THE REV. JAMES HAMILTON, D.D.

It is a remarkable fact that a Scotchman has never led the House of

Commons. The real reason is, I imagine, that Scotchmen are not generally

very oratorical. The Scots suffer from the _fercidum ingenium_ which old

Buchanan claimed for them, undoubtedly; but it does not generally assume

an oratorical form: it finds other ways of development. It leads Sawney,

junior, to bid farewell to the porridge of the paternal roof, to cross

the Tweed, to travel in whatever dark and distant land gold is to be had,

and a fortune to be won. But there it stops. Joseph Hume was a model of

a Scotch orator. There was not a duller dog on the face of the earth

than that most excellent and honoured man. One would as soon listen to a

lecture from Elihu Burritt, or sit out a pantomime, as listen to a speech

from the Scottish Joseph.

So it is with the Scottish pulpit. It is generally hard and heavy,

destitute of life and power, abstruse, metaphysical, learned, and

consequently dull. Yet there have been splendid exceptions. The fiery

and holy Chalmers was one, and Edward Irving was another. The Scottish

Church in Regent Square was at one time a place of no common repute.

Irving, with his splendid face, half fiend half angel--with his intellect

hovering between insanity and genius, the companion of fanatics and

philosophers--there

'Blazed the comet of a season.'

To this day his name yet lives. In spite of the delusions and follies

with which his name was connected--in spite of the reaction, the natural

result of all enthusiasm, no matter what--Irvingite churches remain

amongst us to this present hour. But at one time they threatened to

pervade the land. All London flocked to Regent Square Church: the

religious world was in a state of intense excitement. Timid men and

nervous women went there, Sunday after Sunday, till they became almost

mad. Unknown tongues were heard; strange sights were seen. Some thought

the end of the world had come, and were seized with trembling and fear.

It was a time of wonder, and mystery, and awe; but it passed away, as

such things in this world of ours must pass away. The great magician

died. The crowd that had wondered and wept at his bidding, went to

wonder and weep elsewhere.

Under such circumstances, to attempt to fill the vacant pulpit was no

easy task; and yet that it has been done, and done successfully, is

evinced by Dr. Hamilton's success. It is a fact that he preaches there

every Sunday to a crowded church; that there, where there were divers

prophesyings and bewilderment universal, now order reigns; that the only

voice that you hear there now, besides that of the preacher, is that of

the precentor, as he reads the bald version of the Psalms, to which the

modern Scotch stick as immovably as did their fathers to the Covenant in

the days of Montrose. This is an undeniable fact. Nor does it surprise

you when the Doctor makes his appearance in the pulpit. At first,

perhaps, you are rather surprised. There is certainty nothing taking

about the man. He looks tall, strong, and awkward, with a cloudy face,

and a fearfully drawling voice; a man, not timid, but not striking--plain

and unaffected--better fitted for the study than for the fashion of May

Fair. If you look closer, you will see indications of a calm, untroubled

heart, with deep wells of fine feeling, of tenderness and strength

combined. But still the Doctor is not the man to make a sensation at

first sight--very few ministers are. One can understand this in a way.

In certain families, it is said, the good-looking are put into the

army--if fools, into the Church. Yet, generally, the jewel is worthy of

the casket. If the one be rich and beautiful, the other is so as well.

Plain and slouching as he is, I am told the Doctor succeeded in engaging

the affections of a lady possessed of considerable property. But this is

by no means remarkable: clergymen of every denomination make as many

successful marriages as most men. One would think that they took the

common wicked standard of wicked men, and judged a woman's worth by the

extent of her purse. I fear that there are as many fortune-hunters in

the Church as there are in the world.

If 'Hudibras' had been written in our day, we should at once have

supposed that Dr. Hamilton had helped the poet to a hero. Like Hudibras,

the Doctor

'scarce can ope

His mouth, but out there flies a trope.'

He has been called the Moore of the pulpit. An admiring critic says of

him: 'Like the poet of "Lalla Rookh," he possesses vivid imagination,

brilliant fancy, and sparkling phraseology. His sentences are strings of

pearls, and whatever subject he touches he invariably adorns. His

affluence of imagery is surprising. To illustrate some particular

portion of Scripture, he will lay science, art, and natural history under

contribution, and astonish us by the vastness of his acquirements, and

his tact in availing himself of the stores of knowledge which, from all

sources, he has garnered up in his mind. But plenteous as are the

flowers of eloquence with which he presents us, their perfume, their

sweetness, do not cloy. We listen in absolute wonderment as he pours

forth a stream of eloquence, whose surface exhibits the iridescent hues

of loveliness--one tint as it fades away being succeeded by another and a

brighter. And a pure spirit of earnest piety pervades the whole of the

sermon, the only drawback of which, to southern ears, being the broad

Scotch accent in which it is delivered.'

Perhaps this character is a little coloured. Something must be set down

in it for effect. Still the characteristic of the Doctor's oratory,

whether in the pulpit or on the platform, is poetry. He is a prose poet,

and his genius makes everything it touches rich and rare. As becomes a

divine, he sees everything through an Eastern medium. He is at home in

the Holy Land. Jerusalem is as dear to him as London. All the scenes of

sacred story, in the dead and buried past, live before him, and are

realized by him as much, if not more, than the most exciting scenes of

the living present. He follows the Christ as he treads the path of

sorrow--sees him in the manger--in the temple disputing with the

doctors--in the crowded streets followed by an awe-struck Hebrew

mob--alone in the wilderness--or dying, amidst fanatic scorn and hate, a

triumphant death: and the Doctor tells you these things as if he were

there--as if they had but happened yesterday--as if he had come fresh

from them all. Hence there is a pictorial charm in his preaching, such

as is possessed but by few, and excelled by none.

This is also characteristic of the Doctor's writing. He has used the

press extensively. I see he has just issued an account of one of the

sufferers in that unhappy missionary expedition to the island of Terra

del Fuego, the result of which was the slow death, by hunger, of the

parties engaged. His cheap series of tracts, entitled 'Happy Home,' are

considered, by the religious world, exquisite productions. They are much

in demand. This, however, is easily accounted for. The pastor of a rich

London congregation can always have a good sale for his works. The

wealthy members of his church will buy them for distribution; even the

very poor will make an effort to procure them. Bad or good, they are

sure to have a respectable sale. Happily, in Dr. Hamilton's case, this

respectable sale is deserved. His publications have the same beauties as

his sermons. It is to be regretted that the small tracts, published by

well-meaning men, with the best of motives, should be so little adapted

to that end. In reality, they do more harm than good. The very class

they are intended for do not read them; and those who do are precisely

the class that need to be stimulated into some life higher and grander

than your small tract-writer can generally conceive of. It is to the

credit of Dr. Hamilton that he does not disdain to write little books on

great subjects, and thus seek to rescue the tract system from the

contempt into which, owing to the injudiciousness of its friends, it has

so extensively fallen.

We have only to add here, that the Doctor sides with the Free Scotch

Church, and that, of that remarkable movement, he was one of the earliest

and warmest friends.

Miscellaneous.

The London Pulpit · 第 30 / 45 题