“There was a species of slavery prevailing only a few years ago in some

boroughs in Scotland. Every child that carried a coal from the pit, was

the bound slave of that borough. Their emancipation was thought by

Parliament to be material; and was very much agitated in the House. It

was urged by those who opposed the emancipation, that, let every man’s

genius be what it might, yet that those pits in which the work, from its

nature, was carried on under ground, were quite an excepted case; and

that without the admission of slavery in this particular instance, the

collieries could not be worked; that the price of coals would be raised

to a most immoderate height; and all the neighbouring manufactories,

which depended on them, would essentially suffer in their interests.

After several years struggle, the Bill, however, was carried through

both houses of Parliament. Within a year after, the whole idea of the

collieries being in the least hurt by the abolition of this sort of

slavery, vanished into smoke, and there was an end of the business.”

I hope therefore, that, notwithstanding the declared sense of the bulk

of the West Indian body, I may, without being thought presumptuous,

still declare, that renewed consideration has only confirmed my

judgment, that the abolition of the Slave Trade would be ultimately and

permanently beneficial to the West Indians themselves.

It is not lightly that I have taken up the persuasion, which has been

intimated more than once, that the determined hostility with which the

abolition of the Slave Trade has been opposed by the bulk of the West

Indian body, is, in a multitude of instances, the effect of party spirit

rather than of rational conviction after full and fair investigation. It

is in the case of the West Indian party as in that of parties in

general, a few men of superior zeal and activity give the tone to the

rest. The residents in the islands, the greater part of whom are either

engaged in planting speculations, or are looking forward to such

speculations, are the real instigators of the opposition. The West

Indian merchants lend them their zealous and powerful aid; and the

proprietors in this country head the party, partly from an implicit

confidence in the judgment of others, partly from a liberal feeling,

which renders them unwilling to desert the cause of their fellow

planters abroad; and if they take any share at all in the contest, their

rank and fortune render it natural for them to take the lead.

By far the greater part however are actuated merely by deference for the

opinion of others; and by that _esprit de corps_ which first renders men

unwilling to differ from their friends, and which, by degrees, produces

warmth, and at length vehemence, by mutual intercourse, sympathy, and

collision.

In truth, what force of mind does it not require in a considerate man of

any feeling, aware of all the low surmises, the invidious comments, the

unkind constructions, the altered countenances, not to speak of the real

loss of influence and connections to which he may expose himself, to

resolve, on refusing to join the general party, and to adhere to his

resolution; in such circumstances as those of the West Indian body; or,

even still more, to quit the party he has joined, when a sense of duty

commands the sacrifice. It is indeed but too true, that almost in any

instance, and never perhaps in any more than in that of the West Indian

connection, to break through the trammels of our party, demands the most

strenuous, and, judging from experience, we should say, one of the most

difficult of all efforts.

For men to emancipate themselves from this bondage, it requires not so

much an uncommon degree of judgment and foresight, not even so much of

impartiality and candour, as it calls for such a share of firmness and

independence of mind as rarely indeed falls to the lot of men in any

times, and less than almost in any other, in our own, in which fashion

and party rule with such a rigorous despotism, as if it were to revenge

on us our not submitting to any other yoke. Yet are there not a few West

Indian Proprietors, both in and out of Parliament, who, though owners of

large colonial possessions, have refused to join the West Indian body;

who are exempt from West Indian prejudices, and who, to their honour,

are resolved that the source from which their annual income is derived,

shall not be polluted by injustice and cruelty.

There are also various individuals connected with the colonies, whose

complete personal acquaintance with the whole system of West Indian

management has given them an opportunity of discovering it’s vices, and

has prevented their becoming the dupes of party violence or sophistry.

And though, in quitting a formed party when we have once joined it, we

obviously have greater difficulties to encounter, and obstacles to

overcome, than even in originally refusing to combine with our brethren

in constituting it, yet one splendid conquest of this kind has been made

well it deserves such an epithet, for he, who knows any thing of human

nature, knows full well, that these are the most difficult of all

masteries.

Yet this difficult conquest has been achieved by one of those gentlemen

who originally took the lead, in committing to the colonial legislatures

the service of superseding the necessity of abolishing the Slave Trade

by internal regulations. He has since abundantly proved that he did not

support the measure, in order merely to defeat the efforts of the

Abolitionists, and with a real view of prolonging the continuance of the

Slave Trade; but that he conceived, that the question then at issue was,

whether that traffic should be abolished by the Colonial Assemblies or

the British Legislature: and now, that the former have refused to accept

the commission which the House of Commons offered to instruct to them,

he has embraced the other part of the alternative, and cordially

co-operated in the attempt to abolish by the Imperial Parliament.

Instances of such conduct as this are rare; for being rare, they are the

more honourable. The mind loves to dwell on them. Perhaps, from never

having been a party man myself I may feel their excellencies with

peculiar force.

I might offend the delicacy of this gentleman, by mentioning his name;

but surely without his leave I may venture to describe him. I fear there

are but two or three others with whom, in all the following particulars,

he can be well confounded. I may state him, then, to be the Jamaica

Proprietor, in whom I believe humanity and kindness to his Slaves are

hereditary virtues; and who, having more waste but cultivable land, than

almost any other Jamaica landholder, had more to gain by the continuance

of the Slave Trade, while he has been among the first to abandon, or

rather to abolish it; who has ever had his eyes more open than most

other proprietors to the abuses of the West Indian system, and his

endeavours more warmly and actively exerted to correct them; being more

exempt than most others of his brethren from West Indian prejudices, but

often, I fear, counteracted by the prejudices of others; who has been

desirous especially of promoting those moral reforms which would above

all other improvements tend to the comfort of the Slaves, and the

security and prosperity of the islands.

This is not general and indiscriminate praise; each commendation has

it’s object. May he go forward in the path on which he has so honourably

entered, and may he be followed by descendants, inheriting his

principles as well as his property, who may perfect the work which he

has commenced.

[Sidenote: Power of party spirit in the West Indians.]

That the principle of party spirit is adequate to the production of most

powerful effects; that it may be even sufficient to prompt men to act in

manifest opposition to a clear, direct and valuable interest, has been

decisively established in the case of our West Indian Proprietors

themselves in a very recent instance. For, what but this party spirit

could cause them to support the continuance of that branch of the Slave

Trade which consisted in supplying foreigners with Slaves, and still

more, which could prevent their even strenuously and eagerly

anticipating the efforts of the Abolitionists for stopping the supply

for the cultivation of the immeasurable expanse of the South American

continent. In the colonies which we there conquered, near twenty

millions of the capital of this country were actually invested during

the short period after their conquest, for which we remained in

possession of them during the last war; and, on their being restored by

the peace, all this vast sum contributed to the improving and enriching

of the colonies of a power which unhappily even then could be considered

only as the vassal of our already too powerful rival. The proprietor in

our old islands will not deny that those continental settlements not

only have injured him by greatly increasing the quantity of colonial

produce in the market, but that, enjoying very decided advantages over

our older islands, from a more fertile soil, from being exempted from

hurricanes, from the opportunity of feeding the Slaves more plentifully,

and at a cheaper rate, they have been to him the cause of very great

loss and embarrassment. Had this evil been suffered to advance, the ruin

which must have followed from it, though gradual, would have been sure

and complete. From that misfortune the Abolitionists have relieved him,

by obtaining the Order of Council, since confirmed and sanctioned by an

Act of Parliament, for stopping the importation of Slaves, not only into

foreign colonies, but even into those possessions, chiefly in Guiana,

which in the present war have been again conquered from the enemy. And

surely we may assume to ourselves some credit for having willingly

rendered to them, our opponents, the greatest benefit which they could

receive. But while we are engaged on this topic, let me call on the West

Indians in our own ancient possessions, for whom again I must declare I

feel most good will, as those who have long been our fellow subjects, in

company with whom we have weathered many a storm and rejoiced after many

a victory; let me call on them to bear in mind a very probable source of

extreme injury to their particular interests, which will be opened on

the restoration of peace, if the Slave Trade be not abolished.

Supposing us to retain the conquered settlements, the importation of

Slaves cannot be withheld from the proprietors in those colonies, while

we allow it to their fellow subjects; yet, if granted to the former, by

far the larger part of our whole export from Africa will be allotted to

their use. Their settlements will be every year increasing; new cargoes

of colonial produce will be poured by them into the market, and the

planters in our old islands, for whom and for whose interests we ought

to feel most concern, will be plunged deeper and deeper into a gulf, in

which, by their own confession, they have already sunk almost

irretrievably. But supposing us even to give up the conquered West

Indian settlements on the restoration of peace, still Trinidad will

remain to us; and that large and fertile island would of itself be

sufficient to furnish such an immense quantity of fresh colonial produce

as almost to consummate the ruin at least of our more ancient and less

fertile colonies.

To resume the discussion in which I was lately engaged. Let me again

declare, that so much do I ascribe to the effects of that party spirit

of which I have treated so largely, that I am convinced, if the colonial

proprietors were not warped by prejudice, and heated by _esprit de

corps_, such of them as are really well acquainted with the subject in

it’s various parts and bearings, would be in favour of abolition; they

would agree with me, that, excepting only some particular interests, the

present West Indian system, and, above all, the Slave Trade, as it’s

basis and ground-work, are contrary to sound policy, no less than to

justice and humanity. In truth, this question has been already decided;

for, we have been assured by the same respectable gentleman who was

before alluded to, that, above thirty years ago, the following question

was discussed in Kingston, the capital of Jamaica, in a society formed

of the first characters of the place, “Whether the Trade to Africa for

Slaves was consistent with sound policy, the laws of nature and

morality.”—The discussion occupied several meetings, and at last was

determined, by a majority, that the Trade to Africa for Slaves was

neither consistent with sound policy, the laws of nature, or

morality[46].

“The chief ground on which the advocates for the Slave Trade rested

their opinion (he thinks) was, that God had formed some of the human

race inferior to others in intellect, and that Negroes appeared to have

been intended for Slaves; or to that purpose.”

Let this incident, and the conclusions which it suggests, be well

considered. It deserves to have the more weight, on account both of the

understanding and character of the individual who gave the account of

it; for, no man living was ever less likely to confound any hasty

expressions of men of warm and feeling minds, or of men of speculation

or ingenuity, who might like to defend a paradox, with the real

deliberate judgment of men of reflection, practical knowledge, and

personal experience. Observe, the only ground on which the Slave Trade

was defended, even in Jamaica, was that of the Negroes being an inferior

species. This opinion, as I formerly remarked, was the original

foundation of the Slave Trade, and it is the only ground on which it can

be rested with the smallest pretence to reason, justice, or humanity.

Happily, the friends of these wretched beings have, at length, obtained

the recognition of their human nature; but as yet it is a barren and

unprofitable right, if, while we grant them to be men, we treat them as

if we still deemed them of an inferior species. But still more this

incident shews, that they, who, from their local circumstances and

pursuits were most conversant with this great subject in all it’s parts,

had adopted, above thirty years ago, the position which Mr. Pitt

asserted so confidently, and proved so unanswerably, that the Slave

Trade was contrary not to justice and humanity only, but to sound policy

also; and if even so long ago they entertained this opinion; what, if

relieved from the blinding effects of prejudice and party, would be

their judgment now, when all the facts and principles, on which the

Slave Trade system must have been proved impolitic, have received an

almost unspeakable accession of force, and when the arguments, by which

it’s policy could alone be contended for, have since been almost

entirely done away: I regret that I have not time for enlarging on this

topic. But any man who has obtained any insight into this question will

readily discern the several considerations to which I allude.

[Sidenote: The hope of West Indian body’s opposition ceasing.]

But notwithstanding I ascribe so much of the opposition which has been

made to us, to the operation of party spirit, yet I dare not hope that

the flame is likely to become weaker, or at length to die away. On the

contrary, there is a store of aliment fully sufficient to maintain it in

continual and even interminable vigour. For after all that I have

stated, of it’s being rather the spirit of party, or at the utmost a

mistaken apprehension of loss, than a just sense of interest, which

animates the efforts of the great mass of West Indian Proprietors, yet

there are many who, it cannot be denied, are prompted by a true

persuasion that the abolition of the Slave Trade will materially lessen

their gains. Of this number is that great, respectable, affluent, and,

as we have fatally experienced; most powerful body, the West Indian

Merchants. I cannot deny that many, perhaps almost all of this class,

may have a direct interest in the extension of West Indian cultivation.

Though planting speculations may not answer to the immediate

undertakers, they may answer to the merchant in this country; and he

might gain by the cultivation being pushed to an extent which would

utterly ruin the planters. He pays himself in the first instance both

for the articles furnished for the supply of the estate, and for his

profits on the importations from abroad; and if he have prudence

sufficient, which however is seldom the case, to prevent his advancing

too much on any one estate, so as to compel him to become the proprietor

of it, he is certainly engaged in an advantageous branch of business.

Hence he is always the foremost to petition against the abolition.

Together with the merchants, I must except also that considerable body,

often of respectable men, who have gone over to the West Indian islands

in inferior capacities, and who mean to engage in planting undertakings.

The stoppage of the importations from Africa would retard, at least, if

not destroy these speculations. This is a class of men, in whose

interests I confess I take a lively interest; but not an interest

sufficient to induce me to sanction the destruction of thousands of my

fellow creatures annually, for the sake of allowing them more convenient

opportunities of rising in life. I confess their interest is a matter of

much more concern to me than those of the greater and more adventurous

speculators. I ought, perhaps, also to except the last-mentioned class

of persons. Though, in common, to afford them the opportunity of

engaging in these West Indian speculations, be only to afford them an

occasion of accomplishing their own ruin; yet they conceive they have an

interest in the continuance of the Slave Trade, and therefore they are

not actuated only by party spirit. This class is likely to increase. The

few great prizes in the West Indian lottery will tempt adventurers to

engage in it; and it is in vain to hope that the colonists will ever

concur in the abolition of the Slave Trade, so long as there is room

left for new speculations; that is, so long as there remains, in the

Western hemisphere, any unsettled land capable of cultivation, and as

any Negroes can be brought from Africa to work it. So long as there is

any scope left for new speculations, so long there will be a set of new

speculators residing in the islands, who will form the real instigators

of the opposition to the proposal for abolishing the Slave Trade; and

these, joined by the great mercantile body at home, will carry along

with them the bulk of their brethren, the colonial proprietors resident

in this country.

It is for the benefit of these classes, not for that of our old colonial

proprietors, that the Slave Trade is in reality carried on. For it is

undeniably true, nor will it, I presume, be contested, that by far the

larger proportion of all the Slaves we import, have always been and will

ever be destined to the formation of new settlements, not in maintaining

and keeping up estates which had been already completed.

But surely the question has ere now occurred to you, When or where is

this system to terminate? Is it to go on till our colonial settlements

are brought into a state of complete cultivation? It may be worth while

to spend a few moments in examining the consequences of such an

admission; they were traced out by a high authority, who stated, that,

even of the great island of Jamaica itself, the quantity of uncultivated

land was two-thirds more than that already in cultivation.[47] To

suffice for the cultivation of the other parts, the complete number of

600,000 more Negroes, living at the same time, would be necessary, in

addition to 256,000 now there. The calculation went on to consider the

numbers which must be imported, and the length of time which, under all

the waste of human life which attends the present destructive system,

must elapse, in bringing the Island of Jamaica into complete cultivation

by Slaves. It was found that, supposing the rate at which the

cultivation and population would increase in future, to be the same as

that at which they had increased hitherto, that it would not be

accomplished in less than two hundred and twenty years, and it would

require the exportation from Africa of greatly more than a million of

our fellow creatures. For reasons which could be stated, the period here

mentioned is much too short. But besides the Island of Jamaica, there

are St. Vincents, Grenada, Dominica, above all, Trinidad, and the

unknown extent of our future continental acquisitions, which would claim

just the same right to have their cultivation completed.

Such must be admitted to be the fair consequences of prosecuting the

Slave Trade, for the purpose, plainly enough avowed by the colonists in

Jamaica, of bringing into cultivation the whole of the land which is

still uncultivated. Would even the most determined friends of the West

Indians on this side of the water go this length? I speak not of those,

if any such there be, who love the Slave Trade on account of its own

inherent excellencies; nor of the West Indian merchants, nor yet of the

African trader. But would the less devoted friends of the Slave Trade go

the length of admitting this principle? I trust they would not. Must

they not then concede, that the only principle on which they can act

consistently, must be that of carrying on the importation of Slaves for

the sole purpose of keeping up, not of extending the cultivation.

Indeed, when this great cause was argued in the House of Commons in

1792, all, I believe, of our opponents, excepting only those who were

personally connected with the Slave Trade, admitted fully and frankly

the principle of not opening new lands. They objected not to the ground

which was taken by that great man to whom I have already so often

alluded. Would the most attached friend, he asked, of the Slave Trade,

think of founding a new colony, or of setting up a new Slave Trade? And

it was justly and undeniably argued, nor was the position contested,

that the formation of new settlements in our old islands was just as

much the planting of a new colony, as if the same settlements were made

in any newly discovered country. There was no difference in principle

between the two cases. It was a new and voluntary establishment, made

with our eyes open to all the guilt which the enterprise would involve,

and all the horrors of which we professed to be sensible. The force of

these arguments, when used in 1792, was granted to be irresistible; but,

as if it were in absolute contempt of them, and of the practical

conclusions to which they lead, we are plainly warned by the colonists,

against supposing that they will ever consent to stop the importations

from Africa, so long as any vacant and cultivable land remains on which

to plant them. These facts, with the aweful considerations which result

from them, let me most seriously urge on the conscientious deliberations

of those who, contrary alas! to the expectation indulged by that great

man whom I have before so often mentioned; by their fatal proposal of

gradual, [Sidenote: The gradual abolitionists especially bound to

consider these facts.] instead of immediate abolition, dashed the cup of

happiness from the lips of the wretched African, at the very moment when

at last he appeared likely to taste it, and who thus proved in fact the

most efficient supporters of the Slave Trade. A vast majority in

Parliament were then so much alive to the principles of justice and

humanity, that all direct opposition would have been utterly

ineffectual. But this kind of half measure, however unintentionally,

exactly answered the purpose of our enemies, by giving time for the zeal

of men to cool, and providing an expedient by which, aided by a little

of that self deception which we are all apt to practice on ourselves on

suitable occasions, they might feel the complacencies arising from an

act of justice and humanity, without paying the price or making the

sacrifice which those principles required.

A Letter on the Abolition of the Slave Trade Addressed to the freeholders and other inhabitants of Yorkshire · 第 14 / 21 段