ENGLAND’S CORONATION STONE.

A notable survival of the primitive reverence for the one foundation, or

the original threshold, as the earliest place of sacrifice and

covenanting,[710] is shown in the famous “Coronation Stone” in

Westminster Abbey. This stone is under the chair in which all the

sovereigns of England from Edward I. to Victoria have been crowned. It

was brought by Edward I. to England from Scone, the coronation seat of

the kings of Scotland. The legend attached to it was that it was the

stone pillar on which Jacob rested at Bethel,–the House of God where

Abraham worshiped, and where Jacob covenanted with God for all his

generations.[711]

“In it, or upon it, the Kings of Scotland were placed by the Earls of

Fife. From it Scone became the ‘_sedis principalis_’ of Scotland, and

the kingdom of Scotland the kingdom of Scone.” Since the days of Edward

I., it has never been removed from Westminster Abbey, except when

Cromwell was installed as Lord Protector in Westminster Hall, on which

occasion it was brought out in order that he might be placed on it.

As in ancient Babylonia, in Egypt, in Syria, in India, in China, in

Arabia, in Greece, in Scandinavia, the one primitive foundation was

deemed the only foundation on which to build securely with Divine

approval, so in the very center of the highest modern civilization the

reputed foundation stone of the kingdom of the “Father of the Faithful”

is deemed the only secure coronation, or installation, seat of King,

Queen, or Lord Protector. Is it not reasonable to suppose that this

feeling has a basis in primitive religious convictions and customs?

Dean Stanley, referring to this Coronation Stone as “probably the chief

object of attraction to the innumerable visitors to the Abbey,” says of

it: “It is the one primeval monument which binds together the whole

Empire. The iron rings, the battered surface, the crack which has all

but rent its solid mass asunder, bear witness to its long migrations. It

is thus embedded in the heart of the English monarchy–an element of

poetic, patriarchal, heathen times, which, like Araunah’s rocky

threshing-floor in the midst of the Temple of Solomon, carries back our

thoughts to races and customs now almost extinct; a link which unites

the Throne of England to the traditions of Tara and Iona, and connects

the charm of our complex civilization with the forces of our mother

earth,–the stocks and stones of savage nature.”[712]

-----

Footnote 704:

Driver’s _Deuteronomy_, p. 323.

Footnote 705:

_Heb. Chald. Lex._, s. v.

Footnote 706:

See p. 187 f., _supra_.

Footnote 707:

See, also, 2 Kings 21 : 6; 23 : 10; 2 Chron. 33 : 6; Ezek. 16 : 21; 20

: 26, 31; 23 : 37.

Footnote 708:

See, also, Jer. 7 : 31; 19 : 5.

Footnote 709:

See pp. 39–42, 142 f., 212, _supra_.

Footnote 710:

See pp. 153–164, _supra_.

Footnote 711:

See Dean Stanley’s _Historical Memorials of Westminster Abbey_, first

edition, pp. 59–67; also, Appendices, pp. 492–502.

Footnote 712:

See Dean Stanley’s _Historical Memorials of Westminster Abbey_, first

edition, pp. 64–66.

-----

The Threshold Covenant; or, The Beginning of Religious Rites · 第 99 / 166 题