I have already had occasion to refer, in my last Lecture, to water as a

chemical substance, as a compound containing and consisting of hydrogen

and oxygen. What are these water constituents, hydrogen and oxygen? Each

of them is a gas, but each a gas having totally different properties. On

decomposing water and collecting the one of these two gases, the

hydrogen gas, in one vessel, and the other, the oxygen gas, in another

vessel, twice as large a volume of hydrogen gas is given off by the

decomposing water as of oxygen. You may now notice a certain meaning in

the formula assigned to water, H_{2}O: two volumes of hydrogen combined

with one of oxygen; and it may be added that when such combination takes

place, not three volumes of resulting water vapour (steam), but two

volumes are produced. This combination of the two gases, when mixed

together, is determined by heating to a high temperature, or by passing

an electric spark; it then takes place with the consequent sudden

condensation of three volumes of mixture to two of compound, so as to

cause an explosion. I may also mention that as regards the weights of

these bodies, oxygen and hydrogen, the first is sixteen times as heavy

as the second; and since we adopt hydrogen as the unit, we may consider

H to stand for hydrogen, and also to signify 1--the unit; whilst O

means oxygen, and also 16. Hence the compound atom or molecule of

water, H_{2}O, weighs 18. I must now show you that these two gases are

possessed of totally different properties. Some gases will extinguish a

flame; some will cause the flame to burn brilliantly, but will not burn

themselves; and some will take fire and burn themselves, though

extinguishing the flame which has ignited them. We say the first are

non-combustible, and will not support combustion; the second are

supporters of combustion, the third are combustible gases. Of course

these are, as the lawyers say, only _ex parte_ statements of the truth;

still they are usually accepted. Oxygen gas will ignite a red-hot match,

but hydrogen will extinguish an inflamed one, though it will itself

burn. You generally think of water as the great antithesis of, the

universal antidote for, fire. The truth is here again only of an _ex

parte_ character, as I will show you. If I can, by means of a substance

having a more intense affinity for oxygen than hydrogen has, rob water

of its oxygen, I necessarily set the hydrogen that was combined with

that oxygen free. If the heat caused by the chemical struggle, so to

say, is great, that hydrogen will be inflamed and burn. Thus we are

destroying that antithesis, we are causing the water to yield us fire. I

will do this by putting potassium on water, and even in the cold this

potassium will seize upon the oxygen of the water, and the hydrogen will

take fire.

_Specific Gravity._--We must now hasten to other considerations of

importance. Water is generally taken as the unit in specific gravities

assigned to liquids and solids. This simply means that when we desire to

express how heavy a thing is, we are compelled to say it is so many

times heavier or lighter than something. That something is generally

water, which is regarded, consequently, as unit or figure 1. A body of

specific gravity 1·5, or 1-1/2, means that that body is 1-1/2 or 1·5

times as heavy as water. As hat manufacturers, you will have mostly to

do with the specific gravities of liquids, aqueous solutions, and you

will hear more of Twaddell degrees. The Twaddell hydrometer, or

instrument for measuring the specific gravities of liquids, is so

constructed that when it stands in water, the water is just level with

its zero or 0° mark. Well, since in your reading of methods and new

processes, you will often meet with specific gravity numbers and desire

to convert these into Twaddell degrees, I will give you a simple means

of doing this. Add cyphers so as to make into a number of four figures,

then strike out the unit and decimal point farthest to the left, and

divide the residue by 5, and you get the corresponding Twaddell degrees.

If you have Twaddell degrees, simply multiply by 5, and add 1000 to the

result, and you get the specific gravity as usually taken, with water as

the unit, or in this case as 1000. An instrument much used on the

Continent is the Beaumé hydrometer. The degrees (_n_) indicated by this

instrument can be converted into specific gravity (_d_) by the

formula: _d_ = 144·3/(144·3 - n)

_Ebullition or Boiling of Water, Steam._--The atmosphere around us is

composed of a mixture of nitrogen and oxygen gases; not a compound of

these gases, as water is of hydrogen and oxygen, but a mixture more like

sand and water or smoke and air. This mass of gases has weight, and

presses upon objects at the surface of the earth to the extent of 15 lb.

on the square inch. Now some liquids, such as water, were it not for

this atmospheric pressure, would not remain liquids at all, but would

become gases. The pressure thus tends to squeeze gases together and

convert them into liquids. Any force that causes gases to contract will

do the same thing, of course--for example, cold; and _ceteris paribus_

removal of pressure and expansion by heat will act so as to gasify

liquids. When in the expansion of liquids a certain stage or degree is

reached, different for different liquids, gas begins to escape so

quickly from the liquid that bubbles of vapour are continually formed

and escape. This is called ebullition or boiling. A certain removal of

pressure, or expansion by heat, is necessary to produce this, _i.e._ to

reach the boiling-point of the liquid. As regards the heat necessary for

the boiling of water at the surface of the earth, _i.e._ under the

atmospheric pressure of 15 lb. on the square inch, this is shown on the

thermometer of Fahrenheit as 212°, and on the simpler centigrade one, as

100°, water freezing at 0° C. But if what I have said is true, when we

remove some of the atmospheric pressure, the water should boil with a

less heat than will cause the mercury in the thermometer to rise to 100°

C., and if we take off all the pressure, the water ought to boil and

freeze at the same time. This actually happens in the Carré ice-making

machine. The question now arises, "Why does the water freeze in the

Carré machine?" All substances require certain amounts of heat to enable

them to take and to maintain the liquid state if they are ordinarily

solid, and the gaseous state if ordinarily liquid or solid, and the

greater the change of state the greater the heat needed. Moreover, this

heat does not make them warm, it is simply absorbed or swallowed up, and

becomes latent, and is merely necessary to maintain the new condition

assumed. In the case of the Carré machine, liquid water is, by removal

of the atmospheric pressure, coerced, as it were, to take the gaseous

form. But to do so it needs to absorb the requisite amount of heat to

aid it in taking that form, and this heat it must take up from all

surrounding warm objects. It absorbs quickly all it can get out of

itself as liquid water, out of the glass vessel containing it, and from

the surrounding air. But the process of gasification with ebullition

goes on so quickly that the temperature of the water thus robbed of heat

quickly falls to 0° C., and the remaining water freezes. Thus, then, by

pumping out the air from a vessel, _i.e._ working in a vacuum, we can

boil a liquid in such exhausted vessel far below its ordinary boiling

temperature in the open air. This fact is of the utmost industrial

importance. But touching this question of latent heat, you may ask me

for my proof that there is latent heat, and a large amount of it, in a

substance that feels perfectly cold. I have told you that a gasified

liquid, or a liquefied solid, or most of all a gasified solid, contains

such heat, and if reconverted into liquid and solid forms respectively,

that heat is evolved, or becomes sensible heat, and then it can be

decidedly felt and indicated by the thermometer. Take the case of a

liquid suddenly solidifying. The heat latent in that liquid, and

necessary to keep it a liquid, is no longer necessary and comes out, and

the substance appears to become hot. Quicklime is a cold, white, solid

substance, but there is a compound of water and lime--slaked lime--which

is also a solid powdery substance, called by the chemist, hydrate of

lime. The water used to slake the quicklime is a liquid, and it may be

ice-cold water, but to form hydrate of lime it must assume a solid form,

and hence can and does dispense with its heat of liquefaction in the

change of state. You all know how hot lime becomes on slaking with

water. Of course we have heat of chemical combination here as well as

evolution of latent heat. As another example, we may take a solution of

acetate of soda, so strong that it is just on the point of

crystallising. If it crystallises it solidifies, and the liquid

consequently gives up its latent heat of liquefaction. We will make it

crystallise, first connecting the tube containing it to another one

containing a coloured liquid and closed by a cork carrying a narrow tube

dipping into the coloured liquid. On crystallising, the solution gives

off heat, as is shown by the expansion of the air in the corked tube,

and the consequent forcing of the coloured liquid up the narrow tube.

Consequently in your works you never dissolve a salt or crystal in water

or other liquid without rendering heat latent, or consuming heat; you

never allow steam to condense in the steam pipes about the premises

without losing vastly more heat than possibly many are aware of. Let us

inquire as to the latent heat of water and of steam.

_Latent Heats of Water and Steam._--If we mix 1 kilogram (about 2 lb.)

of ice (of course at zero or 0° C.) with 1 kilogram of water at 79° C.,

and stir well till the ice is melted, _i.e._ has changed its state from

solid to liquid, we find, on putting a thermometer in, the temperature

is only 0° C. This simply means that 79° of heat (centigrade degrees)

have become latent, and represent the heat of liquefaction of 1 kilogram

of ice. Had we mixed 1 kilogram of water at 0° C. with 1 kilogram of

water at 79° C. there would have been no change of state, and the

temperature of the mixture might be represented as a distribution of the

79° C. through the whole mass of the 2 kilograms, and so would be

39-1/2° C. We say, therefore, the latent heat of water is the heat which

is absorbed or rendered latent when a unit of weight, say 1 kilogram of

water as ice, melts and liquefies to a unit of water at zero, or it is

79 heat units. These 79 units of heat would raise 79 units of weight of

liquid water through 1° C., or one unit of liquid water through 79°.

Let us now inquire what the latent heat of steam is. If we take 1

kilogram of water at 0° C. and blow steam from boiling water at 100° C.

into it until the water just boils, and then stop and weigh the

resulting water, we shall find it amounts to 1·187 kilograms, so that

0·187 kilogram of water which was in the gaseous steam form, and had

besides a sensible heat of 100° C., has changed its state to that of

liquid water. This liquid water, being at the boiling-point, has still

the 100° C. of sensible heat, and hence the water in the gaseous steam

form can have given up to the water at 0° C. into which it was blown,

only the latent heat of gasification which was not sensible, but by

virtue of which it was enabled to assume the gaseous form. But if 0·187

kilogram of steam at 100° C. can heat 1 kilogram of water through 100

degrees, then 1 kilogram of steam can raise 5·36 kilograms of ice-cold

water through 100 degrees, or 536 kilograms through 1 degree, and thus

the latent heat of steam is 536 heat units.

_Effect of Increase of Pressure on the Boiling of Water._--Now we have

referred to diminution of pressure and its effect on the boiling-point

of water, and I may point out that by increasing the pressure, such,

_e.g._, as boiling water under a high pressure of steam, you raise the

boiling-point. There are some industrial operations in which the action

of certain boiling solutions is unavailing to effect certain

decompositions or other ends when the boiling is carried on under the

ordinary atmospheric pressure, and boiling in closed and strong vessels

under pressure must be resorted to. Take as an example the wood-pulp

process for making paper from wood shavings. Boiling in open pans with

caustic soda lye is insufficient to reduce the wood to pulp, and so

boiling in strong vessels under pressure is adopted. The temperature of

the solution rises far above 212° F. (100° C.). Let us see what may

result chemically from the attainment of such high temperatures of water

in our steam boilers working under high pressures. If you blow ordinary

steam at 212° F. or 100° C., into fats or oils, the fats and oils remain

undecomposed; but suppose you let fatty and oily matters of animal or

vegetable origin, such as lubricants, get into your boiler feed-water

and so into your boiler, what will happen? I have only to tell you that

a process is patented for decomposing fats with superheated steam, to

drive or distil over the admixed fatty acids and glycerin, in order to

show you that in your boilers such greasy matters will be more or less

decomposed. Fats are neutral as fats, and will not injure the iron of

the boilers; but once decompose them and they are split up into an acid

called a fat acid, and glycerin. That fat acid at the high temperature

soon attacks your boilers and pipes, and eats away the iron. That is one

of the curious results that may follow at such high temperatures.

Mineral or hydrocarbon oils do not contain these fat acids, and so

cannot possibly, even with high-pressure steam, corrode the boiler

metal.

_Effect of Dissolved Salts on the Boiling of Water._--Let us inquire

what this effect is? Suppose we dissolve a quantity of a salt in water,

and then blow steam at 100° C. (212° F.) into that water, the latter

will boil not at 212° F., but at a higher temperature. There is a

certain industrial process I know of, in course of which it is necessary

first to maintain a vessel containing water, by means of a heated closed

steam coil, at 212° F. (100° C.), and at a certain stage to raise the

temperature to about 327° F. (164° C.). The pressure on the boiler

connected with the steam coil is raised to nearly seven atmospheres, and

thus the heat of the high-pressure steam rises to 327° F. (164° C.), and

then a considerable quantity of nitrate of ammonium, a crystallised

salt, is thrown into the water, in which it dissolves. Strange to say,

although the water alone would boil at 212° F., a strong solution in

water of the ammonium nitrate only boils at 327° F., so that the effect

of dissolving that salt in the water is the same as if the pressure were

raised to seven atmospheres. Now let us, as hat manufacturers, learn a

practical lesson from this fact. We have observed that wool and fur

fibres are injured by boiling in pure water, and the heat has much to do

with this damage; but if the boiling take place in bichrome liquors or

similar solutions, that boiling will, according to the strength of the

solution in dissolved matters, take place at a temperature more or less

elevated above the boiling-point of water, and so the damage done will

be the more serious the more concentrated the liquors are, quite

independently of the nature of the substances dissolved in those

liquors.

_Solution._--We have already seen that when a salt of any kind dissolves

in water, heat is absorbed, and becomes latent; in other words, cold is

produced. I will describe a remarkable example or experiment, well

illustrating this fact. If you take some Glauber's salt, crystallised

sulphate of soda, and mix it with some hydrochloric acid (or spirits of

salt), then so rapidly will the solution proceed, and consequently so

great will be the demand for heat, that if a vessel containing water be

put in amongst the dissolving salt, the heat residing in that vessel and

its water will be rapidly extracted, and the water will freeze. As

regards solubility, some salts and substances are much more quickly and

easily dissolved than others. We are generally accustomed to think that

to dissolve a substance quickly we cannot do better than build a fire

under the containing vessel, and heat the liquid. This is often the

correct method of proceeding, but not always. Thus it would mean simply

loss of fuel, and so waste of heat, to do this in dissolving ordinary

table salt or rock salt in water, for salt is as soluble in cold water

as in hot. Some salts are, incredible though it may appear, less soluble

in boiling water than in cold. Water just above the freezing-point

dissolves nearly twice as much lime as it does when boiling. You see,

then, that a knowledge of certain important facts like these may be so

used as to considerably mitigate your coal bills, under given

circumstances and conditions.

LECTURE IV

WATER: ITS CHEMISTRY AND PROPERTIES; IMPURITIES AND THEIR ACTION; TESTS

OF PURITY--_Continued_

The Chemistry of Hat Manufacturing Lectures Delivered Before the Hat Manufacturers' Association · 第 2 / 11 段