HOYLE, EDMUND, or EDMOND (1672-1769), the first systematizer of the laws

of whist, and author of a book on games, was born in 1672. His parentage

and place of birth are unknown, and few details of his life are

recorded. For some time he was resident in London, and partially

supported himself by giving instruction in the game of whist. For the

use of his pupils he drew up a _Short Treatise_ on the game, which after

circulating for some time in manuscript was printed by him and entered

at Stationers' Hall in November 1742. The laws of Hoyle continued to be

regarded as authoritative until 1864, since which time they have been

gradually superseded by the new rules adopted by the Arlington and

Portland clubs in that year (see Whist). He also published rules for

various other games, and his book on games, which includes the _Short

Treatise_, has passed into many editions. The weight of his authority is

indicated by the phrase "according to Hoyle," which, doubtless first

applied with reference to whist, has gained currency as a general

proverb. Hoyle died in London on the 29th of August 1769.

HOZIER, PIERRE D', SEIGNEUR DE LA GARDE (1592-1660), French genealogist,

was born at Marseilles on the 10th of July 1592. In 1616 he entered upon

some very extensive researches into the genealogy of the noble families

of the kingdom, in which work he was aided by his prodigious memory for

dates, names and family relationships, as well as by his profound

knowledge of heraldry. In 1634 he was appointed historiographer and

genealogist of France, and in 1641 _juge d'armes_ of France, an officer

corresponding nearly to the Garter king-of-arms in England. In 1643 he

was employed to verify the claims to nobility of the pages and equerries

of the king's household. He accumulated a large number of documents, but

published comparatively little, his principal works being _Recueil

armorial des anciennes maisons de Bretagne_ (1638); _Les noms, surnoms,

qualitez, armes et blasons des chevaliers et officiers de l'ordre du

Saint-Esprit_ (1634); and the genealogies of the houses of La

Rochefoucauld (1654), Bournonville (1657) and Amanze (1659). He was

renowned as much for his uprightness as for his knowledge, no slight

praise in a profession exposed to so many temptations to fraud. He died

in Paris on the 1st of December 1660. At his death his collections

comprised more than 150 volumes or portfolios of documents and papers

relating to the genealogy of the principal families in France. Of his

six sons, only two survived him. His eldest son, Louis Roger d'Hozier

(1634-1708), succeeded him as _juge d'armes_, but became blind in 1675,

and was obliged to surrender his office to his brother.

CHARLES RENE D'HOZIER (1640-1732), younger son of Pierre, was the true

continuator of his father. In addition to his commentary appended to

Antoine Varillas's history of King Charles IX. (1686 ed.), he published

_Recherches sur la noblesse de Champagne_ (1673). On the promulgation in

1696 of an edict directing all who had armorial bearings to register

them on payment of 20 livres, he was employed to collect the

declarations returned in the various _generalites_, and established the

_Armorial general de France_. This work, which contained not only the

armorial bearings of noble families, but also of those commoners who

were entitled to bear arms, is not complete, inasmuch as many refused to

register their arms, either from vanity or from a desire to evade the

fee.

The collection (now in the Bibliotheque Nationale) consists of 34

volumes of text and 35 of coloured armorial bearings, and in spite of

its deficiencies is a useful store of information for the history of

the old French families. It contains 60,000 names, grouped according

to provinces and provincial subdivisions. The sections relating to

Burgundy and Franche-Comte were published by Henri Bouchot

(1875-1876): those relating to the _generalite_ of Limoges, by Moreau

de Pravieux (1895); and those for the _election_ of Reims, by P.

Gosset (1903).

In 1717, in consequence of a quarrel with his nephew Louis Pierre, son

of Louis Roger, Charles sold his collection to the king. It then

comprised 160 portfolios of genealogical papers arranged alphabetically,

175 volumes of documents, and numerous printed books profusely

annotated. In 1720 it was inventoried by P. de Clairambault, who added a

certain number of genealogies taken from the papers of F. R. de

Gaignieres, increasing the total to 217 boxes and portfolios. Thus

originated the _Cabinet des titres_ of the Bibliotheque Nationale.

Charles subsequently became reconciled to his nephew, to whom he left

all the papers he had accumulated from the date of the quarrel until his

death, which occurred in Paris on the 13th of February 1732.

LOUIS PIERRE D'HOZIER (1685-1767), son of Louis Roger, succeeded his

uncle Charles as _juge d'armes_. He published the _Armorial general, ou

registre de la noblesse de France_ (10 vols., 1738-1768), which must not

be confounded with the publication mentioned above, inasmuch as it

related solely to noble families and was not an official collection.

Complete copies of this work, which should contain six _registres_, are

comparatively rare. A seventh _registre_, forming vol. xi., prepared by

Ambroise Louis Marie, nephew of Louis Pierre, was published in 1847 by

comte Charles d'Hozier. Louis Pierre died on the 25th of September 1767.

His eldest son, Antoine Marie d'Hozier de Serigny (1721-c. 1810), was

his father's collaborator and continuator; and his fourth son, Jean

Francois Louis, wrote an account of the knights of St Michael in the

province of Poitou, which was published in 1896 by the vicomte P. de

Chabot.

His nephew, AMBROISE LOUIS MARIE D'HOZIER (1764-1846), was the last of

the _juges d'armes_ of France. He held the position of president of the

_cour des comptes, aides et finances_ of Normandy, and was therefore

generally known as President d'Hozier, to distinguish him from the other

members of the family. After the Restoration he was employed to verify

French armorial bearings for the _conseil du sceau des titres_. He died

in obscurity. His collection, which was purchased in 1851 by the

Bibliotheque Nationale, comprised 136 volumes, 165 portfolios of

documents and 200 packets of extracts from title-deeds, known as the

_Carres d'Hozier_.

ABRAHAM CHARLES AUGUSTE D'HOZIER (1775-1846), who also belonged to his

family, was implicated in the conspiracy of Georges Cadoudal, and was

condemned to death, but Bonaparte spared his life. He did not, however,

recover his liberty until after the fall of the emperor, and died at

Versailles on the 24th of August 1846. (C. B.*)

HRABANUS MAURUS MAGNENTIUS (c. 776-856), archbishop of Mainz, and one of

the most prominent teachers and writers of the Carolingian age, was born

of noble parents at Mainz. Less correct forms of his name are Rabanus

and Rhabanus. The date of his birth is uncertain, but in 801 he received

deacon's orders at Fulda, where he had been sent to school; in the

following year, at the instance of Ratgar, his abbot, he went together

with Haimon (afterwards of Halberstadt) to complete his studies at Tours

under Alcuin, who in recognition of his diligence and purity gave him

the surname of Maurus, after St Maur the favourite disciple of Benedict.

Returning after the lapse of two years to Fulda, he was entrusted with

the principal charge of the school, which under his direction rose into

a state of great efficiency for that age, and sent forth such pupils as

Walafrid Strabo, Servatus Lupus of Ferieres and Otfrid of Weissenburg.

At this period it is most probable that his _Excerptio_ from the grammar

of Priscian, long so popular as a text-book during the middle ages, was

compiled. In 814 he was ordained a priest; but shortly afterwards,

apparently on account of disagreement with Ratgar, he was compelled to

withdraw for a time from Fulda. This "banishment" is understood to have

occasioned the pilgrimage to Palestine to which he alludes in his

commentary on Joshua. He returned to Fulda on the election of a new

abbot (Eigil) in 817, upon whose death in 822 he himself became abbot.

The duties of this office he discharged with efficiency and success

until 842, when, in order to secure greater leisure for literature and

for devotion, he resigned and retired to the neighbouring cloister of St

Peter's. In 847 he was again constrained to enter public life by his

election to succeed Otgar in the archbishopric of Mainz, which see he

occupied for upwards of eight years. The principal incidents of

historical interest belonging to this period of his life were those

which arose out of his relations to Gottschalk (q.v.): they may be

regarded as thoroughly typical of that cruel intolerance which he shared

with all his contemporaries, and also of that ardent zeal which was

peculiar to himself; but they hardly do justice to the spirit of kindly

benevolence which in less trying circumstances he was ever ready to

display. He died at Winkel on the Rhine, on the 4th of February 856. He

is frequently referred to as St Rabanus, but incorrectly.

His voluminous works, many of which remain unpublished, comprise

commentaries on a considerable number of the books both of canonical

and of apocryphal Scripture (Genesis to Judges, Ruth, Kings,

Chronicles, Judith, Esther, Canticles, Proverbs, Wisdom,

Ecclesiasticus, Jeremiah, Lamentations, Ezekiel, Maccabees, Matthew,

the Epistles of St Paul, including Hebrews); and various treatises

relating to doctrinal and practical subjects, including more than one

series of Homilies. Perhaps the most important is that _De

institutione clericorum_, in three books, by which he did much to

bring into prominence the views of Augustine and Gregory the Great as

to the training which was requisite for a right discharge of the

clerical function; the most popular has been a comparatively worthless

tract _De laudibus sanctae crucis_. Among the others may be mentioned

the _De universo libri xxii., sive etymologiarum opus_, a kind of

dictionary or encyclopaedia, designed as a help towards the historical

and mystical interpretation of Scripture, the _De sacris ordinibus_,

the _De disciplina ecclesiastica_ and the _Martyrologium_. All of them

are characterized by erudition (he knew even some Greek and Hebrew)

rather than by originality of thought. The poems are of singularly

little interest or value, except as including one form of the "Veni

Creator." In the annals of German philology a special interest

attaches to the _Glossaria Latino-Theodisca_. A commentary, _Super

Porphyrium_, printed by Cousin in 1836 among the _Ouvrages inedits

d'Abelard_, and assigned both by that editor and by Haureau to

Hrabanus Maurus, is now generally believed to have been the work of a

disciple.

The first nominally complete edition of the works of Hrabanus Maurus

was that of Colvener (Cologne, 6 vols. fol., 1627). The _Opera omnia_

form vols. cvii.-cxii. of Migne's _Patrologiae cursus completus_. The

_De universo_ is the subject of _Compendium der Naturwissenschaften an

der Schule zu Fulda im IX. Jahrhundert_ (Berlin, 1880). Maurus is the

subject of monographs by Schwarz (_De Rhabano Mauro primo Germaniae

praeceptore_, 1811), Kunstmann (_Historische Monographie uber Hrabanus

Magnentius Maurus_, 1841), Spengler (_Leben des heil. Rhabanus

Maurus_, 1856) and Kohler (_Rhabanus Maurus u. die Schule zu Fulda_,

1870). _Lives_ by his disciple Rudolphus and by Joannes Trithemius are

printed in the Cologne edition of the _Opera_. See also Pertz, _Monum.

Germ. Hist._ (i. and ii.); Bahr, _Gesch. d. romischen Literatur im

Karoling. Zeitalter_ (1840), and Hauck's article in the Herzog-Hauck

_Realencyklopadie_, ed. 3.

HROLFR KRAKI, perhaps the most famous of the Danish kings of the heroic

age. In _Beowulf_, where he is called Hrothwulf, he is represented as

reigning over Denmark in conjunction with his uncle Hrothgar, one of the

three sons of an earlier king called Healfdene. In the Old Norse sagas

Hrolfe is the son of Helgi (Halga), the son of Halfdan (Healfdene). He

is represented as a wealthy and peace-loving monarch similar to Hrothgar

in _Beowulf_, but the latter (Hroarr, or Roe) is quite overshadowed by

his nephew in the Northern authorities. The chief incidents in Hrolfr's

career are the visit which he paid to the Swedish king Aethils

(Beowulf's Eadgils), of which several different explanations are given,

and the war, in which he eventually lost his life, against his

brother-in-law Hiorvarethr. The name Kraki (pole-ladder) is said to have

been given to him on account of his great height by a young knight named

Voggr, whom he handsomely rewarded and who eventually avenged his death

on Hiorvarethr. There is no reason to doubt that Hrolfr was an

historical person and that he reigned in Denmark during the early years

of the 6th century, but the statement found in all the sagas that he was

the stepson of Aethils seems hardly compatible with the evidence of

_Beowulf_, which is a much earlier authority.

See Saxo Grammaticus, _Gesta Danorum_, pp. 52-68, ed. A. Holder

(Strassburg, 1886); and A. Olrik, _Danmarks Hettedigtning_

(Copenhagen, 1903).

HROSVITHA (frequently ROSWITHA, and properly HROTSUIT), early medieval

dramatist and chronicler, occupies a very notable position in the

history of modern European literature. Her endeavours formed part of the

literary activity by which the age of the emperor Otto the Great sought

to emulate that of Charles the Great. The famous nun of Gandersheim has

occasionally been confounded with her namesake, a learned abbess of the

same convent, who must have died at least half a century earlier. The

younger Hrosvitha was born in all probability about the year 935; and,

if the statement be correct that she sang the praises of the three

Ottos, she must have lived to near the close of the century. Some time

before the year 959 she entered the Benedictine nunnery of Gandersheim,

a foundation which was confined to ladies of German birth, and was

highly favoured by the Saxon dynasty. In 959 Gerberga, daughter of Duke

Henry of Bavaria and niece of the emperor Otto I., was consecrated

abbess of Gandersheim; and the earlier literary efforts of the youthful

Hrosvitha (whose own connexion with the royal family appears to be an

unauthenticated tradition) were encouraged by the still more youthful

abbess, and by a nun of the name of Richarda.

The literary works of Hrosvitha, all of which were as a matter of course

in Latin, divide themselves into three groups. Of these the first and

least important comprises eight narrative religious poems, in leonine

hexameters or distichs. Their subjects are the Nativity of the Virgin

(from the apocryphal gospel of St James, the brother of our Lord), the

Ascension and a series of legends of saints (Gandolph, Pelagius,

Theophilus, Basil, Denis, Agnes). Like these narrative poems, the dramas

to which above all Hrosvitha owes her fame seem to have been designed

for reading aloud or recitation by sisters of the convent. For though

there are indications that the idea of their representation was at least

present to the mind of the authoress, the fact of such a representation

appears to be an unwarrantable assumption. The comedies of Hrosvitha are

six in number, being doubtless in this respect also intended to recall

their nominal model, the comedies of Terence. They were devised on the

simple principle that the world, the flesh and the devil should not have

all the good plays to themselves. The experiment upon which the young

Christian dramatist ventured was accordingly, although not absolutely

novel, audacious enough. In form the dramas of "the strong voice of

Gandersheim," as Hrosvitha (possibly alluding to a supposed etymology of

her name) calls herself, are by no means Terentian. They are written in

prose, with an element of something like rhythm, and an occasional

admixture of rhyme. In their themes, and in the treatment of these, they

are what they were intended to be, the direct opposites of the lightsome

adapter of Menander. They are founded upon legends of the saints,

selected with a view to a glorification of religion in its supremest

efforts and most transcendental aspects. The emperor Constantine's

daughter, for example, Constantia, gives her hand in marriage to

_Gallicanus_, just before he starts on a Scythian campaign, though she

has already taken a vow of perpetual maidenhood. In the hour of battle

he is himself converted, and, having on his return like his virgin bride

chosen the more blessed unmarried state, dies as a Christian martyr in

exile. The three holy maidens, Agape, Chionia and Irene, are preserved

by a humorous miracle from the evil designs of _Dulcitius_, to offer up

their pure lives as a sacrifice under Diocletian's persecutions.

_Callimachus_, who has Romeo-like carried his earthly passion for the

saintly Drusiana into her tomb, and among its horrors has met with his

own death, is by the mediation of St John raised with her from the dead

to a Christian life. All these themes are treated with both spirit and

skill, often with instinctive knowledge of dramatic effect--often with

genuine touches of pathos and undeniable felicities of expression. In

_Dulcitius_ there is also an element of comedy, or rather of farce. How

far Hrosvitha's comedies were an isolated phenomenon of their age in

Germany must remain undecided; in the general history of the drama they

form the visible bridge between the few earlier attempts at utilizing

the forms of the classical drama for Christian purposes and the miracle

plays. They are in any case the productions of genius; nor has Hrosvitha

missed the usual tribute of the supposition that Shakespeare has

borrowed from her writings.

The third and last group of the writings of Hrosvitha is that of her

versified historical chronicles. At the request of the abbess Gerberga,

she composed her _Carmen de gestis Oddonis_, an epic attempting in some

degree to follow the great Roman model. It was completed by the year

968, and presented by the authoress to both the old emperor and his son

(then already crowned as) Otto II. This poem so closely adheres to the

materials supplied to the authoress by members of the imperial family

that, notwithstanding its courtly omissions, it is regarded as an

historical authority. Unfortunately only half of it remains; the part

treating of the period from 953 to 962 is lost with the exception of a

few fragments, and the period from 962 to 967 is summarized only.

Subsequently, in a poem (of 837 hexameters) _De primordiis et

fundatoribus coenobii Gandersheimensis_, Hrosvitha narrated the

beginnings of her own convent, and its history up to the year 919.

The Munich MS., which contains all the works enumerated above except

the _Chronicle of Gandersheim_, was edited by the great Vienna

humanist, Conrad Celtes, in 1501. The edition of Celtes was published

at Nuremberg, with eight wood-cuts by Albrecht Durer. It was re-edited

by H. L. Schurzfleisch and published at Wittenberg in 1707. The

comedies have been edited and translated into German by J. Bendixen

(Lubeck, 1857), and into French by C. Magnin (Paris, 1845), whose

introduction gives a full account of the authoress and her works. See

also her _Poesies latines_, with a translation into French verse by V.

Retif de la Bretonne (Paris, 1854). A copious analysis of her plays

will be found in Klein, _Geschichte des Dramas_, iii. 665-754. See

also W. Creizenach, _Geschichte des neueren Dramas_, i. 17 sqq.

(Halle, 1893), and A. W. Ward, _History of English Dramatic

Literature_, i. 6 sqq. (Cambridge, 1899). Gustav Freytag wrote a

dissertation, _De Rosuitha poetria_ (Breslau, 1839), to qualify

himself as an academical teacher, which, as he records (_Erinnerungen

aus meinem Leben_, Leipzig, 1887, p. 1839), showed "how impossible it

was to the German, a thousand years since, to compose dramatically";

and at the beginning of Albert Cohn's _Shakespeare in Germany_

(Berlin, 1865) Shakespearean parallels are suggested to certain

passages in Hrosvitha's dramas. Her two chronicles in verse were

edited by Z. H. Pertz in the _Monumenta Germaniae_, iv. 306-335

(Hanover, 1841). See also J. P. Migne, _Patrologiae curs. compl._

(Paris, 1853, vol. 137). The _Carmen_ was included by Leibnitz in his

_Scriptores rer. Brunsvic._ (Hanover, 1707-1711). For other early

editions of these see A. Potthast, _Bibliotheca historica medii aevi_

(supplement, Berlin, 1862-1868); and for an appreciation of them see

Wattenbach, _Geschichtsquellen_, pp. 214-216, and Giesebrecht,

_Deutsche Kaiserzeit_, i. 780, who mentions a German translation by

Pfund (1860). There is a complete edition of the works of Hrosvitha by

K. A. Barack (Nurnberg, 1858). J. Aschbach (1867) attempted to prove

that Celtes had forged the productions which he published under the

name of Hrosvitha, but he was refuted by R. Kopke (Berlin, 1869).

Anatole France, _La Vie litteraire_ (3^eme serie, Paris, 1891), cited

by Creienach, mentions a curious recent experiment, the performance of

Hrosvitha's comedies in the Theatre des Marionettes at Paris.

(A. W. W.)

HSUAN TSANG (HIOUEN THSANG, HIWEN T'SANG, YUAN TSANG, YUAN-CHWANG), the

most eminent representative of a remarkable and valuable branch of

Chinese literature, consisting of the narratives of Chinese Buddhists

who travelled to India, whilst their religion flourished there, with the

view of visiting the sites consecrated by the history of Sakya Muni, of

studying at the great convents which then existed in India, and of

collecting books, relics and other sacred objects.

The importance of these writings as throwing light on the geography

and history of India and adjoining countries, during a very dark

period, is great, and they have been the subject of elaborate

commentaries by modern students. Several Chinese memoirs of this kind

appear to have perished; and especially to be regretted is a great

collection of the works of travellers to India, religious and secular,

in sixty books, with forty more of maps and illustrations, published

at the expense of the emperor Kao-Tsung of the T'ang dynasty, A.D.

666, with a preface from the imperial hand. We will mention the

clerical travellers of this description who are known to us by name.

1. _Shi-tao-'an_ (d. 385) wrote a work on his travels to the "western

lands" (an expression applying often to India), which is supposed to

be lost. 2. _Fa-hien_ travelled to India in 399, and returned by sea

in 414. His work, called _Fo-Kwo-Ki, or Memoirs on the Buddha Realms_,

has been translated by Abel-Remusat and Landresse, and again into

English by the Rev. S. Beale; Mr Laidlay of Calcutta also published a

translation from the French, with interesting notes. 3. _Hwai Seng_

and _Sung-Yun_, monks, travelled to India to collect books and

reliques, 518-521. Their short narrative has been translated by Karl

Fried. Neumann, and also by Mr Beale (along with Fa-hien). 4. _Hsuan

Tsang_, the subject of this notice. In relation to his travels there

are two Chinese works, both of which have been translated with an

immense appliance of labour and learning by M. Stanislas Julien, viz.

(a) the _Ta-T'ang-Si-Yu-Ki, or Memoirs on Western Countries issued by

the T'ang Dynasty_, which was compiled under the traveller's own

supervision, by order of the great emperor Tai-Tsung; and (b) a

_Biography of Hsuan Tsang_ by two of his contemporaries. 5. _The

Itinerary of Fifty-six Religious Travellers_, compiled and published

under imperial authority, 730. 6. _The Itinerary of Khi-Nie_, who

travelled (964-976) at the head of a large body of monks to collect

books, &c. Neither of the last two has been translated.

Hsuan Tsang was born in the district of Keu-Shi, near Honan-Fu, about

605, a period at which Buddhism appears to have had a powerful influence

upon a large body of educated Chinese. From childhood grave and

studious, he was taken in charge by an elder brother who had adopted the

monastic life, in a convent at the royal city of Loyang in Honan. Hsuan

Tsang soon followed his brother's example. For some years he travelled

over China, teaching and learning, and eventually settled for a time at

the capital Chang-gan (now Si-gan-fu in Shensi), where his fame for

learning became great. The desire which he entertained to visit India,

in order to penetrate all the doctrines of the Buddhist philosophy, and

to perfect the collections of Indian books which existed in China, grew

irresistible, and in August 629 he started upon his solitary journey,

eluding with difficulty the strict prohibition which was in force

against crossing the frontier.

The "master of the law," as his biographers call him, plunged alone into

the terrible desert of the Gobi, then known as the Sha-mo or "Sand

River," between Kwa-chow and Igu (now Hami or Kamil). At long intervals

he found help from the small garrisons of the towers that dotted the

desert track. Very striking is the description, like that given six

centuries later by Marco Polo, of the quasi-supernatural horrors that

beset the lonely traveller in the wilderness--the visions of armies and

banners; and the manner in which they are dissipated singularly recalls

passages in Bunyan's _Pilgrim's Progress_. After great suffering Hsuan

Tsang reached Igu, the seat of a Turkish principality, and pursued his

way along the southern foot of the T'ian-shan, which he crossed by a

glacier pass (vividly described) in the longitude of Lake Issyk-kul. In

the valley of the Talas river he encounters the great khan of the Turks

on a hunting party,--a rencontre which it is interesting to compare with

the visit of Zemarchus to the great khan Dizabul, sixty years before, in

the same region. Passing by the present Tashkend, and by Samarkand, then

inhabited by fire worshippers, he reached the basin of the Upper Oxus,

which had recently been the seat of the powerful dominion of the

Haiathelah, Ephthalites or White Huns, known in earlier days to the

Greeks as _Tochari_, and to Hsuan Tsang (by the same name) as _Tuholo_

or Tukhara. His account of the many small states into which the Tukhara

empire had broken up is of great interest, as many of them are identical

in name and topography with the high valley states and districts on the

Upper Oxus, which are at this day the object of so much geographical and

political interest.

Passing by Bamian, where he speaks of the great idols still so famous,

he crosses Hindu-Kush, and descends the valley of the Kabul river to

Nagarahara, the site of which, still known as Nagara, adjoining

Jalalabad, has been explored by Mr W. Simpson. Travelling thence to

Peshawar (_Purushapura_), the capital of Gandhara, he made a digression,

through the now inaccessible valley of Swat and the Dard states, to the

Upper Indus, returning to Peshawar, and then crossing the Indus

(_Sintu_) into the decayed kingdom of _Taxila_ (Ta-cha-si-lo,

Takshasila), then subject to Kashmir. In the latter valley he spent two

whole years (631-633) studying in the convents, and visiting the many

monuments of his faith. In his further travels he visited Mathura

(_Mot'ulo_, Muttra), whence he turned north to Thanesar and the upper

Jumna and Ganges, returning south down the valley of the latter to

Kanyakubja or Kanauj, then one of the great capitals of India. The

pilgrim next entered on a circuit of the most famous sites of Buddhist

and of ancient Indian history, such as Ajodhya, Prayaga (Allahabad),

Kausambhi, Sravasti, Kapilavastu, the birth-place of Sakya, Kusinagara,

his death-place, Pataliputra (Patna, the _Palibothra_ of the Greeks),

Gaya, Rajagriha and Nalanda, the most famous and learned monastery and

college in India, adorned by the gifts of successive kings, of the

splendour of which he gives a vivid description, and of which traces

have recently been recovered. There he again spent nearly two years in

mastering Sanskrit and the depths of Buddhist philosophy. Again,

proceeding down the banks of the Ganges, he diverged eastward to

Kamarupa (Assam), and then passed by the great ports of Tamralipti

(Tamluk, the misplaced _Tamalitis_ of Ptolemy), and through Orissa to

Kanchipara (Conjeeveram), about 640. Thence he went northward across the

Carnatic and Maharashtra to Barakacheva (Broach of our day, _Barygaza_

of the Greeks). After this he visited Malwa, Cutch, Surashtra

(peninsular Gujarat, _Syrastrene_ of the Greeks), Sind, Multan and

Ghazni, whence he rejoined his former course in the basin of the Kabul

river.

This time, however, he crosses Pamir, of which he gives a remarkable

account, and passes by Kashgar, Khotan (_Kustana_), and the vicinity of

Lop-nor across the desert to Kwa-chow, whence he had made his venturous

and lonely plunge into the waste fifteen years before. He carried with

him great collections of books, precious images and reliques, and was

received (April 645) with public and imperial enthusiasm. The emperor

T'ai-Tsung desired him to commit his journey to writing, and also that

he should abandon the eremitic rule and serve the state. This last he

declined, and devoted himself to the compilation of his narrative and

the translation of the books he had brought with him from India. The

former was completed A.D. 648. In 664 Hsuan Tsang died in a convent at

Chang-gan. Some things in the history of his last days, and in the

indications of beatitude recorded, strongly recall the parallel history

of the saints of the Roman calendar. But on the other hand we find the

Chinese saint, on the approach of death, causing one of his disciples to

frame a catalogue of his good works, of the books that he had translated

or caused to be transcribed, of the sacred pictures executed at his

cost, of the alms that he had given, of the living creatures that he had

ransomed from death. "When Kia-shang had ended writing this list, the

master ordered him to read it aloud. After hearing it the devotees

clasped their hands, and showered their felicitations on him." Thus the

"well-done, good and faithful" comes from the servant himself in

self-applause.

The book of the biography, by the disciples Hwai-li and Yen-t'sung, as

rendered with judicious omissions by Stan. Julien, is exceedingly

interesting; its Chinese style receives high praise from the translator,

who says he has often had to regret his inability to reproduce its

grace, elegance and vivacity.

AUTHORITIES.--_Fo-Koue-Ki_, trad. du Chinois, par Abel-Remusat, revu

et complete par Klaproth et Landresse (Paris, 1836); _H. de la vie de

Hiouen-Thsang, &c._, trad. du Chinois par Stanislas Julien (Paris,

1853); _Memoires sur les contrees occidentales ..._ trad. du Chinois

en Francais (par le meme) (2 vols., Paris, 1857-1858); _Memoire

analytique_, &c., attached to the last work, by L. Vivien de St

Martin; "Attempt to identify some of the Places mentioned in the

Itinerary of Hiuan Thsang," by Major Wm. Anderson, C.B., in _Journ.

As. Soc. Bengal_, vol. xvi. pt. 2, p. 1183 (the enunciation of a

singularly perverse theory); "Verification of the Itinerary of Hwan

Thsang, &c.," by Captain Alex. Cunningham, Bengal Engineers, ibid.

vol. xvii. pt. 1, p. 476; _Travels of Fah-hian and Sung-Yan, Buddhist

Pilgrims, &c._, by Sam. Beal (1869); _The Ancient Geography of India_,

by Major-General Alex. Cunningham, R.E. (1871); "Notes on Hwen

Thsang's Account of the Principalities of Tokharistan," by Colonel H.

Yule, C.B., in _Journ. Roy. As. Soc._, new ser., vol. vi. p. 82; "On

Hiouen Thsang's Journey from Patna to Ballabhi," by James Fergusson,

D.C.L., ibid. p. 213. (H. Y.; R. K. D.)

HUAMBISAS, a tribe of South American Indians on the upper Maranon and

Santiago rivers, Peru. In 1841 they drove all the civilized Indians from

the neighbouring missions. In 1843 they killed all the inhabitants of

the village of Santa Teresa, between the mouths of the Santiago and

Morona. They are fair-skinned and bearded, sharing with the Jeveros a

descent from the Spanish women captured by their Indian ancestors at the

sack of Sevilla del Oro in 1599.

HUANCAVELICA, a city of central Peru and capital of a department, 160 m.

S.E. of Lima. The city stands in a deep ravine of the Andes at an

elevation of about 12,400 ft. above the sea, the ravine having an

average width of 1 m. Pop. (1906 estimate) 6000. The city is solidly and

regularly built, the houses being of stone and the stream that flows

through the town being spanned by several stone bridges. Near

Huancavelica is the famous quicksilver mine of Santa Barbara, with its

subterranean church of San Rosario, hewn from the native

cinnabar-bearing rock. Huancavelica was founded by Viceroy Francisco de

Toledo in 1572 as a mining town, and mining continues to be the

principal occupation of its inhabitants. The department is traversed by

the Cordillera Occidental, and is bounded N., E. and S. by Junin and

Ayacucho. Pop. (1906 official estimate) 167,840; area, 9254 sq. m. The

principal industry is mining for silver and quicksilver. The best-known

silver mines are the Castrovirreyna.

HUANUCO, a city of central Peru, capital of a department, 170 m. N.N.E.

of Lima in a beautiful valley on the left bank of the Huallaga river,

nearly 6000 ft. above sea-level. Pop. (1906 estimate) about 6000. The

town was founded in 1539 by Gomez Alvarado. Huanuco is celebrated for

its fruits and sweetmeats, the "chirimoya" (_Anona chirimolia_) of this

region being the largest and most delicious of its kind. Mining is one

of the city's industries. Huanuco was the scene of one of the

bloodthirsty massacres of which the Chileans were guilty during their

occupation of Peruvian territory in 1881-1883. The department of Huanuco

lies immediately N. of Junin, with Ancachs on the W. and San Martin and

Loreto on the N. and E. Pop. (1906 estimate) 108,980; area, 14,028 sq.

m. It lies wholly in the Cordillera region, and is traversed from S. to

N. by the Maranon and Huallaga rivers.

HUARAZ, a city of northern Peru and capital oL the department of

Ancachs, on the left bank of the Huaraz, or Santa river, about 190 m.

N.N.W. of Lima and 58 m. from the coast. Pop. (1876) 4851, (1906

estimate) 6000. Huaraz is situated in a narrow fertile valley of the

Western Cordillera, at a considerable elevation above sea-level, and has

a mild climate. A railway projected to connect Huaraz with the port of

Chimbote, on the Bay of Chimbote, a few miles S. of the mouth of the

Santa river, was completed from Chimbote to Suchiman (33 m.) in 1872,

when work was suspended for want of money. In the valley of the Huaraz

cattle are raised, and wheat, sugar and fruit, gold, silver, copper and

coal are produced. Alfalfa is grown by stock-raisers, and the cattle

raised here are among the best in the Peruvian market. In the vicinity

of Huaraz are megalithic ruins similar to those of Tiahunaco and Cuzco,

showing that the aboriginal empire preceding the Incas extended into

northern Peru.

HUARTE DE SAN JUAN, or HUARTE Y NAVARRO, JUAN (c. 1530-1592), Spanish

physician and psychologist, was born at Saint-Jean-Pied-de-Port (Lower

Navarre) about 1530, was educated at the university of Huesca, where he

graduated in medicine, and, though it appears doubtful whether he

practised as a physician at Huesca, distinguished himself by his

professional skill and heroic zeal during the plague which devastated

Baeza in 1566. He died in 1592. His _Examen de ingenios para las

ciencias_ (1575) won him a European reputation, and was translated by

Lessing. Though now superseded, Huarte's treatise is historically

interesting as the first attempt to show the connexion between

psychology and physiology, and its acute ingenuity is as remarkable as

the boldness of its views.

HUASTECS, a tribe of North American Indians of Mayan stock, living to

the north of Vera Cruz. They are of interest to the ethnologist as being

so entirely detached from the other Mayan tribes of Central America. The

theory is that the Mayas came from the north and that the Huastecs were

left behind in the migration southward.

HUBER, FRANCOIS (1750-1831), Swiss naturalist, was born at Geneva on the

2nd of July 1750. He belonged to a family which had already made its

mark in the literary and scientific world: his great-aunt, Marie Huber

(1695-1753), was known as a voluminous writer on religious and

theological subjects, and as the translator and epitomizer of the

_Spectator_ (Amsterdam, 3 vols., 1753); and his father Jean Huber

(1721-1786), who had served for many years as a soldier, was a prominent

member of the coterie at Ferney, distinguishing himself by his

_Observations sur le vol des oiseaux_ (Geneva, 1784). Francois Huber was

only fifteen years old when he began to suffer from an affection of the

eyes which gradually resulted in total blindness; but, with the aid of

his wife, Marie Aimee Lullin, and of his servant, Francois Burnens, he

was able to carry out investigations that laid the foundations of our

scientific knowledge of the life history of the honey-bee. His

_Nouvelles Observations sur les abeilles_ was published at Geneva in

1792 (Eng. trans., 1806). He assisted Jean Senebier in his _Mem. sur

l'influence de l'air, &c., dans la germination_ (Geneva, 1800); and he

also wrote "Mem. sur l'origine de la cire" (_Bibliotheque britannique_,

tome xxv.), a "Lettre a M. Pictet sur certains dangers que courent les

abeilles" (_Bib. brit_. xxvii), and "Nouvelles Observ. rel. au sphinx

Atropos" (_Bib. brit_. xxvii). He died at Lausanne on the 22nd of

December 1831. De Candolle gave his name to a genus of Brazilian

trees--_Huberia laurina_.

PIERRE HUBER (1777-1840) followed in his father's footsteps. His

best-known work is _Recherches sur les moeurs des fourmis indigenes_

(Geneva and Paris, 1810; new ed., Geneva, 1861), and he also wrote

various papers on entomological subjects.

See the account of Francois Huber, by De Candolle, in _Bibl.

universelle_ (1832); and the notice of Pierre in _Bibl. univ._ (1886);

also Haag, _La France protestante_.

HUBER, JOHANN NEPOMUK (1830-1879), German philosophical and theological

writer, a leader of the Old Catholics, was born at Munich on the 18th of

August 1830. Originally destined for the priesthood, he early began the

study of theology. By the writings of Spinoza and Oken, however, he was

strongly drawn to philosophical pursuits, and it was in philosophy that

he "habilitated" (1854) in the university of his native place, where he

ultimately became professor (extraordinarius, 1859; ordinarius, 1864).

With Dollinger and others he attracted a large amount of public

attention in 1869 by the challenge to the Ultramontane promoters of the

Vatican council in the treatise _Der Papst und das Koncil_, which

appeared under the pseudonym of "Janus," and also in 1870 by a series of

letters (_Romische Briefe_, a redaction of secret reports sent from Rome

during the sitting of the council), which were published over the

pseudonym Quirinus in the _Allgemeine Zeitung_. He died suddenly of

heart disease at Munich on the 20th of March 1879.

WORKS.--The treatise _Uber die Willensfreiheit_ (1858), followed in 1859

by _Die Philosophie der Kirchenvater_, which was promptly placed upon

the _Index_, and led to the prohibition of all Catholic students from

attending his lectures; _Johannes Scotus Erigena_ (1861); _Die Idee der

Unsterblichkeit_ (1864); _Studien_ (1867); _Der Proletarier; zur

Orientirung in der sozialen Frage_ (1865); _Der Jesuitenorden nach

seiner Verfassung und Doctrin, Wirksamkeit und Geschichte_ (1873), also

placed upon the _Index_; _Der Pessimismus_ (1876); _Die Forschung nach

der Materie_ (1877); _Zur Philosophie der Astronomie_ (1878); _Das

Gedachtnis_ (1878). He also published adverse criticisms of Darwin,

Strauss, Hartmann and Hackel; pamphlets on _Das Papsttum und der Staat_

(1870), and on _Die Freiheiten der franzosischen Kirche_ (1871); and a

volume of _Kleine Schriften_ (1871).

See E. Zirngiebl, _Johannes Huber_ (1881); and M. Carriere in

_Allgemeine deutsche Biographie_, xiii. (1881), and in _Nord und Sud_

(1879).

HUBER, LUDWIG FERDINAND (1764-1804), German author, was born in Paris on

the 14th of September 1764, the son of Michael Huber (1727-1804), who

did much to promote the study of German literature in France. In his

infancy young Huber removed with his parents to Leipzig, where he was

carefully instructed in modern languages and literature, and showed a

particular inclination for those of France and England. In Leipzig he

became intimate with Christian Gottfried Korner, father of the poet; in

Dresden Huber became engaged to Dora Stock, sister of Korner's

betrothed, and associated with Schiller, who was one of Korner's

stanchest friends. In 1787 he was appointed secretary to the Saxon

legation in Mainz, where he remained until the French occupation of

1792. While here he interested himself for the welfare of the family of

his friend Georg Forster, who, favouring republican views, had gone to

Paris, leaving his wife Therese Forster (1764-1829) and family in

destitute circumstances. Huber, enamoured of the talented young wife,

gave up his diplomatic post, broke off his engagement to Dora Stock,

removed with the Forster family to Switzerland, and on the death of her

husband in 1794 married Therese Forster. In 1798 Huber took over the

editorship of the _Allgemeine Zeitung_ in Stuttgart. The newspaper

having been prohibited in Wurttemberg, Huber continued its editorship in

Ulm in 1803. He was created "counsellor of education" for the new

Bavarian province of Swabia in the following year, but had hardly

entered upon the functions of his new office when he died on the 24th of

December 1804.

Huber was well versed in English literature, and in 1785 he published

the drama _Ethelwolf_, with notes on Beaumont and Fletcher and the old

English stage. He also wrote many dramas, comedies and tragedies, most

of which are now forgotten, and among them only _Das heimliche Gericht_

(1790, new ed. 1795) enjoyed any degree of popularity. As a critic he is

seen to advantage in the _Vermischte Schriften von dem Verfasser des

heimlichen Gerichts_ (2 vols., 1793). As a publicist he made his name in

the historical-political periodicals _Friedenspraliminarien_ (1794-1796,

10 vols.) and _Klio_ (1795-1798, 1819).

His collected works, _Samtliche Werke seit dem Jahre 1802_ (4 vols.,

1807-1819), were published with a biography by his wife Therese Huber.

See L. Speidel and H. Wittmann, _Bilder aus der Schiller-Zeit_ (1884).

HUBERT (HUCBERTUS, HUGBERTUS), ST (d. 727), bishop of Liege, whose

festival is celebrated on the 3rd of November. The Bollandists have

published seven different lives of the saint. The first is the only one

of any value, and is the work of a contemporary. Unfortunately, it is

very sparing of details. In it we see that Hubert in 708 succeeded

Lambert in the see of Maestricht (Tongres), and that he erected a

basilica to his memory. In 825 Hubert's remains were removed to a

Benedictine cloister in the Ardennes, which thenceforth bore his name

(St Hubert, province of Luxemburg, Belgium), and ultimately became a

considerable resort of pilgrims. The later legends (_Bibliotheca

hagiographica latina_, nos. 3994-4002) are devoid of authority. One of

them relates, probably following the legend of St Eustace, the miracle

of the conversion of St Hubert. This conversion, represented as having

been brought about while he was hunting on Good Friday by a miraculous

appearance of a stag bearing between his horns a cross or crucifix

surrounded with rays of light, has frequently been made the subject of

artistic treatment. He is the patron of hunters, and is also invoked in

cases of hydrophobia. Several orders of knighthood have been under his

protection; among these may be mentioned the Bavarian, the Bohemian and

that of the electorate of Cologne.

See _Acta Sanctorum_, Novembris, i. 759-930; G. Kurth, _Chartes de

l'abbaye de St Hubert en Ardenne_ (Brussels, 1903); Anna Jameson,

_Sacred and Legendary Art_, i. 732-737 (London, 1896); Cahier,

_Caracteristiques des saints_, pp. 183, 775, &c. (Paris, 1867).

(H. De.)

HUBERTUSBURG, a chateau in the kingdom of Saxony, near the village of

Wermsdorf and midway 6 m. between the towns Oschatz and Grimma. It was

built in 1721-1724 by Frederick Augustus II., elector of Saxony,

subsequently King Augustus III. of Poland, as a hunting box, and was

often the scene of brilliant festivities. It is famous for the peace

signed here on the 15th of February 1763, which ended the Seven Years'

War. After undergoing various vicissitudes, it now serves the purpose of

a lunatic asylum and a training school for nursing sisters.

See Riemer, _Das Schloss Hubertusburg, sonst und jetzt_ (Oschatz,

1881).

HUBLI, a town of British India, in the Dharwar district of Bombay, 15 m.

S.E. of Dharwar town. Pop. (1901) 60,214. It is a railway junction on

the Southern Mahratta system, where the lines to Bangalore and Bezwada

branch off south and west. It is an important centre of trade and of

cotton and silk weaving, and has two cotton mills and several factories

for ginning and pressing cotton. Hubli was in early times the seat of an

English factory, which, with the rest of the town, was plundered in 1673

by Sivaji, the Mahratta leader.

HUBNER, EMIL (1834-1901), German classical scholar, son of the

historical painter Julius Hubner (1806-1882), was born at Dusseldorf on

the 7th of July 1834. After studying at Berlin and Bonn, he travelled

extensively with a view to antiquarian and epigraphical researches. The

results of these travels were embodied in several important works:

_Inscriptiones Hispaniae Latinae_ (1869, supplement 1892), _I. H.

Christianae_ (1871, supplement 1900); _Inscriptiones Britanniae Latinae_

(1873), _I. B. Christianae_ (1876); _La Arqueologia de Espana_ (1888);

_Monumenta linguae Hibericae_ (1893). Hubner was also the author of two

books of the greatest utility to the classical student: _Grundriss zu

Vorlesungen uber die romische Literaturgeschichte_ (4th ed. 1878,

edited, with large additions, by J. E. B. Mayor as _Bibliographical Clue

to Latin Literature_, 1875), and _Bibliographie der classischen

Altertumswissenschaft_ (2nd ed., 1889); mention may also be made of

_Romische Epigraphik_ (2nd ed., 1892); _Exempla Scripturae Epigraphicae

Latinae_ (1885); and _Romische Herrschaft in Westeuropa_ (1890). In 1870

Hubner was appointed professor of Classical Philology in the university

of Berlin, where he died on the 21st of February 1901.

HUBNER, JOSEPH ALEXANDER, COUNT (1811-1892), Austrian diplomatist, was

born in Vienna on the 26th of November 1811. His real name was

Hafenbredl, which he afterwards changed to Hubner. He began his public

career in 1833 under Metternich, whose confidence he soon gained, and

who sent him in 1837 as attache to Paris. In 1841 he became secretary of

embassy at Lisbon, and in 1844 Austrian consul-general at Leipzig. In

1848 he was sent to Milan to conduct the diplomatic correspondence of

Archduke Rainer, viceroy of Lombardy. On the outbreak of the revolution

he was seized as a hostage, and remained a prisoner for some months.

Returning to Austria, he was entrusted with the compilation of the

documents and proclamations relating to the abdication of the Emperor

Ferdinand and the accession of Francis Joseph. His journal, an

invaluable clue to the complicated intrigues of this period, was

published in 1891 in French and German, under the title of _Une Annee de

ma vie, 1848-1849_. In March 1849 he was sent on a special mission to

Paris, and later in the same year was appointed ambassador to France. To

his influence was in large measure due the friendly attitude of Austria

to the Allies in the Crimean War, at the close of which he represented

Austria at the congress of Paris in 1856. He allowed himself, however,

to be taken by surprise by Napoleon's intervention on behalf of Italian

unity, of which the first public intimation was given by the French

emperor's cold reception of Hubner on New Year's Day, 1859, with the

famous words: "I regret that our relations with your Government are not

so good as they have hitherto been." He did not return to Paris after

the war, and after holding the ministry of police in the Goluchowski

cabinet from August to October 1859, lived in retirement till 1865, when

he became ambassador at Rome. Quitting this post in 1867, he undertook

extensive travels, his descriptions of which appeared as _Promenade

autour du monde, 1871_ (1873; English translation by Lady Herbert, 1874)

and _Through the British Empire_ (1886). Written in a bright and

entertaining style, and characterized by shrewd observation, they

achieved considerable popularity in their time. A more serious effort

was his _Sixte-Quint_ (1870, translated into English by H. E. H.

Jerningham under the title of _The Life and Times of Sixtus the Fifth_,

1872), an original contribution to the history of the period, based on

unpublished documents at the Vatican, Simancas and Venice. In 1879 he

was made a life-member of the Austrian Upper House, where he sat as a

Clerical and Conservative. He had received the rank of Baron (Freiherr)

in 1854, and in 1888 was raised to the higher rank of Count (Graf). He

died at Vienna on the 30th of July 1892. Though himself of middle-class

origin, he was a profound admirer of the old aristocratic regime, and

found his political ideals in his former chiefs, Metternich and

Schwarzenberg. As the last survivor of the Metternich school, he became

towards the close of his life more and more out of touch with the trend

of modern politics, but remained a conspicuous figure in the Upper House

and at the annual delegations. That he possessed the breadth of mind to

appreciate the working of a system at total variance with his own school

of thought was shown by his grasp of British colonial questions. It is

interesting, in view of subsequent events, to note his emphatic belief

in the loyalty of the British colonies--a belief not shared at that time

by many statesmen with far greater experience of democratic

institutions.

See Sir Ernest Satow, _An Austrian Diplomatist in the Fifties_ (1908).

HUC, EVARISTE REGIS (1813-1860), French missionary-traveller, was born

at Toulouse, on the 1st of August 1813. In his twenty-fourth year he

entered the congregation of the Lazarists at Paris, and shortly after

receiving holy orders in 1839 went out to China. At Macao he spent some

eighteen months in the Lazarist seminary, preparing himself for the

regular work of a missionary. Having acquired some command of the

Chinese tongue, and modified his personal appearance and dress in

accordance with Chinese taste, he started from Canton. He at first

superintended a Christian mission in the southern provinces, and then

passing to Peking, where he perfected his knowledge of the language,

eventually settled in the Valley of Black Waters or He Shuy, a little to

the north of the capital, and just within the borders of Mongolia.

There, beyond the Great Wall, a large but scattered population of native

Christians had found a refuge from the persecutions of Kia-King, to be

united half a century later in a vast but vague apostolic vicariate. The

assiduity with which Huc devoted himself to the study of the dialects

and customs of the Tatars, for whom at the cost of much labour he

translated various religious works, was an admirable preparation for

undertaking in 1844, at the instigation of the vicar apostolic of

Mongolia, an expedition whose object was to dissipate the obscurity

which hung over the country and habits of the Tibetans. September of

that year found the missionary at Dolon Nor occupied with the final

arrangements for his journey, and shortly afterwards, accompanied by his

fellow-Lazarist, Joseph Gabet, and a young Tibetan priest who had

embraced Christianity, he set out. To escape attention the little party

assumed the dress of lamas or priests. Crossing the Hwang-ho, they

advanced into the terrible sandy tract known as the Ordos Desert. After

suffering dreadfully from want of water and fuel they entered Kansu,

having recrossed the flooded Hwang-ho, but it was not till January 1845

that they reached Tang-Kiul on the boundary. Rather than encounter alone

the horrors of a four months' journey to Lhasa they resolved to wait for

eight months till the arrival of a Tibetan embassy on its return from

Peking. Under an intelligent teacher they meanwhile studied the Tibetan

language and Buddhist literature, and during three months of their stay

they resided in the famous Kunbum Lamasery, which was reported to

accommodate 4000 persons. Towards the end of September they joined the

returning embassy, which comprised 2000 men and 3700 animals. Crossing

the deserts of Koko Nor, they passed the great lake of that name, with

its island of contemplative lamas, and, following a difficult and

tortuous track across snow-covered mountains, they at last entered Lhasa

on the 29th of January 1846. Favourably received by the regent, they

opened a little chapel, and were in a fair way to establish an important

mission, when the Chinese ambassador interfered and had the two

missionaries conveyed back to Canton, where they arrived in October of

the same year. For nearly three years Huc remained at Canton, but Gabet,

returning to Europe, proceeded thence to Rio de Janeiro, and died there

shortly afterwards. Huc returned to Europe in shattered health in 1852,

visiting India, Egypt and Palestine on his way, and, after a prolonged

residence in Paris, died on the 31st of March 1860.

His writings comprise, besides numerous letters and memoirs in the

_Annales de la propagation de la foi_, the famous _Souvenirs d'un

voyage dans la Tartarie, le Thibet, et la Chine pendant les annees

1844-1846_ (2 vols., Paris, 1850; Eng. trans. by W. Hazlitt, 1851,

abbreviated by M. Jones, London, 1867); its supplement, crowned by the

Academy, entitled _L'Empire chinois_ (2 vols., Paris, 1854; Eng.

trans., London, 1859); and an elaborate historical work, _Le

Christianisme en Chine, &c._ (4 vols., Paris, 1857-1858; Eng. trans.,

London, 1857-1858). These works are written in a lucid, racy,

picturesque style, which secured for them an unusual degree of

popularity. The _Souvenirs_ is a narrative of a remarkable feat of

travel, and contains passages of so singular a character as in the

absence of corroborative testimony to stir up a feeling of

incredulity. That Huc was suspected unjustly was amply proved by later

research. But he was by no means a practical geographer, and the

record of his travels loses greatly in value from the want of precise

scientific data.

See, for information specially relating to the whole subject, the Abbe

Desgodin's _Mission du Thibet de 1855 a 1870_ (Verdun, 1872); and

"Account of the Pundit's Journey in Great Tibet," in the _Royal

Geographical Society's Journal_ for 1877.

HUCBALD (HUGBALDUS, HUBALDUS), Benedictine monk, and writer on music,

was born at the monastery of Saint Amand near Tournai, in or about 840,

if we may believe the statement of his biographers to the effect that he

died in 930, aged 90. He studied at the monastery, where his uncle Milo

occupied an important position. Hucbald made rapid progress in the

acquirement of various sciences and arts, including that of music, and

at an early age composed a hymn in honour of St Andrew, which met with

such success as to excite the jealousy of his uncle. It is said that

Hucbald in consequence was compelled to leave St Amand, and started an

independent school of music and other arts at Nevers. In 860, however,

he was at St Germain d'Auxerre, bent upon completing his studies, and in

872 he was back again at St Amand as the successor in the headmastership

of the convent school of his uncle, to whom he had been reconciled in

the meantime. Between 883 and 900 Hucbald went on several missions of

reforming and reconstructing various schools of music, including that of

Rheims, but in the latter year he returned to St Amand, where he

remained to the day of his death on the 25th of June 930, or, according

to other chroniclers, on the 20th of June 932. The only work which can

positively be ascribed to him is his _Harmonica Institutio_. The _Musica

Enchiriadis_, published with other writings of minor importance in

Gerbert's _Scriptores de Musica_, and containing a complete system of

musical science as well as instructions regarding notation, has now been

proved to have originated about half a century later than the death of

the monk Hucbald, and to have been the work of an unknown writer

belonging to the close of the 10th century and possibly also bearing the

name of Hucbald. This work is celebrated chiefly for an essay on a new

form of notation described in the present day as _Dasia Notation_. The

author of the _Harmonica Institutio_ wrote numerous lives of the saints

and a curious poem on bald men, dedicated to Charles the Bald.

AUTHORITIES.--Sir John Hawkins, _General History of the Science and

Practice of Music_ (i. 153); _Histoire litteraire de la France_ (vi.

216 et seq.); Coussemaker, _Memoire sur Hucbald_ (Paris, 1841); Hans

Muller, _Hucbald's echte und unechte Schriften uber Musik_ (Leipzig,

1884); Spitta, _Die Musica Enchiriadis und seine Zeitalter_

(_Vierteljahresschrift fur Musikwissenschaft_, 1889, 5th year).

HU-CHOW-FU, a city of China, in the province of Cheh-Kiang (30 deg. 48'

N., 120 deg. 3' E.), a little S. of Tai-hu Lake, in the midst of the

central silk district. According to Chinese authorities it is 6 m. in

circumference, and contains about 100,000 families. A broad stream or

canal crosses the city from south to north, and forms the principal

highway for boat traffic. The main trade of the place is in raw silk,

but some silk fabrics, such as flowered crape (_chousha_), are also

manufactured. Silk is largely worn even by the lowest classes of the

inhabitants.

HUCHOWN, "of the Awle Ryale" (fl. 14th century), Scottish poet, is

referred to by Wyntoun in his _Chronicle_ in these words:--

"Hucheon,

that cunnande was in littratur.

He made a gret Gest of Arthure,

And the Awntyr of Gawane,

The Pistil als of Suet Susane.

He was curyousse in his stille,

Fayr of facunde and subtile,

And ay to pleyssance hade delyte,

Mad in metyr meit his dyte

Litil or noucht neuir the lesse

Wauerande fra the suythfastnes."

(Cott. MS. bk. v. II, 4308-4318).

Much critical ingenuity has been spent in endeavouring to identify (a)

the poet and (b) the works named in the foregoing passage. It has been

assumed that "Huchown," or "Hucheon," represents the "gude Sir Hew of

Eglyntoun" named by Dunbar (q.v.) in his _Lament for the Makaris_ (i.

53). The only known Sir Hugh of Eglintoun of the century is frequently

mentioned in the public records from the middle of the century onwards,

as an auditor of accounts and as witness to several charters. By 1360 he

had married Dame Egidia, widow of Sir James Lindsay and half-sister of

Robert the Steward. His public office and association with the Steward

sorts well with the designation "of the Awle Ryale," if that be

interpreted as "Aula Regalis" or "Royal Palace." He appears to have died

late in 1376 or early in 1377.

The first of the poems named above, the _Gest of Arthure_ or _Gest

Historyalle_ (_ib._ i. 4288), has been identified by Dr Trautmann,

"Anglia," _Der Dichter Huchown_ (1877), with the alliterative _Morte

Arthure_ in the Thornton MS. at Lincoln, printed by the E.E.T.S. (ed.

Brock, 1865). The problem of the second (_The Awntyr of Gawane_) is

still in dispute. There are difficulties in the way of accepting the

conjecture that the poem is the "Awntyres of Arthure at the Tern

Wathelyne" (see S.T.S., _Scottish Alliterative Poems_, 1897, and

Introduction, pp. 11 et seq.), and little direct evidence in favour of

the view that the reference is to the greatest of middle English

romances, _Sir Gawain and the Grene Knight_. The third may be safely

accepted as the well-known _Pistil_ [Epistle] _of Swete Susan_, printed

by Laing (_Select Remains_, 1822) and by the S.T.S. (_Scottish

Alliterative Poems, u.s._).

See, in addition to the works named, above, G. Neilson's _Sir Hew of

Eglintoun and Huchown of the Awle Ryale_ (Glasgow, 1901), which

contains a full record of references to the historical Sir Hew of

Eglintoun; _Huchown of the Awle Ryale, the Alliterative Poet_

(Glasgow, 1902) by the same; J. T. T. Brown's _Huchown of the Awle

Ryale and his Poems_ (Glasgow, 1902), in answer to the foregoing. See

also the correspondence in the _Athenaeum_, 1900-1901, and the review

of Mr Neilson's pamphlets, ib. (Nov. 22, 1902); and J. H. Millar's

_Literary History of Scotland_ (1903), pp. 8-14.

HUCHTENBURG, the name of two brothers who were Dutch painters in the

second half of the 17th century. Both were natives of Haarlem. Jacob,

the elder, of whom very little is known, studied under Berghem, and went

early to Italy, where he died young about 1667. His pictures are

probably confounded with those of his brother. In Copenhagen, where

alone they are catalogued, they illustrate the style of a Dutchman who

transfers Berghem's cattle and flocks to Italian landscapes and

marketplaces.

John van Huchtenburg (1646-1733), born at Haarlem it is said in 1646,

was first taught by Thomas Wyk, and afterwards induced to visit the

chief cities of Italy, where, penetrating as far as Rome, he met and

dwelt with his brother Jacob. After the death of the latter he wandered

homewards, taking Paris on his way, and served under Van der Meulen,

then employed in illustrating for Louis XIV. the campaign of 1667-1668

in the Low Countries. In 1670 he settled at Haarlem, where he married,

practised and kept a dealer's shop. His style had now merged into an

imitation of Philip Wouvermans and Van der Meulen, which could not fail

to produce pretty pictures of hunts and robber camps, the faculty of

painting horses and men in action and varied dress being the chief point

of attraction. Later Huchtenburg ventured on cavalry skirmishes and

engagements of regular troops generally, and these were admired by

Prince Eugene and William III., who gave the painter sittings, and

commissioned him to throw upon canvas the chief incidents of the battles

they fought upon the continent of Europe. When he died at Amsterdam in

1733, Huchtenburg had done much by his pictures and prints to make

Prince Eugene, King William and Marlborough popular. Though clever in

depicting a _melee_ or a skirmish of dragoons, he remained second to

Philip Wouvermans in accuracy of drawing, and inferior to Van der Meulen

in the production of landscapes. But, nevertheless, he was a clever and

spirited master, with great facility of hand and considerable natural

powers of observation.

The earliest date on his pictures is 1674, when he executed the

"Stag-Hunt" in the Museum of Berlin, and the "Fight with Robbers" in

the Lichtenstein collection at Vienna. A "Skirmish at Fleurus" (1690)

in the Brussels gallery seems but the precursor of larger and more

powerful works, such as the "Siege of Namur" (1695) in the Belvedere

at Vienna, where William III. is seen in the foreground accompanied by

Max Emmanuel, the Bavarian elector. Three years before, Huchtenburg

had had sittings from Prince Eugene (Hague museum) and William III.

(Amsterdam Trippenhuis). After 1696 he regularly served as court

painter to Prince Eugene, and we have at Turin (gallery) a series of

eleven canvases all of the same size depicting the various battles of

the great hero, commencing with the fight of Zentha against the Turks

in 1697, and concluding with the capture of Belgrade in 1717. Had the

duke of Marlborough been fond of art he would doubtless have possessed

many works of our artist. All that remains at Blenheim, however, is a

couple of sketches of battles, which were probably sent to Churchill

by his great contemporary. The pictures of Huchtenburg are not very

numerous now in public galleries. There is one in the National

Gallery, London, another at the Louvre. But Copenhagen has four,

Dresden six, Gotha two, and Munich has the well-known composition of

"Tallart taken Prisoner at Blenheim in 1704."

HUCKABACK,[1] the name given to a type of cloth used for towels. For

this purpose it has perhaps been more extensively used in the linen

trade than any other weave. One of the chief merits of a towel is its

capacity for absorbing moisture; plain and other flat-surfaced cloths do

not perform this function satisfactorily, but cloths made with

huckaback, as well as those made with the honeycomb and similar weaves,

are particularly well adapted for this purpose. The body or foundation

of the cloth is plain and therefore sound in structure (see designs A

and B in figure), but at fixed intervals some of the warp threads float

on the surface of the cloth, while at the same time a number of weft

threads float on the back. Thus the cloth has a somewhat similar

appearance on both sides. Weave A is the ordinary and most used huck or

huckaback, while weave B, which is usually woven with double weft, is

termed the Devon or medical huck. The cloths made by the use of these

weaves were originally all linen, but are too often adulterated with

inferior fibres.

[Illustration]

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Horticulture" to "Hudson Bay" Volume 13, Slice 7 · 第 56 / 57 题