R.V.

Winchester.

_Capture of Henry VI._ (Vol. ii., p. 228.).--In his correction of your

correspondent, CLERICUS CRAVENSIS, MR. NICHOLS states:--

"Both Sir John Tempest and Sir James Harrington of Brierley,

near Barnesley, were concerned in the king's capture, and each

received 100 marks reward; but the fact of Sir Thomas Talbot

being the chief actor, is shown by his having received the

larger reward of 100l."

In this statement appears entirely to have been overlooked the grant of

lands made by King Edward IV. to Sir James Harrington--

"For his services in taking prisoner, and withholding as such in

diligence and valour, his enemy Henry, lately called King Henry

VI."

This grant, which was confirmed in Parliament, embraced the castle,

manor, and domain of Thurland; a park, called Fayzet Whayte Park, with

lands, &c. in six townships in the county of Lancaster; lands at Burton

in Lonsdale, co. York; and Holme, in Kendal, co. Westmoreland, the

forfeited lands of Sir Richard Tunstell, and other "rebels." So

considerable a recognition of the services of Sir James Harrington would

seem to demand something more than the second-rate position given to

them by your correspondent. The order to give Sir James Harrington

possession of the lands under his grant will be found in Rymer. The

grant itself is printed in the _Nugæ Antiquæ_, by Henry Harrington, 1775

(vol. ii. p. 121.), and will, I believe, be found in Baines'

_Lancashire_. Mr. Henry Harrington observes that the lands were

afterwards lost to his family by the misfortune of Sir James and his

brother being on the wrong side at Bosworth Field; after which they were

both attainted for serving Richard III. and Edward IV., "and commanding

the party which seized Henry VI. and conducted him to the Tower."

Notes and Queries, Number 50, October 12, 1850 · 第 86 / 113 题