Ray remarks that birds of the gallinae order, as cocks and hens,

partridges, and pheasants, etc., are pulveratrices, such as dust

themselves, using that method of cleansing their feathers, and ridding

themselves of their vermin. As far as I can observe, many birds that

dust themselves never wash: and I once thought that those birds that

wash themselves would never dust; but here I find myself mistaken; for

common house-sparrows are great pulveratrices, being frequency seen

grovelling and wallowing in dusty roads; and yet they are great

washers. Does not the skylark dust?

Query.—Might not Mahomet and his followers take one method of

purification from these pulveratrices? because I find from travellers

of credit, that if a strict Mussulman is journeying in a sandy desert

where no water is to be found, at stated hours he strips off his

clothes, and most scrupulously rubs his body over with sand or dust.

A countryman told me he had found a young fern-owl in the nest of a

small bird on the ground; and that it was fed by the little bird. I

went to see this extraordinary phenomenon, and found that it was a

young cuckoo hatched in the nest of a titlark; it was become vastly too

big for its nest, appearing

… in tenui re

Majores pennas nido extendisse …

and was very fierce and pugnacious, pursuing my finger, as I teased it,

for many feet from the nest, and sparring and buffeting with its wings

like a game-cock. The dupe of a dam appeared at a distance, hovering

about with meat in its mouth, and expressing the greatest solicitude.

In July I saw several cuckoos skimming over a large pond; and found,

after some observation, that they were feeding on the libellulae, or

dragon-flies; some of which they caught as they settled on the weeds,

and some as they were on the wing. Notwithstanding what Linnaeus says,

I cannot be induced to believe that they are birds of prey.

This district affords some birds that are hardly ever heard of at

Selborne. In the first place considerable flocks of cross-beaks (loxiae

curvirostrae) have appeared this summer in the pine-groves belonging to

this house; the water-ousel is said to haunt the mouth of the Lewes

river, near Newhaven; and the Cornish chough builds, I know, all along

the chalky cliffs of the Sussex shore.

I was greatly pleased to see little parties of ring-ousels (my

newly-discovered migrators) scattered, at intervals, all along the

Sussex-downs from Chichester to Lewes. Let them come from whence they

will, it looks very auspicious that they are cantoned along the coast

in order to pass the channel when severe weather advances. They visit

us again in April, as it should seem, in their return; and are not to

be found in the dead of winter. It is remarkable that they are very

tame, and seem to have no manner of apprehensions of danger from a

person with a gun. There are bustards on the wide downs near

Brighthelmstone. No doubt you are acquainted with the Sussex-downs: the

prospects and rides round Lewes are most lovely!

As I rode along near the coast I kept a very sharp lookout in the lanes

and woods, hoping I might, at this time of the year, have discovered

some of the summer short-winged birds of passage crowding towards the

coast in order for their departure: but it was very extraordinary that

I never saw a red-start, white-throat, black-cap, uncrested wren,

fly-catcher, etc. And I remember to have made the same remark in former

years, as I usually come to this place annually about this time. The

birds most common along the coast at present are the stone-chatters,

whin-chats, buntings, linnets, some few wheatears, titlarks, etc.

Swallows and house-martins abound yet, induced to prolong their stay by

this soft, still, dry season.

A land-tortoise, which has been kept for thirty years in a little

walled court belonging to the house where I now am visiting, retires

under ground about the middle of November, and comes forth again about

the middle of April. When it first appears in the spring it discovers

very little inclination towards food; but in the height of summer grows

voracious: and then as the summer declines its appetite declines; so

that for the last six weeks in autumn it hardly eats at all. Milky

plants, such as lettuces, dandelions, sow-thistles, are its favourite

dish. In a neighbouring village one was kept till by tradition it was

supposed to be an hundred years old. An instance of vast longevity in

such a poor reptile!

Letter VIII

To The Honourable Daines Barrington

Selborne, Dec. 20, 1770.

Dear Sir,

The birds that I took for aberdavines were reed-sparrows (passeres

torquati).

There are doubtless many home internal migrations within this kingdom

that want to be better understood: witness those vast flocks of hen

chaffinches that appear with us in the winter without hardly any cocks

among them. Now was there a due proportion of each sex, it should seem

very improbable that any one district should produce such numbers of

these little birds; and much more when only half of the species

appears: therefore we may conclude that the fringillae caelebes, for

some good purposes, have a peculiar migration of their own in which the

sexes part. Nor should it seem so wonderful that the intercourse of

sexes in this species of birds should be interrupted in winter; since

in many animals, and particularly in bucks and does, the sexes herd

separately, except at the season when commerce is necessary for the

continuance of the breed. For this matter of the chaffinches see Fauna

Suecica, p. 85, and Systema Naturae, p. 318. I see every winter vast

flights of hen chaffinches, but none of cocks.

Your method of accounting for the periodical motions of the British

singing birds, or birds of flight, is a very probable one; since the

matter of food is a great regulator of the actions and proceedings of

the brute creation: there is but one that can be set in competition

with it, and that is love. But I cannot quite acquiesce with you in one

circumstance when you advance that, ‘when they have thus feasted, they

again separate into small parties of five or six, and get the best fare

they can within a certain district, having no inducement to go in quest

of fresh-turned earth.’ Now if you mean that the business of

congregating is quite at an end from the conclusion of wheat-sowing to

the season of barley and oats, it is not the case with us; for larks

and chaffinches, and particularly linnets, flock and congregate as much

in the very dead of winter as when the husbandman is busy with his

ploughs and harrows.

Sure there can be no doubt but that woodcocks and fieldfares leave us

in the spring, in order to cross the seas, and to retire to some

districts more suitable to the purpose of breeding. That the former

pair before they retire, and that the hens are forward with egg, I

myself, when I was a sportsman, have often experienced. It cannot

indeed be denied but that now and then we hear of a woodcock’s nest, or

young birds, discovered in some part or other of this island: but then

they are always mentioned as rarities, and somewhat out of the common

course of things: but as to redwings and fieldfares, no sportsman or

naturalist has ever yet, that I could hear, pretended to have found the

nest or young of those species in any part of these kingdoms. And I the

more admire at this instance as extraordinary, since, to all

appearance, the same food in summer as well as in winter might support

them here which maintains their congeners, the blackbirds and thrushes,

did they choose to stay the summer through. From hence it appears that

it is not food alone which determines some species of birds with regard

to their stay or departure. Fieldfares and redwings disappear sooner or

later according as the warm weather comes on earlier or later. For I

well remember, after that dreadful winter of 1739-40, that cold

north-east winds continued to blow on through April and May, and that

these kinds of birds (what few remained of them) did not depart as

usual, but were seen lingering about till the beginning of June.

The best authority that we can have for the nidification of the birds

above-mentioned in any district, is the testimony of faunists that have

written professedly the natural history of particular countries. Now,

as to the fieldfare, Linnaeus, in his Fauna Suecica, says of it that

‘maximis in arboribus nidificat’; and of the redwing he says, in the

same place, that ‘nidificat in mediis arbusculis, sive sepibus: ova sex

caeruleo-viridia maculis nigris variis.’ Hence we may be assured that

fieldfares and redwings breed in Sweden. Scopoli says, in his Annus

Primus, of the woodcock, that ‘nupta ad nos venit circa aequinoctium

vernale’; meaning in Tirol, of which he is a native. And afterwards he

adds ‘nidificat in paludibus alpinis: ova ponit, 3-5.’ It does not

appear from Kramer that woodcocks breed at all in Austria: but he says

‘Avis haec septentrionalium provinciarum aestivo tempore incola est;

ubi plerumque nidificat. Appropinquante hyeme australiores provincias

petit: hinc circa plenilunium mensis Octobris plerumque Austriam

transmigrat. Tunc rursus circa plenilunium potissimum mensis Martii per

Austriam matrimonio juncta ad septentrionales provincias redit.’ For

the whole passage (which I have abridged) see Elenchus, etc., p. 351.

This seems to be a full proof of the migration of woodcocks; though

little is proved concerning the place of breeding.

P.S. There fell in the county of Rutland, in three weeks of this

present very wet weather, seven inches and an half of rain, which is

more than has fallen in any three weeks for these thirty years past in

that part of the world. A mean quantity in that county one year is

twenty inches and an half.

Letter IX

To The Honourable Daines Barrington

Fyfield, near Andover, Feb. 12, 1771.

Dear Sir,

You are, I know, no great friend to migration; and the well attested

accounts from various parts of the kingdom seem to justify you in your

suspicions, that at least many of the swallow kind do not leave us in

the winter, but lay themselves up like insects and bats, in a torpid

state, to slumber away the more uncomfortable months till the return of

the sun and fine weather awakens them.

But then we must not, I think, deny migration in general; because

migration certainly does subsist in some places, as my brother in

Andalusia has fully informed me. Of the motions of these birds he has

ocular demonstration for many weeks together, both spring and fall:

during which periods myriads of the swallow kind traverse the Straits

from north to south, and from south to north, according to the season.

And these vast migrations consist not only of hirundines but of

bee-birds, hoopoes, oro pendolos or golden thrushes, etc., etc., and

also many of our soft-billed summer-birds of passage; and moreover of

birds which never leave us, such as all the various sorts of hawks and

kites. Old Belon, two hundred years ago, gives a curious account of the

incredible armies of hawks and kites which he saw in the spring-time

traversing the Thracian Bosphorus from Asia to Europe. Besides the

above-mentioned, he remarks that the procession is swelled by whole

troops of eagles and vultures.

Now it is no wonder that birds residing in Africa should retreat before

the sun as it advances, and retire to milder regions, and especially

birds of prey, whose blood being heated with hot animal food, are more

impatient of a sultry climate: but then I cannot help wondering why

kites and hawks, and such hardy birds as are known to defy all the

severity of England, and even of Sweden and all north Europe, should

want to migrate from the south of Europe, and be dissatisfied with the

winters of Andalusia.

It does not appear to me that much stress may be laid on the difficulty

and hazard that birds must run in their migrations, by reason of vast

oceans, cross winds, etc.; because, if we reflect, a bird may travel

from England to the equator without launching out and exposing itself

to boundless seas, and that by crossing the water at Dover, and again

at Gibraltar. And I with the more confidence advance this obvious

remark, because my brother has always found that some of his birds, and

particularly the swallow kind, are very sparing of their pains in

crossing the Mediterranean: for when arrived at Gibraltar, they do not

… rang’d in figure wedge their way,

… and set forth

Their airy caravan high over seas

Flying, and over lands with mutual wing

Easing their flight …

MILTON.

but scout and hurry along in little detached parties of six or seven in

a company; and sweeping low, just over the surface of the land and

water, direct their course to the opposite continent at the narrowest

passage they can find. They usually slope across the bay to the

south-west, and so pass over opposite to Tangier, which, it seems, is

the narrowest space.

In former letters we have considered whether it was probable that

woodcocks in moon-shiny nights cross the German ocean from Scandinavia.

As a proof that birds of less speed may pass that sea, considerable as

it is, I shall relate the following incident, which, though mentioned

to have happened so many years ago, was strictly matter of fact: — As

some people were shooting in the parish of Trotton, in the county of

Sussex, they killed a duck in that dreadful winter 1708-9, with a

silver collar about its neck,* on which were engraven the arms of the

king of Denmark. This anecdote the rector of Trotton at that time has

often told to a near relation of mine; and, to the best of my

remembrance, the collar was in the possession of the rector.

* I have read a like anecdote of a swan.

At present I do not know anybody near the sea-side that will take the

trouble to remark at what time of the moon woodcocks first come: if I

lived near the sea myself I would soon tell you more of the matter. One

thing I used to observe when I was a sportsman, that there were times

in which woodcocks were so sluggish and sleepy that they would drop

again when flushed just before the spaniels, nay, just at the muzzle of

a gun that had been fired at them: whether this strange laziness was

the effect of a recent fatiguing journey I shall not presume to say.

Nightingales not only never reach Northumberland and Scotland, but

also, as I have been always told, Devonshire and Cornwall. In those two

last counties we cannot attribute the failure of them to the want of

warmth: the defect in the west is rather a presumptive argument that

these birds come over to us from the continent at the narrowest

passage, and do not stroll so far westward.

Let me hear from your own observation whether skylarks do not dust. I

think they do: and if they do, whether they wash also.

The alauda pratensis of Ray was the poor dupe that was educating the

booby of a cuckoo mentioned in my letter of October last.

Your letter came too late for me to procure a ring-ousel for Mr.

Tunstal during their autumnal visit; but I will endeavour to get him

one when they call on us again in April. I am glad that you and that

gentleman saw my Andalusian birds; I hope they answered your

expectation. Royston, or grey crows, are winter birds that come much

about the same time with the woodcock: they, like the fieldfare and

redwing, have no apparent reason for migration; for as they fare in the

winter like their congeners, so might they in all appearance in the

summer. Was not Tenant, when a boy, mistaken? did he not find a

missel-thrush’s nest, and take it for the nest of a fieldfare?

The stock-dove, or wood-pigeon, oenas Raii, is the last winter bird of

passage which appears with us; and is not seen till towards the end of

November: about twenty years ago they abounded in the district of

Selborne; and strings of them were seen morning and evening that

reached a mile or more: but since the beechen woods have been greatly

thinned they are much decreased in number. The ring-dove, palumbus

Raii, stays with us the whole year, and breeds several times through

the summer.

Before I received your letter of October last I had just remarked in my

journal that the trees were unusually green. This uncommon verdure

lasted on late into November; and may be accounted for from a late

spring, a cool and moist summer; but more particularly from vast armies

of chafers, or tree beetles, which, in many places, reduced whole woods

to a leafless naked state. These trees shot again at Midsummer, and

then retained their foliage till very late in the year.

My musical friend, at whose house I am now visiting, has tried all the

owls that are his near neighbours with a pitch-pipe, set at

concert-pitch, and finds they all hoot in B flat. He will examine the

nightingales next spring.

I am, etc., etc.

Letter X

To The Honourable Daines Barrington

Selborne, Aug. 1, 1771.

Dear Sir,

From what follows, it will appear that neither owls nor cuckoos keep to

one note. A friend remarks that many (most) of his owls hoot in B flat:

but that one went almost half a note below A. The pipe he tried their

notes by was a common half-crown pitch-pipe, such as masters use for

tuning of harpsichords; it was the common London pitch.

A neighbour of mine, who is said to have a nice ear, remarks that the

owls about this village hoot in three different keys, in G flat, or F

sharp, in B flat and A flat. He heard two hooting to each other, the

one in A flat, and the other in B flat. Query: Do these different notes

proceed from different species, or only from various individuals? The

same person finds upon trial that the note of the cuckoo (of which we

have but one species) varies in different individuals; for, about

Selborne wood, he found they were mostly in D: he heard two sing

together, the one in D, the other in D sharp, who made a disagreeable

concert: he afterwards heard one in D sharp, and about Wolmer-forest

some in C. As to nightingales, he says that their notes are so short,

and their transitions so rapid, that he cannot well ascertain their

key. Perhaps in a cage, and in a room, their notes may be more

distinguishable. This person has tried to settle the notes of a swift,

and of several other small birds, but cannot bring them to any

criterion.

As I have often remarked that redwings are some of the first birds that

suffer with us in severe weather, it is no wonder at all they retreat

from Scandinavian winters: and much more the ordo of grallae, who, all

to a bird, forsake the northern parts of Europe at the approach of

winter. ‘Grallae tanquam conjugatae unanimiter in fugam se conjiciunt;

ne earum unicam quidem inter nos habitantem invenire possimus; ut enim

aestate in australibus degere nequeunt ob defectum lumbricorum,

terramque siccam; ita nec in frigidis ob eandem causam,’ says Eckmarck

the Swede, in his ingenious little treatise called Migrationes Avium,

which by all means you ought to read while your thoughts run on the

subject of migration. See Amoenitates Academicae, vol. iv, p. 565.

Birds may be so circumstanced as to be obliged to migrate in one

country and not in another: but the grallae (which procure their food

from marshes and boggy grounds) must in winter forsake the more

northerly parts of Europe, or perish for want of food.

I am glad you are making inquiries from Linnaeus concerning the

woodcock: it is expected of him that he should be able to account for

the motions and manner of life of the animals of his own Fauna.

Faunists, as you observe, are too apt to acquiesce in bare

descriptions, and a few synonyms: the reason is plain; because all that

may be done at home in a man’s study, but the investigation of the life

and conversation of animals, is a concern of much more trouble and

difficulty, and is not to be attained but by the active and

inquisitive, and by those that reside much in the country.

Foreign systematics are, I observe, much too vague in their specific

differences; which are almost universally constituted by one or two

particular marks, the rest of the description running in general terms.

But our countryman, the excellent Mr. Ray, is the only describer that

conveys some precise idea in every term or word, maintaining his

superiority over his followers and imitators in spite of the advantage

of fresh discoveries and modern information.

At this distance of years it is not in my power to recollect at what

periods woodcocks used to be sluggish or alert when I was a sportsman;

but, upon my mentioning this circumstance to a friend, he thinks he has

observed them to be remarkably listless against snowy foul weather: if

this should be the case, then the inaptitude for flying arises only

from an eagerness for food; as sheep are observed to be very intent on

grazing against stormy wet evenings.

I am, etc., etc.

Letter XI

To The Honourable Daines Barrington

Selborne, Feb. 8, 1772.

Dear Sir,

When I ride about in the winter, and see such prodigious flocks of

various kinds of birds, I cannot help admiring at these congregations,

and wishing that it was in my power to account for those appearances

almost peculiar to the season. The two great motives which regulate the

proceedings of the brute creation are love and hunger; the former

incites animals to perpetuate their kind, the latter induces them to

preserve individuals; whether either of these should seem to be the

ruling passion in the matter of congregating is to be considered. As to

love, that is out of the question at a time of the year when that soft

passion is not indulged; besides, during the amorous season, such a

jealousy prevails between the male birds that they can hardly bear to

be together in the same hedge or field. Most of the singing and elation

of spirits of that time seem to me to be the effect of rivalry and

emulation: and it is to this spirit of jealousy that I chiefly

attribute the equal dispersion of birds in the spring over the face of

the country.

Now as to the business of food: as these animals are actuated by

instinct to hunt for necessary food, they should not, one would

suppose, crowd together in pursuit of sustenance at a time when it is

most likely to fail: yet such associations do take place in hard

weather chiefly, and thicken as the severity increases. As some kind of

self-interest and self-defence is no doubt the motive for the

proceeding, may it not arise from the helplessness of their state in

such rigorous seasons; as men crowd together, when under great

calamities, though they know not why? Perhaps approximation may dispel

some degree of cold; and a crowd may make each individual appear safer

from the ravages of birds of prey and other dangers.

If I admire when I see how much congenerous birds love to congregate, I

am the more struck when I see incongruous ones in such strict amity. If

we do not much wonder to see a flock of rooks usually attended by a

train of dews, yet it is strange that the former should so frequently

have a flight of starlings for their satellites. Is it because rooks

have a more discerning scent than their attendants, and can lead them

to spots more productive of food? Anatomists say that rooks, by reason,

of two large nerves which run down between the eyes into the upper

mandible, have a more delicate feeling in their beaks than other

round-billed birds, and can grope for their meat when out of sight.

Perhaps then their associates attend them on the motive of interest, as

greyhounds wait on the motions of their finders; and as lions are said

to do on the yelpings of jackals. Lapwings and starlings sometimes

associate.

Letter XII

To The Honourable Daines Barrington

March 9, 1772.

Dear Sir,

The Natural History of Selborne · 第 9 / 19 段