_Remarks._--Specimens from Mount Timpanogos and environs are

Produced by Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper, Diane Monico, and

the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at

http://www.pgdp.net. Some images courtesy of The Internet

Archive.

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PUBLICATIONS

MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY

VOLUME 1

1946-1950

EDITORS

E. RAYMOND HALL

DONALD S. FARNER

DONALD F. HOFFMEISTER

H. H. LANE

A. BYRON LEONARD

EDWARD H. TAYLOR

ROBERT W. WILSON

MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS

LAWRENCE, KANSAS

1950

MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS

LAWRENCE, KANSAS

PRINTED BY

FERD VOILAND, JR., STATE PRINTER

TOPEKA, KANSAS

1950

23-2413

CONTENTS

1. The pocket gophers (genus Thomomys) of Utah. By Stephen

D. Durrant. Pp. 1-82, 1 figure in text. August 15, 1946.

2. The systematic status of Eumeces pluvialis Cope, and

noteworthy records of other amphibians and reptiles from

Kansas and Oklahoma. By Hobart M. Smith. Pp. 85-89. August

15, 1946.

3. The tadpoles of Bufo cognatus Say. By Hobart M. Smith.

Pp. 93-96, 1 figure in text. August 15, 1946.

4. Hybridization between two species of garter snakes. By

Hobart M. Smith. Pp. 97-100. August 15, 1946.

5. Selected records of reptiles and amphibians from Kansas.

By John Breukelman and Hobart M. Smith. Pp. 101-112. August

15, 1946.

6. Kyphosis and other variations in soft-shelled turtles. By

Hobart M. Smith. Pp. 117-124, 3 figures. July 7, 1947.

7. Natural history of the prairie vole (Mammalian genus

Microtus). By E. W. Jameson, Jr. Pp. 125-151, 4 figures in

text. October 6, 1947.

8. The postnatal development of two broods of great horned

owls (Bubo virginianus). By Donald F. Hoffmeister and Henry

W. Setzer. Pp. 157-173, 5 figures in text. October 6, 1947.

9. Additions to the list of the birds of Louisiana. By

George H. Lowery, Jr. Pp. 177-192. November 7, 1947.

10. A check-list of the birds of Idaho. By M. Dale Arvey.

Pp. 193-216. November 29, 1947.

11. Subspeciation in pocket gophers of Kansas. By Bernardo

Villa R. and E. Raymond Hall. Pp. 217-236, 2 figures in

text. November 29, 1947.

12. A new bat (Genus Myotis) from Mexico. By Walter W.

Dalquest and E. Raymond Hall. Pp. 237-244, 6 figures in

text. December 10, 1947.

13. Tadarida femorosacca (Merriam) in Tamaulipas, Mexico. By

Walter W. Dalquest and E. Raymond Hall. Pp. 245-248, 1

figure in text. December 10, 1947.

14. A new pocket gopher (Thomomys) and a new spiny pocket

mouse (Liomys) from Michoacan, Mexico. By E. Raymond Hall

and Bernardo Villa-R. Pp. 249-256, 6 figures in text. July

26, 1948.

15. A new hylid frog from eastern Mexico. By Edward H.

Taylor. Pp. 257-264, 1 figure in text. August 16, 1948.

16. A new extinct emydid turtle from the Lower Pliocene of

Oklahoma. By Edwin C. Galbreath. Pp. 265-280, 1 plate.

August 16, 1948.

17. Pliocene and Pleistocene records of fossil turtles from

western Kansas and Oklahoma. By Edwin C. Galbreath. Pp.

281-284, 1 figure in text. August 16, 1948.

18. A new species of heteromyid rodent from the Middle

Oligocene of northeast Colorado with remarks on the skull.

By Edwin C. Galbreath. Pp. 285-300, 2 plates. August 16,

1948.

19. Speciation in the Brazilian spiny rats (Genus

Proechimys, Family Echimyidae). By Joao Moojen. Pp. 301-406,

140 figures in text. December 10, 1948.

20. Three new beavers from Utah. By Stephen D. Durrant and

Harold S. Crane. Pp. 407-417, 7 figures in text. December

24, 1948.

21. Two new meadow mice from Michoacan, Mexico. By E.

Raymond Hall. Pp. 423-427, 6 figures in text. December 24,

1948.

22. An annotated check list of the mammals of Michoacan,

Mexico. By E. Raymond Hall and Bernardo Villa-R. Pp.

431-472, 2 plates, 1 figure in text. December 27, 1949.

23. Subspeciation in the kangaroo rat, Dipodomys ordii. By

Henry W. Setzer. Pp. 423-573, 27 figures in text, 7 tables.

December 27, 1949.

24. Geographic range of hooded skunk, Mephitis macroura,

with description of a new subspecies from Mexico. By E.

Raymond Hall and Walter W. Dalquest. Pp. 575-580, 1 figure

in text. January 20, 1950.

25. Pipistrellus cinnamomeus Miller 1902 referred to the

genus Myotis. By E. Raymond Hall and Walter W. Dalquest. Pp.

581-590, 5 figures in text. January 20, 1950.

26. A synopsis of the American bats of the genus

Pipistrellus. By E. Raymond Hall and Walter W. Dalquest. Pp.

591-602, 1 figure in text. January 20, 1950.

Index pp. 605-638.

The Pocket Gophers (Genus Thomomys)

of Utah

BY

STEPHEN D. DURRANT

University of Kansas Publications

Museum of Natural History

Volume 1, No. 1, pp. 1-82, 1 figure in text

August 15, 1946

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS

LAWRENCE

1946

The Pocket Gophers (Genus Thomomys)

of Utah

BY

STEPHEN D. DURRANT

University of Kansas Publications

Museum of Natural History

Volume 1, No. 1, pp. 1-82, 1 figure in text

August 15, 1946

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS

LAWRENCE

1946

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PUBLICATIONS, MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY

Editors: E. Raymond Hall, Chairman, Donald S. Farner,

Donald F. Hoffmeister

Volume 1, No. 1, pp. 1-82, 1 figure in text.

Published AUGUST 15, 1946

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS

Lawrence, Kansas

PRINTED BY

FERD VOILAND, JR., STATE PRINTER

TOPEKA, KANSAS

1946

21-2786

The Pocket Gophers (Genus Thomomys) of Utah

By

STEPHEN D. DURRANT

Contribution from the Department of Biology, University of Utah,

and the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas.

INTRODUCTION

The history of pocket gophers of Utah begins with J. A. Allen's mention

in 1874 of mounds of these animals. For them he employed the name

"_Thomomys rufescens?_" (1874:65). Actual specimens were reported upon

a year later by Elliot Coues (1875:251, 256), who used the name

_Thomomys talpoides_ for specimens from "Utah" but later in the same

paper listed specimens from Provo as _Thomomys talpoides bulbivorus_.

Even as the great variation in Utah pocket gophers has been perplexing

to modern workers, so it was also to Coues seventy years ago who left

the problem with the statement that animals from Provo "exhibit among

themselves such variations that their labelling becomes a matter of

indifference"! In the same year in another report, Coues and Yarrow

(1875:112) used the name _Thomomys talpoides umbrinus_ for animals from

Provo. In 1877, Coues again referred these same animals to _Thomomys

talpoides bulbivorus_, using the name _umbrinus_ for the animals of

only southern Utah (Coues, 1877:627, 628). The two names _Thomomys

bottae_ and _Thomomys talpoides_, now applicable to gophers in Utah,

were synonomized under the name _Thomomys talpoides bulbivorus_ by

Coues (1875:256; 1877:627). After this beginning only three other

papers, all by J. A. Allen, appeared in the next twenty years. They

were reports on collections of mammals made by Walter W. Granger and

Charles P. Rowley. One of these contained the description of _Thomomys

aureus_. Likewise, in the ensuing twenty years there were only three

papers, one in 1901 by C. Hart Merriam in which he described _Thomomys

uinta_, one by Allen (1905:119), and Vernon Bailey's (1915) "Revision

of the pocket gophers of the genus _Thomomys_" in which he summarized

the information then available on these animals within the state.

Barnes (1922 and 1927) reprinted the information summarized by Bailey.

Since 1927 approximately twenty-five papers, mostly taxonomic, have

been published in which reference is made to Utah gophers, and

especially since 1930 much information has been accumulated about the

distribution and speciation of this genus within the state.

Specimens to the number of 1,045 have been available for this study.

Whereas Bailey (_loc. cit._) listed only four kinds belonging to four

different species, thirty-five kinds are now known from Utah. Seven of

these are herein described as new. The thirty-five kinds are found to

belong to only two instead of four full species.

Inasmuch as the literature is scattered and since names have been

applied in different ways at different times, I have attempted to give

a synonomy as complete as possible for each form found within the

state.

The bibliographies of Hayward (1936 and 1941) and Miller's (1924) "List

of North American mammals" have been of great use.

Capitalized color terms in the accounts are after Ridgway, Color

Standards and Color Nomenclature, Washington, D. C., 1912.

In the lists of specimens examined, the localities are listed by

counties from west to east, beginning at the northwestern corner of the

state, and within each county from north to south. When two localities

are on the same latitude, the westernmost is listed first.

I am deeply indebted to Professor R. V. Chamberlin, of the

University of Utah, for encouragement and support in my

investigation. I also acknowledge critical assistance in the

preparation of this paper from Professor E. Raymond Hall of

the University of Kansas. For the loan of specimens I am

grateful to the following: Clinton G. Abbott and Lawrence M.

Huey, Natural History Museum of San Diego, San Diego,

California; Harold E. Anthony and J. Eric Hill, American

Museum of Natural History, New York City, New York; Seth B.

Benson, Museum of Vertebrate Zooelogy, University of

California, Berkeley, California; William H. Burt, Museum of

Zooelogy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; J.

Kenneth Doutt, Carnegie Museum, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;

Ross Hardy, Dixie Junior College, St. George, Utah; C. Lynn

Hayward and Vasco M. Tanner, Brigham Young University,

Provo, Utah; H. H. T. Jackson and Viola S. Schantz, United

States Fish and Wildlife Service, U. S. National Museum,

Washington, D. C.; Remington Kellogg and Alexander Wetmore,

U. S. National Museum, Washington, D. C.; J. S. Stanford,

Utah State Agricultural College, Logan, Utah.

Unless otherwise indicated, specimens are in the Museum of

Zooelogy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. In lists

of specimens examined, abbreviations are employed as

follows:

(A. M. N. H.) American Museum of Natural History.

(N. H. M. S. D.) Natural History Museum of San Diego.

(M. V. Z.) Museum of Vertebrate Zooelogy, University of California.

(U. M.) Museum of Zooelogy, University of Michigan.

(C. M.) Carnegie Museum.

(R. H.) Collection of Ross Hardy.

(B. Y. U.) Brigham Young University.

(U. S. N. M.) United States National Museum.

(U. S. A. C.) Utah State Agricultural College.

(K. U.) Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas.

[Illustration: FIG. 1. Map showing the distribution of species and

subspecies of pocket gophers in Utah.]

Guide to subspecies:

1. _T. t. gracilis_

2. _T. t. wasatchensis_

3. _T. t. oquirrhensis_

4. _T. t. uinta_

5. _T. t. pygmaeus_

6. _T. t. ravus_

7. _T. t. ocius_

8. _T. t. moorei_

9. _T. t. fossor_

10. _T. t. parowanensis_

11. _T. t. levis_

12. _T. b. aureiventris_

13. _T. b. robustus_

14. _T. b. minimus_

15. _T. b. nesophilus_

16. _T. b. stansburyi_

17. _T. b. albicaudatus_

18. _T. b. bonnevillei_

19. _T. b. centralis_

20. _T. b. sevieri_

21. _T. b. convexus_

22. _T. b. tivius_

23. _T. b. contractus_

24. _T. b. lenis_

25. _T. b. levidensis_

26. _T. b. osgoodi_

27. _T. b. howelli_

28. _T. b. wahwahensis_

29. _T. b. dissimilis_

30. _T. b. aureus_

31. _T. b. birdseyei_

32. _T. b. virgineus_

33. _T. b. planirostris_

34. _T. b. absonus_

35. _T. b. alexandrae_

GENUS =Thomomys= Wied

All pocket gophers of Utah belong to the genus _Thomomys_. There are

only two species within the state, _Thomomys bottae_ with twenty-four

subspecies and _Thomomys talpoides_ with eleven subspecies.

Due to marked mutational capacities and ready response to environmental

pressures and sedentary habits, pocket gophers differentiate readily

into numerous subspecies. It is well known that Utah by its highly

varied topography and climate possesses widely different types of

habitats. The aforementioned plasticity of these animals and possibly

the fact that both species are at the extreme limits of their ranges in

Utah account for the numerous forms found within the state.

The genus may be characterized as follows: Highly specialized fossorial

rodents, with heavy, thick bodies; all four legs of approximately equal

length, but front legs more muscular for digging, and feet provided

with long claws; external fur-lined cheek pouches; small eyes, short

ears and tail; upper incisors long and projecting external to lips.

Skull: Stout and flattened; zygomatic arches well developed and usually

widely spreading; all teeth with permanent pulp cavities; incisors

superficially smooth, but fine median groove present on anterior face

of each upper incisor; dental formula, i. 1/1, c. 0/0, p. 1/1, m. 3/3;

external auditory canal long; stapedial artery small and enclosed

within an osseous canal.

=Thomomys talpoides= (Richardson)

_Thomomys talpoides_ is a northern species that in Utah approaches the

southern limits of its range. The animals of this species inhabit the

mountains and high valleys. In the southward extension of their range,

as in Utah, they are found at higher elevations which zonally represent

lower elevations at more northern latitudes. The specific characters

are: Sphenorbital fissure absent; incisive foramina anterior to

infraorbital canal; anterior prism of P4 triangular; interparietal

relatively large; lambdoidal suture concave posteriorly in region of

interparietal, in Utah specimens.

=Thomomys talpoides gracilis= Durrant

_Thomomys quadratus gracilis_ Durrant, Bull. Univ. Utah, 39

(No. 6):3, February 28, 1939.

_Thomomys talpoides gracilis_ Durrant, Bull. Univ. Utah, 30

(No. 5):6, August 24, 1939; Goldman, Journ. Mamm., 25:414,

December 12, 1944.

_Thomomys quadratus fisheri_ Hall, Univ. California Publ.

Zooel., 37:4, April 10, 1931.

_Thomomys uinta_ Bailey, N. Amer. Fauna, 39:114, November

15, 1915; Barnes, Bull. Univ. Utah, 12 (No. 15):83, April,

1922; Bull. Univ. Utah, 17 (No. 12):104, June, 1927.

_Type._--Male adult, skin and skull; No. 44866, Museum of Vertebrate

Zooelogy, University of California; Pine Canyon, 6,600 ft., 17 mi. NW

Kelton, Box Elder County, Utah; July 12, 1930; collected by Annie M.

Alexander; original number 676.

_Range._--Mountainous regions of extreme northwestern Utah.

_Diagnosis._--Size medium (see measurements). Color: Upper parts

Buckthorn Brown grading over the sides and flanks to Light Buff on the

underparts; chin white; nose and postauricular patches grayish black.

Claws on front feet long and slender. Skull: Long and slender; rostrum

long and narrow; zygomatic and mastoidal breadths slight; palatal pits

deep; upper incisors narrow; basioccipital wide.

_Comparisons._--Compared with topotypes of _Thomomys talpoides

fisheri_, _gracilis_ is of approximately the same size. Upper parts

darker and underparts lighter; postauricular patches larger and darker;

claws on front feet longer and slenderer. Skull: Generally longer and

narrower; nasals and rostrum longer; basioccipital wider.

As compared with _T. t. uinta_, _gracilis_ is of approximately the same

size but differs as follows: Color: Lighter throughout; postauricular

patches markedly smaller and lighter; inguinal and pectoral regions

much lighter. One characteristic difference is in the ear. In _uinta_

the external opening of the ear is much larger; the pinna of the ear is

larger, more rounded at the tip, and lacks most of the pigmentation on

the inner margin. Skull: Generally narrower and longer; nasals longer;

zygomatic arches weaker and less angular; upper incisors narrower.

This form is easily distinguished from _bridgeri_ by smaller size, and

by the skull being longer, narrower and less angular.

From _Thomomys talpoides oquirrhensis_ to the southeast, _T. t.

gracilis_ can be distinguished by: Total length and ear shorter. Color:

Generally lighter, except the underparts which are about the same;

postauricular patches larger and more deeply pigmented. Skull:

Braincase less inflated; nasals truncated posteriorly as opposed to

rounded; zygomatic and mastoidal breadths less; rostrum shorter but

narrower; upper incisors narrower and shorter.

For comparisons with _wasatchensis_ see comparisons under that form.

In general, this mountain form can be distinguished from all other

_talpoides_ in Utah by lighter color, narrow, slender, "graceful" skull

whence the name _gracilis_ is derived.

_Remarks._--In Utah, _gracilis_ is limited to the extreme northwestern

corner of the state. This part of the state is in the Snake River

drainage. The main part of the range of this race lies in south-central

and southwestern Idaho and northeastern Nevada. The center of its range

might be considered to be in the Jarbidge Mountains area of Nevada. The

south slopes of these mountains are in the Humboldt River drainage,

while the north slopes are in the Snake River drainage, and this

subspecies occurs as far north as the Snake River and south and west

almost to central Nevada. No specimens are available from the area in

Utah between the Raft River Mountains inhabited by _gracilis_ and the

Wasatch Mountains in central Utah inhabited by _wasatchensis_. Judging

from the nature of the terrain, the range of _gracilis_ does not extend

eastward much beyond the Raft River Mountains. The type locality for a

gopher of a different species, _Thomomys bottae aureiventris_, is in

the first valley east of these mountains. Furthermore, all valleys to

the east and south, as far as known, are inhabited by gophers of the

_bottae_ group. Also, all mountain ranges in this area, as far east as

the Wasatch Mountains are inhabited by members of the _bottae_ group.

No specimens from Utah indicate intergradation between _gracilis_ and

_wasatchensis_, the form to the east, but specimens from farther north

at Albion, Cassia County, Idaho, do show intergradation. Bailey

(1915:116), Hall (1931:4), and Durrant (1939:6) have reported on these

specimens which at the present time seem best referred to _T. t.

gracilis_.

_Specimens examined._--Total, 24, distributed as follows:

_Box Elder County_: Yost, 4 (U. S. A. C.); Pine Canyon,

6,600 ft., 17 mi. NW Kelton, 7 (M. V. Z.): Lynn Canyon, Raft

River, 4; Park Valley, 3 (U. S. A. C.); Etna, 4 (U. S. A.

C.); Raft River Mountains, Clear Creek Camp of Minnedoka

National Forest, 1 (R. H.); Raft River Mountains, 1,500 feet

above Clear Creek Camp of Minnedoka National Forest, 1 (R. H.).

=Thomomys talpoides wasatchensis= new subspecies

_Thomomys quadratus uinta_ Hall, Univ. California Publ.

Zooel., 37:4, April 10, 1931.

_Thomomys talpoides uinta_ Goldman, Journ. Mamm., 20:234.

May 14, 1939.

_Thomomys uinta_ Bailey, N. Amer. Fauna, 39:114, November

15, 1915; Barnes, Bull. Univ. Utah, 12 (No. 15):83, April,

1922; Bull. Univ. Utah, 17 (No. 12):104, June, 1927;

Stanford, Journ. Mamm., 12:360, November 11, 1931.

_Type._--Male, adult, skin and skull, No. 1604, Museum of Zooelogy,

University of Utah; Midway, 5,500 ft., Wasatch County, Utah; September

1, 1936; collected by S. D. Durrant; original number 1049.

_Range._--Wasatch Mountains and neighboring high valleys as far south

as Spanish Fork Canyon, Utah County.

_Diagnosis._--Size medium (see measurements). Color: Upper parts Snuff

Brown, finely mixed with black; sides and flanks Sayal Brown;

underparts overlaid with Cinnamon Buff, with suffusion of black on

underfur; postauricular patches black, extending around ear; ears

pointed and covered with black hairs; nose, cheeks, chin and top of

head dusky; front feet, hind feet and distal part of tail white; tail

covered proximally with light brown hairs. Skull: Moderately heavy and

ridged; nasals long, wide posteriorly and not markedly dilated

distally; posterior ends of nasals emarginate; zygomatic arches fairly

widely spreading and angular, being nearly straight in adults, but

tending to bow out slightly at posterior ends in young; zygomatic

processes of maxillae heavy; interparietal small and variously shaped,

but always wider than long; interorbital region fairly wide; well

marked dorsal depression in frontals posterior to ends of nasals;

interpterygoid space narrowly V-shaped; tympanic bullae large;

occipital condyles large and widely separated; foramen magnum large and

higher than wide; basioccipital wide; dentition light.

_Comparisons._--From topotypes of _Thomomys talpoides moorei_,

_wasatchensis_ differs as follows: Size slightly larger; ears longer

and more pointed. Color: Generally darker throughout; postauricular

patches smaller. Skull: Zygomatic arches not as widely spreading;

zygomatic processes of squamosals dip farther ventrally; premaxillae

less extended posterior to nasals; nasals wider posteriorly and less

dilated distally; median dorsal depression of frontals present;

tympanic bullae generally larger, but less inflated ventrally; foramen

magnum larger especially in dorsoventral dimension; occipital condyles

farther apart; basioccipital wider; alveolar length of upper molar

series less; molariform teeth smaller; upper incisors wider and

shorter.

Topotypes of _wasatchensis_ differ from topotypes and near topotypes of

_Thomomys talpoides uinta_ as follows: Size larger in every measurement

taken. Color: Darker throughout; ears longer and more pigmented;

opening of external ear smaller; postauricular patches larger. Skull:

In females larger throughout, more massive and angular; nasals longer,

wider and not so dilated distally; rostrum longer but wider; zygomatic

arches wider, more angular and less widely spreading posteriorly;

extension of premaxillae posterior to nasals less; tympanic bullae

larger, but less inflated ventrally; foramen magnum larger and more

ovoid; width across occipital condyles greater; basioccipital wider;

molariform teeth smaller; upper incisors shorter and wider.

Topotypes of _wasatchensis_ can be distinguished from those of

_Thomomys talpoides oquirrhensis_ as follows: Size larger; tail longer;

ears longer. Color: Slightly darker on sides and underparts. Skull:

Heavier, more ridged and angular; nasals more dilated distally;

posterior ends of nasals more deeply emarginate; zygomatic arches

heavier and more widely spreading, but more nearly parallel and less

divergent posteriorly; zygomatic processes of maxillae much heavier;

braincase and tympanic bullae larger; pterygoid hamulae shorter;

interpterygoid space more narrowly V-shaped; wider across occipital

condyles; foramen magnum larger and more ovoid.

From topotypes of _Thomomys talpoides gracilis_, _wasatchensis_ differs

as follows: Size larger; hind foot longer; ears longer and more

pointed. Color: Darker throughout; postauricular patches relatively

smaller. Skull: Larger, heavier and more angular; nasals emarginate

posteriorly as opposed to truncate; rostrum heavier; zygomatic arches

heavier and more widely spreading; zygomatic processes of maxillae much

heavier and more angular; mastoid breadth greater; interparietal

relatively smaller; extension of premaxillae posterior to nasals

actually as well as relatively less; palatal pits deeper; tympanic

bullae larger; interpterygoid space more narrowly V-shaped; foramen

magnum more ovoid; upper incisors wider.

Topotypes of _wasatchensis_ can be readily distinguished from those of

_Thomomys talpoides levis_ and _parowanensis_ by larger size; more

massive, ridged, angular skulls; larger tympanic bullae; large, ovoid

foramen magnum; and relatively smaller interparietal.

_Remarks._--Specimens from Mount Timpanogos and environs are

intergrades between _moorei_ and _wasatchensis_. They resemble _moorei_

in the shape and size of the tympanic bullae, and are intermediate in

the size and shape of the foramen magnum. In the majority of characters

they resemble _wasatchensis_ to which they are here referred. The

animals from east of Salt Lake City in Salt Lake County are intergrades

between _oquirrhensis_ and _wasatchensis_ and show some characters of

_uinta_, but are referable to _wasatchensis_. Animals from Morgan

County and western Summit County are intergrades between _wasatchensis_

and _uinta_. They resemble _uinta_ in size, shape of nasals and size of

tympanic bullae. The remainder of the cranial details place them with

_wasatchensis_. Morphologically the animals from Wellsville, Cache

County, were the closest to the topotypes of any obtained and are

nearly indistinguishable from them. Like the topotypes of

_wasatchensis_ this population inhabits a high valley. The remaining

specimens from Cache County resemble those from Morgan and Summit

counties.

_Specimens examined._--Total, 119, distributed as follows:

_Cache County_: Logan Canyon, Beaver Basin, Utah-Idaho Line,

2 (U. S. A. C); Logan Canyon, Tony Grove Camp, 6 (U. S. A.

C); Logan Canyon, Green Camp, 3 (U. S. A. C); Logan Canyon,

3 (U. S. A. C); Logan Mountains, 20 mi. E Logan, 3 (U. S. A.

C); Logan Peak area, 13 (U. S. A. C); near Providence Peak,

Logan Mountains, 1 (U. S. A. C.); Wellsville, 10 (U. S. A.

C); Hardware Ranch, Blacksmith Fork, 1 (U. S. A. C); Avon, 1

(U. S. A. C); 1 mi. E Avon, 1 (U. S. A. C); 7-8 mi. E Avon,

1 (U. S. A. C). _Weber County_: South Fork, Ogden River, 18

mi. E Ogden, 4 (M. V. Z.). _Morgan County_: East Canyon, 18

mi. NW Park City, 6,000 ft., 1. _Davis County_: 8 mi. NE

Salt Lake City, 1. _Salt Lake County_: Mouth of Dry Canyon,

1 mi. NE Salt Lake City, 1; 4 mi. above mouth City Creek

Canyon, 5,000 ft., 1; mouth of Emigration Canyon, 1; mouth

of Millcreek Canyon, 1; Lambs Canyon, 13 mi. SE Salt Lake

City, 2 (C. M.); mouth of Big Cottonwood Canyon, 1. _Summit

County_: Park City, 1 (U. S. N. M.). _Wasatch County_:

Midway, 5,500 ft., 29. _Utah County_: Mt. Timpanogos, 1 mi.

N Aspen Grove, 7,500 ft., 20; Aspen Grove, Mt. Timpanogos, 5

(1, U. S. A. C.; 4, B. Y. U.); Head of Grove Creek, Mt.

Timpanogos, 4 (B. Y. U.).

_Additional Records_: _Weber County_: Ogden, 6. _Salt Lake

County_: Parleys Canyon, 1 (Bailey, 1915:114).

=Thomomys talpoides oquirrhensis= Durrant

_Thomomys talpoides oquirrhensis_ Durrant, Bull. Univ. Utah,

30 (No. 5):3, October 24, 1939.

_Type._--Male, adult, skin and skull; No. 2605, Museum of Zooelogy,

University of Utah; Settlement Creek, Oquirrh Mountains, 6,500 ft.,

Tooele County, Utah; June 11, 1938; collected by S. D. Durrant;

original number 1461.

_Range._--Known only from the Oquirrh Mountains, which are in Salt

Lake, Tooele and Utah counties, Utah.

_Diagnosis._--Size medium (see measurements); ear long; tail short,

claws of front feet long and slender. Color: Upper parts Buckthorn

Brown, mixed with black, grading over the sides and flanks to Pinkish

Buff on the ventral surface; feet white; nose grayish black;

postauricular patches medium in size and black; chin and throat with

varying amounts of white; proximal two-thirds of tail dark brown,

distal third white. Skull: Long and slender, but relatively wide across

mastoidal region; nasals long and rounded posteriorly; rostrum long and

narrow; zygomatic arches weak and not widely spreading, tending to be

slightly bowed out posteriorly, but in the main roughly parallel to the

sides of the skull; outer margin of zygomatic arch slightly concave,

and zygomatic arch dips deeply ventrad; dorsal surface of skull smooth,

with weakly defined parietal crests; parietal crest nearly parallel,

but bowed medially, in parietal region, and flaring widely posteriorly

to pass lateral to interparietal; tympanic bullae large, truncate

anteriorly and markedly inflated ventrally; upper incisors short and

fairly robust.

_Comparisons._--From _Thomomys talpoides uinta_, _oquirrhensis_ may be

differentiated as follows: Color: Darker throughout; postauricular

patches larger and darker; ears longer and more pointed; inner margin

of pinna heavily pigmented; external opening of ear smaller. Skull:

Nasals rounded posteriorly rather than deeply emarginate, and less

flaring distally; zygomatic arches weaker and markedly less widely

spreading; pterygoid hamulae weaker; basisphenoid narrower; upper

incisors shorter and wider.

For comparisons between _oquirrhensis_ and _Thomomys talpoides

gracilis_, and _oquirrhensis_ and _wasatchensis_, see comparisons under

those forms.

Topotypical specimens of _oquirrhensis_ can be distinguished from those

of _Thomomys talpoides moorei_ as follows: Color generally darker, due

to greater admixture of black; terminal bands of hair actually lighter;

postauricular patches larger and darker; ears longer, more pointed and

with more heavily pigmented pinnae; tail shorter. Skull: About the same

size; smoother; zygomatic arches weaker and less widely spreading;

nasals rounded posteriorly as opposed to emarginate; mastoid breadth

less; pterygoid hamulae weaker; upper incisors wider.

_Remarks._--This race is limited to the Oquirrh Mountains, a high

mountain range that lies parallel to, and just west of the Wasatch

Mountains, in Utah, Salt Lake and Tooele counties. These mountains were

connected in past times to the Wasatch Mountains by the Transverse

Range, and by a sand and gravel bar deposited by Pleistocene Lake

Bonneville. The Jordan River in its course from Utah Lake to the Great

Salt Lake has cut a channel through the aforementioned bar. This

channel has been cut to the level of the surrounding valleys as is

indicated by the meandering nature of the stream through this part of

its course. As a result the Oquirrh Mountains are relatively isolated.

Although separated from the Wasatch Mountains by the Jordan River

Valley only a few miles wide, the pocket gophers are distinct on each

mountain. A population of _T. bottae_ is interposed between the two

mountain ranges as is indicated by specimens from Riverton, six miles

north of the Transverse Range. The populations of _bottae_ are

subspecifically the same on the two sides of the Jordan River.

On the east side of the Oquirrh Mountains, pocket gophers collected

from the Jordan Valley up Rose Canyon to about 5,000 feet elevation

were all of the species _T. bottae_. Between 5,000 and 6,000 feet there

is an area in which the ranges of _bottae_ and _talpoides_ overlap.

When trapping, it is possible to predict what species will be taken by

the types of burrows and soil. Gophers of the _bottae_ group have their

burrows in the areas of the deepest soil and heaviest vegetation,

whereas the areas of shallow, rocky soil covered with sparse vegetation

are the habitat of _talpoides_. Above 6,000 feet the only gopher

encountered is _talpoides_. Along Settlement Creek on the west side of

the Oquirrh Mountains, which is the type locality of _oquirrhensis_,

_bottae_ and _talpoides_ have essentially the same vertical

distribution as in Rose Canyon. On this mountain the two species appear

to be in competition.

The available information, based on collections, indicates that the

Oquirrh Mountains are the only mountains west of the Wasatch Range upon

which _talpoides_ occurs. In Utah, all other mountains to the west, as

far as known, are inhabited by subspecies of of _Thomomys bottae_.

_Specimens examined._--Total, 41, as follows: _Tooele

County_: Settlement Creek, Oquirrh Mountains, 6,500 ft., 14.

_Salt Lake County_: Rose Canyon, Oquirrh Mountains, 5,650

ft., 27.

=Thomomys talpoides uinta= Merriam

_Thomomys uinta_ Merriam, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington,

14:112, July 19, 1901; Bailey, N. Amer. Fauna, 39:113,

November 15, 1915; Barnes, Bull. Univ. Utah, 12 (No. 15):83,

April, 1922; Bull. Univ. Utah, 17 (No. 12):104, June, 1927;

Stanford, Journ. Mamm., 12:360; November 11, 1931; Goldman,

Journ. Washington Acad. Sci., 28:333, July 15, 1938; Davis,

The Recent mammals of Idaho, pp. 239, 259, The Caxton

Printers, Ltd., Caldwell, Idaho, April 5, 1939.

_Thomomys talpoides uinta_ Goldman, Journ. Mamm., 20:234,

May 14, 1939.

_Thomomys quadratus uinta Hall_, Univ. California Publ.

Zooel., 37:4, April 10, 1931.

_Type._--Male, adult, skin and skull, No. 22501/30051, U. S. National

Museum (Biological Surveys Collection); north base Gilbert Peak, Uinta

Mountains, 10,000 ft., Summit County, Utah; June 6, 1890; collected by

Vernon Bailey; original number 1262 (after Merriam, type not seen).

_Range._--Uinta Mountains in Duchesne County, eastern Wasatch and

Summit counties, and western Uintah County south to the Roan, Brown and

Book cliffs in Carbon County.

_Diagnosis._--Size medium (see measurements). Color: Upper parts Snuff

Brown finely mixed with black, paling over sides and flanks to near

Pinkish Buff on underparts; postauricular patches relatively small and

dusky; external opening of ear large; pinnae usually lightly pigmented;

hind feet white; front feet usually white only at base of toes; distal

third to half of tail white; tail usually light below, with proximal

dorsal half covered with darker hairs; nose, chin, cheeks and top of

head dusky; usually considerable white on throat. Skull: Small,

slender, and not heavily ridged; nasals short and dilated distally;

posterior margins of nasals emarginate; zygomatic arches moderately

widely spreading, widest posteriorly; interparietal pentagonal or

subquadrangular; interpterygoid space V-shaped; tympanic bullae well

inflated ventrally; upper incisors long and narrow.

_Comparisons._--For comparisons with other subspecies of _Thomomys

talpoides_, see accounts of those forms.

_Remarks._--The range formerly ascribed to _uinta_ (Bailey, 1915:114;

Barnes, 1922:83, 1927:104) is now known to be inhabited by animals

belonging to three distinct subspecies. The range of _uinta_ as now

understood is restricted to the southern and western parts of the

Uinta Mountains and their environs. Three specimens from the Book

Cliffs, Sunnyside, Carbon County, are not typical, but in a majority of

their characters agree with _uinta_ to which they are here referred.

I have seen only one specimen from the type locality. It is one of the

series on which Merriam (1901:112) based his original description. In

addition, I have studied several large series of near topotypes. From

the material at hand, and from Merriam's description (_loc. cit._), I

regard the animals on which the name _uinta_ was based as intergrades

between _Thomomys talpoides ravus_, the race to the northeast, on the

one hand and the animals of the western and southern parts of the Uinta

Mountains on the other hand. The affinities of the type series are with

the animals from the latter area which are here all referred to

_uinta_.

_Specimens examined._--Total, 41, distributed as follows:

_Summit County_: 2 mi. S junction Bear River and Haydens

Fork, 2 (C. M.); N base, Gilbert Peak, 10,000 ft., 1 (U. S.

N. M.); Smith and Moorehouse Creek, 2; Bald Peak, 25 mi. NE

Kamas, 15 (8, M. V. Z.; 6, C. M.). _Duchesne County_: Petty

Mountain, 15 mi. N Mountain Home, 9,500 ft., 6 (C. M.).

_Wasatch County_: Wolf Creek Pass, 18 mi. NW Hanna, 1 (U. S.

A. C.); Lost Lake, Uinta Mountains, 10 (B. Y. U.); Current

Creek, Uinta Mountains, 1 (U. S. N. M.). _Carbon County_:

Forks, Sunnyside, 9,000 ft., 3.

_Additional records._--_Summit County_: Uinta Mountains, 6

(see Bailey, 1915:114).

=Thomomys talpoides pygmaeus= Merriam

_Thomomys pygmaeus_ Merriam, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington,

14:115. July 19, 1901.

_Thomomys talpoides pygmaeus_ Davis, The Recent mammals of

Idaho, p. 252, The Caxton Printers, Ltd., Caldwell, Idaho,

April 5, 1939.

_Type._--Male, adult, skin and skull, No. 55251, U. S. National Museum

(Biological Surveys Collection); 10 mi. NE Montpelier, in open

sagebrush of Transition Zone, 6,600 ft., Bear County, Idaho; July 29,

1893; collected by Vernon Bailey: original number 4150 (after Merriam,

type not seen: see, also, Bailey, 1915:109).

_Range._--Limited to Daggett County.

_Diagnosis._--Size: Small (see measurements). Color: Upper parts near

Bister slightly mixed with black, grading over sides and flanks to

Ochraceous Buff on underparts; postauricular patches small and dusky;

hind feet white; front feet dusky, being white only at base of claws;

chin and nose dusky; tail brown, lighter below and tipped with white.

Skull: Very small, slender and smooth; nasals short and slender;

zygomatic arches weak and not widely spreading; rostrum narrow;

extension of premaxillae posterior to nasals short; parietal ridges

hardly noticeable; interparietal large; extension of supraoccipital

posterior to lambdoidal suture long; tympanic bullae actually small,

but relatively large; basioccipital narrow; interpterygoid space narrow

and acutely angled; upper incisors markedly recurved; molariform teeth

relatively large.

_Comparisons._--This small pocket gopher can be distinguished from all

other members of _Thomomys talpoides_ occurring in Utah by remarkably

small size, and slender, weak, small skull with strongly recurved upper

incisors.

_Remarks._--The specimens used in this study were those recorded by

Svihla (1931:261). She reports that they were obtained in the

flood-plain banks of the streamsides, and preferred the pine belt. This

shows probably an extension of range with reference to life zones, as

heretofore the main reported localities of capture have been in

sagebrush in the Transition Life-zone.

Insofar as I am aware, Mrs. Svihla's specimens are the only ones of

this subspecies ever obtained in Utah. Additional work is necessary in

southwestern Wyoming to outline accurately the geographic distribution

of this subspecies. In comparison with topotypes, the specimens from

Utah are lighter in color and some specimens have slightly larger

skulls, suggesting slight intergradation with _Thomomys talpoides

uinta_.

_Specimens examined._--Total, 18 (all in Museum of Zooelogy,

University of Michigan), distributed as follows: _Daggett

County_: Sheep Creek, 4; 1 mi. W Summit Springs, 4; Beaver

Creek, 22 mi. S Manila, 9; Granite Park, 24 mi. S Manila, 1.

=Thomomys talpoides ravus= new subspecies

_Type._--Male, adult, skin and skull, No. 13690, Carnegie Museum;

Vernal-Manila Highway, 19 mi. N Vernal, 8,000 ft., Uintah County, Utah;

August 22, 1937; collected by J. K. and M. T. Doutt; original number

4718.

_Range._--Uinta Mountains in Daggett, northern Uintah and northern

Summit counties.

_Diagnosis._--Size large (see measurements); ears relatively narrow;

hind foot relatively small. Color: Upper parts between Drab and Light

Drab, darkest along middorsal line due to mixture of hairs tipped with

light brown; sides and flanks Light Drab; entire underparts creamy

white; front and hind feet, ventral surface of tail and end of tail

white; proximal two-thirds of tail covered dorsally with light brown

hairs; nose and cheeks dusky; postauricular patches black. Skull:

Large, heavy and ridged; rostrum long and narrow; nasals long,

moderately dilated distally and with a distal hump; posterior ends of

nasals emarginate; parietal and lambdoidal crests well developed;

zygomatic arches moderately heavy and widely spreading, widest

posteriorly; zygomatic processes of maxillae moderately heavy and

flaring abruptly from base of rostrum; marked middorsal depression in

frontals present; interparietal pentagonal; extension of premaxillae

posterior to nasals long; posterior tongues of premaxillae long,

slender and rounded proximally; braincase high, vaulted and relatively

narrow; tympanic bullae well inflated ventrally, and ridged in old

animals; pterygoid hamulae long; interpterygoid space narrowly

V-shaped; upper incisors long and narrow; molariform teeth medium.

_Comparisons._--Compared with topotypes of _Thomomys talpoides

bridgeri_, _ravus_ differs as follows: Size larger; hind foot smaller;

ears narrower. Color: Lighter throughout, grayish as opposed to brown.

Skull: Smaller, narrower, less angular and less massive; nasals,

rostrum, zygomatic processes of maxillae, ascending branches of

premaxillae and posterior tongues of premaxillae all narrower;

extension of premaxillae posterior to nasals longer; interparietal

wider; braincase higher and narrower; tympanic bullae approximately the

same size, but more inflated ventrally; interpterygoid space more

narrowly V-shaped; upper incisors narrower; molariform teeth weaker.

Compared with topotypes and near topotypes of _Thomomys talpoides

uinta_, _ravus_ differs as follows: Size larger in every measurement

taken. Color: Lighter throughout, being grayish as opposed to brown.

Skull: Larger in every measurement taken; rostrum and nasals actually

as well as relatively longer; extension of premaxillae posterior to

nasals longer; upper incisors longer and wider; molariform teeth

larger.

There is only one other gray subspecies of _Thomomys talpoides_ in

Utah, _Thomomys talpoides ocius_. Topotypes of _ravus_ differ from it

as follows: Size markedly larger in every measurement taken. Color:

Darker, more brown hairs. Skull: Larger in every measurement taken;

premaxillae extended farther posteriorly to nasals; extension of

supraoccipital posterior to lambdoidal suture markedly less; tympanic

bullae actually as well as relatively smaller; upper incisors longer

and more procumbent.

This new subspecies can be readily distinguished from all other

subspecies of _Thomomys talpoides_ occurring in Utah by markedly

greater size and paler, more grayish color.

_Remarks._--The range of this form appears to be limited to the north

slopes of the Uinta Mountains, except in Daggett County where it occurs

also on the south slopes. Intergradation in color and in cranial

details with _bridgeri_ is shown by animals from the East Fork of

Blacks Fork, thirty-one miles SSW Fort Bridger, and by those from

Henrys Fork, 8,300 ft., both in Summit County. Due to the grayish color

and the narrower, weaker skull they are referred to _ravus_.

Intergradation with _uinta_ is shown by specimens from the type

locality of the latter race. The type series of _uinta_ consists of

intergrades between _ravus_ and the animals to the west and south (see

remarks under _uinta_).

It is doubtful whether _bridgeri_ occurs in Utah. Material from Rich

County and extreme northern Cache County would settle the question.

Perhaps _bridgeri_ is restricted to the lower valleys in southwestern

Wyoming. Two specimens from northern Cache County, from Logan Canyon,

Beaver Basin, Utah-Idaho Line appear to be intergrades between

_bridgeri_ and _wasatchensis_, but are referable to the latter race.

_Specimens examined._--Total, 38, distributed as follows:

_Summit County_: Henrys Fork, 8,300 ft., 8; E Fork, Blacks

Fork, 31 mi. SSW Fort Bridger, 4 (C. M.). _Daggett County_:

Vernal-Manila Road, 4 mi. W Green's Lake, 7,500 ft., 6 (C.

M.); Elk Park, Uinta Mountains, 5 (B. Y. U.). _Uintah

County_: Trout Creek, SE Trout Peak, 22 mi. NW Vernal, 9,300

ft., 5 (C. M.); Vernal-Manila Highway, 19 mi. N Vernal,

8,000 ft., 6 (C. M.); Taylor Peak, 17 mi. N Vernal, 4 (C.

M.).

=Thomomys talpoides ocius= Merriam

_Thomomys clusius ocius_ Merriam, Proc. Biol. Soc.

Washington, 14:114, July 19, 1901.

_Thomomys clusius_ Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist.,

13:246, November 25, 1896.

_Thomomys ocius_ Bailey, N. Amer. Fauna, 39:107, November

15, 1915; Barnes, Bull. Univ. Utah, 12 (No. 15):83, April,

1922; Bull. Univ. Utah, 17 (No. 12):102, June, 1927.

_Type._--Male, adult, skin and skull, No. 18852/25586, U. S. National

Museum (Biological Surveys Collection); dry sagebrush mesas at Harveys

Ranch, Smiths Fork, 6 mi. SW Fort Bridger, 6,657 ft., Uinta County,

Wyoming; May 24, 1890; collected by Vernon Bailey; original number 1194

(after Bailey, type not seen).

_Diagnosis._--Size small (see measurements). Color: Upper parts Tilleul

Buff overlaid with Avellaneous, grading over sides and flanks to nearly

white on underparts; underparts with faint wash of creamy white;

postauricular patches small and dusky and completely circling the ear;

nose and cheeks dusky; front feet, hind feet, throat, ventral surface

of tail and distal half of tail white. Skull: Small, slender but

compact; nasals rounded posteriorly; extension of premaxillae posterior

to nasals very short; zygomatic arches robust, but not widely

spreading, widest posteriorly; interparietal large and pentagonal in

shape; extension of supraoccipital posterior to lambdoidal suture long;

tympanic bullae actually as well as relatively large; basioccipital

narrow; pterygoid hamulae long and ridged; upper incisors short and

strongly recurved.

_Comparisons._--Compared with one topotype and seven near topotypes of

_Thomomys talpoides pygmaeus_, _ocius_ differs as follows: Size larger

in every measurement taken. Color: Lighter throughout, grayish as

opposed to brown; distal half of tail white as opposed to only a few

white hairs at tip of tail. Skull: Larger in every measurement taken;

skull more compact; zygomatic arches heavier and more widely spreading

posteriorly; tympanic bullae larger; upper incisors larger, but equally

strongly recurved; molariform teeth larger.

Topotypes of ocius can be distinguished from those of _Thomomys

talpoides uinta_ as follows: Color: Lighter throughout, grayish as

opposed to brown. Skull: Nasals rounded posteriorly as opposed to

emarginate; zygomatic arches more robust; interparietal pentagonal as

opposed to subquadrangular; extension of supraoccipital posterior to

lambdoidal suture markedly greater; tympanic bullae actually as well as

relatively much larger; upper incisors short and strongly recurved as

opposed to long and procumbent.

Specimens of this subspecies can be distinguished from all other

members of the species _Thomomys talpoides_ occurring in Utah by their

grayish color, and by small, compact skulls with very large tympanic

bullae and short strongly recurved upper incisors.

_Remarks._--Two specimens from Vernal, Uintah County, are intergrades

between _ocius_ and _uinta_. They resemble _uinta_ in size and dorsal

color, but are slightly lighter tending toward the color of _ocius_.

Ventrally they are intermediate in color but more like _ocius_. The

skulls are more like those of _ocius_ in general appearance, extension

of supraoccipital posterior to the lambdoidal suture, shape and

thickness of the zygomatic arches, posterior tongues of premaxillae,

size of tympanic bullae and recurved upper incisors. They more closely

resemble _uinta_ in shape of posterior ends of nasals, basioccipital

and shape of the zygomatic processes of the squamosals. In all of the

above mentioned characters, they are intermediate between the two named

forms, but tend towards one or the other as listed. The majority of

characters are more as in _ocius_ to which they are here referred.

When Goldman (1939:233, 234) listed the named subspecies of _Thomomys

talpoides_, he hesitated to include _ocius_ and merely mentioned that

_ocius_, _pygmaeus_ and _idahoensis_ might also belong to _talpoides_.

Davis (1939:240, 241) found intergradation between _idahoensis_ and

_fuscus_ and also between _idahoensis_ and _pygmaeus_, and, therefore,

arranged the last two mentioned forms as subspecies of _talpoides_.

This present study reveals intergradation between _ocius_ and _uinta_,

and also between _ocius_ and _fossor_ (see account of _fossor_).

Therefore, _ocius_ is properly to be treated as a subspecies of the

series of intergrading forms of which _talpoides_ is the earliest

named.

All specimens of _ocius_ known from Utah are from the extreme eastern

part of the northeastern corner of the state. The type locality of

_ocius_ is near Fort Bridger, Wyoming, which is north of Utah. I have

seen one specimen from 12 miles west of Linwood, Daggett County, Utah,

on Henrys Fork in Wyoming. Additional collecting in northern Utah

probably will reveal _ocius_ to inhabit also parts of northern Utah.

_Specimens examined._--Total, 4, distributed as follows:

_Uintah County_: Vernal, 2 (C. M.); Uncompahgre Indian

Reservation, 2 (A. M. N. H.).

The Pocket Gophers (Genus Thomomys) of Utah University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History, Vol. 1 No. 1 · 第 1 / 8 段