INTRODUCTION.

§ 1. _The MS. and Halliwell’s edition_, p. v.

§ 2. _Metre and Versification_, p. vi.

§ 3. _Dialect_, p. x;

_short vowels_, p. xi;

_long vowels_, p. xii;

_inflexions_, p. xiii.

§ 4. a. _The contents of the Romance_, p. xvi;

b. _its character_, p. xx;

c. _Origin of the story of Torrent_, p. xxi;

d. _Legend of Eustache or Plasidas_, p. xxii;

e. _Sir Isumbras_, p. xxiv;

f. _Romances of Octavian_, p. xxv;

g. _Sir Eglamour_, p. xxvi;

h. _Comparison of Torrent and Eglamour_, p. xxvii;

i. _the 2 Romances independent_, p. xxx.

§ 5. _Arrangement of this Edition_, p. xxxii.

§ 1. The manuscript from which the following romance of _Sir Torrent of

Portugal_ is taken, is a folio volume on paper, of the fifteenth

century, preserved in the Chetham Library at Manchester.

A description of this volume is given by Halliwell in his _Account of

the European MSS. in the Chetham Library at Manchester_, Manchester,

1842, page 16, and by Prof. Koelbing in his _Englische Studien_, vii.

195. The only edition of this romance that we have hitherto had was done

by Halliwell. As he had, besides his own transcript, another copy made

by Madden, his text is a pretty accurate one, and therefore the results

of Prof. Koelbing’s collation, printed in his _Englische Studien_, vii.

344 ff., concern, for the most part, things of little importance, except

one very curious passage, l. 88, where Halliwell renders the quite

correct reading of the MS., _p la more de dewe_ = _par l’amour de dieu_,

by _Pericula more bedew[n]e_. Also, from l. 1720, the counting of the

lines is wrong by 100 lines.

A few short fragments of a printed edition were found by Halliwell in

the Douce Collection, Bodleian Library, Oxford, and added to his work as

an Appendix. They contain the following passages of the MS.:

Fragment III. = lines 462-489.

„ II. = „ 492-520.

„ VI. = „ 820-851.

„ V. = „ 917-948.

„ IV. = „ 949-970.

„ I. = „ 1807-1866.

A seventh fragment, of which not much more than the rhyming words are

preserved, was omitted by Halliwell, and was printed for the first time

in Prof. Koelbing’s collation.

This Chetham MS. contains the romance in a very debased and corrupt

form, so that the original reading in many passages can hardly be

recognized.[1] The scribe, who copied the poem from an older MS., lived

(no doubt) at a far later period than the poet; he did not therefore

understand a great many old expressions, and these he used to supplant

by words of his own; he also transposed and even omitted many lines, and

spoiled the rhyme, because he had not the slightest idea of the nature

of the stanza in which the poem is composed. Halliwell did not trouble

himself about the restoration of the true readings; he merely reproduced

the traditional text, even where it would have been very easy to do

more, though many passages are hopelessly corrupt; still worse is the

fact, that he did not recognize the metre as the tail-rhymed twelve-line

stanza, for he prints six-line stanzas.

[Footnote 1: Halliwell says, Preface v f.: ‘It is very incorrectly

written, and the copy of the romance of Torrent of Portugal, which

occupies 88 pages of the book, contains so many obvious blunders

and omissions, that it may be conjectured with great probability

to have been written down from oral recitation.’]

In consequence, the whole of the philological work on the text had still

to be done, and a new edition was plainly necessary; the more that this

poem, though not written in the best period of romance poetry, treats of

a legendary subject widely spread in the Middle Ages, and is nearly

related to another poem, _Syr Eglamour of Artois_.

Torrent of Portyngale · 第 5 / 38 题