Representative FORD. But he had his tie and his collar still----

Mr. KELLERMAN. Still on.

Representative FORD. Still on?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes, sir.

Representative FORD. You never saw his neck?

Mr. KELLERMAN. No, sir.

Representative FORD. At that time?

Mr. KELLERMAN. At that time, I did not observe him.

Representative FORD. The only time you saw him was later at the morgue?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Very much, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. Did you observe any blood on the portion of his body in

the neck area or anyplace in the front of his body?

Mr. KELLERMAN. I don't recall any.

Mr. SPECTER. Did you observe any hole in the clothing of the President

on the front part, in the shirt or tie area?

Mr. KELLERMAN. No, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. From your observation of the wound which you observed in

the morgue which you have described as a tracheotomy, would that have

been above or below the shirtline when the President was clothed?

Mr. KELLERMAN. It would have been below the shirtline, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. Now, have you described all of the wounds of the President

to which you have referred?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. Will you describe the three wounds which I believe you

said Governor Connally sustained?

Mr. KELLERMAN. I am going to refer to the medical report on Governor

Connally, wherein they said one wound was in his right back----

Mr. SPECTER. Indicating the upper shoulder area?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes, sir. One went through his wrist.

Mr. SPECTER. Indicating the right wrist.

Mr. KELLERMAN. I am using the numbers, and he was--a missile went into

his thigh somewhere.

Mr. SPECTER. Do you know anything about Governor Connally's wounds

aside from what you read in the medical report?

Mr. KELLERMAN. No; not personally.

Mr. SPECTER. Do you have any independent knowledge of which wrist and

which thigh, aside from what you read in the medical reports themselves?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes, sir; I do, I talked to the Governor several times

later, and it is the right wrist, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. It is the right wrist?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. And which thigh?

Mr. KELLERMAN. It would be the left one.

Representative FORD. Is this a good point for a recess?

Mr. SPECTER. This is fine.

Representative FORD. We will take a 5-minute break.

(Short recess.)

Representative FORD. The Commission will resume, and will you proceed,

Mr. Specter, please?

Mr. SPECTER. Yes sir. One of your last answers was that the position

of the wounds on Governor Connally was ascertained from a conversation

between you and Governor Connally, as well as from the medical reports

themselves. Is that correct?

Mr. KELLERMAN. No; it is really not.

Mr. SPECTER. Then tell us what your basis is for your testimony on

Governor Connally's wounds.

Mr. KELLERMAN. I have never conversed with the Governor as to his other

wounds outside of his wrist. Your medical report on Governor Connally

which indicate the shoulder wound, wrist, and in the thigh.

Mr. SPECTER. When did you have occasion to talk to him about his wrist

wound?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Over the holidays in Texas, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. The Christmas holidays?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. Have you now told us everything you know, either from

conversations or reports, about the wounds of Governor Connally?

Mr. KELLERMAN. That is right; yes, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. All right. Were you able to observe at the time of the

shooting and immediately thereafter, as Governor Connally went into the

hospital, any of his specific wounds?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Only of the--I am presuming now of the hand because,

when he was lying, he had it across his stomach here, and it was rather

bloody.

Mr. SPECTER. And was it the hand that was bloody, the stomach, or both?

Mr. KELLERMAN. I would say so right now; yes.

Mr. SPECTER. Which?

Mr. KELLERMAN. The hand.

Mr. SPECTER. Was the stomach bloody at all?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Not that I remember.

Mr. SPECTER. Do you have anything to add, Mr. Kellerman, on the total

number of wounds in relationship to your view that there were more than

three shots?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Well, let's consider the vehicle.

Mr. SPECTER. Fine. What about the vehicle would you consider relevant

in this regard?

Mr. KELLERMAN. The windshield itself, which I observed a day or two

after the funeral here, had been hit by a piece of this missile or

missiles, whatever it is, shell.

Mr. SPECTER. While you are referring to the windshield, permit me to

hand you a photograph marked Commission Exhibit 349 and ask if you can

tell us what that photograph depicts?

Mr. KELLERMAN. This photograph is the windshield of the Presidential

special automobile that we used in Dallas on November 22. And it

depicts a hit by some instrument on the metal railing that covers the

windshield.

Mr. SPECTER. In what position is the hit on that metal railing?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Directly to the right of the mirror.

Mr. SPECTER. Is that on the top of the windshield?

Mr. KELLERMAN. That is on the top of the windshield. I am sorry; this

is not the windshield itself; this is the top of the vehicle. This is

the framework.

Mr. SPECTER. Would you draw a red arrow with the pen that you have to

the mark which you have just described?

(Mr. Kellerman marked the photograph.)

Mr. SPECTER. Now, when did you first observe that indentation?

Mr. KELLERMAN. This was observed a day or two after the funeral, which

funeral was the 25th of November; this would be upward of the 27th.

Mr. SPECTER. Where was the automobile at the time you observed that

indentation?

Mr. KELLERMAN. At the White House garage, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. Was the windshield in the automobile at that time?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes, sir; it was in the automobile.

Mr. SPECTER. Did you observe or notice that indentation in the

windshield when you were in Dallas after the shooting occurred?

Mr. KELLERMAN. No, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. Did you observe or notice that indentation before the

shooting occurred?

Mr. KELLERMAN. No, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. Are you able to state positively whether or not that

indentation was present before the shooting?

Mr. KELLERMAN. No, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. So that you observed it on the first occasion when you

saw the car in the White House garage on or about November 27; is that

correct?

Mr. KELLERMAN. That is correct, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. The indentation could conceivably have been present before

the shooting?

Mr. KELLERMAN. It could have; yes.

Mr. SPECTER. But you didn't observe it before the shooting?

Mr. KELLERMAN. I did not.

Mr. SPECTER. And did you not observe it in Dallas after the shooting?

Mr. KELLERMAN. That is right; I did not.

Mr. SPECTER. Did you have any occasion to examine closely the

windshield area after the assassination in Dallas?

Mr. KELLERMAN. No, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. Did you have any occasion to examine closely the

windshield at any time after the assassination until you saw the car in

the garage on or about November 27?

Mr. KELLERMAN. No, sir; I have not.

Mr. SPECTER. Would you describe for the record where that indentation

occurs or is placed?

Mr. KELLERMAN. This indentation is placed on the metal-bar framework

which is across the top of the windshield. The indentation is directly

to the right of the mirror holder.

Mr. SPECTER. Is that on the inside or the outside of the car?

Mr. KELLERMAN. This is on the inside of the car.

Representative FORD. What prompted you to make that investigation on or

about November 27?

Mr. KELLERMAN. First, Mr. Congressman, I wanted to look this car over

for--let me go back a little bit. When this car was checked over that

night for its return to Washington, I was informed the following day

of the pieces of these missiles that were found in the front seat, and

I believe aside from the skull, that was in the rear seat, I couldn't

conceive even from elevation how this shot hit President Kennedy like

it did. I wanted to view this vehicle, whether this was a slant blow

off the car, whether it hit the car first and then hit him, or what

other marks are on this vehicle, and that is what prompted me to go

around and check it over myself.

Representative FORD. Had anybody told you of this indentation prior to

your own personal investigation?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Not of the windshield; no, sir.

Representative FORD. You were the first one to find this indentation?

Mr. KELLERMAN. I believe I am the first one who noticed this thing up

on the bar.

Representative FORD. That is what I meant.

Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes, sir.

Representative FORD. You are the first one to notice this particular

indentation?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes; I believe I am, sir.

Representative FORD. All right.

Mr. SPECTER. Did you have occasion to examine the windshield or the

framework closely before the assassination, either in Dallas or in

Washington?

Mr. KELLERMAN. No; I honestly didn't.

Mr. SPECTER. Mr. Chairman, I move for the admission to evidence of

Exhibit No. 349.

Representative FORD. It will be so admitted.

(The document referred to, heretofore marked Commission Exhibit No. 349

for identification, was received in evidence.)

Mr. SPECTER. Now I hand to Mr. Kellerman, through the Chairman,

Commission Exhibit No. 350, and ask you to describe what this picture

represents?

Mr. KELLERMAN. This picture represents the windshield of the

President's special automobile as we are looking into it. This is an

outside photo. My reason for this is that on inspection there is a--the

windshield has been struck by an instrument and it has been cracked.

This crack is opposite the mirror facing the driver would be toward the

driver, to the right of the mirror, and----

Mr. SPECTER. The photograph, Exhibit 350, is from the outside of the

car front looking toward the car; correct?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. What mark, if any, appears in the photograph on the

windshield itself?

Mr. KELLERMAN. There is the cracked windshield located to the right of

the mirror as you look into the automobile.

Mr. SPECTER. That would be on the driver's side, as you previously

stated?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes, sir; on the driver's side of the vehicle.

Mr. SPECTER. Now, is this picture an accurate representation of the

appearance of the windshield at some time when you observed the

windshield?

Mr. KELLERMAN. This windshield I observed on this same day.

Mr. SPECTER. On or about November 27, 1963?

Mr. KELLERMAN. That is correct.

Mr. SPECTER. Does that picture accurately represent what the windshield

looked like on that day when you observed it?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes, sir; it is.

Mr. SPECTER. Did you observe any crack in the windshield as

the President's automobile was being driven from the point of

assassination to the hospital?

Mr. KELLERMAN. I did not.

Mr. SPECTER. Did you observe it at any time prior to the time you saw

the automobile in the White House garage on or before November 27?

Mr. KELLERMAN. I did not, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. Did you have any occasion to examine closely the

windshield after the time of the shooting up until the time you saw it

in the White House garage?

Mr. KELLERMAN. No, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. Now, at the time of your examination of the windshield in

the White House garage, did you feel the windshield?

Mr. KELLERMAN. On the day that I visited the White House garage and

checked this car over for my own personal reasons, and this windshield

crack was pointed out to me, I did----

Mr. SPECTER. When you say it was pointed out to you, by whom?

Mr. KELLERMAN. There were other people in the garage, Mr. Specter, like

Mr. Kinney, I believe was there at the time, Special Agent Henry Rybka

was the other person.

Mr. SPECTER. Was it sufficiently prominent without having to have it

pointed out specially?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Oh, yes; very much. And I felt this windshield both

inwardly and outwardly to determine first if there was something that

was struck from the back of us or--and I was satisfied that it was.

Mr. SPECTER. When you say struck from in back of you, do you mean on

the inside or outside of the windshield?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Inside, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. Inside of the car?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Right.

Mr. SPECTER. Did you have occasion to feel the outside of the

windshield?

Mr. KELLERMAN. I did on that day; yes, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. What did you feel, if anything?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Not a thing; it was real smooth.

Mr. SPECTER. Did you have occasion to feel the inside of the windshield?

Mr. KELLERMAN. I did.

Mr. SPECTER. How did that feel to you?

Mr. KELLERMAN. My comparison was that the broken glass, broken

windshield, there was enough little roughness in there from the cracks

and split that I was positive, or it was my belief, that whatever hit

it came into the inside of the car.

Mr. SPECTER. I move for the admission into evidence of Exhibit No. 350.

Representative FORD. It will be so admitted.

(The document referred to, heretofore marked Commission Exhibit No. 350

for identification, was received in evidence.)

Mr. SPECTER. I now call the attention of the Commission to Exhibit

No. 351, which is the windshield itself which, as the Commission may

observe, is present in the hearing room. Now, with reference to Exhibit

No. 351, which is a marking placed over a glass object, Mr. Kellerman,

can you describe for the Commission what that is?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes; this windshield, which has since been removed from

the vehicle, at the time I first viewed it, this area marked in here

was all that was cracked. These are later splints.

Mr. SPECTER. Before you proceed, Mr. Kellerman, do you have knowledge

as to the general removal procedure during which this windshield was

taken from the President's car?

Mr. KELLERMAN. I believe I do not. However, I believe Mr. Greer would

be able to identify it better than I, on the removal side.

Mr. SPECTER. Would you describe the condition of the windshield in its

present state as we are viewing it here this morning?

Mr. KELLERMAN. The windshield this morning has--has been hit by some

object with sufficient force----

Mr. SPECTER. Perhaps we ought to start with the point of impact, Mr.

Kellerman. First, are you able to positively identify this as the

windshield from the President's automobile?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes, sir; I would say it was, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. Is this the same windshield as depicted in Exhibits 349

and 350?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes, sir.

Mr. SPECTER. All right. Now, starting with the principal point of

impact, where does that exist on this windshield?

Mr. KELLERMAN. The principal point of impact is located to the left of

the mirror, to the right above the driver's head, and to the right of

his, I am going to say, view line.

Mr. SPECTER. As we view the windshield at this time, state whether or

not there are spidering lines which have emanated from that point which

you have described as the principal point of impact?

Mr. KELLERMAN. The spidering lines which extend in three different

directions--you are speaking of the large ones or the others?

Mr. SPECTER. Well, I want to put on this record all of the spidering

lines which exist here.

Mr. KELLERMAN. OK; the spidering lines which are in this encircled area

reflect, in my opinion, that when the instrument hit this glass it

shattered in half a dozen different ways.

Mr. SPECTER. Well now, with respect to the cracks themselves, is there

a crack which goes in a generally upwardly direction slanting off in

the general direction of the driver?

Mr. KELLERMAN. In the center of this, the impact of the center of this

scratch, one goes directly to the top of the windshield.

Mr. SPECTER. On that line itself, is there a further splintering off of

that line at another point?

Mr. KELLERMAN. It then continues on a small leg, a straight leg, about

3 inches from the original direction.

Mr. SPECTER. And is there a change of direction at that point, or a

bifurcation, dividing it into two parts?

Mr. KELLERMAN. No.

Mr. SPECTER. Well, you have described in a generally upwardly direction

of about 3 inches?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes.

Mr. SPECTER. And is there not a crack which then extends all the way to

the top of the windshield moving, in the direction of the left side of

the windshield from the driver facing it?

Mr. KELLERMAN. That is right. There is a complete crack from this

so-called cutoff to the top right of the windshield right above the

view line of the driver.

Mr. SPECTER. Taking that from a compass reading, would that be in a

generally northeasterly direction?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes, sir; northeasterly.

Mr. SPECTER. All right. From a point 3 inches from the center crack,

which we described as the principal point of impact, then, does there

form a point of crack in a V-direction with the line you have already

described?

Mr. KELLERMAN. Yes; there does. There is a small splint, about 2

inches, that heads directly north off from this splinter that goes in a

northeasterly direction.

Mr. SPECTER. All right. Now, moving in a clockwise direction.

Mr. KELLERMAN. In a clockwise direction.

Mr. SPECTER. What crack do you observe, if any?

Mr. KELLERMAN. I next observe on the eastward side of this center crack

a splint of about 3 inches long, which then makes a sharp veer to the

southeast to the bottom of the windshield.

Mr. SPECTER. Now, moving further in a clockwise direction, what crack

do you next observe emanating from the central point of impact?

Mr. KELLERMAN. The next crack from the central point of impact extends

down about 3 inches, to the southeast, and then veers to a sharp

southeast to the bottom of the windshield.

Mr. SPECTER. Now, moving further in a clockwise direction.

Warren Commission (02 of 26): Hearings Vol. II (of 15) · 第 56 / 291 题