Meanwhile the great schism of the Church rages, before and after Rienzi.

The Empire and its Kingdoms join issue with each other and with the

Barons for the lordship of Christendom; there are two Popes, waging war

with nations on both sides, and Rome is reduced to a town of barely

twenty thousand souls. Then comes Hildebrand, Pope Gregory the Seventh,

friend of the Great Countess, humbler of the Emperor, a restorer of

things, the Julius Caesar of the Church, and from his day there is

stability again, as Urban the Second follows, like an Augustus; Nicholas

the Fifth, the next great Pontiff, comes in with the Renascence. Last of

destroyers Charles, the wild Constable of Bourbon, marches in open

rebellion against King, State and Church, friend to the Emperor,

straight to his death at the walls, his work of destruction carried out

to the terrible end by revengeful Spaniards who spare only the churches

and the convents. Out of those ashes Rome rose again, for the last time,

the Rome of Sixtus the Fifth, which is, substantially, the Rome we see

today; less powerful in the world after that time, but more beautiful as

she grew more peaceful by degrees; flourishing in a strange, motley

way, like no other city in the world, as the Empire of the Hapsburgs and

the Kingdoms of Europe learned to live apart from her, and she was

concentrated again upon herself, still and always a factor among

nations, and ever to be. But even in latter days, Napoleon could not do

without her, and Francis the Second of Austria had to resign the Empire,

in order that Pius the Seventh might call the self-crowned Corsican

soldier, girt with Charlemagne's huge sword, the anointed Emperor of

Christendom.

Once more a new idea gives life to fragments hewn in pieces and

scattered in confusion. A dream of unity disturbs Italy's sleep. Never,

in truth, in all history, has Italy been united save by violence. By the

sword the Republic brought Latins, Samnites and Etruscans into

subjection; by sheer strength she crushed the rebellion of the slaves

and then forced the Italian allies to a second submission; by terror

Marius and Sylla ruled Rome and Italy; and it was the overwhelming power

of a paid army that held the Italians in check under the Empire, till

they broke away from each other as soon as the pressure was removed, to

live in separate kingdoms and principalities for thirteen or fourteen

hundred years, from Romulus Augustulus--or at least from Justinian--to

Victor Emmanuel, King of Italy, in whose veins ran not one drop of

Italian blood.

One asks whence came the idea of unity which has had such power to move

these Italians, in modern times. The answer is plain and simple. Unity

is the word; the interpretation of it is the name of Rome. The desire is

for all the romance and the legends and the visions of supreme greatness

which no other name can ever call up. What will be called hereafter the

madness of the Italian people took possession of them on the day when

Rome was theirs to do with as they pleased. Their financial ruin had its

origin at that moment, when they became masters of the legendary

Mistress of the world. What the end will be, no one can foretell, but

the Rome of old was not made great by dreams. Her walls were founded in

blood, and her temples were built with the wealth of conquered nations,

by captives and slaves of subject races.

The Rome we see today owes its mystery, its sadness and its charm to six

and twenty centuries of history, mostly filled with battle, murder and

sudden death, deeds horrible in that long-past present which we try to

call up, but alternately grand, fascinating and touching now, as we

shape our scant knowledge into visions and fill out our broken dreams

with the stuff of fancy. In most men's minds, perhaps, the charm lies in

that very confusion of suggestions, for few indeed know Rome so well as

to divide clearly the truth from the legend in her composition. Such

knowledge is perhaps altogether unattainable in any history; it is most

surely so here, where city is built on city, monument upon monument,

road upon road, from the heart of the soil upwards--the hardened lava

left by many eruptions of life; where the tablets of Clio have been

shattered again and again, where fire has eaten, and sword has hacked,

and hammer has bruised ages of records out of existence, where even the

race and type of humanity have changed and have been forgotten twice and

three times over.

Therefore, unless one have half a lifetime to spend in patient study and

deep research, it is better, if one come to Rome, to feel much than to

try and know a little, for in much feeling there is more human truth

than in that dangerous little knowledge which dulls the heart and

hampers the clear instincts of natural thought. Let him who comes hither

be satisfied with a little history and much legend, with rough warp of

fact and rich woof of old-time fancy, and not look too closely for the

perfect sum of all, where more than half the parts have perished for

ever.

It matters not much whether we know the exact site of Virgil's

Laurentum; it is more interesting to remember how Commodus, cruel,

cowardly and selfish, fled thither from the great plague, caring not at

all that his people perished by tens of thousands in the city, since he

himself was safe, with the famous Galen to take care of him. We can

leave the task of tracing the enclosures of Nero's golden house to

learned archaelogists, and let our imagination find wonder and delight in

their accounts of its porticos three thousand feet long, its game park,

its baths, its thousands of columns with their gilded capitals, and its

walls encrusted with mother-of-pearl. And we may realize the depth of

Rome's abhorrence for the dead tyrant, as we think of how Vespasian and

his son Titus pulled down the enchanted palace for the people's sake,

and built the Colosseum where the artificial lake had been, and their

great baths on the very foundations of Nero's gorgeous dwelling.

[Illustration: BRASS OF TRAJAN, SHOWING THE CIRCUS MAXIMUS]

[Illustration: BRASS OF ANTONINUS PIUS, IN HONOUR OF FAUSTINA, WITH

REVERSE SHOWING VESTA BEARING THE PALLADIUM]

III

It is impossible to conceive of the Augustan age without Horace, nor to

imagine a possible Horace without Greece and Greek influence. At the

same time Horace is in many ways the prototype of the old-fashioned,

cultivated, gifted, idle, sarcastic, middle-class Roman official, making

the most of life on a small salary and the friendship of a great

personage; praising poverty, but making the most of the good things that

fell in his way; extolling pristine austerity of life and yielding with

a smile to every agreeable temptation; painting the idyllic life of a

small gentleman farmer as the highest state of happiness, but secretly

preferring the town; prudently avoiding marriage, but far too human to

care for an existence in which woman had no share; more sensible in

theory than in practice, and more religious in manner than in heart;

full of quaint superstitions, queer odds and ends of knowledge, amusing

anecdotes and pictures of personal experience; the whole compound

permeated with a sort of indolent sadness at the unfulfilled promises of

younger years, in which there had been more of impulse than of ambition,

and more of ambition than real strength. The early struggles for Italian

unity left many such half-disappointed patriots, and many less fortunate

in their subsequent lives than Horace.

Born in the far South, and the son of a freed slave, brought to Rome as

a boy and carefully taught, then sent to Athens to study Greek, he was

barely twenty years of age when he joined Brutus after Caesar's death,

was with him in Asia, and, in the lack of educated officers perhaps,

found himself one day, still a mere boy, tribune of a Legion--or, as we

should say, in command of a brigade of six thousand men, fighting for

what he believed to be the liberty of Rome, in the disastrous battle of

Philippi. Brutus being dead, the dream of glory ended, after the

amnesty, in a scribe's office under one of the quaestors, and the

would-be liberator of his country became a humble clerk in the Treasury,

eking out his meagre salary with the sale of a few verses. Many an old

soldier of Garibaldi's early republican dreams has ended in much the

same way in our own times under the monarchy.

But Horace was born to other things. Chaucer was a clerk in the Custom

House, and found time to be the father of English poetry. Horace's daily

work did not hinder him from becoming a poet. His love of Greek,

acquired in Athens and Asia Minor, and the natural bent of his mind made

him the greatest imitator and adapter of foreign verses that ever lived;

and his character, by its eminently Italian combination of prim

respectability and elastic morality, gave him a two-sided view of men

and things that has left us representations of life in three dimensions

instead of the flat, though often violent, pictures which prejudice

loves best to paint.

In his admiration of Greek poetry, Horace was not a discoverer; he was

rather the highest expression of Rome's artistic want. If Scipio of

Africa had never conquered the Carthaginians at Zama, he would be

notable still as one of the first and most sincere lovers of Hellenic

literature, and as one of the earliest imitators of Athenian manners.

The great conqueror is remembered also as the first man in Rome who

shaved every day, more than a hundred and fifty years before Horace's

time. He was laughed at by some, despised by others and disliked by the

majority for his cultivated tastes and his refined manners.

The Romans had most gifts excepting those we call creative. Instead of

creating, therefore, Rome took her art whole, and by force, from the

most artistic nation the world ever produced. Sculptors, architects,

painters and even poets, such as there were, came captive to Rome in

gangs, were sold at auction as slaves, and became the property of the

rich, to work all their lives at their several arts for their master's

pleasure; and the State rifled Greece and Asia, and even the Greek Italy

of the south, and brought back the masterpieces of an age to adorn

Rome's public places. The Roman was the engineer, the maker of roads, of

aqueducts, of fortifications, the layer out of cities, and the planner

of harbours. In a word, the Roman made the solid and practical

foundation, and then set the Greek slave to beautify it. When he had

watched the slave at work for a century or two, he occasionally

attempted to imitate him. That was as far as Rome ever went in original

art.

But her love of the beautiful, though often indiscriminating and lacking

in taste, was profound and sincere. It does not appear that in all her

conquests her armies ever wantonly destroyed beautiful things. On the

contrary, her generals brought home all they could with uncommon care,

and the consequence was that in Horace's day the public places of the

city were vast open-air museums, and the great temples picture galleries

of which we have not the like now in the whole world. And with those

things came all the rest; the manners, the household life, the

necessaries and the fancies of a conquering and already decadent nation,

the thousands of slaves whose only duty was to amuse their owners and

the public; the countless men and women and girls and boys, whose souls

and bodies went to feed the corruption of the gorgeous capital, or to

minister to its enormous luxuries; the companies of flute-players and

dancing-girls, the sharp-tongued jesters, the coarse buffoons, the

play-actors and the singers. And then, the endless small commerce of an

idle and pleasure-seeking people, easily attracted by bright colours,

new fashions and new toys; the drug-sellers and distillers of perfumes,

the venders of Eastern silks and linens and lace, the barbers and

hairdressers, the jewellers and tailors, the pastry cooks and makers of

honey-sweetmeats; and everywhere the poor rabble of failures, like scum

in the wake of a great ship; the beggars everywhere, and the pickpockets

and the petty thieves. It is no wonder that Horace was fond of strolling

in Rome.

In contrast, the great and wonderful things of the Augustan city stand

out in high relief, above the varied crowd that fills the streets, with

all the dignity that centuries of power can lend. To the tawdry is

opposed the splendid, the Roman general in his chiselled corselet and

dyed mantle faces the Greek actor in his tinsel; the band of painted,

half-clad, bedizened dancing-girls falls back cowering in awestruck

silence as the noble Vestal passes by, high-browed, white-robed,

untainted, the incarnation of purity in an age of vice. And the old

Senator in his white cloak with its broad purple hem, his smooth-faced

clients at his elbows, his silent slaves before him and behind, meets

the low-chattering knot of Hebrew money-lenders, making the price of

short loans for the day, and discussing the assets of a famous

spendthrift, as their yellow-turbaned, bearded fathers had talked over

the chances of Julius Caesar when he was as yet but a fashionable young

lawyer of doubtful fortune, with an unlimited gift of persuasion and an

equally unbounded talent for amusement.

Between the contrasts lived men of such position as Horace occupied, but

not many. For the great middle element of society is a growth of later

centuries, and even Horace himself, as time went on, became attached to

Maecenas and then, more or less, to the person of the Emperor, by a

process of natural attraction, just as his butt, Tigellius, gravitated

to the common herd that mourned his death. The 'golden mean' of which

Horace wrote was a mere expression, taught him, perhaps, by his father,

a part of his stock of maxims. Where there were only great people on the

one side, and a rabble on the other, the man of genius necessarily rose

to the level of the high, by his own instinct and their liking. What was

best of Greek was for them, what was worst was for the populace.

But the Greek was everywhere, with his keen weak face, his sly look and

his skilful fingers. Scipio and Paulus Emilius had brought him, and he

stayed in Rome till the Goth came, and afterwards. Greek poetry, Greek

philosophy, Greek sculpture, Greek painting, Greek music everywhere--to

succeed at all in such society, Virgil and Horace and Ovid must needs

make Greek of Latin, and bend the stiff syllables to Alcaics and

Sapphics and Hexameters. The task looked easy enough, though it was

within the powers of so very few. Thousands tried it, no doubt, when the

three or four had set the fashion, and failed, as the second-rate fail,

with some little brief success in their own day, turned into the total

failure of complete disappearance when they had been dead awhile.

Supreme of them all, for his humanity, Horace remains. Epic Virgil,

appealing to the traditions of a living race of nobles and to the

carefully hidden, sober vanity of the world's absolute monarch, does not

appeal to modern man. The twilight of the gods has long deepened into

night, and Ovid's tales of them and their goddesses move us by their own

beauty rather than by our sympathy for them, though we feel the tender

touch of the exiled man whose life was more than half love, in the

marvellous Letters of Heroes' Sweethearts--in the complaint of Briseis

to Achilles, in the passionately sad appeal of Hermione to Orestes.

Whoever has not read these things does not know the extreme limit of

man's understanding of woman. Yet Horace, with little or nothing of such

tenderness, has outdone Ovid and Virgil in this later age.

He strolled through life, and all life was a play of which he became

the easy-going but unforgetful critic. There was something good-natured

even in his occasional outbursts of contempt and hatred for the things

and the people he did not like. There was something at once caressing

and good-humouredly sceptical in his way of addressing the gods,

something charitable in his attacks on all that was ridiculous,--men,

manners and fashions.

He strolled wherever he would, alone; in the market, looking at

everything and asking the price of what he saw, of vegetables and grain

and the like; in the Forum, or the Circus, at evening, when 'society'

was dining, and the poor people and slaves thronged the open places for

rest and air, and there he used to listen to the fortune-tellers, and

among them, no doubt, was that old hag, Canidia, immortalized in the

huge joke of his comic resentment. He goes home to sup on lupins and

fritters and leeks,--or says so,--though his stomach abhorred garlic;

and his three slaves--the fewest a man could have--wait on him as he

lies before the clean white marble table, leaning on his elbow. He does

not forget the household gods, and pours a few drops upon the cement

floor in libation to them, out of the little earthen saucer filled from

the slim-necked bottle of Campanian earthenware. Then to sleep, careless

of getting up early or late, just as he might feel, to stay at home and

read or write, or to wander about the city, or to play the favourite

left-handed game of ball in the Campus Marius before his bath and his

light midday meal.

With a little change here and there, it is the life of the idle

middle-class Italian today, which will always be much the same, let the

world wag and change as it will, with all its extravagances, its

fashions and its madnesses. Now and then he exclaims that there is no

average common sense left in the world, no half-way stopping-place

between extremes. One man wears his tunic to his heels, another is girt

up as if for a race; Rufillus smells of perfumery, Gargonius of anything

but scent; and so on--and he cries out that when a fool tries to avoid a

mistake he will run to any length in the opposite direction. And Horace

had a most particular dislike for fools and bores, and has left us the

most famous description of the latter ever set down by an accomplished

observer.

By chance, he says, he was walking one morning along the Sacred Street

with one slave behind him, thinking of some trifle and altogether

absorbed in it, when a man whom he barely knew by name came up with him

in a great hurry and grasped his hand. 'How do you do, sweet friend?'

asks the Bore. 'Pretty well, as times go,' answers Horace, stopping

politely for a moment; and then beginning to move on, he sees to his

horror that the Bore walks by his side. 'Can I do anything for you?'

asks the poet, still civil, but hinting that he prefers his own

company. The Bore plunges into the important business of praising

himself, with a frankness not yet forgotten in his species, and Horace

tries to get rid of him, walking very fast, then very slowly, then

turning to whisper a word to his slave, and in his anxiety he feels the

perspiration breaking out all over him, while his Tormentor chatters on,

as they skirt the splendid Julian Basilica, gleaming in the morning sun.

Horace looks nervously and eagerly to right and left, hoping to catch

sight of a friend and deliverer. Not a friendly face was in sight, and

the Bore knew it, and was pitilessly frank. 'Oh, I know you would like

to get away from me!' he exclaimed. 'I shall not let you go so easily!

Where are you going?' 'Across the Tiber,' answered Horace, inventing a

distant visit. 'I am going to see someone who lives far off, in Caesar's

gardens--a man you do not know. He is ill.' 'Very well,' said the other;

'I have nothing to do, and am far from lazy. I will go all the way with

you.' Horace hung his head, as a poor little Italian donkey does when a

heavy load is piled upon his back, for he was fairly caught, and he

thought of the long road before him, and he had moreover the unpleasant

consciousness that the Bore was laughing at his imaginary errand, since

they were walking in a direction exactly opposite from the Tiber, and

would have to go all the way round the Palatine by the Triumphal Road

and the Circus Maximus and then cross by the Sublician bridge, instead

of turning back towards the Velabrum, the Provision Market and the

Bridge of AEmilius, which we have known and crossed as the Ponte Rotto,

but of which only one arch is left now, in midstream.

[Illustration: PONTE ROTTO, NOW DESTROYED

After an engraving made about 1850]

Ave Roma Immortalis, Vol. 1 Studies from the Chronicles of Rome · 第 3 / 19 段