The usual parallelogram of the New York parlor is broken, by the

pleasantly irregular shape of the rooms, into a series of unexpected

openings, turnings and corners. At the most distant end, beyond the

square drawing-room, the perspective is defined by the rich tones of a

long stretch of stained glass. The figures are neither those of nymph

nor satyr, nor yet of the æsthetic young damsel in amber garments whom

Burne-Jones and William Morris would have us accept as the successor

of these. Here sit two strangely familiar-looking stolid Dutchmen in

colonial dress, puffing their pipes in an old-time kitchen. They are

Peter Stuyvesant and Govert Loockermans, in the act of being waited

upon by “goede-vrouw Maria, ... bustling at her best to spread the

New Year’s table.” Lest the gazer might be in need of an introduction

to these three jovial creations of the poet’s fancy, there are lines

of the poem intertwined with the holly which serves as a decorative

adjunct. No more fitting entrance could have been chosen to the Stedman

dining-room than this. If there was no other company, there was always

the extra plate and an empty chair awaiting the coming guest. It has

pleased the humor of Boston to lance its arrows of wit at New York

for the latter’s pretensions to establishing literary circles and

coteries. When literary Boston was invited to the Stedmans to dinner,

these satirical arrows seemed suddenly to lose their edge. During the

four or five years that Mr. and Mrs. Stedman occupied their charming

house, New York had as distinctly a literary center as either Paris

or London. On Sunday evenings, the evenings at home, there was such a

varied assemblage of guests as only a metropolis can bring together.

Not only authors and artists, critics and professional men, but fashion

and society, found their way there. At the weekly dinners were to be

met the distinguished foreigner, the latest successful novelist or

young poet, and the wittiest and the most beautiful women. As if in

humorous mockery of the difficulties attendant upon literary success

and recognition, the dining-room in its size and seating capacity might

not inaptly be likened to that Oriental figure of speech by which the

rich found heaven so impossible of access. The smallness of the room

only served, however, like certain chemical apparatus, to condense and

liberate the brilliant conversational gases. If the poet were in his

most gracious mood, the more favored guests, after dinner, might be

allowed a glimpse of the library. Books were scattered so profusely

over the house, that each room might easily have been mistaken for

one. But in a large square room at the top of the house is the library

proper--workshop and study together. This building his poet’s nest

under the eaves of his own cornice is the one evidence of the recluse

in Stedman’s character. When he is about to pluck his own plumage

that his fledglings may be covered, he turns his back on the world.

All the paraphernalia of his toil are about him. The evidences of the

range and the extent of his reading and scholarship are to be found

in taking down some of the volumes on the shelves. Here are the Greek

classics, in the original, with loose sheets among the pages, where are

translations of Theocritus or Bion, done into finished English verse.

Mr. Stedman’s proficiency in Doric Greek is matched by his familiarity

with the modern French classics, whose lightness of touch and airy

grace he has caught in “Aucassin and Nicolette,” “Toujours Amour,” and

“Jean Prouvaire’s Song.” With a delicate sense of fitness, the dainty

verse of Coppée, Béranger, Théodore de Banville, the sonnets of Victor

Hugo, and, indeed, his whole collection of the French poets, is bound

in exquisite vellum or morocco. Among these volumes the poet’s own

works appear in several rare and beautiful editions. There are the

“Songs and Ballads,” issued by the Bookfellows Club, the essay on

Edgar Allan Poe in vellum (the first so bound in America), and other

beautifully illustrated and printed copies of his poems. The shelves

and tables are laden with a wealth of literary treasure. But there

is one volume one holds with a truly reverent delight. It is Mrs.

Browning’s own copy of “Casa Guidi Windows,” with interlineations and

corrections. It was the gift of the poetess to Mrs. Kinney, Stedman’s

mother, who was among Mrs. Browning’s intimate friends. “How John Brown

took Harper’s Ferry,” it is pleasant to learn, was an especial favorite

with the great songstress.

Since the reversal of fortune which overwhelmed Mr. Stedman five years

ago, this charming home has been temporarily leased. The family,

however, were altogether fortunate in securing Bayard Taylor’s old home

in East Thirtieth Street, during an absence in Europe of the latter’s

wife and daughter. Here the conditions surrounding Stedman’s home life

have been necessarily changed. The arduous literary labor attendant

on the publishing of his recently completed volume on the “Poets of

America,” which completes the series of contemporaneous English and

American poets, together with his work on the “Library of American

Literature” (of which he and Miss Hutchinson are the joint editors),

the writing of magazine articles, poems and critiques, and the

increased cares of his business struggles, make him too hard-worked

a man to be available for the lighter social pleasures. The Sunday

evenings are, however, still maintained, as his one leisure hour,

and the hospitality is as generous as the present modest resources

of the household will permit. Mr. Stedman’s early career, and the

native toughness of fibre which has enabled him to fight a winning

battle against tremendous odds during his whole life, furnished

him with the fortitude and endurance with which he met his recent

calamity. The heroic element is a dominant note in his character. At

the very outset of his career he gave proof of the stuff that was in

him. Entering Yale College in 1849, and suspended in ’53 for certain

boyish irregularities, the man in him was born in a day. At nineteen

he went into journalism, married at twenty, and in another year was

an editor and a father. Ten years later, after service in all the

grades of newspaper life, the same energy of decision marked his next

departure. He gave up journalism, and went into active business in

Wall Street that he might have time for more independent, imaginative

writing. The bread-winning was so successful that in another ten years

he had gained a competence, and was about to retire from business, to

devote himself entirely to literary pursuits. He now returns to the

struggle with fortune with the old unworn, undaunted patience. He

has been sustained in the vicissitudes of his career by the cheering

companionship of his wife. Ever in sympathy with her husband’s work and

ambitions, Mrs. Stedman has possessed the gift of adaptability which

has enabled her to meet with befitting ease and dignity the varying

fortunes which have befallen them. In the earlier nomadic days she was

the Blanche, who, with the poet, rambled through the “faery realm” of

Bohemia. The “little King Arthur” is a grown man now, his father’s

co-worker and devoted aid. The king has abdicated in favor of a tiny

princess, who rules the household with her baby ways. This is another

Laura, _ætat_ four, who, with her mother, Mrs. Frederick Stedman,

completes the family circle. It needs the reiterated calls for grandpa

and grandma to impress one with the reality of the fact that this

still youthful-looking couple are not masquerading in the parts. Mr.

Stedman, in spite of his grayish beard and mustache, is a singularly

young-looking man for his years. He is slight, with slender figure

and delicate features. His motions and gestures are full of impulse

and energy. He has the bearing of a man who has measured his strength

with the world. The delicate refinement and finish of his work, as

well as its power and vigor, are foreshadowed in his _personnel_. His

manner is an epitome of his literary style. His face has the charm

which comes from high-bred features molded into the highest form of

expression--that of intellectual energy infused with a deep and keen

sympathetic quality. Something of this facial charm he inherits from

his mother, now Mrs. Kinney. As the lovely and brilliant wife of the

Hon. William B. Kinney, when the latter was American Minister at the

Court of Turin, this gifted lady won a European reputation for the

sparkling radiance of her beauty.

As a talker Mr. Stedman possesses the first and highest of

qualities--that of spontaneity. The thought leaps at a bound into

expression. So rapid is the flow of ideas, and so fluent its delivery,

that one thought sometimes trips on the heels of the next. His talk,

in its range, its variety, and the multiplicity of subjects touched

upon, even more, perhaps, than his work, is an unconscious betrayal

of his many-sided life. The critic, the poet, the man of business and

the man of the world, the lover of nature, and the keen observer of

the social machinery of life, each by turn takes the ascendant. The

whole, woven together by a brilliant tissue of short, epigrammatic,

trenchant sentences, abounding in good things one longs to remember and

quote, forms a most picturesque and dazzling ensemble. Added to the

brilliancy, there is a genial glow of humor, and such an ardor and

enthusiasm in his capacity for admiration, as complete Mr. Stedman’s

equipment as a man and a conversationalist. He would not be a poet did

he not see his fellow-man aureoled with a halo. His natural attitude

toward life and men is an almost boyish belief and delight in their

being admirable. It is only on discovering they are otherwise that the

critic appears to soften the disappointment by the rigors of analysis.

Stedman is by nature an enthusiast. He owes it to his training that

he is a critic. As an enthusiast he has the fervor, the intensity,

the exaltation, which belong to the believer and the lover of all

things true and good and beautiful. He is as generous as he is ardent,

and his gift of praising is not to be counted as among the least of

his qualities. But the critic comes in to temper the ardor, to weigh

the value, and to test the capacity. And thus it is found that there

are two men in Mr. Stedman, one of whom appears to be perpetually in

pursuit of the other, and never quite to overtake him.

If poets are born and not made this side of heaven, so are sportsmen.

In Stedman’s case the two appeared in one, to prove the duality

possible. Summer after summer, in the hard-won vacations, the two have

sailed the inland lakes and fished in the trout streams together;

the fisherman oblivious of all else save the movements of that most

animate of inanimate insects--the angler’s fly; the poet equally

absorbed in quite another order of motion--that of nature’s play. The

range of Mr. Stedman’s acquaintance among backwoodsmen and seafaring

men is in proportion to the extent of his journeyings. “There are at

least a hundred men with whom I am intimate who don’t dream I have

ever written a line,” I once overheard him say in the midst of a story

he was telling of the drolleries of some forest guide who was among

his “intimates.” This talent for companionship with classes of men

removed from his own social orbit has given Stedman that breadth of

sympathy and that sure vision in the fields of observation which makes

his critical work so unusual. He knows men as a naturalist knows the

kingdom of animal life. He can thus analyze and classify, not only the

writer, but the man, for he holds the key to a right comprehension of

character by virtue of his own plastic sensibility. His delight in

getting near to men who are at polaric distances from him socially,

makes him impatient of those whom so-called culture has removed to

Alpine heights from which to view their fellow-beings. “There’s so

and so,” he once said, in speaking of a second-rate poet whose verses

were æsthetic sighs to the south wind and the daffodil; “he thinks of

nothing but rhyming love and dove. I wonder what he would make out of

a man--a friend of mine, for instance, in the Maine woods, a creature

as big as Hercules, with a heart to match his strength. I should like

to see what he would make of him.” Stedman’s own personality is infused

with a raciness and a warmth peculiar to men who have the power of

freshening their own lives by that system of wholesome renewal called

human contact. Much of the secret of his social charm comes from his

delight in, and ready companionship with, all conditions of men.

In his present study in the little house in Thirtieth Street there

are several photographs, scattered about the room, of a quaint and

picturesque seaside house. This is the summer home on the island of

New Castle, N. H. It has a tower which seems to have been built over

the crest of the waves, and a _loggia_ as wide and spacious as a

Florentine palace. No one but a sailor or a sea-lover could have chosen

such a spot. To Mr. Stedman, New Castle was a veritable _trouvaille_.

It fulfilled every condition of pleasure and comfort requisite in a

summer home. The sea was at his doors, and the elms and fields ran down

to meet it. The little island, with its quaint old fishing village,

its old colonial houses, its lanes and its lovely coast line, is the

most picturesque of microcosms ever set afloat. There is no railroad

nearer than three miles, and to reach it one crosses as many bridges

as span a Venetian canal. Mr. Stedman himself, the poet John Albee,

Barrett Wendell (one of Boston’s clever young authors), Prof. Bartlett,

of Harvard, and Jacob Wendell’s family, make a charming and intimate

little coterie. At Kelp Rock Mr. Stedman is only the poet, the genial

host, and the _bon camarade_. Business cares and thoughts are relegated

to the world whence they came. The most approachable of authors at

all times, at New Castle, with the sea and the sunshine to keep his

idleness in countenance, he seems fairly to irradiate companionship.

His idleness is of an order to set the rest of the world a lesson in

activity. In his play he is even more intense, if possible, than in

his work. The play consists of five or six hard-writing hours in his

tower during the morning. This is followed by an afternoon of sailing,

or fishing, or walking, any one of which forms of pleasure is planned

with a view to hard labor of some kind, some strenuous demand on the

physical forces. The evening finds him and his family, with some of the

group mentioned and often with stray visitors from the outer world,

before the drift-wood fire in the low-raftered hall, where talk and

good-cheer complete the day.

With such abundantly vigorous energies, Mr. Stedman’s quarter of a

century of productiveness is only an earnest of his future work. He

has doubly pledged himself hereafter to the performance of strictly

original creative writing. As critic he has completed the work which

he set himself to do--that of rounding the circle of contemporaneous

poetry. In giving to the world such masterpieces of critical writing

as the “Victorian Poets” and “Poets of America,” he owes it to his own

muse to prove that the critic leaves the poet free.

ANNA BOWMAN DODD.

[Since this sketch was written (November, 1885) Mr. Stedman has sold

his Fifty-fourth Street house, leased a house in East Twenty-sixth

Street, bought one in West Seventy-eighth Street (1890) and sold it in

1895, at the same time that he disposed of “Kelp Rock.” His permanent

home is now at Lawrence Park--“Casa Laura,” named after his wife and

granddaughter--although he spent last winter in apartments in New York.

His most recent works are his Victorian and American Anthologies and

“Mater Coronata,” the poem written for the Bicentennial Celebration of

Yale University.--EDITORS.]

RICHARD HENRY STODDARD

RICHARD HENRY STODDARD

IN NEW YORK

Among those New York men-of-letters who are “only that and nothing

more”--who are known simply as writers, and not as politicians or

public speakers, like George William Curtis in the older, or Theodore

Roosevelt in the younger, generation,--there is no figure more familiar

than that of Richard Henry Stoddard. The poet’s whole life since he

was ten years old has been passed on Manhattan Island; no feet, save

those of some veteran patrolman, “have worn its stony highways” more

persistently than his. The city has undergone many changes since the

boy landed at the Battery one Sunday morning over half a century ago,

and with his mother and her husband wandered up Broadway, but his

memory keeps the record of them all.

It is not only New York that has changed its aspect in the hurrying

years; the times have changed, too, and the conditions of life are

not so hard for this adopted New Yorker as they were in his boyhood

and early youth. Perhaps he is not yet in a position to display the

motto of the Stoddards, “Post Nubes Lux,” which he once declared would

be his when the darkness that beclouded his fortunes had given place

to light. But his labors to-day, however irksome and monotonous, are

not altogether uncongenial. He is not yet free from the necessity of

doing a certain amount of literary hackwork (readers of _The Mail

and Express_ are selfish enough to hope he never will be); but he

has sympathetic occupation and surroundings, leisure to write verse

at other than the “mournful midnight hours,” a sure demand for all

he writes (a condition not last or least in the tale of a literary

worker’s temporal blessings), and, above all, that sense of having

won a place in the hearts of his fellow-men which should be even more

gratifying to a poet than the assurance of a niche in the Temple of

Fame. Such further gratification as this last assurance may give, Mr.

Stoddard certainly does not lack.

The story of the poet’s life has been told so often, and in volumes so

readily accessible to all (the best account is to be found in “Poets’

Homes,” Boston, D. Lothrop Co.), that I do not need to rehearse it

in detail. Like the lives of most poets, especially the poets of

America, it has not been an eventful one, if by eventful we imply those

marvelous achievements or startling changes of fortune that dazzle

the world. Yet what more marvelous than that the delicate flower

of poetry should be planted in a soil formed by the fusion of such

rugged elements as a New England sailing-master and the daughter of a

“horse-swapping” deacon? Or that, once planted there, it should have

not only survived, but grown and thriven amid the rigors of such an

early experience as Stoddard’s? These surely _are_ marvels, but marvels

to which mankind was passably accustomed even before Shelley told us

that the poet teaches in song only what he has learned in suffering.

Mr. Stoddard was born July 2, 1825, at Hingham, Mass., the home of his

ancestors since 1638. The Stoddards were seafaring folk; the poet’s

father being one of those hardy New England captains whose bones now

whiten the mid-sea sands. It was a step-father that brought Richard and

his mother to New York; and here the boy had his only schooling and an

unpromising practical experience of life. The reading and writing of

poetry kept his soul alive during these dark days, and his achievements

did not fail of appreciation. Poe paid him the back-handed compliment

of pronouncing a poem he had written too good to be original; while

N. P. Willis more directly encouraged him to write. So also did Park

Benjamin, Lewis Gaylord Clarke, and Mrs. Caroline M. Kirkland. But the

first friendship formed with a writer of his own age resulted from

a call on Bayard Taylor--already the author of “Views Afoot” and one

of the editors of the _Tribune_,--who had accepted some verses of the

poet’s, and who was, later on, the means of making him acquainted with

another young poet and critic--the third member of a famous literary

trio. This was Edmund Clarence Stedman, a younger man than the other

two by eight years or so; then (in 1859) but twenty-six years old,

though he had already made himself conspicuous by “The Diamond Wedding”

and “How Old Brown took Harper’s Ferry.” With Taylor Mr. Stoddard’s

intimacy continued till the death of that distinguished traveler,

journalist, poet, translator and Minister to Germany; with Stedman his

friendship is still unbroken. He has had many friends, and many are

left to him, but none have stood closer than these in the little circle

in which he is known as “Dick.”

When Mr. Stoddard met the woman he was to marry, he had already

published, or rather printed (at his own expense), a volume called

“Footprints.” The poems were pleasantly noticed in two or three

magazines, and one copy of them was sold. As there was no call for the

remainder of the edition, it was committed to the flames. Encouraged

by this success, the young poet saw no impropriety in becoming the

husband of a young lady of Mattapoisett. Elizabeth Barstow was her

name, and the tie that bound them was a common love of books. It was

at twenty-five (some years before his first meeting with Taylor or

Stedman) that the penniless poet and the ship-builder’s daughter were

made one by the Rev. Ralph Hoyt, an amiable clergyman of this city,

“who found it easier to marry the poet than to praise his verses.”

Realizing that man cannot live by poetry alone, particularly when he

has given hostages to fortune (as Bacon, not Shakspeare, puts it) he

set to work to teach himself to write prose, “and found that he was

either a slow teacher, or a slow scholar, probably both.” But prose and

verse together, though by no means lavish in their rewards to-day, were

still less bountiful in the early ’50s; and even when the slow pupil

had acquired what the slow teacher had to impart, he was in a fair

way to learn by experience whether or no “love is enough” for husband

and wife and an increasing family of children. Not long before this,

however, it had been Mr. Stoddard’s good fortune to become acquainted

with Hawthorne, and through the romancer’s friendly intervention he

received from President Pierce an appointment in the New York Custom

House. He was just twenty-eight years of age when he entered the

granite temple in Wall Street, and he was forty-five when he regained

his freedom from official bondage.

It was in 1870 that Mr. Stoddard lost his position in the Custom House.

Shortly afterwards he became a clerk in the New York Dock Department,

under Gen. McClellan; and, in 1877, Librarian of the City Library--an

anomalous position, better suited to his tastes and capabilities in

title than in fact, since the Library is a library only in name, its

shelves being burdened with books that would have come under Lamb’s

most cordial ban. The librarianship naturally came to an end in not

more than two years. Since then, or about that date, Mr. Stoddard has

been the literary editor of _The Mail and Express_--a position in

which he has found it hard to do his best work, perhaps, but in which

he has at least given a literary tone to the paper not common to our

dailies. He has also been an occasional contributor to _The Critic_

since its foundation; until recently he was a leading review-writer for

the _Tribune_; and he is still to be found now and then in the poets’

corner of _The Independent_. Of the books he has written or edited

it is unnecessary to give the list; it can be found in almost any

biographical dictionary. The volume on which his fame will rest is his

“Poetical Works,” published by the Scribners. It contains some of the

most beautiful lyrics and blank-verse ever written in America--some of

the most beautiful written anywhere during the poet’s life-time. His

verse is copious in amount, rich in thought, feeling, and imagination,

simple and sensuous in expression. The taste of readers and lovers of

English poetry must undergo a radical change indeed, if such poems as

the stately Horatian ode on Lincoln, the Keats and Lincoln sonnets,

the “Hymn to the Beautiful,” “The Flight of Youth,” “Irreparable,”

“Sorrow and Joy,” “The Flower of Love Lies Bleeding,” or the pathetic

poems grouped in the collective edition of the poet’s verses under the

general title of “In Memoriam,” are ever to be forgotten or misprized.

In prose, too--the medium he found it so difficult to teach himself

to use,--he has put forth (often anonymously) innumerable essays and

sketches betraying a ripe knowledge of literature and literary history

together with the keenest critical acumen, and flashing and glowing

with alternate wit and humor. Long practice has given him the mastery

of a style as individual as it is pleasing: once familiar with it, one

needs no signature to tell whether he is the author of a given article.

The Stoddards’ home has been, for sixteen years, the first of a row of

three-story-and-basement houses, built of brick and painted a light

yellow, that runs eastward along the north side of East Fifteenth

Street, from the south-east corner of Stuyvesant Square. Like its

neighbors it is distinguished from the conventional New York house

by a veranda that shades the doorway and first-floor windows. The

neighborhood to the east is unattractive; to the west, delightful.

Stuyvesant Square--“Squares” it should be, for Second Avenue, with

its endless file of horse-cars, trucks, carriages and foot-travelers,

bisects the stately little park--is one of the most beautiful as well

as one of the most “aristocratic” quarters of the city. (Was it not

from Stuyvesant Square that the late Richard Grant White dedicated one

of his last books to a noble English lady?) It is the quarter long

known to and frequented by the Stuyvesants, the Rutherfords, the Fishs,

the Jays. Senator Evarts’s city home is but a block below the Square.

The twin steeples of fashionable St. George’s keep sleepless watch over

its shaded walks and sparkling fountains. By the bell of the old church

clock the poet can regulate his domestic time-piece; for its sonorous

hourly strokes, far-heard at night, are but half-muffled by the loudest

noises of the day; or should they chance to be altogether hushed,

the passer-by has but to raise his eyes to one of the huge faces to

see the gilt hands gleaming in the sun or moonlight. St. George’s is

on the opposite side of the Square to Mr. Stoddard’s, at the corner

of Rutherford Place and Sixteenth Street; and a Friends’ School and

Meeting-House fill the space between this and the Fifteenth Street

corner. Past the latter, the poet--true to the kindred points of club

and home--is a constant wayfarer. For the Century Association, of which

he is one of the oldest members, commands his interest now as it did

when housed at No. 109 in the same street that holds the Stoddards’

household gods. The number at which the family receive their friends

and mail, and give daily audience (vicariously) to the inevitable

butcher and baker, is 329.

Authors at home: Personal and biographical sketches of well-known American writers · 第 12 / 17 段