4. CONFIRMATION OF THIS VIEW.

If the view here given of the origin of this rite of the Threshold

Covenant be correct, there will be found traces of the truth in the

different religions of mankind. And this is the case, as shown in

religious literatures, in history, and in primitive customs and beliefs.

The most ancient expression of the religious thought and feeling of the

Aryan races is found in the Vedas and their accompanying literature. The

Brahmanas, in this literature, deal with the sacrificial element in

public and family worship, and with the rites and ceremonies pertaining

to religion. In the description of the construction of the household

altars and the high altars, there is abundant evidence that the woman is

recognized as the primitive altar, and that the form of the woman is

made the pattern of the altar form.

It is distinctly declared as to the shape of the altar, standing east

and west, that it “should be broader on the west side, contracted on the

middle, and broad again on the east side; for thus shaped they praise a

woman: ‘broad about the hips, somewhat narrower between the shoulders,

and contracted in the middle [or about the waist].’” Again, it is said,

in explanation, that “the altar (_vedi_, feminine) is female, and the

fire (_agni_, masculine) is male.”[526] This identifying of the altar

with the woman, of the offering with the man, and of their union with

worship and covenanting, is repeatedly found in the Brahmanas.[527]

Even as far back as the Vedas themselves the term _yoni_, or doorway of

physical life, is used as synonymous with altar.[528] And the production

of sacred fire, for purposes of worship, by twisting a stick in softened

wood, is described in the Rig-Vedas as a form of this covenant rite.

These facts point to this origin of the threshold altar of covenant and

sacrifice.

At present in India the most widely recognized visible aid in worship is

the representation of the _linga_ and the _yoni_ combined. This symbol

nominally stands for Siva; but that seems to be only because Saivism

predominates in modern Hindooism. The idea of this symbolic combination

long antedates this prominence of Siva worship.[529]

A form of Booddhist prayer in Tibet, said to be repeated more frequently

than any other known among men, is “the six-syllabled sentence, ‘_Om

mani padme Hūm_,’–‘Om! the Jewel in the Lotus! Hum!’” This prayer is

simply a euphemism for the primitive Threshold Covenant, as here

explained, with an ejaculatory invocation and ascription before and

after it.[530] It seems to be a survival of the thought that here was

the beginning of religious rites, and that all covenant worship must

continue in its spirit and power.

Every repetition of that prayer, by speech or by mechanism, is supposed

to affect the progress of a soul in its crossing the threshold of one of

the stages of being in the universe. It is a help to a new birth for

some soul somewhere.

There would thus appear to be no room for doubt in this matter in the

language and customs of the primitive Aryan peoples, and there are also

confirmations of the idea among the Semites. A legend that has a place

among the Jews and the Muhammadans, tells of a visit of Abraham to the

home of Hagar and Ishmael in Arabia.[531] An Amalekite wife of Ishmael

refused hospitality to Abraham, and in consequence Abraham left a

message to Ishmael to “change his threshold.” This message Ishmael

understood to mean the putting away of his wife and the taking of

another, and he acted accordingly. In the Arabic “a wife” is one of the

meanings of the term “threshold.”[532]

And the term “gate,” or “door,” had among the rabbis a specific

application to the altar of family covenanting. Thus Buxtorf, in his

definings of “_janua_” and “_ostium_,” says plainly: “_Apud rabbinos

etiam est ‘ostium ventris muliebris.’_” And he quotes the saying of a

disappointed bridegroom : “_Ostium apertum inveni._”[533]

Among the early Babylonians and Egyptians, as among other primitive

peoples, the twofold symbols of sex are counted the sacred emblem of

life, and as such are borne by the gods of life, and by those who have

the power of life and death from those gods. The circle and rod, or ring

and bolt, conjoined, are in the right hand of the Babylonian sun-god

Shamash;[534] as, in the _ankh_, or _crux ansata_, they are in the right

hand of every principal deity of ancient Egypt.[535] It is much the same

with the Phœnicians and others.[536]

In the innermost shrine of the most sacred Shinto temples of Japan, the

circular mirror, and the straight dagger, with the same meaning as the

circle and rod in Babylonia and Egypt and Phœnicia, are the only

indications of the presence of deity; and the worshipers in those

temples can come no farther than the threshold of the shrine containing

these emblems.[537]

Wherever, among the primitive peoples in America, as elsewhere, the red

hand is found as a symbol of covenant, and of life and strength through

covenant, it would seem to point to this primal meaning of the hand

stamp of blood at the doorway of life in a sacred covenant. There are

indications in Central American sculptures of the sacredness attaching

to the covenant rite between the first pair; and the combined symbols of

sex are represented there as in the East.[538]

It is a well-known fact that the public exhibit of the primitive

Threshold Covenant, as here explained, has been continued as a mode of

reverent worship among primitive peoples in the South Sea Islands, down

to modern times. The testimony of Captain Cook, the famous navigator, is

specific on this point.[539] It is also to be noted that in these

islands the two supports of the altar, or table of sacrifice, are

seemingly symbols of the two sexes, similar to those used in the far

East.[540]

All of the gathered facts concerning the Threshold Covenant in different

lands and in different times, as presented in the foregoing pages, would

seem to be in accordance with this view of the origin of the rite, as

with no other that can be suggested. The main symbolism of both the Old

and the New Testament also seem to indicate the same beginning.

V.

HEBREW PASS-OVER, OR CROSS-OVER,

SACRIFICE.

The Threshold Covenant; or, The Beginning of Religious Rites · 第 67 / 166 题