls in, by an Earthquake or otherwise, and the Sea

entring in at the Gap passeth through, and makes that Promontory or

Country become an Island. Thus the Island _Sicily_ is suppos’d to have

been made, and all _Africa_ might be an Island, if the Isthmus between

the _Mediterranean_ and the red Sea should sink down. And these Islands

may have Rocks and Mountains in them, if the Land had so before. Lastly,

There are Islands that have been said to rise from the Bottom of the

Sea; History mentions such in both the _Archipelago_’s, _Ægæan_ and

_Indian_; and this seems to argue that there are great Fragments or

Tracts of Earth that lie loose at the Bottom of the Sea, or that are not

incorporated with the Ground; which agrees very well with our

Explication of the Sea-Channel.

BUT beside these Islands, and the several Sorts of them, there are

others which I call _Original_; because they could not be produc’d in

any of the forementioned Ways, but are of the same Origin and Antiquity

with the Channel of the Sea; and such are the Generality of our Islands;

they were not made of Heaps of Sands, nor torn from any Continent, but

are as ancient as the Continents themselves, namely, ever since the

Deluge, the common Parent of them both. Nor is there any Difficulty to

understand how Islands were made at the Dissolution of the Earth, any

more than how Continents were made; for Islands are but lesser

Continents, or Continents greater Islands; and according as Continents

were made of greater Masses of Earth, or greater Fragments standing

above the Water, so Islands were made of less, but so big always, and in

such a Posture, as to bear their Tops above the Water. Yet tho’ they

agree thus far, there is a particular Difference to be taken notice of,

as to their Origin; for the Continents were made of those three or four

primary Masses into which the falling Orb of the Earth was divided, but

the Islands were made of the Fractures of these, and broken off by the

Fall, from the Skirts and Extremities of the Continents: We noted

before, that when those great Masses and primary Fragments came to dash

upon the Abyss in their Fall, the sudden Stop of the Motion, and the

weighty Bulk of the descending Fragment broke off all the Edges and

Extremities of it, which Edges and Extremities broken off made the

Islands; and accordingly we see that they generally lie scatter’d along

the Sides of the Continents, and are but Splinters, as it were, of those

greater Bodies. ’Tis true, beside these, there were an infinite Number

of other Pieces broke off that do not appear, some making Rocks under

Water, some Shallows and Banks in the Sea; but the greatest of them when

they fell either one upon another, or in such a Posture as to prop up

one another, their Heads and higher Parts would stand out of the Water

and make Islands.

THUS I conceive the Islands of the Sea were at first produc’d; we cannot

wonder therefore that they should be so numerous, or far more numerous

than the Continents; these are the Parents, and those are the Children;

nor can we wonder to see along the Sides of the Continents several

Islands, or Sets of Islands, sown, as it were, by Handfuls, or laid in

Trains; for the Manner of their Generation would lead us to think they

would be so plac’d. So the _American_ Islands lie scatter’d upon the

Coast of that Continent; the _Maldivian_ and _Philippine_ upon the

_East-India_ Shore, and the _Hesperides_ upon the _Africk_; and there

seldom happen to be any towards the Middle of the Ocean, tho’ by an

Accident, that also might come to pass. Lastly, It suits very well with

our Explication, that there should be Mountains and Rocks, sometimes in

Clusters, sometimes in long Chains, in all Islands; (as we find there

are in all that are true and original) for ’tis that makes them high

enough to appear above the Water, and strong enough to continue and

preserve themselves in that high Situation.

AND thus much may suffice for a summary Explication of the Causes of the

Sea-Channel and Islands, according to our _Hypothesis_.

The sacred theory of the Earth, Volume 1 (of 2) · 第 57 / 74 题