METHOD OF TEACHING

The first advance which should be mentioned is a fundamental

one—namely, methods of medical teaching. At the beginning of the

nineteenth century there were only three medical schools in the United

States: the Medical Department of the University of Pennsylvania,

established in 1765; the Medical Department of Harvard, established

in 1783; and the Medical Department of Dartmouth, established in

1797. The last report of the Commissioner of Education gives a list

of one hundred and fifty-five medical schools now in existence in

this country, many of them still poorly equipped and struggling for

existence, but a large number of them standing in the first rank, with

excellent modern equipment, both in teachers, laboratories, hospitals,

and other facilities. The medical curriculum then extended over

only two years or less, and consisted of courses of lectures at the

most by seven professors who, year after year, read the same course

of lectures, without illustrations and with no practical teaching.

The medical schools, even when connected with universities, were

practically private corporations, the members of which took all the

fees, spent what money they were compelled to spend in the maintenance

of what we now should call the semblance of an education, and divided

the profits. Until within about twenty years this method prevailed in

all our medical schools. But the last two decades of the century have

seen a remarkable awakening of the medical profession to the need of

a broader and more liberal education, and that, as a prerequisite,

the medical schools should be on the same basis as the department of

arts in every well-regulated college. To accomplish this the boards of

trustees have taken possession of the fees of students, have placed the

faculties upon salaries, and have used such portion of the incomes of

the institutions as was needed for a constant and yet rapid development

along the most liberal lines.

The Progress of the Century · 第 57 / 155 题