Bellomont’s requisition for a frigate to suppress piracy was vetoed, for

the reason that England needed her entire available marine force for

service in home waters because of the war with France. The suggestion of

a private ship was more successful and met with the financial assistance

of the King, the duke of Shrewsbury, lord chancellor Somers, the Earls

of Oxford and Romney, Robert Livingston and others, Bellomont assuming

the responsibility of equipment. It was this ship, the _Adventure_,

which was turned over to William Kidd, a resident of New York, then in

London. Kidd, beyond question, ranks as the transcendent specimen of his

class. He was a navigator _par excellence_, a man of the world; a type

that, when pushed by fortune into any orbit, commands the situation by

the power of his own robust characteristics. Kidd’s orders were simple.

He was to prey upon French commerce and to destroy pirates. In the first

desideratum he proved a failure; in the second, by becoming a pirate

himself he achieved a brilliant and, in the end, a fatal success. Upon

his career on the high seas, as a privateer and pirate, it is not

necessary to dilate. Two years after his departure from Plymouth he

arrived in New York, only to find that his friend, Governor Fletcher,

and other piratical sympathizers were no longer in control of the

affairs of the province. Kidd sailed Eastward along the Sound and buried

part of his plunder on Gardiner’s Island. He then proceeded to Boston,

where he appeared on the streets in the gorgeous raiment of a man of

fashion. Governor Bellomont happened to meet him, recognized him,

arrested him and shipped him to Europe. Kidd was tried and convicted for

the murder of William Moore—and was hanged as a pirate.

In the meantime Bellomont deplored the legacy his predecessor, Fletcher,

had left him: A divided people, an empty purse, a few miserable, naked,

half-starved soldiers, not half the number the King allowed pay for; the

fortifications and the governor’s house very much out of repair, and “in

a word the whole government was out of frame.” The province was rent

with turmoil and turbulence in consequence of the Leisler-Milborne

rebellion. The new governor’s sympathies had been drawn toward the

martyr Leisler, whose enemies in the aristocratic party resisted almost

to the point of violence Bellomont’s efforts to make restitution for a

monstrous crime. As a rebuke to the rascality of his predecessor

Bellomont had declared: “I will take care there shall be no

misapplication of the public money; I will pocket none of it myself nor

shall there be embezzlement by others.” To this standard he

unflinchingly held. No breath of scandal, no charge of prostitution of

duty for self-aggrandizement tainted his reputation. He loyally

protected the interests of those whom he was sent to govern. He was

distinctively a statesman of the constructive school, in marked

contradistinction to many of those governors who preceded and who

followed him, who pursued a policy of confiscation or of destruction—of

confiscation in grabbing everything in sight and of destruction by

undermining the liberties of the people and by attempted restriction of

their God-given rights. Under Bellomont’s short administration the

frontiers were strengthened, a library was established, printing was

encouraged, shipping promoted and education, which had been neglected,

stimulated. His untimely death, however, prevented the development of

many beneficent reforms which he had under contemplation.

Under the cloak of politics repressive religious measures were adopted

and inhuman persecutions practised. Dongan, an Irish Catholic, favored

an act permitting Jews to exercise their religion, but the New York

Common Council vetoed the proposition, while Bellomont, an Irish church

of England worshipper, approved the measure proscribing priests, on the

ground that Catholic prelates uniformly labored to excite the Indians

against the Anglo-Americans. Both governors recommend themselves to

posterity for enlightened statesmanship that throws into deep obscurity

the times in which they lived. Dongan brought to the province of New

York the first semblance of a representative form of government; under

Lord Bellomont the first spark of American Independence flashes, by the

demand that the colonists repudiate the laws of England because the

colonists are not represented in the parliament that frames these laws.

The board of trade of London directs Bellomont to check this heresy

because “the independence the Colonists thirst for is so notorious.”

During the Colonial epoch England assigned many men to govern New York.

The governor possessed unlimited despotic powers. He exercised authority

denied to the King. He not only made the laws but interpreted and

executed them, and when necessary unmade them. He usurped the

prerogatives of the Assembly and of the courts; his council was merely

an aggregation of automatons who danced when he pulled the string. No

act of the Assembly was placed on the statute book without his signature

and no decision of the court was valid until he, as chief justice,

passed judgment, and in this respect he exercised powers denied to the

King, for his Majesty, while permitted to sit on the king’s bench, was

prohibited from expressing judgment. There were two governors of early

New York who never have been brought under the ban of usurping the

functions of the coördinate branches of government nor of debasing the

powers confided to them by their superiors, Thomas Dongan and the Earl

of Bellomont. No charge ever has been brought that they carried away

money unworthily raised or dishonestly made. Nor has either ever been

accused of using his high position for unmeritorious or discreditable

purposes. Both, however, have received the encomiums and praise of

historians of England and America as rulers and statesmen of the highest

degree of efficiency and honesty at a time when the standard of morals

and of statesmanship was lamentably low and unquestionably debased.

Toward both every Irishman and every New Yorker should turn with

sentiments of the strongest esteem and admiration of the highest

calibre, not only in commendation of the success they gained in the

fulfillment of official obligations in the face of discouraging and

corrupt environment, but for the sturdy and sterling manhood they

displayed in the maintenance of their official honor and in the normal

performance of their official duty.

In this connection it may not be amiss for us to pay a deserved tribute

to Dr. Edmund Bailey O’Callaghan, a native of Ireland, who was more

instrumental in awakening the study of the Dutch language and of our

priceless Dutch records than any other man since the creation of the

State of New York. Dr. O’Callaghan represented the type of the pushing,

aggressive and scholarly Irishman. Two years of his early life were

devoted to the study of medicine in Paris. At the age of twenty-six he

crossed the ocean, settled in Canada and at once became prominent in the

agitation for Catholic emancipation in Ireland and England. He became

secretary of an organization for Irish immigrants to America, edited a

newspaper in Montreal, and was sent to the Provincial Parliament, where

his activity and ability placed him in the front rank as a leader. His

radical views and conduct, however, brought a mob of tories to his

office and led to the destruction of his type, press and establishment.

His neighbors, however, made it so unpleasant that he was compelled to

seek refuge in the United States when he was forty years of age. He

established his residence in Albany, was fortunate in the selection of

his most intimate friend, Chancellor Reuben Hyde Walworth, practised his

profession with more or less success, and at the same time conducted an

industrial paper called the _Northern Light_. It was at this period

that, during the anti-rent disturbances, he undertook the study of the

Dutch language. His “History of New Netherlands” made him famous and

stimulated the study of Colonial records and Colonial research

throughout the United States.

[Illustration:

HONORABLE JAMES FITZGERALD.

Justice of Supreme Court of the State of New York.

]

THE SIXTY-NINTH REGIMENT, NEW YORK CITY.

_A Paper Read before the American-Irish Historical Society, at its

Twelfth Annual Meeting, Held at the Hotel Plaza, New York City,

Saturday, January 8, 1910, by Hon. James Fitzgerald, Justice of the

Supreme Court of the State of New York._

The patriotic founders of our government looked with disfavor upon the

existence of large standing armies in times of peace for very many

reasons. Not only did they consider them a tax upon industry and a drain

upon the young manhood of the country, but they felt that their

maintenance constituted a menace to liberty, and yet these wise and far

seeing builders of the Republic realized that there could be no security

for personal liberty or property rights in a State that had not at its

command an armed force, and so we find imbedded in the fundamental law a

provision that “a well regulated militia being necessary to the security

of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not

be infringed” (Art. 2, 1st Amendts. U. S. Const. March, 1789). Freedom

had just been achieved by the sword, and that reliance for its

preservation must at all times rest upon arms was a doctrine to which

the statesmen of the Revolution unreservedly subscribed. Soldiers were

necessary but it was not necessary that all good soldiers should be

professionals. To citizens engaged in the ordinary avocations of life,

in industrial arts, in commercial pursuits, in commerce or trade, in the

professions, military instruction could be given, opportunities for

practice and drill formations afforded, including lessons in the

organization and mobilization of armies, so that when necessity

required, a well disciplined armed body might be readily summoned from

civil ranks for service in the field and as readily absorbed back into

industrial life when the hour of peril had passed, the threatened danger

had been averted and the emergency no longer existed for martial music,

emblazoned banners, marching legions and tented fields.

Since the earliest settlement of this continent, the Irish race has been

prominently identified with our history. Irishmen were among the first

settlers; they continued to come uninterruptedly, they are still coming,

and unless conditions change very much for the better in the Green Isle,

they are going to keep on coming in the future. The spirit of

Irish-Americanism is a spirit of intense Americanism; it stands for the

Union of States, the sovereignty of the flag, obedience to the laws,

loyalty to the government, good citizenship in peace, and in war, prompt

response when volunteers are called for. Volumes would be insufficient

to spread the record of the achievements of the sons of Erin upon

American battlefields; individuals might be cited by the score or by the

hundred whose intrepidity and devotion shed glory upon our arms on sea

and shore.

The Constitution of the State of New York, adopted April 20, 1777,

contained the clause: “The militia of this State at all times hereafter,

as well in peace as in war, shall be armed, disciplined and ready for

service.” The necessary enactments to carry out this provision were

provided for by legislation the following year. (Chap. 33. “An Act for

regulating the Militia of the State of New York.” Passed April 3, 1778;

Chap. 46, An Act to amend an act entitled “An Act for regulating the

Militia of the State of New York.” Passed June 30, 1778.) Outside of a

few cities, while the militia force was large upon paper, it was in

reality but a mere skeleton. Until at the end of 1860, there were less

than 15,000 men uniformed, disciplined and drilled, or in any sort of

readiness for military duty, and this meagre force was chiefly confined

to the cities of New York and Brooklyn, with contingents at Kingston and

Albany.

The first record of the 69th Regiment of New York City is the order

issued by the Adjutant General, bearing date November 1, 1851, and

designated “General Order 489.” This order provided for the

consolidation into a single regiment of a number of independent

companies which had been separately organized prior to that time chiefly

by men of Irish birth or parentage. About this period, owing to the vast

volume of immigration in the preceding decade, New York contained the

largest Irish population of any city in the world, and from the first,

the 69th became identified in the public mind as a regiment composed of

Irishmen. Among its early officers appear the names of some men who were

well-known in connection with the Young Ireland movement, which had

culminated but a few years previously. Its first commander was Colonel

Charles S. Roe, who served until 1854, and was succeeded by Colonel

James B. Ryan, who was followed August 26, 1859, by the gallant and

beloved Col. Michael Corcoran. The regiment crept early into the

affections of the people of the metropolis and was beloved by the Irish

residents. Its distinctive character was manifested in numerous and

emphatic ways,—sometimes by the wearing of green faced tunics, at others

by the display of plumes showing the green above the red, the carrying

of the Irish flag, or other similar devices. It had usually the right of

the line in the St. Patrick’s Day parades, and in all functions in which

it participated, its approach was heralded by the strains of well-known

Irish music. It rapidly became the typical Irish military organization

of the country, and for its success or failure, the children of the race

throughout the Union felt themselves responsible.

In 1860, the then Prince of Wales—now Edward VII, King of Great

Britain—visited the United States, and was scheduled to arrive in New

York City on Thursday, October 11, of that year. The First Division, New

York State Militia, was ordered out to receive him and directed to form

at the Battery for the purpose of parade and review. All the regiments

of the Division with the exception of the Sixty-ninth Regiment,

assembled at the time and place appointed for the formation. The order

received by Colonel Corcoran from headquarters was not promulgated, and

he was immediately ordered under arrest and a court martial summoned to

try him upon a charge of disobedience of orders. This circumstance fixed

firmly in the public mind the race and sentiments of the commander and

the men of the 69th.

April 12, 1861, witnessed the firing upon Fort Sumter, and on the 15th,

President Lincoln issued his proclamation calling out the militia of the

several states to the number of 75,000 men, and five days thereafter,

the court martial which had been ordered to try Colonel Corcoran was

dissolved, the pending charges were dismissed, and he was at once

restored to his command. The order dismissing the charges, which bears

date, April 20, 1861, is designated Special Order No. 9, and reads as

follows:

“In pursuance of Special Orders No. 58 from General Headquarters, the

Court Martial detailed for the trial of Colonel Corcoran is dissolved,

and the charges dismissed, and Colonel Corcoran is directed forthwith

to resume the command of his regiment.

“By order of

“CHARLES W. SANFORD,

“_Major-General_.

“GEORGE W. MORELL,

“_Div. Eng’r. and Div. Insp’r._”

Colonel Corcoran at once resumed command of the regiment and issued

General Order No. 1, an historic order concluding with the words: “The

Commandant feels proud that his first duty after being relieved from a

long arrest is to have the honor of promulgating an order to the

regiment to rally to the support of the Constitution and Laws of the

United States.” Within twenty-four hours from the posting of this order,

six thousand men had volunteered, but the instructions of Governor

Morgan prohibited the enlistment of more than the regimental compliment

of one thousand men. The twenty-third of April, 1861, dawned bright and

clear, but warmer than usual at that season, over the Empire City;

apprehension and gloom prevailed throughout the country; ten sovereign

states had formed a powerful confederacy and were in armed revolt

against the authority of the Federal Government. Many of the ablest

soldiers and statesmen of the Republic had taken their stand against the

Union; the timid were upon the verge of panic, and misgivings and

uncertainty were paralyzing even the resolute and strong. Under such

circumstances, faithful and loyal, the gallant Sixty-ninth Militia

assembled in Prince Street, near the then St. Patrick’s Cathedral, the

Cathedral of the great Archbishop of New York, the Most Reverend John

Hughes, and proceeded thence to the rendezvous at Great Jones Street.

Hope was given to the hearts of the good people of this city as they

witnessed the spirit displayed by this brave body of citizen soldiery,

and when at the appointed hour, the order to march was sounded and the

regiment proceeded down Broadway to the strains of martial music, the

surging multitude that lined the streets, the myriad spectators that

filled the windows along the route to Cortlandt Street broke into

continuous cheers. Twin flags floated everywhere on that day. Twin

banners were carried by the regimental standard bearers—the flag of

Columbia with all its stars emblazoned on its field of blue, the green

banner of Erin with the harp uncrowned. The regiment boarded the Steamer

“James Adger,” at Pier 4, North River, reached Annapolis on the

twenty-sixth of April, and proceeding up the Potomac to Washington by

Steamer “Marion,” was mustered into the service of the United States on

May 9 for three months. The following is a list of the field, staff and

company commanders at this time:

FIELD AND STAFF.

Colonel—Michael Corcoran, Commanding.

Lieutenant Colonel—Robert B. Nugent.

Major—James Bagley.

Adjutant—John McKeon.

Chaplain—Rev. Thomas Mooney.

Engineers—Hon. John H. McCunn, James B. Kirker.

Surgeon—Dr. James L. Kiernan.

Assistant Surgeon—Robert Johnson.

Quartermaster—Joseph B. Tully.

Paymaster—Martin Kehoe.

COMPANY COMMANDERS.

Company “A”—Captain Haggerty.

Company “B”—Captain Lynch.

Company “C”—Captain Cavanagh.

Company “D”—Captain Clark.

Company “E”—Captain Kelly.

Company “F”—Captain Breslin.

Company “G”—Captain Duffy.

Company “H”—Captain James Kelly.

On the 22nd of May a body of three hundred men, known as Meagher’s

Zouaves, recruited after the regiment’s departure, joined Colonel

Corcoran at the Capitol City. At midnight on the 23d of May the 69th,

together with the 5th Massachusetts, the 28th New York, and a detachment

of regular cavalry, crossed the Aqueduct Bridge at Georgetown into

Virginia. On the following morning the regiment began the construction

of Fort Corcoran, which, with Fort Runyon, constituted the first regular

works erected by Federalist forces at the beginning of the Civil War,

and the ceremonies attending the raising of the flag on the occasion

were participated in by Colonel Corcoran, Colonel David Hunter and

Captain Thomas Francis Meagher, two of whom subsequently attained the

rank of Brigadier General (Corcoran and Meagher) and the third of whom

(Hunter) afterwards became a Major General. The 69th, together with the

79th and 13th New York and 2d Wisconsin regiments, and a Battery of

Light Artillery, U. S. A., composed the 3d Brigade of the 1st Division

of McDowell’s Army, having for its Brigade Commander Colonel William

Tecumseh Sherman, of the 13th U. S. Infantry, whose distinguished

achievements in after years elevated him to foremost rank among the

great Captains of history. Brigadier General Daniel Tyler commanded the

division.

On July 21st, the regiment participated in the Battle of Bull Run

(Manassas). Col. Corcoran was wounded and fell into the hands of the

Confederates. The regiment lost one hundred and fifty of its members,

among them its gallant Acting Lieutenant Colonel James Haggerty, of whom

the eloquent Meagher said: “No braver soldier was ever produced by the

land of Sarsfield and Shields.” The three months period of service

having expired, the 69th Regiment, New York State Militia, was mustered

out of the United States service August 3, 1861, and returned to New

York City, resuming its position as a militia regiment of the State. The

time for which the regiment had been called into service had ended but

the great war had only fairly begun, and President Lincoln having issued

his call for 500,000 men for three years or the war, about 800 of the

returned militiamen volunteered to re-enlist, and on August 30, 1861,

under orders from the War Department, the 69th Regiment, New York

Volunteers, was formed. Robert Nugent was selected as Colonel; James

Kelly, Lieutenant Colonel; and James Cavanagh, Major. This regiment was

rapidly recruited to full strength, and so many additional recruits

presented themselves that it was decided to organize a brigade. The 63d

and 88th Regiments, together with the 14th and 15th Independent

Batteries, New York Light Artillery, in furtherance of this design, were

immediately formed. The organization of the brigade was entrusted to

Thomas Francis Meagher, who, on February 6, 1862, assumed its command as

Brigadier General. This gifted and daring soldier and patriot, the

Commander of the Irish Brigade, will ever be remembered as a conspicuous

figure of his time. In his early manhood, by gift of genius, he had

leaped to foremost rank among public men in his native isle. He had

pleaded the doctrine of armed resistance to tyranny with an inspired

eloquence and had defied the might of his country’s oppressors by

participating in an insurrection; he had been condemned to death and had

suffered a long imprisonment. The electric eloquence of the peroration

of a speech delivered by him in Conciliation Hall in Dublin in 1846,

during the Repeal agitation, caused him to be referred to thereafter as

“Meagher of the sword.” His fidelity to the warlike principles advocated

in his youth on behalf of Ireland was demonstrated by gallant conduct in

many of the bloodiest battles of the American Civil War, and well

established his title to high rank among the soldier sons of a fighting

race. To tell the story of the Irish Brigade would be to recite the

history of the Civil War. It participated rapidly in the Battle of Fair

Oaks, May 31st; Gaines Mill, June 28th; Savage Station, June 29th; Peach

Orchard, White Oaks Swamp, Glendale, June 30th; and Malvern Hill, July

1st, marching thereafter to Newport News, and proceeding by transports

and on foot to Falmouth, Alexandria, Arlington Heights, Falls Church,

Fairfax Court House and Centreville, crossing the Potomac at Chain

Bridge, and marching to Tenallytown, Rockville and Frederick City,

Maryland, crossing South Mountain to Antietam, participating in that

battle and leaving two hundred and one of its members either killed or

wounded to testify to the character of the resistance offered by these

sons of the Gael to the rebel line in front of the “Bloody Lane.” On

December 13th the regiment constituting part of Meagher’s Brigade took

part in the desperate attempt to carry the impregnable position of the

Confederate forces on Marye’s Heights at Fredericksburg. The valor

displayed by the officers and men on this memorable day must dwell

forever in the memory of mankind. Inspired by the traditions of the old

brigades, the brigades of O’Brien, Dillon, Lally, Sarsfield, the

brigades of Landen, Ramilles and Fontenoy; aroused by the burning

eloquence and encouraged by the intrepid daring of their fearless

leader; mindful of the wrongs which exiled them from their native

shores; grateful to the free, fair land that welcomed them to home and

liberty, there was no danger too great for them to face, no suffering

too severe to endure, no odds too overwhelming to encounter. Five

hundred and forty-five soldiers of the Irish Brigade fell in that heroic

charge in that most bloody quarter of a mile ever dashed over by armed

men in the annals of civilized warfare. The testimony of the _London

Times_ correspondent will be regarded at least as not coming from an

unduly partial source. This is his description of the charge of the

Irish Brigade: “Never at Fontenoy, Albuera, nor at Waterloo was more

undaunted courage displayed than during those six frantic dashes which

the Irish Brigade directed against the almost impregnable position of

their foe. That mortal man could have carried the position, defended as

it was, seems idle for a moment to believe, but the bodies which lie in

dense masses within forty-eight yards of the muzzles of Colonel Walton’s

guns are the best evidence of what manner of men they were who pressed

onto death, with the dauntlessness of the race which has gained glory on

a thousand battlefields and never more richly deserved it than at the

foot of Marye’s Heights on the 13th day of December, 1862.” In his

official report General Meagher says: “Of the 1,200 men I took into

action, only 280 appeared on parade next morning.”

The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. IX, 1910 · 第 13 / 53 段