PROSAIC SPIRIT OF THE AGE.

There are some phrases that convey only a vague and indefinite

meaning, that make an impression upon the mind so faint as to be

scarcely resolvable into shape or character. Being associated,

however, with the feeling of beauty or enjoyment, they are ever on our

lips, and pass current in conversation at a conventional value. Of

these phrases is the 'poetry of life'--words that never fail to excite

an agreeable though dreamy emotion, which it is impossible to refer to

any positive ideas. They are generally used, however, to indicate

something gone by. The poetry of life, we say, with sentimental

regret, has passed away with the old forms of society; the world is

disenchanted of its talismans; we have awakened from the dreams that

once lent a charm to existence, and we now see nothing around us but

the cold hard crust of external nature.

This must be true if we think it is so; for we cannot be mistaken,

when we feel that the element of the poetical is wanting in our

constitutions. But we err both in our mode of accounting for the fact,

and in believing the loss we deplore to be irretrievable. The fault

committed by reasoners on this subject is, to confound one thing with

another--to account for the age being unpoetical--as it unquestionably

is--by a supposed decay in the materials of poetry. We may as well be

told that the phenomena of the rising and setting sun--of clouds and

moonlight--of storm and calm--of the changing seasons--of the

infinitely varying face of nature, are now trite and worn-out. They

are as fresh and new as ever, and will be so at the last day of the

world, presenting, at every recurring view, something to surprise as

well as delight. To each successive generation of men, the phenomena

both of the outer and inner world are absolutely new; and the child of

the present day is as much a stranger upon the earth as the first-born

of Eve. But the impression received by each individual from the things

that surround him is widely different--as different as the faces in a

crowd, which all present the common type of humanity without a single

feature being alike. This fact we unconsciously assert in our everyday

criticism; for when any similarity is detected in a description,

whether of things internal or external, we at once stigmatise the

later version as a plagiarism, and as such set it down as a confession

of weakness.

But although the manifestations of nature, being infinite, cannot be

worn out, the capacity to enjoy them, being human, may decay. It may,

in fact, in some natures, be entirely wanting, and in some generations

at least partially so. Seamen, for instance, who live, move, and have

their being in a world of poetry and romance, are the least poetical

of men; even in their songs they affect the prosaic and matter of

fact, and discard everything appertaining to the fanciful.[1] Here is

a direct instance of the materials of poetry being present, and its

spirit wanting. So common, however, is it to confound the poetical

with the faculty of enjoying it, that we find a hygienic power

ascribed as an absolute property to the beauty of that very element,

from which they who view it, both in its sweetest and grandest

aspects, derive no elevation of feeling whatever. Hufeland, who

reckons among the great panaceas of life the joy arising from the

contemplation of the beauties of nature, in estimating the advantage

of sea-bathing as the chief natural tonic, attributes it in great part

to the action of the prospect of the sea upon the nervous system. 'I

am fully convinced,' says he, 'that the physical effects of

sea-bathing must be greatly increased by the impression on the mind,

and that a hypochondriac or nervous person may be half-cured by

residing on the sea-coast, and enjoying a view of the grand scenes of

nature which will there present themselves--such as, the rising and

setting of the sun over the blue expanse of the waters, and the awful

majesty of the waves during a storm.' Now, if all patients were alike

impressionable, this would be sound doctrine; but, as it is, few see

the sun rise at all, many retire before the dews of evening begin to

condense, and almost all shut themselves carefully up during a storm.

The poetry of life, we need hardly say, is not associated exclusively

with the things of external nature:

All thoughts, all passions, all delights,

Whatever stirs this mortal frame,

are likewise a portion of the materials which it informs as with a

soul. For poetry does not create, but modify. It is neither passion

nor power; neither beauty nor love; but to one of these it gives

exaltation, to another majesty; to one enchantment, to another

divinity. It is not the light of 'the sun when it shines, nor of the

moon walking in brightness,' but the glory of the one, and the grace

and loveliness of the other. It is not instruction, but that which

lends to instruction a loftier character, ascending from the finite to

the infinite. It is not morality, but that which deepens the moral

impression, and sends the thrill of spiritual beauty throughout the

whole being. But its appeals, says an eloquent writer, are mainly 'to

those affections that are apt to become indolent and dormant amidst

the commerce of the world;' and it aims at the 'revival of those purer

and more enthusiastic feelings which are associated with the earlier

and least selfish period of our existence. Immersed in business,

which, if it sharpen the edge of intellect, leaves the heart barren;

toiling after material wealth or power, and struggling with fortune

for existence; seeing selfishness reflected all around us from the

hard and glittering surface of society as from a cold and polished

mirror; it would go hard with man in adversity, perhaps still more in

prosperity, if some resource were not provided for him, which, under

the form of an amusement and recreation, administered a secret but

powerful balsam in the one case, and an antidote in the other.' Poetry

elevates some of our emotions, disinters others from the rubbish of

the world, heightens what is mean, transforms what is unsightly,

Clothing the palpable and the familiar

With golden exhalations of the dawn.

It is a spiritual wine which revives the weary denizen of the vale of

tears, and softens, warms, and stimulates, without the reaction of

material cordials. 'It gives him wings,' says another writer, 'and

lifts him out of the dirt; and leads him into green valleys; and

carries him up to high places, and shews him at his feet the earth and

all its glories.'

The poetry of life, therefore, although one of those expressions that

baffle definition, points to something of vast importance to the

happiness of men and the progress of the race. It is no idle dream, no

mere amusement of the fancy. Whenever we feel a generous thrill on

hearing of a great action--that is poetry. Whenever we are conscious

of a larger and loftier sympathy than is implied in the exercise of

some common duty of humanity--that is poetry. Whenever we look upon

the hard realities of life through a medium that softens and relieves

them--that medium is poetry. Without poetry, there is no loftiness in

friendship, no devotedness in love. The feelings even of the young

mother watching her sleeping child till her eyes are dim with

happiness, are one half poetry. Hark! there is music on the evening

air, always a delightful incident in the most delightful scene; and

here there are ruins, and woods, and waters, all the adjuncts of a

picture. This is beauty; but if we breathe over that beauty the spirit

of poetry, see what a new creation it becomes, and what a permanent

emotion it excites!

The splendour falls on castle walls,

And snowy summits, old in story;

The long light shakes across the lakes,

And the wild cataract leaps in glory.

Blow, bugle blow, set the wild echoes flying;

Blow bugle, answer echoes, dying, dying, dying.

O hark! O hear! how thin and clear,

And thinner, clearer, further going;

O sweet and far, from cliff and scar,

The horns of Elfland faintly blowing!

Blow, let us hear the purple glens replying;

Blow bugle, answer echoes, dying, dying, dying.

O love, they die in yon rich sky!

They faint on field, and hill, and river;

Our echoes roll from soul to soul,

And grow for ever and for ever.

Blow, bugle blow, set the wild echoes flying;

And answer, echoes answer, dying, dying, dying.[2]

This is a sample of the spiritual wine we have talked of--something to

elevate and intoxicate. But the picture it presents does not pass away

in the reaction of the morning. It haunts us in all after-life, rising

up before us in the pauses of the world, to heal and refresh our

wearied spirits.

As in this poem the pleasure is caused by its appeals to the

imagination heightening the feeling the scene naturally excites; by

the spiritual and material world being linked together as regards the

music; and by the connection established between the echoes and the

sky, field, hill, and river, where they die--just so it is with the

poetry of moral feeling. The spectacle we have instanced of the young

mother watching her sleeping infant, is in itself beautiful; but it

becomes poetical when we imagine the feeling of beauty united in her

mind with the instinct of love, and detect in her glance, moist with

emotion, the blending of hopes, memories, pride, and tearful joy.

Poetry, therefore, is not moral feeling, but something that heightens

and adorns it. It is not even a direct moral agent, for it deepens the

lesson only through the medium of the feelings and imagination. Thus

moral poetry, when reduced to writing, is merely morality conveyed in

the form of poetry; and in like manner, religious poetry, is religion

so conveyed. The thing conveyed, however, must harmonise with the

medium, for poetry will not consent to give an enduring form to what

is false or pernicious. It has often been remarked, with a kind of

superstitious wonder, that poems of an immoral character never live

long; but the reason is, that it is the characteristic of immorality

to tie down man in the chains of the senses, and this shews that it

has nothing in common with the spiritual nature of poetry. For the

same reason, a poem based upon atheism, although it might attract

attention for a time, would meet with no permanent response in the

human breast; religion being Truth, and poetry her peculiar

ministrant.

Although written poetry, however, does not necessarily come into this

subject, it may be observed, that the comparative incapacity of the

present generation to enjoy the poetical is clearly exhibited in its

literature. Never was there so much verse, and so little poetry. Never

was the faculty of rhyming so impartially spread over the whole mass

of society. The difficulty used to be, to find one possessed of the

gift: now it is nearly as difficult to find one who is not. Formerly,

to write verses was a distinction: now it is a distinction not to

write them--and one of some consequence. But with all this multitude

of poets, there is not one who can take his place with the

comparatively great names of the past, or vanishing generation. Now

and then we have a brilliant thought--even a certain number of verses

deserving the name of a poem; but there is no sustained poetical

power, nothing to mark an epoch, or glorify a name. When we commend,

it is some passage distinct from the poem, something small, and

finished, and complete in itself. The taste of the day runs more upon

conceits and extravagances, such as Cowley would have admired, and

which he might have envied. The suddenness of the impression, so to

speak, made by great poets, their direct communication with the heart,

belongs to another time. It is our ambition to come to the same end by

feats of ingenuity; and instead of touching the feelings, and setting

the imagination of the reader instantaneously aglow, to exercise his

skill in unravelling and interpretation. We expect the pleasure of

success to reward him for the fatigue.

The same feeling is at work, as we have already pointed out, in

decorative art; in which 'a redundancy of useless or ridiculous

ornament is called richness, and the inability to appreciate simple

and beautiful, or grand and noble forms, receives the name of genius.'

The connection is curious, likewise, between this ingenuity of poetry

and that of the machinery which gives a distinguishing character to

our epoch. It looks as if the complication of images, working towards

a certain end, were only another development of the genius that

invents those wonderful instruments which the eye cannot follow till

they are familiarly entertained--and sometimes not even then. If this

idea were kept in view, there would be at least some wit, although no

truth, in the common theory which attempts to account for the decline

of poetry. Neither advancement in science, however, nor ingenuity in

mechanics, is in itself, as the theory alleges, hostile to the

poetical; on the contrary, the materials of poetry multiply with the

progress of both. The prosaic character of the age does not flow from

these circumstances, but exists in spite of them. It has been said,

indeed, that the light of knowledge is unfavourable to poetry, by

making the hues and lineaments of the phantoms it calls up grow

fainter and fainter, till they are wholly dispelled. But this applies

only to one class of images. The ghost of Banquo, for instance, may

pale away and vanish utterly before the light of knowledge; but the

air-drawn dagger of Macbeth is immortal like the mind itself.

Knowledge cannot throw its illumination upon eternity, or dissipate

the influences by which men feel they are surrounded. A candle brought

into a darkened room discloses the material forms of the things in the

midst of which we are standing, and which may have been involved, to

our imagination, in a poetical mystery. But the light itself, as an

unexplained wonder--its analogies with the flame of life--the

modifications it receives from the faint gleam of the sky through the

shadowed window--all are poetical materials, and of a higher

character. Where one series of materials ends, another begins; and so

on in infinite progression, till poetry seems to spurn the earth from

beneath her foot--

Driving far off each thing of sin and guilt,

And in clear dream and solemn vision

Telling of things which no gross ear can hear;

Till oft converse with heavenly habitants

Begins to cast a beam on the outer shape--

The unpolluted temple of the mind,

And turn it by degrees to the soul's essence,

Till all be made immortal.

Science with us, however, is a business instead of an ambition;

ingenuity a trade rather than a taste. We go on from discovery to

discovery, from invention to invention, with an insatiate but prosaic

spirit, which turns everything to a profitable and practical

account--imprisoning the very lightning, that it may carry our

messages over land and under sea! We do not stop to look, to listen,

to feel, to exalt with a moral elevation the objects of our study, and

snatch a spiritual enjoyment from imagination. All with us is

material; and all would be even mean, but for the essential grandeur

of the things themselves. And here comes the question: Is this

material progress incompatible with spiritual progress? Is the poetry

of life less abundant because the conveniences of life are more

complete and admirable? Is man less a spirit of the universe because

he is a god over the elements? We answer, No: the scientific and the

prosaic spirit are both independent elements in the genius of the age;

or, if there is a necessary connection, it is the converse of what is

supposed--the restless mind in which the fervour of poetry has died,

plunging into science for the occupation that is necessary to its

happiness. Thus one age is merely poetical, another merely scientific;

although here, of course, we use, for the sake of distinctness, the

broadest terms, unmindful of the modifications ranging between these

extreme points. The age, however, that has least poetry has most

science, and _vice versâ_.

But man, unlike the other denizens of the earth, has power over his

own destiny. He is able to cultivate the poetical as if it were a

plant; and if once convinced of its important bearing upon his

enjoyment of the world, he will do so. The imagination may be educated

as well as the moral sense, and the result of the advancement of the

one as well as the other is an expansion of the mind, and an

enlargement of the capacity for happiness. The grand obstacle is

precisely what we have now endeavoured to aid in removing--the common

mistake as to the nature of the poetical, which it is customary to

consider as something remote from, or antagonistic to, the business of

life. So far from this, it is essentially connected with the moral

feelings. It neutralises the conventionalisms of society, and makes

the whole world kin. It enlarges the circle of our sympathies, till

they comprehend, not only our own kind, but every living thing, and

not only animate beings, but all created nature.

Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 443 Volume 17, New Series, June 26, 1852 · 第 3 / 21 题