THE CHINESE SIGN MANUAL.

[Footnote: Dr. D. J. Macgowan, in Medical Reports of China. 1881.]

Two writers in _Nature_, both having for their theme "Skin-furrows on

the Hand," solicit information on the subject from China.[1] As the

subject is considered to have a bearing on medical jurisprudence and

ethnology as well, this report is a suitable vehicle for responding to

the demand.

[Footnote 1: Henry Faulds, Tzukiyi Hospital, Tokio, Japan. W. J.

Herschel, Oxford, England.--_Nature_, 28th October and 25th November,

1880.]

Dr. Faulds' observations on the finger-tips of the Japanese have an

ethnic bearing and relate to the subject of heredity. Mr. Herschel

considers the subject as an agent of Government, he having charge for

twenty years of registration offices in India, where he employed finger

marks as sign manuals, the object being to prevent personation and

repudiation. Doolittle, in his "Social Life of the Chinese," describes

the custom. I cannot now refer to native works where the practice of

employing digital rugæ as a sign manual is alluded to. I doubt if its

employment in the courts is of ancient date. Well-informed natives think

that it came into vogue subsequent to the Han period; if so, it is in

Egypt that earliest evidence of the practice is to be found. Just as the

Chinese courts now require criminals to sign confessions by impressing

thereto the whorls of their thumb-tips--the right thumb in the case of

women, the left in the case of men--so the ancient Egyptians, it

is represented, required confessions to be sealed with their

thumbnails--most likely the tip of the digit, as in China. Great

importance is attached in the courts to this digital form of signature,

"finger form." Without a confession no criminal can be legally executed,

and the confession to be valid must be attested by the thumb-print

of the prisoner. No direct coercion is employed to secure this; a

contumacious culprit may, however, be tortured until he performs the

act which is a prerequisite to his execution. Digital signatures are

sometimes required in the army to prevent personation; the general

in command at Wenchow enforces it on all his troops. A document thus

attested can no more be forged or repudiated than a photograph--not so

easily, for while the period of half a lifetime effects great changes

in the physiognomy, the rugæ of the fingers present the same appearance

from the cradle to the grave; time writes no wrinkles there. In the

army everywhere, when the description of a person is written down, the

relative number of volutes and coniferous finger-tips is noted. It

is called taking the "whelk striæ," the fusiform being called "rice

baskets," and the volutes "peck measures." A person unable to write, the

form of signature which defies personation or repudiation is required in

certain domestic cases, as in the sale of children or women. Often when

a child is sold the parents affix their finger marks to the bill of

sale; when a husband puts away his wife, giving her a bill of divorce,

he marks the document with his entire palm; and when a wife is sold, the

purchaser requires the seller to stamp the paper with hands and feet,

the four organs duly smeared with ink. Professional fortune tellers in

China take into account almost the entire system of the person whose

future they attempt to forecast, and of course they include palmistry,

but the rugæ of the finger-ends do not receive much attention. Amateur

fortune-tellers, however, discourse as glibly on them as phrenologists

do of "bumps"--it is so easy. In children the relative number of volute

and conical striæ indicate their future. "If there are nine volutes,"

says a proverb, "to one conical, the boy will attain distinction without

toil."

Regarded from an ethnological point of view, I can discover merely that

the rugæ of Chinamen's fingers differ from Europeans', but there is so

little uniformity observable that they form no basis for distinction,

and while the striæ may be noteworthy points in certain medico-legal

questions, heredity is not one of them.

* * * * *

Scientific American Supplement, No. 360, November 25, 1882 · 第 35 / 60 题