The Rubidium-Strontium Clock

The decay of rubidium-87 (⁸⁷Rb) into strontium-87 (⁸⁷Sr) is perhaps the

most useful scheme for geologic age determination. The same problem

shows up here, but at least there is a way out of the wilderness. It is

not exactly simple, but a consideration of it is fundamental to

understanding the process of nuclear dating. The figure shows patterns

from mass spectrometer charts; each peak represents an isotope of

strontium, and the height of every peak is proportional to the relative

abundance of that isotope. In the figure, A shows the mass-spectrum of a

rock or mineral containing COMMON strontium (which is a mixture of

several isotopes). The peak of ⁸⁷Sr is small compared to the others. B

shows the mass-spectrum of strontium from an old rubidium-rich mineral

CRYSTAL, drawn to the same scale, as far as the nonradiogenic isotopes,

⁸⁴Sr, ⁸⁶Sr, and ⁸⁸Sr, are concerned. The ⁸⁷Sr peak in this spectrum is

obviously larger than in the common strontium in A. This is because this

isotope is radiogenic and has been accumulating from the decay of

rubidium since this crystal was formed.

The question we must answer is: How much of this ⁸⁷Sr was formed from

⁸⁷Rb decay and how much originally was present in the crystal as an

impurity? If the amount of this ORIGINAL strontium is not too large, the

problem can be solved by simple arithmetic.

First, we must find a good sample of common strontium—that is, ordinary

strontium, the kind shown at left in the figure. We cannot require that

this strontium be entirely uncontaminated by radiogenic strontium,

because all strontium is more or less contaminated. What we need is

strontium contaminated to _just the same extent_ as the strontium that

was taken as an impurity into the closed system when it first formed. In

geological specimens such a material is usually available.

[Illustration: _Drawings of mass-spectrometer charts showing the

isotopic spectra of two kinds of strontium: (A) common strontium and (B)

strontium from an old mineral rich in rubidium._ (_See page 32 for photo

of a mass spectrometer._)]

[Illustration: _Rubidium-87 and strontium-87 fall on the same spot in

the mass spectrum. Therefore, rubidium must be separated chemically from

strontium before the strontium can be analyzed in a mass spectrometer.

It is done with ion-exchange columns. Four of them are shown in this

photograph. The author of this booklet is adding a sample, dissolved in

a few drops of hydrochloric acid, to the second column._]

Let us take as our closed system a mica crystal in a mass of granite.

Mica contains a fair amount of rubidium, and it retains its radiogenic

strontium very well. Furthermore, mica crystals are often associated or

even intergrown with the slender, rod-shaped crystals of a mineral

called apatite—a phosphate of calcium. It is justifiable, on the basis

of geological knowledge, to say that the mica and the apatite grew at

roughly the same time and thus presumably from the same liquid medium

that became granite when it later solidified. Now strontium is

geochemically similar to calcium, and some strontium will have gone into

the apatite crystal in place of calcium. Apatite contains no

alkalis—hence apatite will have virtually no rubidium (which is an

alkali) in it to contaminate the ⁸⁷Sr. Consequently, when we find

apatite in an old granite, we know the apatite will still contain the

kind of common strontium that was taken into the mica crystal when it

grew originally.

We can separate the apatite from the granite by standard mineralogical

techniques, extract the strontium from the apatite chemically, and

analyze it on a mass spectrometer to obtain the isotopic spectrum—the

relative amount of each isotope that is present. We can then perform the

same isotopic analysis on the strontium extracted from the mica, and

subtract the original (apatite) strontium from the total (mica)

strontium, to obtain the radiogenic component or daughter product. (See

page 32 for details of this method.)

Obviously, there is a certain error associated with every isotopic

analysis, so such a calculation is meaningful only when the radiogenic

component is large compared with the error in the measurement of

isotopic abundance. When one large quantity must be subtracted from

another large quantity to obtain a small difference, there is an obvious

limit to how much one can trust the result. The absolute accuracy in

measuring strontium isotope abundance is a few tenths of 1%, using the

best mass spectrometers now available. In practice, one can trust a

calculated age for a specimen only when the ⁸⁷Sr is as little as about

5% radiogenic. The results do not mean much when only 1 or 2% is

radiogenic.

[Illustration: _A sample of granite being made ready for crushing and

mineral separation._]

Nuclear Clocks Revised · 第 19 / 47 题