Mr. SPECTER. Going back for a moment, Doctor Humes----

The CHAIRMAN. Before we get off that, may I ask you this, Commander: If

we had the pictures here and you could look them over again and restate

your opinion, would it cause you to change any of the testimony you

have given here?

Commander HUMES. To the best of my recollection, Mr. Chief Justice, it

would not.

The CHAIRMAN. Mr. McCloy.

Mr. McCLOY. May I ask this question?

The CHAIRMAN. Go right ahead.

Mr. McCLOY. Do you have any knowledge as to whether or not any

photographs were taken in Dallas?

Commander HUMES. I have none, sir, no knowledge.

Mr. McCLOY. No knowledge that any were taken?

Representative FORD. May I ask what size are the pictures to which you

refer?

Commander HUMES. We exposed both black and white and color negatives,

Congressman. They were exposed in the morgue during the examination.

They were not developed. The kodachrome negatives when developed would

be 405. They were in film carriers or cassettes, as were the black and

white. Of course they could be magnified.

Representative FORD. Have those been examined by personnel at Bethesda?

Commander HUMES. No, sir. We exposed these negatives; we turned them

over. Here I must ask the counsel again for advice--to the Secret

Service.

Mr. SPECTER. Yes; it was the Secret Service.

Commander HUMES. They were turned over to the Secret Service in their

cassettes unexposed, and I have not seen any of them since. This is the

photographs. The X-rays were developed in our X-ray department on the

spot that evening, because we had to see those right then as part of

our examination, but the photographs were made for the record and for

other purposes.

Representative FORD. But they had never been actually developed for

viewing.

Commander HUMES. I do not know, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. Doctor Humes, back to the angles for just a moment.

Commander HUMES. Yes, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. Hypothesize or assume, if you will, that other evidence

will show that the wound inflicted on Commission Exhibit 385 at point

C occurred while the President was riding in the rear seat of his

automobile approximately 100 feet from a point of origin in a six-floor

building nearby, and assume further that the wound inflicted in 388 at

point A occurred when the President was approximately 250 feet away

from the same point.

With those assumptions in mind, there would be somewhat different

angles of declination going from C to D on 385 and from A to B on 388.

Commander HUMES. I would expect there would.

Mr. SPECTER. You have already testified earlier today that you were

unable to pinpoint with precision angle A to B on 388 because of the

reconstruction of the scalp.

Now my question to you, in that elongated fashion, is from what you

know and what you have described, are the angles, as you have expressed

them to be in your opinion, consistent with a situation where the two

wounds were inflicted at the angles and at the distances just described

to you?

Commander HUMES. I believe they are consistent. I would state that the

path outlined on 388-A to B is to a certain extent conjectural for the

reasons given before.

Mr. SPECTER. Now, Doctor Humes, I hand you a group of documents which

have been marked as Commission Exhibit No. 397 and ask you if you can

identify what they are?

Commander HUMES. Yes, sir; these are various notes in long-hand, or

copies rather, of various notes in long-hand made by myself, in part,

during the performance of the examination of the late President, and in

part after the examination when I was preparing to have a typewritten

report made.

Mr. SPECTER. Are there also included there some notes that you made

while you talked to Doctor Perry on the telephone?

Commander HUMES. Yes, sir; there are.

Mr. SPECTER. Are there any notes which you made at any time which are

not included in this group of notes?

Commander HUMES. Yes, sir; there are.

Mr. SPECTER. And what do those consist of?

Commander HUMES. In privacy of my own home, early in the morning of

Sunday, November 24th, I made a draft of this report which I later

revised, and of which this represents the revision. That draft I

personally burned in the fireplace of my recreation room.

Mr. SPECTER. May the record show that the Exhibit No. 397 is the

identical document which has been previously identified as Commission

No. 371 for our internal purposes.

Is the first sheet then in that group the notes you made when you

talked to Doctor Perry?

Commander HUMES. That is correct, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. And do the next 15 sheets represent the rough draft which

was later copied into the autopsy report which has been heretofore

identified with an exhibit number?

Commander HUMES. That is correct, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. And what do the next two sheets represent?

Commander HUMES. The next two sheets are the notes actually made in the

room in which the examination was taking place. I notice now that the

handwriting in some instances is not my own, and it is either that of

Commander Boswell or Colonel Finck.

Mr. SPECTER. And was that writing made at the same time that the

autopsy report was undertaken; that is, did you review all of the

markings on those papers and note them to be present when you completed

the autopsy report?

Commander HUMES. Yes, sir. From the time of the completion of this

examination until the submission of the written report following its

preparation, all of the papers pertinent to this case were in my

personal custody.

Mr. SPECTER. Have you now described all of the documents which were

present in that 397, Exhibit No. 397?

Commander HUMES. Yes, sir; with the exception of the certification

to the fact that I, in fact, detailed them in my custody, and a

certification that I had destroyed certain preliminary draft notes.

Mr. SPECTER. And these represent all the notes except those you have

already described which you destroyed?

Commander HUMES. That is correct, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. Now, just one point on the notes themselves. Page 14 of

your rough draft, Doctor Humes, as to the point of origin, the notes

show that there was a revision between your first draft and your final

report.

Commander HUMES. Yes, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. Will you first of all read into the record the final

conclusion reflected in your final report.

Commander HUMES. I would rather read it from the final report. The

final report reads:

"The projectiles were fired from a point behind and somewhat above the

level of the deceased."

Mr. SPECTER. And what did the first draft of that sentence as shown on

page 14 of your rough draft state?

Commander HUMES. It stated as follows:

"The projectiles were fired from a point behind and somewhat above a

horizontal line to the vertical position of the body at the moment of

impact."

Mr. SPECTER. Now would you state the reason for making that

modification between draft and final report, please?

Commander HUMES. This examination, as I have indicated, was performed

by myself with my two associates. The notes which we have just admitted

as an exhibit are in my own hand and are my opinion, was my opinion at

that time, as to the best way to present the facts which we had gleaned

during this period.

Before submitting it to the typist, I went over this with great care

with my two associates. One or the other of them raised the point

that perhaps this sentence would state more than what was absolutely

fact based upon our observations, pointing out that we did not know

precisely at that time in what position the body of the President was

when the missiles struck, and that therefore we should be somewhat

less specific and somewhat more circumspect than the way we stated it.

When I considered this suggestion, I agreed that it would be better to

change it as noted, and accordingly, I did so.

Mr. SPECTER. Mr. Chief Justice, I move now for the admission into

evidence of Exhibit No. 397.

The CHAIRMAN. It may be admitted.

(The documents, previously marked Exhibit No. 397 for identification,

were received in evidence.)

Mr. McCLOY. May I ask one question about the notes? The notes that you

made contemporaneously with your examination, you said you put those

down and then you put some in later. How much later were the notes,

within the best of your recollection of the final notes made, not the

final report, but the final notes that you made in your own handwriting?

Commander HUMES. The examination was concluded approximately at 11

o'clock on the night of November 22. The final changes in the notes

prior to the typing of the report were made, and I will have to give

you the time because whatever time Mr. Oswald was shot, that is

about when I finished. I was working in an office, and someone had a

television on and came in and told me that Mr. Oswald had been shot,

and that was around noon on Sunday, November 24th.

Mr. SPECTER. Mr. Chief Justice, I have now marked another photograph

as the next exhibit number, Commission Exhibit 398. May I say to the

Commission that this is a photograph which, subject to later proof,

will show it to be taken immediately after the President was struck by

the first bullet.

The CHAIRMAN. It may be marked.

(The photograph was marked Commission Exhibit No. 398 for

identification.)

May I move for its admission into evidence at this time for this

purpose?

The CHAIRMAN. It may be admitted.

(The photograph, previously marked Commission Exhibit No. 398 for

identification, was received in evidence.)

Looking at Commission Exhibit 398, Doctor Humes, with that as a

background, have you had an opportunity to review the medical reports

on Governor Connally at Parkland Hospital in Commission Exhibit 392?

Commander HUMES. I have.

Mr. SPECTER. Have you noted the wounds which he sustained on his right

wrist, that is, Governor Connally's right wrist?

Commander HUMES. Yes, sir; I have noted the report of it in these

records.

Mr. SPECTER. What does the report show as to those wounds on the right

wrist?

Commander HUMES. The report shows a wound of entrance on the dorsal

aspect of the right wrist. Let's get the precise point here. The wound

of entry is described as on the dorsal aspect of the right wrist above

the junction of the distal fourth of the radius and the shaft. It was

approximately two centimeters in length and rather oblique, with the

loss of tissue, and some considerable contusions at the margins. There

was a wound of exit along the volar surface of the wrist about two

centimeters above the flexion crease of the wrist in the midline.

Mr. SPECTER. Doctor Humes, I show you a bullet which we have marked as

Commission Exhibit No. 399, and may I say now that, subject to later

proof, this is the missile which has been taken from the stretcher

which the evidence now indicates was the stretcher occupied by Governor

Connally.

Warren Commission (02 of 26): Hearings Vol. II (of 15) · 第 211 / 291 题