NATURAL ORDER OF FLOWERS.

_May 21st._

He must have an artist’s eye for color and form who can arrange a

hundred flowers as tastefully, in any other way, as by strolling

through a garden, picking here one and there one, and adding them to

the bouquet in the accidental order in which they chance to come. Thus

we see every summer day the fair lady coming in from the breezy

side-hill with gorgeous colors, and most witching effects. If only she

could be changed to alabaster, was ever a finer show of flowers in so

fine a vase? But instead, allowed to remain as they were gathered, the

flowers are laid upon the table, divided and rearranged on some

principle of taste, I know not what, but never regain that charming

naturalness and grace which they first had.

As to the bouquets put up for market, the less said about them the

better. They are mere pillories in which, like innocent children put

into the stocks, flowers are punished! Squeezed, tied on sticks,

formal and pedantic, the flowers lose their rare charms, their

delicacy, their individuality, their exquisite variety of form, every

element of floral beauty except color. They are used as mere pigments.

They are poor studies in color. There are few who really know anything

about flowers by their finer qualities. The elder Park—who committed

the capital crime of leaving Brooklyn and going back to Scotland to

live—loved flowers after the true sort. We remember one day going to

his green-house in Amity Street, and after a world of talk about all

sorts of things, and looking over all his azaleas, camellias,

laurustinus, and what not, he drew us bashfully into a side apartment,

and with the diffidence of a girl, said, pointing to an exquisite

little fern hardly so large as our forefinger, growing in the border

under some orange-plants, “There, I should not dare to tell anybody

but you that I have taken more real pleasure in that one little thing

than in all the whole establishment.” We perfectly understood him. The

fern was of the most delicate sort. It seemed to hover between form

and spirit,—if there be such a thing as soul in plant-life. All around

it were large and vigorous plants growing lush and stalwart. This

dainty little fairy fern appealed to the child-loving side of human

nature, to the unworldly and uncommercial faculties. We always

respected Park the better for this weakness. No man can have such a

sentiment for flowers, who has not in him feelings as fresh and

delicate as the flowers which he admires.

But with what complacency can such a one look upon the merchandise of

flowers which is exhibited at every party, every wedding, every vulgar

jam of rich people, who torment themselves through untimely hours for

the sake of tormenting their host?

Look at the atrocious bridal bouquets! The bride, the bridesmaids,

come forth bearing each a huge _melange_ of orange-blossoms and

rosebuds, wedged together into a pyramidal wart of flowers! If,

instead, the bride were to issue forth bearing in her hand a sprig of

orange-blossoms just as it grew, just as it was plucked from the

branch, or two or three simple rosebuds on the one stem, loosely

clustered, and with their own fresh green leaves, or a simple white

lily, would not every one feel how superior flowers were for such an

occasion, in their own simplicity and individuality, than when, as

generally happens, they are smothered up in an artificial heap, in

which all naturalness is utterly lost?

A single blossom of carnation with a geranium leaf; an exquisite

saffrano rosebud just beginning to open, with a fresh leaf from its

own bush for company; a stem of mignonette, girt round with a dozen

fragrant blue violets; a long sprig of mauvandia-vine, with its

charming blue bells, hanging from a tall wineglass, or carelessly

trailing round it,—these, and such little things, confer a pleasure on

those who have a sensitive eye for grace and simplicity, which nothing

else can.

We would not be understood as objecting to all _masses_ of flowers,

nor to large combinations. For coarser and more distant effects, they

are permissible. But even then, the more they can be made to have a

loose, airy, open habit, the finer will be their effect.

But first, simplicity, naturalness, singleness, and individualism in

flowers; afterward and inferior, though permissible, artificial

structures and combinations.

Pleasant Talk About Fruits, Flowers and Farming · 第 29 / 239 题