CINCINNATI, THE QUEEN CITY.

Whatever may have been the squealing celebrity of Porkopolis,

Cincinnati seems destined to merge the glory of that name in the more

agreeable title, City of Vineyards. That she is the Queen City none

denies. But on account of what single excellence, it might be

difficult, for some, to say. A queen of slaughter-pens might he a

hearty buxom lass, but, withal, not exactly the personage for which

knights (Sancho always excepted) love to break lances. A queen of

foundries and stithies, she might be, and not necessarily, on that

account, a ruddy brunette; inasmuch as Sir Vulcan was, once before,

the husband of Venus—queen of beauty. A blushing queen of strawberry

beds would be quite romantic; but yet more appropriate if her

jurisdiction were extended over vines and purple clusters and

vineyards and orchards. But whether it be pork, or iron, or gardens,

or vineyards, or observatories, Cincinnati is acknowledged on all

hands to be the Queen City.

Leaving her commercial glories out of view, we think Cincinnati has

done more for horticulture than any American city, taking into the

account her recent origin and her means. In all other cities

horticulture has been the child of wealth and leisure. It has

_followed_ commercial or manufacturing prosperity. But in this city,

it began with them and kept pace with them; so that one wonders which

most to admire, the thrift of industry and skill, or the elegant taste

which is so generally evinced in the cultivation of fruit, and shrub

and flower.

The first volume of the Transactions of the Cincinnati Horticultural

Society, is eminently worthy of that enterprising corporation.

The thoughts of several principal friends of horticulture seem much

directed to the subject of vine culture, and the manufacture of wine.

There are more than eighty-three vineyards in the vicinity of the city

containing not far from 400 acres of land! From 114 acres during the

season of 1845, more than 23,000 gallons of wine were manufactured,

and there was not more than half a crop obtained in that season. The

average yield of wine per acre, for five years in succession, is

stated to be from 450 to 500 gallons per annum.

Many think the culture of the grape will be the finishing stroke to

the temperance enterprise; affording a wholesome beverage from our

hills in place of “corn juice” from our bottoms, and beer from our hop

and barley fields.

The arguments urged by some with great sincerity, are the often-quoted

facts, that the inhabitants of wine-making countries are favorably

distinguished for temperance; and that a palatable and wholesome

beverage—pure wine—would supersede the use of violent liquors. If we

thought that our people would become temperate upon such conditions,

we should be glad to see a vineyard on every hillside, and a wine-vat

to every farmhouse. But there is no reason to expect any such result.

Vineyards in Europe exist among a quiet, comparatively unenterprising

peasantry. They have been _trained_ to moderation; necessity has made

them temperate in all things—in food, in dress, in expense, and in

drink. The popular habits are not so excitable as with us; business

runs in quiet streams, and politics are unknown. With us, business is

boisterous, pleasure obstreperous, and politics outrageous. Our people

are anything but quiet; they are hot, hot in tongue and blood. It is

wide enough of the mark to suppose that the same cause existing among

two entirely dissimilar people, would, of course, produce the same

results. We might as well say that vineyards would make our people eat

less meat, less corn and pork, because the residents of wine districts

were known to be addicted to a vegetable diet. The probable

consequences of abundant cheap wine must be judged, not by what would

happen in France, among abstemious peasants, nor on the Rhine, among

economical and sober Germans; but by the tastes, habits, and

tendencies of our own people. In this land everything tends to

excitement. Men live upon a higher key, and live faster and live much

more full of exhilaration than the same classes do in foreign lands.

Our people drink not for the _taste_ but for the _excitement_ of

liquor; and, so that wine, beer, or whisky will bring them up to the

right key, the question of wholesomeness is quite unimportant. Our

people are free and therefore have a right to live in the violation of

natural laws; and a right, constantly exercised, of having fevers on

account of surfeitings, and of dying early and by thousands by reasons

of gross excesses.

Pleasures and business are esteemed by the volume of blood which they

can drive, the pulse they can raise, the heat of excitement which they

can produce. So long as affairs are fresh and piquant they are

stimulants enough. But in the inequalities and intervals and fatigues

of life, something else is required to hold the spirits up to the high

level upon which everything proceeds. As soon as a man resorts to

alcoholic stimulants to do this, he has embarked upon a course where

all experience shows that he will drink deeper and deeper to final

downright intemperance.

Some people think that cheap and wholesome beverage for the “masses,”

for laboring people, is desirable. While it may be well enough for

every gentleman of leisure, it is to be the poor man’s special

blessing, saving him from the swill of the brewery and the fire of the

still. Facts will stand on the side of the reverse reasoning. If wine

is to be harmless at all, it will be with men who are not prone to

enterprising heats; but given to the relishful pleasure of sipping

just for the delicate flavors, for the aroma, for the fine _bouquet_

of wine—men who need to have their blood up, and kept up, and resort

to wine to supply the flagging stimulus of affairs; such men will not

drink for the flavor, but for the feeling.

It is for the sake of being roused; it is to be stimulated; it is, in

plain language, to have the first exhilarations of drunkenness that

laboring men drink, will drink, and have always drank cider, beer,

wine, and brandy. The result of affording wine in abundance to such

people as ours, will be to prepare them for a stronger drink just as

soon as wine, by frequent use, is no longer stimulating enough. Wine

will play jackal to brandy for the rich, and to whisky for the poor.

We have some facts on hand touching this popular wine-drinking, which,

if necessary, we shall employ at another time. Meanwhile, we are glad

to see grape-culture spreading for the production of table-grapes; for

the manufacture of wine, in so far as a supply of pure wine is needed

for medicinal purposes. Further than that, we are opposed to

wine-making. And as to cheating whisky out of its authority over “the

dear people” by the blandishments of hock and champagne, or redeeming

our barley and cornfields from the abominable persecutions of the

brew-tub and the still, by the conservative energy or evangelizations

of grape juice, we shall believe it when we see it; and we shall just

as soon expect to see fire putting out fire and frost melting ice, as

one degree of alcoholic stimulus curing a higher one.

* * * * *

TO PRESERVE GARDEN STICKS.—It is desirable when one has prepared good

sticks for supporting carnations, roses, dahlias, etc., to preserve

them from year to year. The following preparation will make them last

a man’s lifetime: When they are freshly made, allow them to become

thoroughly dry; then soak them in linseed oil for some time, say two

or three days. When taken out let them stand to dry till the oil is

perfectly soaked in; then paint with two coats of verdigris paint. No

wet can then penetrate.

Pleasant Talk About Fruits, Flowers and Farming · 第 87 / 239 题