I am now quoting from the publication:

"On the other side of the overpass a motorcycle policeman was

roughriding across some grass to the trestle for the railroad tracks,

across the overpass. He brought his cycle to a halt and leapt from it

and was running up the base of the trestle when I lost sight of him."

Mr. RANKIN. Can you give us the date of the paper that came from?

Mr. LANE. Yes. That was the Texas Observer, November 29, 1963. That

statement has been confirmed by Mr. Dugger to me in two interviews in

Dallas.

James Vachule, who is a reporter for the Fort Worth Star Telegram,

said, "I heard the shots, several, at the triple overpass."

And Jerry Flemmons, reporting also for the Fort Worth Star Telegram,

on November 22, 1963, stated, "Kennedy was gunned down by an assassin,

apparently standing on the overpass above the freeway."

Now, I spoke to a Mary Woodward, who is an employee of the Dallas

Morning News, and she stated that she was present with three coworkers,

all employees of the Dallas Morning News, and they were standing near

the--the base of the grassy knoll, perhaps 50 feet or so from the

overpass, with the overpass to their right, and the book depository

building to their left. And on November 23, 1963, the Dallas Morning

News ran a story by Miss Woodward, and I have since that time spoken

with Miss Woodward by telephone, and she has confirmed portions--the

entire portion which I will quote from now--in her conversation with me.

That is, that as she and her three coworkers waited for the President

to pass, on the grassy slope just east of the triple overpass, she

explained that the President approached and acknowledged their cheers

and the cheers of others, "he faced forward again, and suddenly there

was an ear-shattering noise coming from behind us and a little to the

right."

Here we have a statement, then, by an employee of the Dallas Morning

News, evidently speaking--she indicated to me that she was speaking on

behalf of all four employees, all of whom stated that the shots came

from the direction of the overpass, which was to their right, and not

at all from the Book Depository Building, which was to their left.

Miss Woodward continued, "Instead of speeding up the car, the car came

to a halt. Things are a little bit hazy from this point, but I don't

believe anyone was hit with the first bullet. The President and Mrs.

Kennedy turned and looked around as if they, too, didn't believe the

noise was really coming from a gun. Then after a moment's pause there

was another shot, and I saw the President slumping in the car."

This would seem to be consistent with the statement by Miss Hill that

more than three shots were fired.

In addition to these statements, James A. Chaney, who is a Dallas

motorcycle policeman, was quoted in the Houston Chronicle on November

24, 1963, as stating that the first shot missed entirely. He said he

was 6 feet to the right and front of the President's car, moving about

15 miles an hour, and when the first shot was fired. "I thought it was

a backfire", he said.

Now, Miss Hill told me that when she was questioned--put that word

unfortunately in quotation marks--by the U.S. Secret Service agents,

that they indicated to her what her testimony should be, and that is

that she only heard three shots. And she insisted that she heard from

four to six shots. And she said that at least one agent of the Secret

Service said to her, "There were three wounds and there were three

shells, so we are only saying three shots." And they raised with her

the possibility that instead of hearing more than three shots, that she

might have heard firecrackers exploding, or that she might have heard

echoes.

Despite this type of questioning by the Secret Service, Miss Hill

continued to maintain, the last I spoke with her, about a week ago,

that she heard from four to six shots.

Now, to the best of my knowledge, from my investigation, which has been

very severely limited by lack of personnel and almost total lack of

funds, and, therefore, is clearly not the kind of investigation which

is required here--but from this limited investigation, it seems that

only two persons immediately charged into the Texas Book Depository

Building after the shots were fired. They were an officer of the Dallas

Police Force, Seymour Weitzman, who submitted an affidavit to the

Dallas police office, in which he stated that he discovered the rifle

on the sixth floor of the Book Depository Building.

There was one other gentleman who ran into the building, and that was

Roy S. Truly, who was and is, I believe, the director of the Book

Depository Building.

However, Mr. Truly stated that he believed that the shots came from the

direction of the overpass and from the grassy knoll. And although he

was standing directly in front of the Book Depository Building, he did

not believe that the shots came from that building.

Standing with him at the time of the assassination was O. V. Campbell,

who was the vice president of the Book Depository Building.

In the Dallas Morning News on November 23, 1963, it was stated that

"Campbell says he ran toward a grassy knoll to the west of the building

where he thought the sniper had hidden."

So we have two persons that we know of standing in front of the Book

Depository Building, and they both thought that the shots came from the

grassy knoll near the overpass.

The police officer, Seymour Weitzman, submitted an affidavit to the

Dallas district attorney's office, he and Mr. Truly, as I indicated

a moment ago were the only two who charged into the Book Depository

Building when the shots were fired.

Weitzman indicated in his affidavit--I assume you have the original of

that affidavit--that he ran "in a northwest direction, scaled the fence

toward where we thought the shots came from."

He indicated "then someone said they thought the shots came from the

old Texas Building. I immediately ran to the Texas Building and started

looking inside."

So even the two people who ran into the building indicated that they

did not believe the shots came from the building.

Mr. Weitzman went into the building because someone whose name he

did not give in his affidavit told him to go into the building, and

then Truly explained that although he thought the shots came from the

general direction of the grassy knoll or the overpass in front of the

President's limousine, he saw this officer run into the building, of

which he is a director, and he felt that since he knew the building and

the officer did not, he should go in the building to assist the officer.

From published accounts, and from my investigation, I can only find one

person who thought that the shots came from the building, and that was

the Chief of Police in Dallas, Jesse Curry, who said as soon as the

shots were fired, he knew they came from the building. From the Book

Depository Building.

Now, of course, there were many persons present there whom I have not

quoted, to whom I have no access.

Now, I spoke on several occasions with the reporter for the Fort Worth

Star Telegram, whose name is Thayer Waldo. Mr. Waldo was standing with

a police captain near the Dallas Trade Mart Building, which was the

building, public building, where the President was going to have spoken

that day. Mr. Waldo was awaiting his arrival, the President's arrival

there, when a sergeant who was seated in a police cruiser called the

captain over hurriedly to the police car. Mr. Waldo accompanied the

captain to the police car. And Mr. Waldo stated to me that he heard

the first bulletin which came over the Dallas police radio, and it was

"Bulletin. The President has been shot. It is feared that others in his

party have been wounded. The shots came from a triple overpass in front

of the Presidential automobile."

So even the police, despite the Chief of Police's later assertion that

he knew that the shots came from the Book Depository Building, behind

the Presidential limousine, the first police radio broadcast indicated

that it was the police position at that time that the shots came from

the front, not from the rear.

Now, Patrolman Chaney, who I made reference to a little earlier,

the motorcycle patrolman, stated that the Presidential car stopped

momentarily after the first shot. That statement was consistent

with Miss Woodward's statement in the Dallas Morning News, that the

automobile came to almost a complete halt after the first shot, and the

statement of many other witnesses as well.

Mr. RANKIN. When was that statement made?

Mr. LANE. That statement appeared in the newspaper I made reference to

before, the Houston Chronicle, on November 24, 1963.

Mr. RANKIN. When you made an independent inquiry at any time, would you

tell us, Mr. Lane?

Mr. LANE. Yes, I certainly shall do that.

Now, I think one has to conjecture as to why the Secret Service agent

who was undoubtedly trained for this assignment, and particularly the

agent who was driving the Presidential limousine in Dallas, where

we were told that the greatest efforts ever to protect an American

President were going to be made that day, because of the previous

difficulties in Dallas, the attack upon our Ambassador to the United

Nations and the attack upon the then Senator Johnson, when he spoke in

Dallas in 1960--one would assume that the most qualified Secret Service

driver that could be secured would be driving that automobile. It is

difficult to understand why the automobile almost came to a complete

stop after the first shot was fired, if the shots were coming from the

rear. The natural inclination, it would seem, would be to step on the

gas and accelerate as quickly as possible. However, if the driver were

under the impression that the shots were from the front, one could

understand his hesitation in not wanting to drive closer to the sniper

or snipers.

In addition, however, Roy Kellerman, who was in the front right-hand

seat of the automobile, who I am told was in charge of the Secret

Service operation that day, the director of the Secret Service not

being present in Dallas on that occasion--according to the pictures

printed in Life magazine, Mr. Kellerman looked forward until the first

shot was fired. Then he turned back, and looked at the President. He

immediately looked forward again, and was looking in the direction of

the overpass while the second shot was fired, and while the third shot

was fired.

One would certainly expect that Mr. Kellerman was and is a trained

observer, who would not panic in such a circumstance, for which he has

received his training.

The pictures I make reference to are those in Life magazine which I

referred to a little earlier in the afternoon.

Senator COOPER. May I ask a question there, Mr. Chief Justice?

The CHAIRMAN. Yes, go right ahead, Senator.

Senator COOPER. This last statement you made, about the Secret Service

agent who turned, so that he was faced to the rear, toward the

President, and then turned forward--I didn't quite understand what you

deduced from that.

Mr. LANE. I assumed that he was looking toward the sound of the shots.

Senator COOPER. You mean when he turned to the rear, or turned ahead?

Mr. LANE. Well, when the President was shot, and was struck he then

turned around, which I would imagine would be an ordinary response when

somebody in an automobile with whom you are riding has been shot.

But immediately after that, before the second shot was fired, he turned

completely to the front, and was looking at the overpass during the

remainder of the time that the shots were fired. It would seem to

indicate to me that it is possible that Mr. Kellerman felt that the

shots were coming from the general direction in which he was looking.

Mr. RANKIN. What do you base your statement on that the car stopped,

the President's limousine?

Mr. LANE. The statement made by various witnesses, including Mr.

Chaney, a motorcycle policeman, Miss Woodward, who was one of the

closest witnesses to the President at the time that he was shot, and

others. I think that is the--I haven't documented that beyond that,

because that seemed to be so generally conceded by almost everyone,

that the automobile came to--almost came to a complete halt after the

first shot--did not quite stop, but almost did. And, of course, you

have the films, I assume, of the assassination and know more about that

than I do, certainly.

Now, in reference to the rifle, there is on file--I assume that you

have it or copies of it--in the Dallas district attorney's office or

the police office in Dallas, an affidavit sworn to by Officer Weitzman,

in which he indicates that he discovered the rifle on the sixth floor

of the Book Depository Building at, I believe, 1:22 p.m., on November

22, 1963.

Now, in this affidavit, Officer Weitzman swore that the murder

weapon--that the weapon which he found on the sixth floor was a

7.65 Mauser, which he then went on to describe in some detail, with

reference to the color of the strap, et cetera.

Now, the prosecuting attorney, of course, took exactly the same

position, and for hours insisted that the rifle discovered on the sixth

floor was a German Mauser, adding the nationality. A German Mauser is

nothing at all like an Italian carbine. I think almost any rifle expert

will indicate that that is so.

I have been informed that almost every Mauser--and I am not able to

document this, unfortunately, but I am sure that you have easy access

to rifle experts--that almost every German Mauser has stamped upon it

the caliber, as does almost every Italian carbine.

Mr. RANKIN. Do you know the difference between the two?

Mr. LANE. Do I know the difference?

Mr. RANKIN. Yes.

Mr. LANE. I know the difference between an Army M-l and an American

carbine--those are the only two weapons I fired--during the war. No, I

don't know anything about rifles, other than those two rifles, which I

used at one time.

I think it is most interesting to note that when Oswald was arrested

we were informed immediately that he had an alias--his last name was

Lee in that alias--as well as a great deal of material about his

political background and activities on behalf of the Fair Play for Cuba

Committee, and his defection to the Soviet Union, et cetera. But the

alias was raised immediately.

The following day, on the 23d, when it was announced by the Federal

Bureau of Investigation, that Oswald had purchased an Italian carbine,

6.5 millimeters, under the assumed name, A. Hidell, then for the first

time the district attorney of Dallas indicated that the rifle in his

possession, the alleged murder weapon, had changed both nationality

and size, and had become from a German 7.65 Mauser, an Italian 6.5

carbine. And, further he indicated then for the first time that they

knew of another alias maintained by Lee Oswald. In addition to the

name Lee, which they discovered, they said, by going to the home where

he lived--the house where he had lived in Dallas, where he rented a

room, a rooming house, they discovered there he had secured the room

under the name Lee. Mr. Wade stated that on Oswald's person, in his

pocketbook, was an identification card made out to A. Hidell, and

I have seen pictures of this reproduced in either Time magazine or

Newsweek, or one of the weekly news magazines--I believe it was one or

the other--with a picture of Oswald appearing on this card, plainly

indicating that Oswald had the alias A. Hidell, to Mr. Wade.

I think it is interesting that the name Lee as an alias was released

immediately, although some investigation was required to secure that

alias. But the name A. Hidell, was not released as an alias, although

that was present and obvious by mere search of Oswald's person when he

was arrested.

Mr. RANKIN. Can you give us the time of the release of the information

about the alias, A. Hidell?

Mr. LANE. That was on November 23.

Mr. RANKIN. And how about Lee?

Mr. LANE. November 22. The first release of the name A. Hidell came

from the district attorney's office after the FBI had indicated that

Oswald had purchased an Italian carbine under that name.

If I were permitted to cross-examine Mr. Wade, which evidently you have

decided that I shall not be permitted to do, and Officer Weitzman, I

would seek to find out how about the most important single element in

probably this case or any other murder case, physical evidence, the

murder weapon, in a case which I am sure is Mr. Wade's most important

case--how he could be so completely in error about this.

Mr. Wade is a very distinguished prosecuting attorney, has been one for

some 13 or 14 years, and I believe was an agent of the Federal Bureau

of Investigation prior to that time.

I would like to know how he could have been so wrong about something so

vital.

Now, assuming that the rifle found on the sixth floor was an Italian

rifle, Italian carbine, one must wonder how it was possible for any

number of things to happen for it to be fired there three times and

strike the President in front of the throat, although he was past

that building, and for the noise, according to the witnesses of the

shooting, to have come from a different place entirely.

But in addition to that, one must wonder if that rifle is capable of

the performance which the prosecuting authorities allege that it gave

on that day. An Olympic rifle champion, Hubert Hammerer, said that he

doubts that it could be done.

Mr. RANKIN. Could you give us his address?

Mr. LANE. He is not in the United States. The story appeared in the New

York Times. I don't have the exact date.

Representative FORD. What nationality is he?

Mr. LANE. I don't know.

Representative FORD. Do you know when he was Olympic champion?

Mr. LANE. No, I don't know that. I do know it probably was some time

after the Italian carbine was manufactured, since it is an extremely

old weapon, manufactured back in 1938, as I recall. There seems to be

an agreement that the period of time was between 5 and 6 seconds from

the first shot to the last shot.

There is a serious question in the minds, I think, of persons who have

fired that pistol--that rifle--first of all, as to its ability to be

fired that quickly accurately with a telescopic sight, and secondly, in

reference to the ammunition which is available. Various persons have

tested various lots of ammunition. Someone from the National Rifle

Association told me that he tested more than 30 rounds, a little over

30 rounds of the Italian 6.5----

Mr. RANKIN. When you refer to these people, will you tell us the names

of any of them that you can? It might be of help to us.

Mr. LANE. I should remember this gentleman, because I just spoke with

him. That is another name I am going to have to supply for you.

Mr. RANKIN. Thank you.

Mr. LANE. He is a member of the board of directors of the National

Rifle Association. He purchased for one of the television networks some

30 rounds, a little over 30 rounds, and told me that 20 of them did

not fire at all, and 6 of them were guilty of hanged fire, which is a

phrase I don't know anything about, but he tells me that means it did

not fire fully, and, therefore, could not be accurate. Therefore, a

very small percentage of the ammunition was of any value.

Mr. Ed Wallace talked about making a similar test in the New York World

Telegram and Sun, in a feature article, and I think he said that he

went with an expert, and they got 20 rounds of this ammunition, and of

those 17 did not fire--only 3 fired. It was very old ammunition.

Representative FORD. Who is Ed Wallace, and who is the individual that

Ed Wallace referred to? Do you have that information?

Mr. LANE. I believe Mr. Wallace indicated that he was present when the

test was made. But it was an article appearing in the New York World

Telegram and Sun within a week after the assassination--from the 23d to

the 30th of November. And I can secure and mail to you a copy of that

article, if you prefer.

While there may be some question as to whether or not a rifle expert

could secure such performance from a rifle, or whether or not one could

secure enough good ammunition to get such performance, I think there

is general agreement that only in the hands of a rifle expert could

one attempt to come close to that kind of shooting that it is alleged

Oswald did on November 22.

The Times reported on November 23, "As Marines go, Lee Harvey Oswald

was not highly regarded as a rifleman." And you have in your files,

of course, the scorecard indicating Oswald's marksmanship or lack of

marksmanship while in the Marine Corps.

In addition to that, you have the documents given to you by Marguerite

Oswald, Lee Oswald's mother, which contained a scorecard maintained by

Oswald while in the Marine Corps, showing his score in fast and slow

shooting at various different yardages, in reference to both an M-l, as

I recall, and an American carbine. Now, of course, it has been alleged

on occasion that Mr. Oswald practiced with his rifle, on occasion, on

weekends, at rifle ranges.

Mrs. Paine, with whom Lee Oswald's wife lived for the 2 month period

preceding the assassination, and where Lee Oswald himself spent

weekends for that 2 months period preceding the assassination, told me

that Oswald could not have ever gone to a rifle range on a weekend,

since she can account for his whereabouts during that entire 2 month

period just preceding the assassination.

Mr. RANKIN. Can you give us the day of that conversation with Mrs.

Paine?

Mr. LANE. I have had about five conversations with her. The first one

would be, oh, I believe, New Year's Day. I think that is the first

time--this year--I believe that is the first time that she made the

statement to me. She said she could account for Oswald's whereabouts

during that 2 month period on weekends, from Friday late afternoon,

when he left work in Dallas and arrived there in Irving, until early

Monday morning.

She said the exception is during that time--she didn't watch him every

moment, of course--there might be exceptions when she went shopping for

half an hour, and he was left home to take care of the children, her

two children, his children. But that unless he ran out quickly into the

back yard with the rifle and shot and then quickly put the rifle away

while caring for three children, or four children, that it would be

impossible for him to practice with the rifle on weekends.

Since it has been alleged that the rifle was in the garage during the

entire period of time, of course--that was in Irving, Tex., and he was

in Dallas, Tex.--it would have been impossible for him to practice

during the week while he was in Dallas, with that particular rifle.

Of course one must zero in a rifle in order to be even fairly accurate

with it. One must practice with the specific weapon which one is going

to use, in order to have any accuracy, in any event.

Now, I spoke with Dial M. Ryder, who is a gunsmith in Irving, Tex.,

at the Irving Sport Shop, and he told me that he mounted a telescopic

sight on a rifle for a man named Oswald during October 1963.

Now, unfortunately, he does not recall--that is around the deer

season, he informed me, and a lot of people are getting rifles

fixed or repaired or sights mounted on them during that time in the

Dallas-Irving area. And he does not recall, therefore, what this

gentleman named Oswald looks like.

But he does know that a rifle was brought to him by someone whose name

now appears in this record as Oswald, and that he drilled three holes

in the rifle for a mount, telescopic mount. He said he had only seen

three rifles which required three holes for telescopic mount--a 303

British Enfield, a 303 American Springfield army surplus rifle, or an

Eddystone, which is also an American rifle. He said, therefore, he did

not attach a telescopic sight to the Italian carbine, because he would

have only drilled two holes.

His employer, I think his name is Greener, he told me, checked with all

the Oswalds they could find in the Irving area after this matter came

to their attention, and could not find anyone in that area--and they

called some people in Dallas also named Oswald--could not find anyone

named Oswald who brought the rifle in to him.

I talked to Milton Klein, who is the owner of Klein's sporting

goods store in Chicago--Klein's Sporting Goods is the name of the

establishment, in Chicago.

Mr. RANKIN. When was this?

Mr. LANE. I spoke with him within the last 2 or 3 days. And he told

me that--he runs the mail-order house which sent the carbine, Italian

carbine, to Dallas, not to Oswald, but to A. Hidell, and that he sent

that out with the holes already bored in the Italian carbine, and

equipped with a telescopic sight which was already attached to the

rifle.

Aguto Marcelli, who is a correspondent for an Italian publication which

appears physically very much to be like Life magazine, called Leuropeo,

stated to me that he had spoken with Mr. Klein, and Mr. Klein told him

that the FBI--"The FBI warned me to keep my trap shut."

Mr. RANKIN. When was this?

Mr. LANE. He told me this about 2 weeks ago. When I spoke with Mr.

Klein, about 3 days ago, 2 or 3 days ago, he indicated that he did not

want to discuss any aspect of this matter with me. And I asked him if

that was because he was told not to talk with anyone about this case,

and he said yes.

Warren Commission (02 of 26): Hearings Vol. II (of 15) · 第 38 / 291 题