_Aac_, the second son of king Can, was also in love with her. To his lot

had fallen the ancient metropolis _Uxmal_, "the three times rebuilt." His

headless and legless statue is still to be seen over the main entrance on

the façade of the palace known as the "House of the Governor," at that

place. The flayed bodies of his two brothers and his eldest sister are at

his feet; their heads hang from the belt round his waist: and the ruins of

his private residence, ornamented with turtles,--his totem--yet exist at

the northwest corner of the second of the three terraces on which the

palace is built. The law of the land and her own predilection for Coh were

insurmountable barriers that prevented Aac from marrying Moo. He was not a

warrior but a courtier. He spent his life in idleness amidst pleasures and

frivolities. Still he was envious of the fame won by his younger brother;

jealous of him because of the love of the people, and still more of that of

his sister and wife. He allowed his evil passions to gain the mastery over

his better feelings. He incited a conspiration against the friends of his

childhood, with the object of killing his own brother, to obtain forcible

possession of the sister he so much coveted, seize the reins of the

government, and become the supreme lord of the whole empire.

In the carvings on the wooden lintels over the entrance of Coh's funereal

chamber, in the paintings that adorn its walls, and in which that part of

the life of the personages concerned in these events is portrayed, Aac is

represented full of wrath, holding three spears in his hand, engaged in a

terrible altercation with Coh. From the sculptures that adorned his

mausoleum we learn that he was murdered treacherously by being stabbed with

a spear three times in the back; and the author of the Troano MS. in giving

an account of that murder and its consequences, has recorded this fact and

illustrated it in the first section of plate xiv., in the second part of

his work. [When I disinterred his statue, I found in an urn his heart,

partially cremated, and the flint head of the spear with which he was

slain.] In one of the tableaux of the mural paintings the body of Coh,

surrounded by his wife, his sister _Nicté_, his children and his mother, is

being prepared for cremation; the heart and other viscera having been

extracted to be preserved in urns. A similar custom prevailed among the

Egyptians of high rank whose bodies were embalmed according to the most

expensive process. The internal parts of the body having been removed, were

cleansed, embalmed in spices and various substances, then deposited in four

vases that were placed in the tomb with the coffin.

[Illustration]

At the death of Coh the whole country became involved in a civil war. The

conspirators, partisans of Aac, striving to seize the reins of the

government, the friends of Prince Coh fighting to avenge his death and in

defense of their queen. The goddess of war favored at times one party, then

the other. Aac, in order to obtain the preponderance, had recourse to

diplomacy. He renewed his suit for the hand of his sister. He sent

messengers to her, with a present of fruits, begging her to accept his love

now that she was free. The scene is vividly pictured in the mural

paintings.

Queen Moo is represented seated in her house situated in the middle of a

garden. At her feet, but outside of the house to indicate that she does not

accept it, is a basket full of oranges. Her extended left hand shows that

she declines to listen to the messenger who stands before her in an

entreating posture, and that she scorns the love of Aac who is seen on a

lower plane, making an obeisance. Over his head is a serpent, typical of

his name, _Can_, looking as lovingly as a serpent can be made to look, at a

_Macaw_ perched on the top of a tree and above the figure of the queen

whose totem it is. The tree is guarded by a monkey in a threatening

attitude. This monkey here, as in Egypt the cynocephalus, is the emblem of

the preceptor of _Moo_, symbol therefor of wisdom.

This tableau is most interesting and significant, since in it we have a

natural explanation of the myth of the temptation of the woman by the

serpent. Here we have the garden, the woman, the temptor, and the fruit.

The story of this family incident passing from mouth to mouth, from

generation to generation, from country to country, has become disfigured

probably by peoples that did not hold woman in as high esteem, or did not

honor her as much as the Mayas did. Perhaps, also, an old misanthropical

bachelor, hater of the fair sex, wrote a distorted account of the tradition

out of spite at having been jilted by his lady-love, and his version was

accepted by the author of Genesis, if he himself did not make the

alteration. The fact is that the author of the Troano MS.--(Plate xvii.,

part second) as the artist who painted the scene just described--asserts

that she refused to listen to _Aac's_ entreaties, in consequence of which

the civil war continued. At last _Moo_ and her followers succumbed. She

fell into the hands of Aac who, after ill-treating her, put her to death

together with _Cay_ the high pontiff, his elder brother, who had sided with

the queen of Chichen, with right and justice. In token of his victory,

_Aac_ caused his statue--the feet resting on the flayed bodies of his kin,

their heads being suspended from his belt--to be placed over the main

entrance of the royal palace at Uxmal, where, as I have said, its remains

may be seen to-day.

I may add here in explanation of the tableau of the scene in the garden,

that the present of a basket of oranges was the offer of marriage made by

_Aac_ to _Moo_. It is usual with the aborigines of Yucatan, that yet retain

many of the customs of their forefathers, when a young man wishes to

propose marriage to a girl to send by a friend as a present, a fruit, or

flower, or sweetmeat. The acceptance of the present is the sign that the

proposal of the suitor is admitted, and from that moment they are

betrothed; whilst the refusal of the present means that he is rejected. A

similar custom exists in Japan. When a young lady expects a proposal of

marriage a convenient flower-pot is placed in a handy position on the

window-sill. The lover plants a flower in it. If next morning the flower is

watered he can present himself to his lady-love knowing that he is welcome.

If on the contrary, the flower has been uprooted and thrown on the

side-walk, he well understands he is not wanted.

The family name of the kings of Mayax was _Can_ (serpent) as _Khan_ is

still the title of the Kings of Tartary and Burmah, and of the governor of

provinces in Persia, Afghanistan and other countries in Central Asia. _Can_

was therefore the family name of Aac. The meaning of the writer of Genesis

when he says that the serpent spoke to the woman and seduced her with a

fruit is now easily understood.

The account of the fratricide in Genesis, in the Ramayana, or in the papyri

of Egypt, is nothing more or less, with a slight variance, than the story

of the feuds of king Can's children. This story, treasured by the priests

of Egypt and India, consigned in their sacred books and poems, has been

handed down to us among the primitive traditions of mankind.

Nowhere, except in Mayax, do we find it as forming part of the history of

the nation. Nowhere, except in Mayax, do we find the portraits of the

actors in the tragedy. There, we not only see their portraits carved in

bas-reliefs, on stone or wood, or their marble statues in the round, or

represented in the mural paintings that adorn the walls of the funereal

chamber built to the memory of the victim, but we discover the ornaments

they wore, the weapons they used, nay, more, their mortal remains.

The following is the certificate of Charles O. Thompson, Principal and

Professor of Chemistry at the Worcester Free Institute, who made the

chemical analysis of part of the cremated remains found in the stone urn

that was near the chest of the statue that occupied the centre of the

mausoleum raised to the memory of the famous warrior Coh, twenty feet below

the upper plane of the monument.

WORCESTER, Mass., Sept. 25, 1880.

"Stephen Salisbury, Jr., Esq., submits an unknown solid for qualitative

examination.

[Illustration]

"Under microscope it presents a certain compactness and horny aspect

characteristic of animal matter which has been charred in a close vessel,

it loses 9 per cent. when dried at 100° and 9 per cent. more by

combustion. After calcination, a dross and residue remains which contains

3 per cent. fenic oxide, a little alumina and much silica. Warm water

exposed to action of residue shows traces of potash and soda.

"These results are consistent with the theory that the mass was once part

of a human body which has been burned with some fuel."

"CHARLES O. THOMPSON."

There is a fact certainly worthy of notice, and this is that the names of

the personages mentioned in the various accounts of the fratricide are

precisely identical, or are words having the same signification. May not

that be regarded as unimpeachable proof that they all refer to the same

event?

No one who has any knowledge of philology will ever deny that

A-bel--A-bal--Bal-_i_--_Balam_ are identical words.

A, contraction of _Ah_, is the Maya masculine article, _the_. _Bal_ is the

radical of Bal_am_. Balam is for the superstitious aborigines, even to-day,

the _Yumil Kaax_--the "Lord of the fields" the "_Leopard_" which they also

call _Coh_--the totem of the victim of Aac is the leopard--and it is so

represented in the bas-reliefs and sculptures.

In Egypt, the spotted skin of the leopard, usually without the head, but

sometimes with it, was always suspended near the images and statues of

Osiris. The skin of a leopard was worn as a mantle over the ceremonial

dress of his priests.

[Illustration]

Besides, when represented as King of the Amenti--of the "West"--the symbol

of Osiris was always a crouching leopard with an open eye over it.

[Illustration]

We must not lose sight of the fact that the leopard's skin worn by Nimrod

and Bacchus was a sacred appendage to the Mysteries. It was used in the

Eleusinian as well as in the Egyptian mysteries instituted in honor of

Osiris. It is mentioned in the earliest speculations by the Brahmins on the

meaning of their sacrificial prayers the _Aytareya Brahmana_, and is used

in the _agnishtoma_ the initiation rites of the _Soma_ mysteries. When the

neophyte is to be born again he is covered with a "leopard skin," out of

which he emerges as from his mother's womb. A leopard skin is worn by the

African warriors, who are so fortunate as to possess one, as a charm to

render them invulnerable to spears according to the French traveler Paul du

Chaillu.

[Illustration]

It would seem as if the manner in which _Coh_ met his death, by being

stabbed with a spear, had been known to their ancestors, and that they

imagined that wearing his totem would save them from being wounded with the

same kind of weapon used in killing him. That the inhabitants of Africa had

communications with those of the Western Continent there can be no doubt,

since populations of black people existed on the isthmus of Panama and

other localities at the time of the first arrival of the Spaniards; besides

their pictures can be seen in the mural paintings at Chichen.

As to the name _Osir_, or be it _Ozil_, it would seem to be a nickname

given to _Coh_ on account of the great love his sisters, and the people in

general, professed for him. _Ozil_ is a Maya verb that means to desire

vehemently. He, therefore, who was very much desired--dearly beloved.

_Osiris_ in Egypt, _Abel_ in Chaldea, _Bali_ in India, are myths. _Coh_, in

Mayax, is a reality--a warrior whose mausoleum I have opened; whose weapons

and jade ornaments are in my possession; whose heart I have found, and a

piece of which was analyzed by Professor Thompson; whose statue, with his

name inscribed on the tablets occupying the place of the ears, I have

unearthed, and which is now in the National Museum in the City of Mexico,

one of the most precious relics in that institution, having been robbed

from me, by force of arms, by the Mexican authorities.

_Isis_ was the wife and sister of Osiris. The word _Isis_ may simply be a

dialectical mode of pronouncing the Maya word _i[c]in_ (idzin) _the younger

sister_. Her headgear, as a goddess, was a vulture. That bird was her totem

and the peculiar type of maternity.

[Illustration]

Isis was often called the great mother-goddess _Mau_; a word certainly as

suggestive of the name _Moo_, sister and wife of Coh and queen of Chichen,

as the _vulture_ is of the _Macaw_. It must not be forgotten that one of

the titles of Isis was the _royal wife and sister_.

[Illustration]

Authors, who of course know nothing of the facts in the ancient history of

Mayax, revealed to me by the sculptures and the mural paintings of the

temples and palaces of the Mayas, and contained in the pages of the Troano

MS., do not believe that Osiris and his sister Isis were deified persons

who had lived on earth, but fabulous beings, whose history was founded on

metaphysical speculations, and adapted to certain phenomena of nature. But

the primitive rulers of the Mayas, whose history is an exact counterpart of

that of the children of _Seb_ and _Nut_, were deified after their death and

worshiped as gods of the elements. My object is not here to enter into long

explanations on these historical disclosures. I refer the reader who wishes

to know more of the subject to my work, "The Monuments of Mayax and their

Historical Teachings."

As to the names _Cain_, _Set_, _Sougriva_, _Aac_, they all convey the idea

of something belonging to or having affinity with water.

_Cain_, by apocope, gives _Cay_, the Maya word for "fish."

_Set_ is a cognate word of the Maya _Ze_, to ill-treat with blows. Can a

name be more appropriate to designate one who has killed his brother with

three thrusts of his spear; and his sister by kicking her to death, as

_Aac_ is represented doing by the author of the Troano MS.?

_Set_, after being treated with the same honor as the other members of the

family of Seb, came to be regarded as the Evil principle and was called

_Nubti_, that is, according to the Maya language, the _adversary_, from

_nup_ adversary and _ti_ for. He also was the Sun God, the enemy of the

serpent. Here again we have a most singular resemblance, to say the least.

_Aac_, in the sculptures of Mayax, is always pictured surrounded by the sun

as his protecting genius; while the serpent, emblem of the country, always

shields _Coh_ and his sister-wife within its folds. The escutcheon of the

city of Uxmal shows that the title of that metropolis was the "Land of the

Sun." In the bas-reliefs of the queen's chamber at Chichen, the followers

of _Aac_ are seen to render homage to the _Sun_; the friends of _Moo_ to

the serpent. So in Mayax as in Egypt, the _Sun_ and the _Serpent_ were

inimical. In Egypt this enmity was a myth; in Mayax a dire reality.

The hippopotamus and the crocodile were emblems of Set. Plutarch says "that

at Hermopolis there was a statue of Set, which was a hippopotamus with a

hawk upon its back fighting with a serpent." Both the hippopotamus and the

crocodile are amphibious animals, having consequently much affinity with

water.

Aac, in Maya, is the name for the turtle, also an amphibious animal.

The name Sougriva, of the brother of Bâli, is a word composed of three Maya

primitives, _zuc_, _lib_, _ha_, _zuc_, quiet, tranquil; _lib_, to ascend,

and _ha_, water--"He who tranquilly rises on the water" as the turtle does.

The universal deluge is another tradition of the early days that was

credited by certain civilized nations of antiquity.

The Egyptian priests who, from times immemorial, had kept in the archives

of the temples a faithful account of all events worthy of being remembered,

derided the Greek philosophers when they spoke of the deluge of Deucalion

and the destruction of the human race. Their answer was that as they had

been preserved from it the inundation could not have been universal; they

even added that the Hellenes were childish in attaching so much importance

to that event, as there had been several other local catastrophes

resembling it. They told Solon that the greatest cataclysm on record in

their books was that during which Atlantis disappeared under the waves of

the ocean, in one day and night, in consequence of violent earthquakes and

volcanic eruptions; that from that time all communications between their

people and the inhabitants of the "Lands of the West" had become

interrupted; the occurrence having taken place 9,000 years before his visit

to Egypt.

An account of that fearful event was also preserved by the learned men of

Mayax who give of it a description identical with that given by the

Egyptians. Nearly all the nations living on the western continent have kept

the tradition of it, but they do not pretend that all mankind was

destroyed.

In Mayax the learned priests caused a relation of it to be carved in

intaglio on the stone that forms the lintel over the interior doorway in

the rooms on the south side of their college. The building is known to this

day by the name of _Akab-[c]ib_, the dark, or terrible writing.

The author of the Troano MS., a work, I have already said, on geology,

dedicates several pages at the beginning of the second part to the recital

of that fearful cataclysm, and the phenomena which then took place. This

leaves no longer room for doubting that a large continent existed in the

middle of the Atlantic ocean, and which was destroyed within the memory of

man; and that the narrative by Plato of the submersion of Atlantis is, in

the main, correct. The Maya author represents the lost land by the figure

of a black man with red lips, which would imply that it was mostly

inhabited by a race of black men. In this case, the presence of

black-skinned populations on the Western continent, anterior to the advent

of the Spaniards, would be easily accounted for. The Mayas like the

Egyptians, represented the world as an old man. Plutarch says they called

East the face, North the right side, South the left side; this conception

has reached our days, only we reckon the East as the right hand, West the

left, North the face.

[Illustration]

When the author of the Troano MS., speaks of the "Master of the land" par

excellence, that is king Can deified, he pictures him sometimes with a

human body, painted blue, and the head of a mastodon. On the façade of the

building at Chichen Itza called by the natives _Kuna_, the house of God, to

which Stephens, in his work on Yucatan, gives the name of _Iglesia_, is a

tableau representing the worship of that great pachyderm, whose head, with

its trunk, forms the principal ornament of the temples and palaces built by

the members of king Can's family.

This tableau is composed of a face intended for that of the mastodon. Over

the trunk and between the eyes formerly existed a human head, which has

been destroyed by malignant hands. It wore a royal crown. This is still in

place. On the front of it is a small portrait cut in the round of some very

ancient personage. On each side of the head are square niches containing

each two now headless statues, a male and a female; they are seated, not

Indian fashion, squatting, but with the legs crossed and doubled under

them, in a worshiping attitude. Each carries a symbol on their back; totem

of the nation or tribe by which the mastodon was held sacred. Under these

figures, are two triangles [Symbol: triangles pointing upwards] emblems of

offerings and worship in Mayax as in Egypt. So also was the other symbol

[Symbol: honeycomb] image of a honey-comb, an oblation most grateful to the

gods, since with the bark of the Balche tree, honey formed the principal

ingredient of _Balche_, that beverage so pleasing to their palate: the same

that under the name of nectar, _Hebe_ served to the inhabitants of Olympus.

It is the _Amrita_, still enjoyed, on the day of the full moon, by the

gods, the manes and the saints, according to the Hindoos; although it was

the cause of the war between the gods and the Titans, and is the origin of

many sanguinary quarrels among the tribes of equatorial Africa even in our

days.

These symbols leave no doubt as to the fact that the personages represented

by the statues are in the act of worshiping the mastodon.

The corona of the upper cornice, that above the mastodon's head, is formed

of a peculiar wavy adornment often met with in the ornamentation of the

monuments erected by the Cans. Emblematic of the serpent, it is composed of

two letters N juxtaposed, monogram of Can [Symbol: wavy lines]. The corona

of the lower cornice is made of two characters [Symbol: spiral and steps]

that read in Maya _Ah [c]am_, He of the throne--the monarch.

In Japan the seven members of the Can family, deified and figured by the

same symbols as in Mayax, are worshiped to-day in the shrine of the palace

at Tokio, dedicated to the goddess symbolized by a bird. This goddess calls

to mind the goddess _Moo_ of the Mayas, or Isis of the Egyptians. In the

upper part of the shrine, over and above all the other attendants who have

wings and beaked noses, is seen an elephant couchant, the god of fire

standing on his back. In the midst of the flames that surround him is the

head of a bird. So in Chichen we see the followers of queen Moo, who, we

are informed by the author of the Troano MS. became the goddess of fire,

carrying her totem, a bird, in their head-gears.

The Japanese claim to be offspring of the gods, and produce two different

genealogical tables in support of their assertion. These gods amounting to

_seven_, are said to have reigned an almost incalculable number of years in

the country; although they assert that these primitive gods were spiritual

substances, incorporeal. They were succeeded by _five_ terrestrial spirits,

or deified heroes, after whom appeared the Japanese themselves.

Here again we have a reminiscence, as it were, of the _twelve_ gods, that

the Egyptians told Herodotus, had governed their country, an incalculable

number of years, before the reign of Menes their first terrestrial king.

These gods were converted by the Greeks into the _twelve_ deities, dwellers

of the Olympus. The _twelve_ serpent heads, brought to light by me in

December, 1883, from the center of the mausoleum of the high-pontiff Cay,

at Chichen-Itza, are emblematic of the _twelve_ rulers, who had reigned in

Mayax in times anterior to the great cataclysm when Atlantis was submerged;

whose portraits, with the sign _cimi_, dead, adorn the east façade of the

palace with the tableau of creation, showing that they existed in very

early times. Of these rulers we again find a dim tradition in China in the

_Tchi_, also called _che-cull-tse_--the _twelve_ children of the emperor of

Heaven, _Tien-Hoang_, who had the _body of a serpent_. Each of these _Tchi_

are said to have lived eighteen thousand years, and to have reigned in

times anterior to _Ti-hoang_, sovereign of the _country in the middle of

the land_.

From this short digression let us return to the worship of the mastodon

which we find very prevalent in India in that of the elephant _Ganesha_,

the god of prudence, of wisdom, of letters, represented as a _red colored_

man with the head of an elephant. He is invoked by the Hindoos of all sects

at the outset of any business. No one would dream of writing a letter or a

book without previously saluting Ganesha. His image is seen at the crossing

of the roads, oftentimes decorated with a garland of flowers, the offering

of some pious devotee. Architects place it in the foundation of every

edifice. It is sculptured or painted at the door of every house as a

protection against evil; at one of the entrances of every Hindoo city, that

is called _Ganesha-pol_, as well as in some conspicuous door of the palace.

We have already seen that in the most ancient edifices of Mayax the

mastodon's head with its trunk is the principal and most common ornament.

Are these mere coincidences? The name _Ganesha-pol_ would be according to

the Maya language, the _head of Ganesha_; _pol_, in Maya, being the head.

If I wished to go further I might say that in _Ganesha_ we have a

dialectical pronounciation of _Can-ex_, "the serpents." No deity in the

Hindoo pantheon is so often addressed; and his titles are so numerous that

like Osiris it might be named _Myrionymus_ "with ten thousand names."

So many are the legends accounting for the elephant head, it may be safely

assumed that its origin is unknown. May not its worship have been

introduced in India, with many other customs, that for instance of carrying

the children astride on the hip; of printing an impression of the human

hand, dipped in red liquid, on the walls of the temples and other sacred

buildings by devotees etc.; by colonists from Mayax where these customs

prevailed, and the worship of the mastodon was widely spread if not

general? This surmise assumes the semblance of probability when we consider

that the body of Ganesha is painted red, the color characteristic of the

American race, and the symbol of nobility of race among the Egyptians.

Sacred Mysteries Among the Mayas and the Quiches, 11,500 Years Ago Their relation to the sacred mysteries of Egypt, Greece, Chaldea and India. Free Masonry in times anterior to the Temple of Solomon. · 第 5 / 9 段