CHAPTER V.

"CHARIVARIETIES."

_Punch's_ Influence on Dress and Fashion--His Records--As a

Prophet--As an Artist--As an Actor and Dramatist--Benefit

Performances--Guild of Literature and Art.

The man who glances at _Punch's_ current number and throws it aside can

have but little appreciation of the influence of the paper, not only in

matters political, but in social subjects of every kind. That the Baron

de Book-Worms can make or mar the success of a new book, as completely

as the "Times," "Athenæum," or "Spectator," has been testified to by Mr.

Hall Caine and others; and in some quarters at least _Punch's_

bâton-strokes are as effective as ever, and recall the times when he

could, and did, drive a semi-public man into obscurity, which, but for

the fame of his onslaught, would have been absolute oblivion.

But it is in dress, in fashion, and in manners that _Punch_ has gained,

if anything, in weight and influence. In such subjects, treated as

"charivarieties," as Mr. Arthur Sykes has called them, he has always

been supreme, and fulfils an unquestioned destiny. John Leech determined

that there should be no Bloomerism in the land, and there was

none--only, by the charm of his drawings, he came very near making it

popular, and converting British young womanhood to Turkish trousers. Mr.

du Maurier thought that it would look pretty if every little lady in the

land were to wear black stockings; and every little lady did: as

unfalteringly as when Miss Kate Greenaway imposed upon them smocks and

poke-bonnets, or when Mrs. Hodgson Burnett clad mothers' darlings in

black velvet Fauntleroy suits, with bright-coloured sashes wound round

their middles. As the volumes are examined, the reader becomes aware of

the enduring value of _Punch_ as a History of Costume in the Victorian

Era. Even men's dress is noted with minute truthfulness--the violently

variegated shirts of 1845; the Joinville ties, with their great fringed

ends, out of which Thackeray made such capital in 1847; the pin-less

cravats and cutaway coats of 1848; the ivory-handled canes of 1850, for

sucking purposes--the fashion which came round thirty years later with

the advance of the "crutch and toothpick brigade;" the big bows and

short sticks of 1852; the frock-coats and weeping whiskers of 1853, with

the corresponding inability to pronounce the "r" otherwise than as a

"w," or to converse but with a languid, used-up drawl; the smaller ties

and growing collars, when a wasting youth complains that "She is lost to

him for ever" (_she_, the laundress!); the schoolboy's Spanish hat of

1860, that was soon developed into the "pork-pie," and was to be adopted

generally for country wear with baggy knickerbockers; the full-blown

Dundreary of 1861, with long weeping whiskers, long coat, long drawl,

and short wits; with the sudden change for the better in the following

year. All this is to be found clearly recorded year by year, season by

season, with all the peculiarities of "form;" of umbrella and

umbrella-carrying; of dancing, energetic and invertebrate; of

handshaking, sensible and high-level (which was invented, of course, by

the ballroom girl who was holding up her train in the dance); of hirsute

adornment and æsthetic craze--every shade of fashion is followed in its

true development and in its wane--down to the recent phase of 1893 and

1894, when the swell lets out his collar for an advertisement hoarding,

or, safe in the perfection of its starching, marches quietly across the

desert while fierce Orientals turn the edges of their swords in vain

across his linen-shielded neck.

And the ladies! The coal-scuttle bonnet and the incipient crinoline of

1845; the growing crinolines of 1851, larger in 1860, largest of all in

1864; the hair in bands or side-curls of 1852, and in nets in 1862; the

bonnets worn almost off the head in 1853, more so in 1854, until Leech

drew a picture of two ladies walking out, with footmen carrying their

headgear behind them; the "spoon-shaped bonnet" of 1860--"the latest

Parisian folly," which the street-boys mistake for "a dustman's 'at;"

the archery of 1862, the pork-pie hat, the croquet, the tennis, the

golf--every sport, every habit and custom, every change of dress, down

to the minutest detail--all is recorded with faithfulness and humour,

first by Leech's pencil, and then, in chief measure, by Mr. du

Maurier's.

* * * * *

It is curious in turning over _Punch's_ volumes to see how on occasion

he could use his power of prophecy with an accuracy that spoke well for

the common-sense, sometimes even the statesmanship, to be found among

the Staff. "There is but one Punch, and he is his own prophet." It is

rather as a social reformer than as a politician that he has exerted his

gift, though an example of the latter class of foresight may be pointed

to in the cartoon of Sir John Tenniel of April 7th, 1860. This was

entitled "A Glimpse of the Future: A Probable and Large Importation of

Foreign Rags," in which King Bomba of Naples, the Emperor Louis

Napoleon, and the Pope were shown landing on British shores in very

sorry plight. And in due time England was to see--at least, as far as

the two monarchs were concerned--the realisation of the oracular couplet

combined:--

"The time will come when discontent

Will overthrow your Government."

Then the number of inventions and innovations forestalled by _Punch's_

pen are many. In December, 1848, much is made of a proposed "opera

telakouphanon"--a forecast of the telephone, phonograph, and

theatrophone combined:--

"It would be in the power of Mr. Lumley," says _Punch_, "during the

aproaching holiday time to bring home the Opera to every lady's

drawing-room in London. Let him cause to be constructed at the back

of Her Majesty's Theatre an apparatus on the principle of the Ear

of DIONYSIUS.... Next, having obtained an Act of Parliament for the

purpose, let him lay down after the manner of pipes a number of

Telakouphona connected--the reader will excuse the apparent

vulgarism--with this ear, and extended to the dwellings of all such

as may be willing to pay for the accommodation. In this way our

domestic establishments might be served with the liquid notes of

JENNY LIND as easily as they are with soft water, and could be

supplied with music as readily as they can with gas. Then at a

_soirée_ or evening party, if a desire were expressed for a little

music, we should only have to turn on the _Sonnambula_ or the

_Puritani_, as the case might be," etc.

--a thirty years' prophecy. The following year he represented a lady

listening to music by telegraph; and the kinetoscope is only now waiting

to fulfil Mr. du Maurier's forecast of many years ago. If Mr. Edison has

not yet done quite all that Mr. Punch foretold, is not that rather Mr.

Edison's than _Punch's_ fault?

In an unhappy moment in 1847 _Punch_ proposed the use of umbrellas and

house-fronts for advertising purposes, and the hint was promptly taken.

In the previous year he foretold the use of the Thames Tunnel as a

railway conduit; and his sketch of a zebra harnessed to a carriage in

the streets of London was realised forty years later. The great "Missing

Word Competition" of 1892 was forestalled by _Punch_ by four-and-thirty

years (p. 53, Vol. XXXV., August 7th, 1858). Leech's "Mistress of the

Hounds," too--how fantastic the idea was thought in those days, and

laughed at accordingly!--has since become a hard, astraddle,

uncompromising fact; and the lady's safety riding-skirt, that attached

itself to the saddle when the lady lost her seat, anticipated by thirty

years the patent for a similar contrivance taken out in 1884. Indeed,

_Punch's_ picture of November, 1854, was put in as evidence before Mr.

Justice Wright in April, 1893, when an action between two sartorial

artists turned upon the point of anteriority, and the picture won the

case.

Common-sense, and shrewdness of observation and judgment, which are at

the root of amateur prophecy, brought as much honour to _Punch_ as ever

Old Moore obtained through one of his lucky flukes. In December, 1893,

the Prince of Wales opened the Hugh Myddleton Board School, the finest

in London, which had been erected on the site of the old Clerkenwell

prison; and on the invitation card to the ceremony appeared a

reproduction of the _Punch_ picture of May, 1847, which accompanied an

altercation between "School and Prison, who've lately risen As

opposition teachers." This was published nearly a quarter of a century

before Mr. Forster's Education Act, and concludes with the prophecy

curiously fulfilled in the case of this particular institution. To this

picture, in which the county gaol, untenanted, looks scowlingly at the

crowded school, the Prince feelingly referred when he spoke of the

scepticism with which the statement was regarded, that the institution

of "free" schools would shut the prisons up. But a volume might be

filled with instances of the occasions on which _Punch_ has seen with

his eyes, and thought with the front of his brain--how his demands for

necessary innovations (such, for example, as fever carriages in 1861)

were quickly acted upon, and how his serious mood has enforced the

respect which mere geniality might have failed to secure.

He is not, of course, entitled to invariable congratulation for his

attitude towards art; but he has suffered as well as acted ill. When he

derided the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, and joined in the storm of

ridicule that swirled round the heads of Rossetti and his devoted and

courageous friends, he doubtless acted within his _rôle_; but he utterly

failed to see below the surface of the apparent affectation of the

artists, and all he had to say of Sir John Millais' "Vale of Rest," in

the lines descriptive of the year 1859, was

"Year Mr. Millais came out with those terrible nuns in the

graveyard."

In the following year, however, Mr. Eastlake, afterwards of the National

Gallery, made his mark in the paper as "Jack Easel," and a more

intelligent view of art prevailed.

But neither has Art, as personified by the Royal Academy, recognised

_Punch_, save by a couple of seats at the annual banquet. It is true

that several of its members have drawn for it--Sir Frederic Leighton,

Sir John Millais, Sir John Gilbert, Mr. Briton Riviere, Mr. Stacey

Marks, Mr. G. A. Storey, and Fred Walker. But _Punch's_ art has gone

unnoticed, otherwise than by a square yard or two of wall space in the

Black-and-White room at the annual exhibition. While the Academy has

canonised many members whose names half a century later are forgotten,

or are remembered only to be called up with a smile or a shrug, it has

persistently ignored those who have employed the pencil instead of the

brush, or have used ink instead of misusing paint. But it is unnecessary

to pursue the subject farther; that the names of Keene, Leech, and

Tenniel are not on the roll of the Academy is surely far more to the

discredit of the institution than of the artists themselves, who

presumably, from the Academic point of view, are "no artists." As Mr. du

Maurier has pointed out, _Punch's_ artists will have their revenge: "If

the illustrator confine himself to his own particular branch, he must

not hope for any very high place in the hierarchy of art. The great

prizes are not for him! No doubt it will be all the same a hundred years

hence--but for this: if he has done his work well, he has faithfully

represented the life of his time, he has perpetuated what he has seen

with his own bodily eyes; and for that reason alone his unpretending

little sketches may, perhaps, have more interest for those who come

across them in another hundred years than many an ambitious historical

or classical canvas that has cost its painter infinite labour,

imagination, and research, and won for him in his own time the highest

rewards in money, fame, and Academical distinction. For genius alone can

keep such fancy-work as this alive, and the so-called genius of to-day

may be the scapegoat of to-morrow."

[Illustration: THE DRAUGHTSMAN'S REVENGE.

(_Drawn by George du Maurier._)]

_Punch_ was born, so to speak, upon the stage, between the four canvas

walls of his own and Judy's show. His heart and soul were with and of

the drama, and plays have rained from the prolific pens of his literary

Staff. Many of his contributors acted in public--a few professionally,

most of them as amateurs--and more than one has linked his life with a

lady who had trodden the stage or concert platform. From the first he

proclaimed that Music and the Drama were to be amongst the most

prominent features of the work; and to that declaration he has ever

since faithfully adhered. As a record of the London stage, the pages of

_Punch_ are fairly complete; as a dramatist he has, through the members

of his Staff, been prolific, and on the whole highly successful; as an

actor he has at least enjoyed himself; and just as Falstaff was the

cause of wit in others, he has unwittingly served the pirates of the

stage, and to better purpose, too, than they deserved.

With "readings," lectures, and "entertainments," the members of

_Punch's_ Staff have often come strikingly before the public; so much

so, indeed, that they have stepped from their studies and studios on to

the platform as by a natural transition. Albert Smith's "Overland Mail"

and "The Ascent of Mont Blanc," with the extraordinary success that

attended them, doubtless set the fashion to the band of men who were

always, in one sense at least, before the public. Thackeray's "Four

Georges" and the "English Humorists" raised the standard of quality at

once; and to that standard more than one of his contemporaries and

successors has aimed at attaining, even though they never hoped to

succeed. Every Editor of _Punch_--except perhaps Stirling

Coyne--delivered such lectures in his day. Henry Mayhew took for his

subject that of which he had a complete mastery, "London Labour and

London Poor." Mark Lemon, whose knowledge of the metropolis was probably

even more extensive and peculiar than Sam Weller's own, lectured on it

in "About London," and gave recitals of "Falstaff" with a certain

measure of success. Shirley Brooks spoke, as he was so well qualified to

do, on "The Houses of Parliament;" and discourses were similarly

delivered by Tom Taylor. Mr. Burnand's bright "Happy Thoughts" readings

could be forgotten by none that heard them. James Hannay, laying humour

aside, lectured on the more serious aspects of literature; and Cuthbert

Bede talked of the literary and artistic friends of his Verdant Green

career. Mr. Harry Furniss, with his delightful entertainments on

"Portraiture" and "The Humours of Parliament," achieved a success

undreamed of by the earlier _Punch_ reciters; and Mr. du Maurier in his

"Social Pictorial Satire" touched a literary and critical height that

charmed every audience by its humour, its delicacy, and its admirable

taste.

The theatrical stars of half a century march through _Punch's_ pages in

long procession, and matters of high theatrical politics engage the

attention from year to year. _Punch's_ interest in theatricals is hardly

surprising when it is remembered how closely identified with the drama

have been many members of the Staff. Douglas Jerrold was a successful

playwright before ever _Punch_ was heard of, and as the author of

"Black-Eyed Susan" and "Time Works Wonders" he made his name popular

with many who had hardly heard of his connection with "the great comic."

It has been computed that the _Punch_ writers, from first to last, have

contributed no fewer than five hundred plays to the stage; and it may be

mentioned as a curious fact that to "German Reed's" each successive

Editor of _Punch_ has contributed an "Entertainment." The Staff has on

several occasions been seen upon the boards; and on countless occasions

_Punch_ has figured there, usually against his will. It but sufficed for

_Punch_ to make a hit for hungry provincial actors, either of stock

companies or on tour, to pounce upon it and work it up into a play or an

entertainment. Jerrold's brother-in-law, W. J. Hammond, who was at one

time manager of the Strand Theatre, travelled with what must be

considered the authorised show, thus described:

* * * * *

"A new Entertainment, called a

NIGHT

with

PUNCH!

Founded on the Series of Celebrated Papers of that highly humorous

Periodical, from the pens of the acknowledged best Comic Writers of the

day. Adapted and Arranged by R. B. Peake, Esq. As performed by Mr. W. J.

Hammond Forty-two successive nights at the New Strand Theatre.... After

which, a Monopolylogue entitled the

LAST MAN;

or,

PUNCH OUT OF TOWN"

--with five characters, all performed by Hammond, the whole reaching its

climax when _Punch_, in _propria persona_, appeared and sang an

"Epilogue Song."

But it was Mrs. Caudle, of course, that offered a bait too tempting to

be resisted. There was Mrs. Keeley's authorised "Mrs. Caudle" in town;

but simultaneously Mrs. Caudles cropped up in every town in the country.

One of these was enacted by Mr. Warren, and his playbill of the Theatre

Royal, Gravesend, dated August 7th, 1845, is before me as I write. "The

REAL MRS. CAUDLE," he asserts, "having received an enthusiastic welcome

from a Gravesend audience, and being pronounced far superior to any of

the _counterfeit Representatives_, will have the honour of repeating her

Curtain Lecture this and to-morrow evenings." "Mrs. Caudle at Gravesend"

was, in fact, a "Comic Sketch" by C. Z. Barnett; and the programme

decorated with a common engraving in impudent imitation of Leech's

immortal cut, contained all the _dramatis personæ_ of Jerrold's little

domestic drama, including "Mrs. Caudle (the Original from _Punch's_

Papers), Mr. WARREN."

Six years later Mr. Briggs himself was lifted from _Punch_ on to the

stage (amongst others) of the Royal Marylebone Theatre, which then

assiduously cultivated the equestrian drama. On November 14th, 1851, for

the benefit of a lady called MRS. MORETON BROOKES, there was played a

"new grand dramatic equestrian spectacle, entitled the MAID OF

SARAGOSSA; OR, THE DUMB SPY AND STEED OF ARRAGON--realising Sir David

Wilkie's Celebrated Picture." As the Arragon Steed remained on the

premises when the curtain fell on the first piece, it was obviously a

pity to waste him; so, after he had finished realising Wilkie's picture,

and had rested awhile, he stepped out of romance into high comedy, or,

as the playbill simply put it--"After which will be presented from

Sketches furnished from PUNCH'S Domicile, Fleet Street, a New, Grand,

Locomotive, Pedestrian, Equestrian, Go-ahead Extravaganza, entitled

=MR. BRIGGS=!

Or, HOUSE KEEPING _versus_ HORSE KEEPING"--

in which Mr. Briggs was played by Mr. Crowther, and Mrs. Briggs by the

fair _beneficiaire_.

The first dramatic effort of _Punch_, in his individual quality and

personality as a jester, was the pantomime of "King John, or Harlequin

and Magna Charta." _Punch_ had at that time become so popular, and was

so generally regarded as the incarnation of all that was witty, that a

commission was given for a pantomime that was to surpass for wit and

humour any pantomime that had ever been written or thought of before.

"They have given out," said Alfred Bunn in his vituperative "Word with

Punch," "in distinct terms that none but themselves can write a

pantomime, and modestly entitled the one they _did_ write '_Punch's_

Pantomime' ... which they laboured so lustily, but so vainly, to puff

into notoriety." It was written in 1842, by Lemon, Jerrold, and Henry

Mayhew; but when it was read by the first-named to the Covent Garden

Company, by whom it was produced, it was found to contain a great deal

of wit, but very little fun. It was extensively amended in response to

the representations of the pantomimists, and W. H. Payne managed to make

a good deal of his part. The wit, however, militated greatly against the

"go" and success of the piece, the prestige of its writers did not help

it, and the experiment of a "_Punch's_ Pantomime" was accordingly not

repeated.

The cordial sympathy that has bound together so many of _Punch's_ Staff

in life has more than once taken the form of kindly charity in death or

misfortune. To the performance given on behalf of the unhappy Angus

Reach reference is made where the man and his work are considered. For

Leigh Hunt--although he was not of the band--a theatrical performance

was also given, and realised a large sum, and the benefit in aid of

Charles H. Bennett's widow and children was even more successful. That

interesting event is described later; but for the sake of history it may

be well to reproduce the programme here:--

AMATEUR PERFORMANCE AT THE THEATRE ROYAL, MANCHESTER,

(kindly placed at the disposal of the committee by John Knowles,

Esq.,)

MONDAY EVENING, JULY 29, 1867.

To commence with an entirely new and original Triumviretta, in one

act and ten tableaux (being a lyrical version of Mr. Maddison

Morton's celebrated farce of "Box and Cox"), by Mr. F. C. BURNAND,

entitled--

COX AND BOX;

OR, THE LONG-LOST BROTHERS.

The Lodging, including the Little Second-floor Back Room, has been

furnished with

ORIGINAL MUSIC by Mr. ARTHUR SULLIVAN.

John Cox, a Journeyman Hatter Mr. QUINTIN

James Box, a Journeyman Printer Mr. G. DU MAURIER.

Bouncer, late of the Hampshire Yeomanry,

with military reminiscences Mr. ARTHUR BLUNT.

Scene--An elegantly furnished apartment in Bouncer's Mansion.

[Illustration: FOR CHARLES H. BENNETT'S BENEFIT. (See p. 132)

MR. ARTHUR LEWIS MR. TWISS SIR JOHN TENNIEL R. T. PRITCHETT

SHIRLEY BROOKS MARK LEMON ARTHUR CECIL (BLUNT) HENRY SILVER

SIR ARTHUR SULLIVAN MISS ELLEN TERRY MR DU MAURIER MISS KATE TERRY

TOM TAYLOR

(_By Permission of the London. Stereoscopic Company._)]

Tableaux--1. Cox at his looking-glass.--2. Cox and Bouncer, the

trial of the hat.--3. The beauties of bacon.--4. Revenons à nos

moutons.--5. The stranger!--6. The duel!!--7. The gamblers. The

hazard. The false die.--8. "Reading of the will."--9. (A classical

study.) Penelope.--10. Knox! et præterea nil.

Mr. SHIRLEY BROOKS will deliver an ADDRESS.

After which will be performed Mr. Tom Taylor's popular Drama,

A SHEEP IN WOLF'S CLOTHING.

Colonel Percy Kirke, of Kirke's Lambs Mr. MARK LEMON.

Colonel Lord Churchill, of the Life Guards Mr. JOHN TENNIEL.

Master Jasper Carew Mr. TOM TAYLOR.

Kester Chedzoy Mr. F. C. BURNAND.

Corporal Flintoff } { Mr. HORACE MAYHEW.

Hackett } of Kirke's Lambs { Mr. HENRY SILVER.

Rasper } { Mr. R. T. PRITCHETT.

John Zoyland, a Locksmith Mr. SHIRLEY BROOKS.

Dame Carew, Wife of Jasper Carew (by the kind

permission of B. Webster, Esq.) Miss KATE TERRY.

Dame Carew, Mother of Jasper Carew Mrs. STOKER.

Sibyl, Daughter of Jasper Carew Miss FLORENCE TERRY.

Keziah Mapletoft, Servant to Anne Miss ELLEN TERRY (Mrs. Watts).

To be followed by J. Offenbach's Bouffonnerie Musicale,

LES DEUX AVEUGLES.

Stanislas Giraffier Mons. G. Du Maurier.

Giacomo Patachon Mons. Hal. Power.

To conclude with Mr. John Oxenford's Farce, in one Act,

A FAMILY FAILING.

Characters by Messrs. ARTHUR BLUNT, MARK LEMON, TOM TAYLOR, HENRY

SILVER, and Miss ELLEN TERRY.

Tickets for the Dress Circle and Stalls, One Guinea each, may be

obtained from any Member of the Committee; at the Theatre Royal;

from Messrs. Hime and Addison, and Mr. Slater, St. Ann's Square;

and Messrs. Forsyth, St. Ann's Street.

On this occasion, says an anonymous writer, "The celebrated cartoonist

received the reception of the evening. The audience rose _en masse_ and

cheered. Tom Taylor, playing in his own piece the principal character,

was, comparatively speaking, nowhere. The most interesting personality

of the _Punch_ Staff was unquestionably Tenniel."

Affiliated with _Punch_, in its membership at least, was that "Guild of

Literature and Art" of which Charles Dickens was the father. Its

theatrical career began in 1845 at the Royalty Theatre, Soho, at that

time called Miss Kelly's, the initial performance being Ben Jonson's

"Every Man in his Humour," with Mark Lemon as Brainworm and Dickens as

Bobadil. (_See p. 137._) On May 15th, 1848, much the same company, in

aid of the fund for the endowment of the perpetual curatorship of

Shakespeare's house at Stratford-on-Avon, gave the "Merry Wives of

Windsor," when Dickens played Shallow; George Cruikshank, Pistol; John

Leech, Slender; Mark Lemon, Falstaff; and other characters were

represented by George Henry Lewes, John Forster, Dudley Costello,

Augustus Egg, R.A., and Mr. Cowden Clarke--a goodly company. Mr. Sala

says that Lemon's conception of Falstaff (which was also known to the

public through the jovial editor's "readings"), though well understood,

was "the worst he ever saw;" but Mrs. Cowden Clarke declared it "a fine

embodiment of rich, unctuous raciness, no caricature, rolling greasiness

and grossness, no exaggerated vulgarisation of Shakespeare's

immortal 'fat knight,' but a florid, rotund, self-indulgent

voluptuary--thoroughly at his ease, thoroughly prepared to take

advantage of all gratification that might come in his way, and

thoroughly preserving the manners of a gentleman accustomed to the

companionship of a prince. John Leech's Master Slender," she continues,

"was picturesquely true to the gawky, flabby, booty squire.... His mode

of sitting on a stile, with his long ungainly legs dangling down ...

ever and anon ejaculating his maudlin cuckoo cry of 'Oh sweet Ann Page,'

was a delectable treat." Without disrespect to Leech's memory, it may be

said that others of his friends did not form a similarly favourable

opinion of his histrionic powers.

A company quite as notable in its way was that which played "Not so Bad

as We Seem," by Lytton (with whom _Punch_ had made his peace), at

Devonshire House, on May 27th, 1851, before the Queen and the Prince

Consort, at the instance of the Duke of Devonshire. The playbill

deserves to be preserved here, although the only _Punch_ names among the

actors are those of Jerrold, Lemon, and Tenniel--the last-named of whom

is the only survivor of them all.

MEN.

The Duke of Middlesex { Peers Attached To the Son } Mr. Frank Stone,

A.R.A.

The Earl of Loftus { of James II., Commonly } Mr. Dudley Costello

{ Called the First Pretender

Lord Wilmot { a Young Man at the Head } Mr. Charles Dickens

{ of the Mode More Than a }

{ Century Ago, Son To Lord }

{ Loftus }

Mr. Shadowly Softhead { a Young Gentleman From the } Mr. Douglas Jerrold

{ City, Friend and Double }

{ of Lord Wilmot }

Mr. Hardman { a Rising Member of } Mr. John Forster

Parliament

{ and Adherent To Sir }

{ Robert Walpole }

Sir Geoffrey Thornside{ a Gentleman of Good Family } Mr. Mark Lemon

{ and Estate }

Mr. Goodenough Easy { in Business, Highly } Mr. F. W. Topham

Respectable,

{ and a Friend of Sir }

{ Geoffrey }

Lord le Trimmer } Frequenters of Wills' { Mr. Peter Cunningham

Sir Thomas Timid } Coffee House { Mr. Westland Marston

Colonel Flint } { Mr. R. H. Horne

Mr. Jacob Tonson a Bookseller Mr. Charles Knight

Smart Valet To Lord Wilmot Mr. Wilkie Collins

Hodge { Servant To Sir Geoffrey } Mr. John Tenniel

{ Thornside }

Paddy O'sullivan Mr. Fallen's Landlord Mr. Robert Bell

Mr. David Fallen { Grub Street Author and } Mr. Augustus Egg,

{ Pamphleteer } A.R.A.

Lord Strongbow, Sir John Bruin, Drawers, } Coffee House Loungers

Newsmen, Watchmen, &c. &c. }

WOMEN.

Lucy { Daughter to Sir Geoffrey } Mrs. Compton

{ Thornside }

Barbara Daughter to Mr. Easy. Miss Ellen Chaplin

The Silent Lady of Deadman's Lane.

Date of Play--The Reign of George I.

Scene--London.

Time supposed to be occupied, from the noon of the first day to the

afternoon of the second.

And, lastly, may be mentioned the performance of Ben Jonson's play at

Knebworth, in which, says Vizetelly, Douglas Jerrold, as Master Stephen,

showed real talent and power. But the piece is not an entertaining one,

as Lord Melbourne--with his bad habit of thinking aloud--bore

disconcerting witness in his stall: "I knew well enough that the play

would be dull, but not so damnably dull as this!"

KNEBWORTH.

ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 18th, 1850,

WILL BE PERFORMED

BEN JONSON'S COMEDY

OF

EVERY MAN

IN

HIS HUMOUR.

Costumiers. Messers. NATHAN, of Titchborne Street. Perruqiuer. Mr.

WILSON, of the Strand.

Knowell, (_an Old Gentleman_) Mr. DELME RADCLIFFE,

Edward Knowell, (_his Son_) Mr. HENRY HAWKINS,

Brainworm, (_the Father's Man_) Mr. MARK LEMON,

George Downright, (_a Plain Squire_) Mr. FRANK STONE,

Wellbred, (_his Half-brother_) Mr. HENRY HALE,

Kitely, (_a Merchant_) Mr. JOHN FORSTER,

Captain Bobadil, (_a Paul's Man_) Mr. CHARLES DICKENS,

Master Stephen, (_a Country Gull_) Mr. DOUGLAS JERROLD,

Master Matthew, (_the Town Gull_) Mr. JOHN LEECH,

Thomas Cash, (_Kitely's Cashier_) Mr. FREDERICK DICKENS,

Oliver Cobb, (_a Water-bearer_) Mr. AUGUSTUS EGG,

Justice Clement, (_an old merry Magistrate_) The HON. ELIOT YORKE,

Roger Formal, (_his Clerk_) Mr. PHANTOM,

Dame Kitely, (_Kitely's Wife_) Miss ANNE ROMER,

Mistress Bridget, (_his Sister_) Miss HOGARTH,

Tib, (_Cob's Wife_) Mrs. MARK LEMON,

(Who has most kindly consented to act, in lieu

of Mrs. CHARLES DICKENS, disabled by an accident.)

THE EPILOGUE BY MR. DELME RADCLIFFE.

To conclude with MRS. INCHBALD'S Farce of

ANIMAL MAGNETISM.

The Doctor Mr. CHARLES DICKENS,

La Fleur Mr. MARK LEMON,

The Marquis de Lancy Mr. JOHN LEECH,

Jeffery Mr. AUGUSTUS EGG,

Constance Miss HOGARTH,

Lisette Miss ANNE ROMER.

Stage Manager, MR. CHARLES DICKENS.

The Theatre will be open at HALF-PAST SIX. The Performance will begin

precisely at HALF-PAST SEVEN.

=GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!=

FOR THE GUILD OF LITERATURE AND ART. (_See p. 135._)

The History of "Punch" · 第 5 / 23 章