CHAPTER VII

ENEMIES AND PROTECTION

Butterflies have many enemies. Even the eggs of butterflies are often

discovered by tiny, four-winged parasites, which pierce the egg-shell

and deposit their own microscopic eggs inside. These eggs produce

little grubs, which devour the contents of the butterfly’s egg, so that

the latter develops into a caterpillar.

The chief enemies of the butterfly tribe, however, are the

insectivorous birds, whose summer food often consists largely of

caterpillars. Caterpillars are also attacked by wasp-like parasites

which deposit their eggs in the victim’s skin; when the eggs hatch

the parasitic grubs feed upon the flesh of their unwilling host, who

usually dies about the time the guests are ready to pupate. One often

sees dead or dying caterpillars covered with the white cocoons of these

hymenopterous parasites. Certain larger wasps, too, use caterpillars as

food for their young. These insects paralyze their prey by stinging it,

lay their eggs on the helpless body, and seal it up in a hollow reed,

or in a nest of mud. When the wasp larva hatches it finds plenty of

living food at hand.

Chrysalids also are eaten by birds and by various carnivorous insects,

and are frequently killed by parasitic wasps and flies. Many an amateur

butterfly-hunter has been puzzled to see that some of his chrysalids

produce, not beautiful butterflies, but a lot of insignificant little

wasps.

Adult butterflies are not much troubled by parasitic insects, but they

are eaten by many birds, particularly those of the fly-catcher type, by

lizards, and by the larger dragonflies. Spiders kill a few, the great

gray robber-flies carry off a butterfly now and then, and frogs and

toads take them whenever possible. They are not much attacked by the

mammals, but I have seen a chipmunk devour a large _Papilio turnus_

with every symptom of satisfaction.

Long ages of struggle with these enemies have developed certain

protective devices--not through any supernatural intervention or any

conscious activity on the part of the butterflies, but simply by

the mechanical process called natural selection. There is a certain

degree of variation among all animals, and some of these variations

are transmitted to succeeding generations. Now, if certain butterflies

happen to vary in such a way that they are protected against their

enemies, they survive at the expense of their less fortunate fellows,

and such of their offspring as inherit the protective variation also

survive, until at last, by a gradual process of elimination, the entire

species is protected.

PROTECTIVE COLORATION

One of the commonest of the protective devices is called _protective

coloration_. It may be noted that many caterpillars are green, a color

which blends well with that of the leaves upon which they feed, and

so protects them in a measure from the prying eyes of their enemies.

Such chrysalids as are attached to green leaves or twigs are often

green also, but most caterpillars leave the foliage to pupate, and the

chrysalids are neutral gray or brown so as to be inconspicuous against

a background of bark or dead wood. Many butterflies pass the winter in

the chrysalis state, and these cold weather chrysalids are never green,

but usually some dull color which harmonizes with the winter landscape.

Another thing to be noted, particularly in caterpillars, is the

operation of the so-called _law of counter-shading_, which means simply

that the part of the body which gets the most light is usually darkest

in color. Some caterpillars habitually feed with their feet downward,

and their backs are darker than their bellies; others are accustomed to

feed in the opposite position, and the shading tones are reversed. One

has only to look at a few living specimens in their native haunts to

see the value of this arrangement.

In adult butterflies it may be observed that it is the upper side of

the wings which shows the bright colors, while the lower side is much

less conspicuous. The flying butterfly is not in much danger anyway,

and a display of color can do no great damage, but it might be fatal

to the same insect at rest. At rest, however, the wings are usually

brought together vertically, so that the highly colored upper side is

quite concealed, and only the dull under surface exposed to view. In

some butterflies--_Vanessa antiopa_, for example--the lower surface so

nearly resembles the bark upon which the insect is accustomed to rest

that it can hardly be distinguished, even when one knows exactly where

to look for it.

Some of these protected butterflies illustrate a minor protective

phenomenon known as _dazzling_ or _eclipsing coloration_. Many

observers believe that the sudden change from the bright colors of the

flying butterfly to the neutral tints of the same specimen at rest is

more confusing to a pursuer than the total absence of brilliant colors.

This dazzling and eclipsing effect is particularly noticeable in

various species of _Grapta_ and _Vanessa_.

Another thing to be remarked is the fact that many butterflies

protectively colored, such as those mentioned above, usually alight

on some object similar in color to the lower side of their own wings.

These butterflies are accustomed to rest upon the trunks of trees, and

almost invariably select one with dark-colored bark, avoiding green or

light-colored trees such as birches and sycamores. It is not claimed

the individual butterfly, after examining the colors of its wings,

casts about for a perch to match, but it is quite conceivable that

those which were attracted to light-colored bark have been gradually

weeded out of the species.

OFFENSIVE ODORS AND TASTES

Besides the method of protective coloration, some caterpillars are

protected against birds by sharp spines or hairs; others by peculiar

markings and attitudes said to approximate the appearance of serpents

or other dangerous objects. Many butterflies, it has been observed,

are protected by still other methods. The common Monarch (_Anosia

plexippus_), the Zebra butterfly (_Heliconius charitonius_), and the

Red Silverwing (_Dione vanillae_) are very conspicuous butterflies, yet

they flutter leisurely about unmolested by birds and other enemies.

This protection is due to what Alfred Russell Wallace called “a strong,

pungent, semi-aromatic odor, which seems to pervade all the juices of

their system.”

It has long been known that certain butterflies produced disagreeable

odors, but Fritz Müller, working in Brazil as early as 1876, was the

first to give the matter any very serious attention. Since Müller’s

time extensive studies have been made by Colonel Longstaff and Dr.

Dixey, two English entomologists, but very little has been done

in North America. It is certainly true, however, that the three

butterflies mentioned above (and doubtless many others) are possessed

of some taste or odor offensive to their enemies.

_Dione vanillae_ is more abundant in South America than in the United

States, and was one of the species investigated by Müller, who writes:

“The males ... when seized, open wide the anal valvulae, from the inner

side of which there appear two glands yielding a strong and nauseous

smell. The females, on the contrary, emit a similar smell from a

yellow gland extruded on the dorsum between the last and penultimate

segments.” Longstaff, who studied this butterfly in Jamaica, describes

it as “a beautiful but ill-smelling Fritillary” and says it smells like

cow-dung.

WARNING COLORATION

It has been noticed that many dangerous and distasteful insects are

rendered conspicuous by their brilliant colors, and examples of this

so-called _warning coloration_ are not lacking among the butterflies.

The Swallowtail caterpillars, which produce a very disagreeable odor,

are usually marked by two great staring eye-spots on the back of the

thorax. Some of the protected butterflies, such as the ill-smelling

Zebra and Red Silverwing, are extraordinarily conspicuous by reason

of striking color-combinations. Many entomologists believe that these

peculiar color-schemes have been developed by protected butterflies

as an advertisement of their inedible character. This view is not

as popular as it used to be, but there may be something in it; it

certainly seems to explain the structure and habits of some of the

higher animals--the rattlesnake for example--better than any other

hypothesis yet advanced.

PROTECTIVE MIMICRY

There seems to be a tendency among certain insects which are edible

and unprotected, to bear a superficial resemblance to inedible or

distasteful species. Thus certain harmless flies have developed a

remarkable likeness to wasps and bumblebees, although in structure and

habits they are really very different. Several diurnal moths, too,

have transparent wings, and yellow bands about the body which give

them the appearance of gigantic and singularly ferocious hornets. It

is certainly a great advantage for a harmless insect to resemble some

dangerous and inedible species, and the whole phenomenon of resemblance

has been called _protective mimicry_.

The best example of mimicry in American butterflies is the case of the

Monarch (_Anosia plexippus_) and the Viceroy (_Basilarchia disippus_).

The Monarch belongs to the subfamily _Euploeinae_, all the members of

which are provided with secretions which render them distasteful to

birds and predaceous insects. The Monarch advertises its inedibility by

its bright brown and black wings, and its leisurely manner of flight.

The Viceroy belongs to an altogether different group, the members of

which are readily eaten by birds, and which do not resemble the Monarch

either in form, coloration, or manner of flight. The Viceroy, however,

has gradually developed so remarkable a resemblance to the Monarch that

it is difficult to distinguish them at a little distance, although the

Viceroy is much the smaller of the two, and has a traverse black band

on the hind wing that is lacking in the Monarch. There is no doubt that

the Viceroy benefits by this resemblance, as birds (doubtless mistaking

it for the inedible Monarch) appear to give it a wide berth.

This novel situation is supposed to have come about as follows: In

the remote past the Viceroy was a blue-and-black butterfly like its

relatives, but because of the abiding principle of variation the

individuals of the species were not exactly alike--some specimens were

lighter than others. For some reason or other these lighter-colored

butterflies had a slight advantage in the struggle for existence, and

so in time the entire species was of this type, the darker specimens

having been exterminated. Finally, some individuals chanced to bear

a slight resemblance to distasteful butterflies of the Monarch type,

so that birds avoided them, but continued to feed upon their less

fortunate relatives. Thus, through a long process of natural selection,

the Viceroy has come to resemble the Monarch.

HELIOTROPISM AND LIST

It was long ago observed that plants respond definitely and

mechanically to the direction of rays of light; the leaves and flowers

of many plants always turn toward the sun and even follow its daily

course, so that the flower which turned to the East in the morning

faces due West at sunset. Similar phenomena are now known to occur

in animals. Among butterflies a good example is that of the Mourning

Cloak (_Vanessa antiopa_). This butterfly, when it alights in the

sunlight, almost invariably turns about until its body lies parallel

with the rays of light and its head points directly away from the sun.

This phenomenon is known as _negative heliotropism_, and a number of

plausible explanations of it have been advanced. Probably it is merely

another method of blending with the background, akin to protective

coloration. When the Mourning Cloak alights upon the ground, or upon a

log, it closes its wings and becomes well-nigh indistinguishable from

its surroundings, because the under side of the wings is protectively

colored. Now, if the body lies at right angles to the sun’s rays, the

wings cast a large shadow, much more conspicuous than the butterfly

itself, and hence attracting unfriendly eyes to the butterfly. If

however the body is in line with the rays of light, and the wings

brought together vertically, the shadow is insignificant. One has

only to pin a few dead butterflies on a smooth neutral background in

full sunlight to see the force of this theory. It is very probable,

then, that _negative heliotropism_ is simply a method of reducing the

too-conspicuous shadow to its lowest terms.

Other butterflies reduce the shadow by what is known as _list_, leaning

far over to one side like a sail-boat in a storm--hence the name.

The best American example of _list_ is found in the behavior of the

Wood-nymph butterfly (_Satyrus alope_), which is often seen to topple

over to one side, presenting the entire wing surface to the source of

light, lowering the top-line and thus reducing the shadow.

FEIGNING DEATH

Many insects, particularly beetles, frequently escape their enemies

by feigning death. Whether this behavior is an instinctive ruse or

a genuine paralysis induced by something akin to fright we do not

know, but it is doubtless of considerable value to the insect. Some

butterflies have been known to play possum when in a tight place.

_Vanessa cardui_, known as the Painted Lady, sometimes closes its

wings, folds its legs close to the body, and falls motionless to the

ground. Usually it is lost in the weeds or grasses, but even if found

and picked up it often allows itself to be handled without any sign

of life. Similar behavior has been reported in _Satyrus alope_, the

Wood-nymph butterfly.

Transcriber’s Notes

In the Table of Contents, the page number for Chapter VI. has been

corrected from 34 to 38.

Page 11: Changed “Fritz Muller” to “Fritz Müller”.

Page 16: In the illustration caption for Fig. I, “9. rectum, 10” was

replaced with “9. rectum; 10”.

Page 17: Changed “slender Malphighian tubules” to “slender Malpighian

tubules”.

Page 24: Changed “a reddish-brown color.” to “a reddish brown color.”.

Page 25: Changed “far from the eggshell” to “far from the egg-shell”.

Page 28: Added a missing “ before “6:00 p. m.”.

Page 34 & 38: Changed “Hesperidae” to “Hesperiidae”.

Page 48: Changed “ajax). a typical representative” to “ajax), a typical

representative”. Changed “A egg” to “A, egg”.

Page 58: Changed “green or light colored trees” to “green or

light-colored trees”.

Page 64: Changed “Wood-nymph butterfly,” to “Wood-nymph butterfly.”

Life among the butterflies · 第 7 / 7 章