The Geologic Time Scale

Much of historical geology is based on a relationship called the LAW OF

SUPERPOSITION. This simply means that when some rock formation was

placed on top of some other formation by natural processes

(sedimentation or volcanic eruption, for example), the layer on top must

be younger than the one on the bottom. Such a conclusion may now seem

obvious, but the concept was not even expressed until the very end of

the eighteenth century and was still a matter of scientific controversy

when Abraham Lincoln was a boy. It was the law of superposition,

however, that led the early geologists to establish the first geologic

time scales and to realize the enormous extent of geologic time.

[Illustration: _Diagram illustrating the law of superposition. Each rock

bed is younger than the strata under it._]

In essence the system of establishing age by this concept is this:

Somewhere a large and easily recognized layer of sedimentary rock was

known. It had a characteristic color, texture, gross composition, and

overall appearance. Let us call it _bed M_. This bed could be traced

across the countryside until a place was reached where it could be seen

that _bed M_ rested on another, different layer of rock, which we might

call _bed L_. _Bed L_ could also be traced some distance and ultimately

could be observed resting on a still different stratum, which we shall

call _bed K_. Some of these beds had fossils in them, and it was

eventually realized that rocks with the same kinds of fossils are of the

same age, even though they may differ in other respects—in color or

composition, for instance.

If _bed M_ was followed in another direction, perhaps a point was

reached where it dipped down a little, and here, was found still another

layer—call it _bed N_—on top of _M_. Obviously, the sequence of beds

from oldest to youngest was _K-L-M-N_. Their relative ages were now

established. Over the years, hundreds of geologists described various

rock layers and identified the fossils in them. By the middle of the

nineteenth century, this “layer-cake” structure of sedimentary rocks was

well-known in western Europe. (One may say, parenthetically, that

America was geologically a vast unknown at that time. Today we know much

more about the geology of Antarctica than anyone a hundred years ago

knew about the geology of the United States.)

A system of nomenclature for the “layer-cake” was developed and refined.

Gradually this nomenclature was accepted internationally. Long-range

correlations between beds of the same age, distant halfway around the

globe from each other, were made possible as the science of PALEONTOLOGY

developed. The relative age of almost any rock containing even poorly

preserved fossils could be determined anywhere in the world with

precision. That is, the age of rock layers in relation to one another

was known. But the real age—the absolute age—remained unknown until

knowledge of radioactivity provided the necessary clocks.

[Illustration: _A geologist carefully maps the layers of soil in which

ancient flint tools have been found. Exact correlation of the

tool-bearing strata with material datable by carbon-14 analysis must be

accomplished before the age of the tools can be determined._]

Even this process wasn’t entirely without problems. The difficulty lay

in the fact that ordinary sedimentary rocks (shale, sandstone, and

limestone) cannot be dated by the usual nuclear methods because they

present no suitable closed systems. Only some volcanic sediments can be

reliably dated by the mica, feldspar, and zircon they contain; but these

ancient ashfalls are rare, usually are only a few inches thick, and are

not easy to identify at the surface because they weather quickly to

clay. Only about a dozen volcanic beds have been accurately dated in

North America. The time points they established are mainstays of the

present geologic time scale, but they have had to be supplemented by

indirect information.

[Illustration: _Steeply dipping sandstone strata from the Cretaceous

Period near Gallup, New Mexico. This photo, taken in 1901 (note the

horse-drawn wagon), was made on an early government survey of Western

lands._]

[Illustration: _Fossils of bird tracks in sandstone in Death Valley,

California._]

The most important of these indirect time points are furnished by what

geologists call BRACKETED INTRUSIVES. It often happens in geologic

history that a mass of rock becomes molten at a great depth and forces

its way up through several layers of sedimentary rocks. The sedimentary

layers are usually bent and twisted (folded) by the upthrust, and where

the cooler rock comes in contact with the molten mass, cooler material

is burned (recrystallized). Geologists call that process CONTACT

METAMORPHISM because the sedimentary rock forms are changed, or

metamorphosed, to have another form or composition.

Contact-metamorphosed rocks, in spite of the damage they have suffered,

may contain recognizable and accurately datable fossils. Thereby the

metamorphic rock establishes a lower limit for the age of the intrusion:

It must be younger than the fossils in the youngest of the metamorphic

rocks it touched.

Now on top of the intrusive rock, we may find another sedimentary rock,

deposited on top of the intrusive after it cooled and was exposed by the

erosion of overlying materials, perhaps millions of years later. This

new sediment may also contain fossils and thus furnish an upper limit

for the age of the intrusion. The measured age of the intrusive rock

thus can be used to set upper and lower limits on the absolute ages of

the two sediments. If we are lucky, the two sediments will bracket a

relatively short interval, making our measurement quite precise.

[Illustration: _Idealized sketch of a bracketed intrusive. The igneous

(molten) rock must be younger than the sedimentary rock (A) it intrudes,

and older than the rock (B) that overlies it. The relative age of the

sedimentary beds is known from their fossils._]

[Illustration: _Facsimile reprint of the famous time scale proposed by

Arthur Holmes in 1959._]

Time-scale in millions of years

PERIODS Since beginning of period Duration of period

PLEISTOCENE _ca_ 1

.... _ca_ 1 ....

PLIOCENE 10

.... 11 ....

MIOCENE 14

.... 25 ....

OLIGOCENE 15

.... 40 ....

EOCENE 20

.... 60 ....

PALEOCENE 10

.... 70 ± 2 ....

Upper }

CRETACEOUS 65

Lower }

.... 135 ± 5 ....

Upper }

JURASSIC 45

Mid. & Lower }

.... 180± 5 ....

TRIASSIC 45

.... 225 ± 5 ....

PERMIAN 45

.... 270 ± 5 ....

Upper }

CARBONIFEROUS 80

Lower }

.... 350 ± 10 ....

Upper }

DEVONIAN 50

Lower }

.... 400 ± 10 ....

SILURIAN 40

.... 440 ± 10 ....

ORDOVICIAN 60

.... 500 ± 15 ....

CAMBRIAN 100

.... 600 ± 20 ....

Using measurements made in many laboratories, and interpolating between

them by using the relative thicknesses of sediments, the great British

geologist, Arthur Holmes, established the time scale that is in general

use today. His original scale is shown on the preceding page. Small

changes can be expected to be made in this scale from time to time, but

major alterations are not likely, except perhaps in the Cambrian Epoch

where the present data are unreliable because they are not complete. (A

scale showing the epochs or periods as often given now is on page 4.)

Nuclear Clocks Revised · 第 36 / 47 题