THE FRIGATE AND HER GUNS

This latter celebrated and favorite class of ship stood next in order

of power above the corvette, with which it might also be said to

have blended; for although in the frigate class there were two, or

at the most three, rates that predominated vastly in numbers over

all the rest, yet the name covered many differing degrees of force.

The distinguishing feature of the frigate was that it carried one

complete row of guns upon a covered deck—upon a deck, that is, which

had another deck over it. On this upper or spar deck there were also

guns—more or fewer—but lighter in weight than those on the covered

deck, usually styled the main deck. The two principal classes of

frigates at the beginning of this century were the thirty-two-gun

and the thirty-eight-gun. That is, they carried nominally sixteen or

nineteen guns on each side; but the enumeration is misleading, except

as a matter of comparison, for guns of some classes were not counted.

Ships generally had a few more cannon than their rate implied. The

United States thirty-two-gun frigate _Essex_, for example, carried at

first twenty-six long twelves on the main deck, with sixteen carronades

and two chase guns on the spar deck. Above these two classes came the

forty-four-gun frigate, a very powerful rate, which was favored by

the United States navy and received a development of strength then

unprecedented.

Being such as here described, the frigate was essentially, though not

exclusively, the appendage of a fleet of line-of-battle ships. Wars are

decided not by commerce destroying nor by raids, however vexatious, but

by fleets and armies, by great organized masses—that is, by crushing,

not by harassment. But ships of the line, to perform their function,

must keep together, both when cruising and when on the field of battle,

in order to put forth their strength in combination. The innumerable

detached services that must be discharged for every great organized

force need for a fleet to be done by vessels of inferior strength,

yet so strong that they cannot be intercepted or driven off lightly

by every whipper-snapper of an armed ship that comes along. Moreover,

a fact not always realized, speed—speed to hasten on a mission, to

overtake a foe, or to escape pursuit—depends upon size, masts that

can carry sail and hold way amid heavy seas. Hence the frigate, not

the lighter sloop, was indicated for the momentous duties upon which

depended the intelligence and the communications of the fleet. Such

leading considerations are needed to be stated and to be kept in mind,

for they affected the warfare of the last decade of the century quite

as really as they did that of the first, and a paper would indeed be

incomplete which confined itself to indicating points of difference

of progress, so-called, and failed to recognize those essential and

permanent conditions which time will never remove. Frigates and sloops

have disappeared in name and form, in motive power and in armament.

Their essential functions remain, and will remain while war lasts.

The Progress of the Century · 第 90 / 155 题