It is the prose-Homer of our Republic whom it is my privileg

[Illustration]

AUTHORS AT HOME

_PERSONAL AND BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES OF

WELL-KNOWN AMERICAN WRITERS_

EDITED BY

J. L. & J. B. GILDER

NEW YORK

A. WESSELS COMPANY

1902

COPYRIGHT, 1889,

BY

O. M. DUNHAM.

COPYRIGHT, 1902,

BY

A. WESSELS COMPANY.

EDITOR’S NOTE

The sketches of authors at home in this book have as their special

value the fact that the writer of each article was selected for the

purpose by the author himself. The sketches appeared from time to time

in _The Critic_, where they attracted particular attention by virtue of

their authenticity, as well as for the names of the subjects and the

writers.

The Canadian border has been crossed in the article on Prof. Goldwin

Smith; but with this exception the series treats only of native

American writers who make their home on this side of the Atlantic.

Since these sketches were written, some of the most distinguished of

the authors in the list have died, all of them meeting natural deaths,

with one exception, Mr. Paul Leicester Ford.

J. L. G.

NEW YORK, _June, 1902_.

CONTENTS

PAGE

THOMAS BAILEY ALDRICH. _By William H. Bishop._ 1

GEORGE BANCROFT. _B. G. Lovejoy._ 17

GEORGE H. BOKER. _George P. Lathrop._ 29

JOHN BURROUGHS. _Roger Riordan._ 39

GEORGE W. CABLE. _J. K. Wetherill._ 49

S. L. CLEMENS (MARK TWAIN). _Chas. Hopkins Clark._ 61

GEORGE WILLIAM CURTIS. _George P. Lathrop._ 73

DR. EDWARD EGGLESTON. _O. C. Auringer._ 83

EDWARD EVERETT HALE. _William Sloane Kennedy._ 97

JOEL CHANDLER HARRIS. _Erastus Brainerd._ 111

PROF. J. A. HARRISON. _W. M. Baskervill._ 125

COL. JOHN HAY. _B. G. Lovejoy._ 135

COL. T. W. HIGGINSON. _George Willis Cooke._ 147

DR. O. W. HOLMES. _Alice Wellington Rollins._ 163

JULIA WARD HOWE. _Maude Howe._ 181

WILLIAM DEAN HOWELLS. _William H. Bishop._ 193

CHARLES GODFREY LELAND. _Elizabeth Robins Pennell._ 211

JAMES RUSSELL LOWELL. _George E. Woodberry._ 227

DONALD G. MITCHELL (IK MARVEL). _Henry H. Beers._ 237

FRANCIS PARKMAN. _Charles H. Farnham._ 253

PROF. GOLDWIN SMITH. _Charles G. D. Roberts._ 263

EDMUND CLARENCE STEDMAN. _Anna Bowman Dodd._ 273

RICHARD HENRY STODDARD. _Joseph B. Gilder._ 291

HARRIET BEECHER STOWE. _Rev. Joseph H. Twichell._ 313

CHARLES DUDLEY WARNER. _Rev. Joseph H. Twichell._ 323

WALT WHITMAN. _George Selwyn._ 333

JOHN GREENLEAF WHITTIER. _Harriet Prescott Spofford._ 343

MRS. MARGARET DELAND. _Lucia Purdy._ 355

F. MARION CRAWFORD. _William Bond._ 369

PAUL LEICESTER FORD. _Lindsay Swift._ 385

THOMAS BAILEY ALDRICH

THOMAS BAILEY ALDRICH

ON BEACON HILL, AND ROUND IT.

Beacon Hill is the great pyramid, or horn of dominion, as it were,

of Boston’s most solid respectability of the older sort. Half-way up

Beacon Hill, Aldrich is to be met with at the office of _The Atlantic

Monthly_, of which he has been the editor since 1881. The publishers of

this magazine have established its headquarters, together with their

general business, in the old Quincy mansion, at No. 4 Park Street,

which they have had pleasantly remodeled for their purposes. Close by,

on the steep slope, is the Union Club; across the street the long,

shaded stretch of Boston Common; and above it is the State House,

presiding over the quarter, with its imposing golden dome half hidden

amid the greenery. The editor’s office is secluded, small, neat, and

looks down into a quiet old graveyard, like those of St. Paul’s and

Trinity in New York. It seems a place strictly adapted to business,

and is cut off from the outer world even by so much of a means of

communication as a speaking-tube. There was formerly a speaking-tube,

but an importunate visitor had his ear to it, and received a somewhat

hasty message intended only in confidence for the call-boy, and it was

abolished. “Imagine the feelings of a sensitive man--_my_ feelings,

of course--on such an occasion,” says the editor with characteristic

drollery. “I flew at the tube, plugged it up with a cork, and drove

that in with a poker!” Among the few small objects that can be called

ornament scattered about is remarked a photograph of a severely

classic doorway, which might have belonged to some famous monument of

antiquity. It has a funereal look, to tell the truth, but it proves

to be nothing less than the doorway of the residence of Thomas Bailey

Aldrich himself, in Mt. Vernon Street. Like one of his own paradoxes,

it has a very different aspect when put amid its proper surroundings.

Mt. Vernon Street crosses the topmost height of Beacon Hill. Parallel

to the famed thoroughfare of Beacon Street, it is like a more retired

military line that has the compensation for its retirement of being

spared the active brunt of service. A very few minutes’ climb from the

office of _The Atlantic Monthly_ suffices to reach it. Precisely at

that portion of it where the pretty grass-plots begin, to the houses

on the upper side, is the attractive, stately mansion of an elder

generation, in which Aldrich has taken up his abode. He bought it,

some years ago, of Dr. Bigelow, a well-known name in Boston, and made

it his own. It is one of a block, and is of red brick, four windows

(and perhaps thirty feet) wide, and four tall stories in height, with

a story of dormers above that. The classic doorway of white marble,

solidly built, after the honest fashion of its time, is but a small

detail after all in such an amplitude of façade, and melts easily into

place as part of a genial whole. The quarter, its sidewalks and all,

is chiefly of old red brick, tempered with the green of grass-plots,

shrubs, and climbing vines. It has a pervading air of antiquity, and

it quaintly suggests a bit of Chester or Coventry. The neighbors are,

on the one hand, Charles Francis Adams; on the other, Bancroft, son

of the historian; while, diagonally across the way, is a lady who is,

by popular rumor, the richest woman in New England. The rooms of the

house take a pleasing irregularity from the partial curvature of the

walls, front and rear. They are all spacious, above-stairs as well as

below. The “hall bedroom,” of modern progress, was hardly invented in

its time. A platform and steps at one side of the hall, on entering

(they clear a small alley to the rear) have a sort of altar-like

aspect. The owner or his books might some time be apotheosized there,

at need, amid candles and flowers. Aldrich has been fortunate in his

marriage as in so many other ways. His family consists of a congenial

and accomplished wife, and “the twins,” not unknown to literature. The

most pervading trait of the interior is a sense of a discriminating

judgment and ardor in household decoration. Both husband and wife

share this taste, and together they have filled this abode and their

two country houses with ample evidence of it, and with rare and taking

objects brought from a wide circle of travel and research. Tribute

should be paid to the quietness of tone, the air of comfort, in the

whole. The collections are not made an end in themselves, but are

parts of a harmonious interior. Several stories are carpeted alike, in

a soft, low-toned hue. In days of professional decorators who throw

together all the hues of the kaleidoscope, and none in a patch larger

than your hand, and held upon these, brass, ebony, stamped leather,

marquetry, enamels and bottle-glass, in a kind of chaotic pudding--in

these days such an exceptional reserve as is here manifest seems little

less than a matter of notable personal daring. The furniture is of the

Colonial time, with a touch of the First Empire, and each piece has

its own history. There is a collection of curious old mirrors. In a

variety of old glazed closets and pantries in the dining-room (behind a

fine reception-room, on the entrance floor), Mrs. Aldrich shows a rare

collection of lovely china, both for use and ornament.

This is a dining-room that has entertained many a distinguished guest;

and the little dinners, to which invitations are rarely refused by the

favored ones, are said to be almost as easy to give as enjoyable to

take part in. The agreeable host, who has always allied himself much

with artists, has on occasion dined the New York Tile Club. Again,

his occupation as editor of _The Atlantic_ makes it often his duty

or privilege to bring home strangers of note who drop down upon him

from afar. The unexpected is, indeed, one of the things consistently

to be looked for in Aldrich. On the evenings of the week when he is

not entertaining, he is very apt to be dining out himself. He is a

social genius, and understands the arts of good fellowship. Good things

abound even more, if possible, in his talk than in his writings. Every

acquaintance of his will give you a list of happy scintillations of his

wit and humor. There is nothing of the recluse by nature in Aldrich;

nothing, either, of the conventional cut of poet or sage in his aspect.

His looks might somewhat astonish those--as the guileless are so often

astonished in this way--who had preconceived ideas of him from the

delicate refinement, the exquisite perfection of finish, of his verse.

As I saw him come in the other day from Lynn in a heavy, serviceable

reefing-jacket, adapted to the variable summer climate of that point,

he had much more the air of athlete than poet. I shall not enter upon

the abstruse calculation of what age a man may now have who was born in

1837, but in looks, manners, habits, Aldrich distinctly belongs to the

school of the younger men. He is now somewhat thickset; he is blond,

and of middle height. He has features that lend themselves easily to

the humorous play of his fancy. The ends of his mustache, pointed

somewhat in the French manner, seem to accentuate with a certain

fitness and _chic_ the quips and cranks which so often issue from

beneath it. Mentally, Aldrich seems Yankee, crossed with the Frenchman.

In the matter of literary finish, he is refined by fastidiousness of

taste to the last degree. He is a man of strong likes and dislikes; it

would sometimes seem fair almost to call them prejudices. In his work

he has scarcely any morbid side. He is the celebrator of every thing

bright and charming, of things opalescent and rainbow-hued, of pretty

women, roses, jewels, humming-bird and oriole, of the blue sky and sea

and the daintiest romance of the daintiest spots of foreign climes. If

man invented the arts to please,--as can hardly be denied,--few can be

called more truly in the vein of art than Thomas Bailey Aldrich.

From the rear window of the dining-room one looks out into a little

court-yard, more like a bit of Chester than ever. The building lot

runs quite through to Pinckney Street, and is closed in on the further

side by an odd little house of red brick, which is rented as a bachelor

apartment. It was formerly a petty shop, until Aldrich bethought him

both to transform it thus into a desirable adjunct, and to make it

pay a considerable part of the taxes. It is like a dwelling out of a

pantomime. One would hardly be surprised to see Humpty Dumpty dive

into or out of it at any moment. Pinckney Street might have a chapter

to itself. Narrower, modester, and at a further remove still from the

front than Mt. Vernon Street, it begins to be invaded now by quiet

lodging-houses, but still retains its quaintness and a high order of

respectability. A bright glimpse of the sea is had at the end of its

contracted down-hill perspective, over Charles Street. Aldrich formerly

lived in Pinckney Street, then in Charles Street, and thence removed

to his present abode. But, if it be a question of view, we must ascend

rather the high, winding staircase to the large cupola, with railed-in

platform, set upon the steep roof. The ground falls away hence on every

side and all of undulating, much-varied Boston is visible. Mark Twain

has pronounced the prospect from here at night, with the electric

lights glimmering in the leafy Common and the myriad of others round

about, as one of the most impressive within his wide experience. The

golden dome of the State House rears its bulk aloft, close at hand.

Up one flight from the entrance are the two principal drawing-rooms

of the house, large and handsome. The most conspicuous objects on the

walls of these are a few unknown old masters after the style of Fra

Angelico--trophies of travel. There are also a remarkable pair of

figures in Venetian wood-carving, nearly life-size. The pictures are,

for the rest, chiefly original sketches done for illustration of the

author’s books by the talented younger American artists.

On the same floor is the library, a modest-sized room, made to seem

smaller than it is through being compactly filled from floor to ceiling

with a collection of three thousand books. The specialties chiefly

observed in its composition are Americana and first editions. Aldrich

would disclaim any very ambitious design, but there are volumes here

which might tempt the cupidity of the most finished book-fancier, and

of a kind that bring liberal sums in market. Something artistic in

the form has generally guided the choice, as for instance Voltaire’s

“La Pucelle,” and the “Contes Moraux” of Marmontel, containing all

the quaint early plates. You take down from the shelves examples of

Aldrich’s own works done into several languages. Here is his “Queen

of Sheba” in Spanish, Valencia, 1879. Here is the treasure which

perhaps he would hardly exchange against any other--the autograph

letter of Hawthorne warmly praising his early poems,--saying, among

other things, that some of them seem almost too delicate even to be

breathed upon. Never did a young writer receive more intelligent and

sympathetic recognition from a greater source. Among the curiosities

of the shelves in yet another way is a gift copy of the early poems of

Fitz-Greene Halleck to Catherine Sedgwick. On the title-page is found

a patronizing line of memorandum from that minor celebrity in American

letters, reading “Mr. Halleck, the author of this book, is a resident

of New York.” Aldrich has never been subjected to the severe pecuniary

straits which befall so many literary men. He has undergone in his

time, however, sufficient pressure to acquaint him with that side of

life at least as an experience, to give him a proper appreciation no

doubt of his ample worldly comfort, and also to furnish the stimulus

for the development of his early powers. He had prepared, in his native

town of Portsmouth, to enter Harvard College, but, his father dying,

he became a clerk instead in the commission house of a rich uncle in

New York. He had his own way to make in the literary world; he began

at the very foot of the ladder, with fugitive contributions, and by

degrees identified himself with the newspapers and magazines of the

day. He even saw something of Bohemian life, a knowledge of which is no

undesirable element in one who is to be a man of the world. He dined at

Pfaff’s, and was one of a coterie which circled around _The Saturday

Press_ and the brilliant, erratic Henry D. Clapp. I recollect passing

with him the office of this defunct journal in Frankfort Street, on

the occasion when he had come to New York to be the recipient of a

complimentary breakfast at Delmonico’s in honor of his induction into

the editorship of _The Atlantic Monthly_. He looked with interest at

the dingy quarters commemorating so very different a phase of his life,

and repeated to me the valedictory address of the paper: “This paper is

discontinued for want of funds, which, by a coincidence, is precisely

the reason for which it was started.”

I have described Aldrich’s town house. He passes much of his time at

Ponkapog, twelve miles away behind the Blue Hills, and at Lynn, on the

sea-coast. “After its black bass and wild duck and teal,” says our

author in one of his charming essays, “solitude is the chief staple

of Ponkapog.... The nearest railway station (Heaven be praised!) is

two miles distant, and the seclusion is without a flaw. Ponkapog has

one mail a day; two mails a day would render the place uninhabitable.”

He took a large old farmhouse in the secluded place, remodeled it,

arranged for himself an attractive working study, and, used to men

and cities though he was, for a period made this exclusively his

home. His leading motive was the health of his boys, who needed an

out-of-door life. Ponkapog owes him a debt of gratitude for spreading

its name abroad. Until the publication of his entertaining book of

travel sketches, “From Ponkapog to Pesth,” it must have been wholly

unheard of, and even then I, for one, can recollect feeling that the

appellation was so ingenious as to be probably fictitious. With a

continuity that speaks strongly in its favor, Aldrich has passed the

summers at Lynn for seventeen years. From these must be excepted,

however, the summers of his jaunts to Europe, which are rather

frequent. The latest of these took him to the Russian fair at Nijni

Novgorod. In another, perhaps unlike any other traveler, he passed a

“day [and a day only] in Africa.” At Lynn, he has lived, in different

villas, all along the breezy Ocean Road. This is a street worthy of its

name, and it has a certain flavor of Newport, being a little remote

from the central bustle of the great shoe-manufacturing mart to which

it belongs. Others will quote a list of varied advantages for the

site; Aldrich will be apt to tell you he likes it for its nearness to

the railway station. The present house, of which he has taken a long

lease, is a large square wooden villa, painted red. It stands just

in the edge of a little indentation known as Deer Cove. “After me,

probably--who knows?” says the humorous host, who is not at all afraid

of a bit of the common vernacular. Nahant, Little Nahant and minor

resorts are in the view in front; Swampscott is three-quarters of a

mile away, at the left, and Marblehead at no great distance beyond

that. The feature of the water view is the bold little reef of Egg

Rock, with three white dots of habitations on its back. “Egg Rock is

exactly opposite everywhere. I recollect once trying to find some place

to which it was not opposite, just as in childhood I tried once to walk

around to the other side of the moon. In this latter case I suppose I

must have walked fully two miles.” So my host describes his peculiar

experience with it.

The main tide of fashion sets rather towards Beverly Farms and

Manchester than in this direction. The family lead, gladly, a quiet

life, little disturbed by a bustle of visits. They depend chiefly for

society upon the guests they bring down with them. They find plenty

of occupation and interest, too, in caring for their boys. These are

twins, as I have said, and so much twins as to be with difficulty

distinguished apart. I was interested to know if they began to develop

the literary faculty. ‘Heaven forbid!’ said their father in comic

horror. Aldrich’s study at Lynn is a modest upper room, in a wing, with

a plain gray cartridge-paper on the walls, no pictures, and nothing

to conspire with a flagging attention in its wanderings. One’s first

impulse, on looking up from the little writing-table in the center of

the floor, would be to cast his eyes out of the single window, where

Egg Rock, in a bit of blue sea, is again visible. This window should be

an inspiring influence, letting in its illumination upon the fabrics

of the heated brain; and not in the gentler mood alone, for tragedy

is often abroad there. The fog shrouds Egg Rock, then rolls in and

envelopes the universe under its stealthy domination; again, the gale

spatters the brine upon the window-panes, and beats and roars about the

house as it might on the light at Montauk.

As an editor, Aldrich is methodical. He goes early in the day to

the office of _The Atlantic Monthly_, and there writes his letters,

examines his manuscripts, and sees (or does not see) his visitors upon

a regular system. As to his personal habit of writing his literature,

he has none--at least no times and seasons. He waits for the mood, and

defends this practice as the best, or, at least for him, almost the

only one possible. This has to do, no doubt, with the small volume

of his writings, smaller comparatively than that of most of his

contemporaries. This result is perhaps contributed to also by the easy

circumstances of his life, and yet more by his devotion to extreme

literary finish. Experienced though he is, and successful though he is,

no manuscript leaves his hands to be printed till he has made at least

three distinct and amended drafts of it. He could never have been a

newspaper man; the merest paragraph would have received the same care,

and in the newspaper such painstaking is ruinous. His was a talent that

had to succeed in the front rank or not at all. He has produced little

of late, far too little to meet the demands of the audience of eager

admirers he has created. So delightful a pen, so droll and original

a fancy, so charming a muse, we can ill afford to spare. Yet that

mysterious genius that goes about collecting material for the archives

of permanent fame can have but little to dismiss from a total so small

and a performance so choice.

WILLIAM HENRY BISHOP.

[After ten years as editor of _The Atlantic Monthly_, Mr. Aldrich

resigned his position, and has since that time been living in Boston.

In 1893 he published “An Old Town by the Sea,” and two years later

“Unguarded Gates, and Other Poems.”--EDITORS.]

GEORGE BANCROFT

GEORGE BANCROFT

AT WASHINGTON

Mr. Bancroft, the historian, was “at home” beneath every roof-tree,

beside every fireside, where books are household gods. Mr. Bancroft,

the octogenarian, who came into the world hand in hand with the

Nineteenth Century, was especially at home at the capital of the

country whose history was to him a labor of love and the absorbing

occupation of a lifetime. For although his career was one of active

participation in public affairs, his pursuits ran parallel with his

literary work. He was contributing to the making of one period of a

United States history while his pen was engaged in writing of other

periods. If self-gratulation is ever permitted to authors, Mr. Bancroft

must have more than once exclaimed, “The lines have fallen to me in

pleasant places!” as he availed himself of opportunities which only an

ambassador could secure and a scholar improve.

It is the prose-Homer of our Republic whom it is my privilege to

present to the readers of this sketch. Picture to yourself a venerable

man, of medium height, slender figure, erect bearing; with lofty

brow thinned, but not stripped, of its silvery locks; a full, snowy

beard adding to his patriarchal appearance; bluish gray eyes, which

neither use nor time has deprived of brightness; a large nose of

Roman type, such as I have somewhere read or heard that the first

Napoleon regarded as the sign of latent force; “small white hands,”

which Ali Pasha assured Byron were the marks by which he recognized

the poet to be “a man of birth”;--let your imagination combine these

details, and you have a sketch for the historian’s portrait. The

frame is a medium-sized room of good, high pitch. In the center is a

rectangular table covered with books, pamphlets and other indications

of a literary life. Shelving reaches to the ceiling, and every

fraction of space is occupied by volumes of all sizes, from folio to

duodecimo; a door on the left opens into a room which is also full to

overflowing with the valuable collections of a lifetime; and further

on is yet another apartment equally crowded with the historian’s dumb

servants, companions, and friends; while rooms and nooks elsewhere

have yielded to Literature’s rights of squatter sovereignty. In the

Republic of Letters, all books are citizens, and one is as good as

another in the eyes of the maid-servant who kindles the breakfast-room

fire, save perhaps the vellum Plautus or illuminated missal. But men

are known not only by the society they keep, but by the books which

surround them. Just as there are “books which are no books,” so are

there libraries which are no libraries. But a library selected by a

scholar who was a book-hunter in European fields, who spared neither

time, money, labor, nor any available agency in his collection, must

be rich in literary treasures, particularly those bearing upon his

specialty; and such was Mr. Bancroft’s library. The facilities which

personal popularity, the fraternal spirit of literary men, and the

courtesy of official relations afford, were employed by Mr. Bancroft

when ambassador in procuring authentic copies of invaluable writings

and state-papers bearing immediately or remotely on the history of

the American Colonies and Republic. To these facilities, and his

own indefatigable industry and perseverance, is due the priceless

collection of manuscripts which, copied in a large and legible

handwriting, well-bound and systematically classified, adorned his

shelves. Of the printed volumes, not the least precious was a copy of

“Don Juan,” presented to him with the author’s compliments, sixty-six

years ago.

Mr. Bancroft’s home was a commodious double house, with brown-stone

front, plain and solid-looking, which was, before the War, the winter

residence of a wealthy Maryland family. Diagonally opposite, at the

corner of the intersecting streets, is the “Decatur House,” whither

the gallant sailor was borne after his duel with Commodore Barron, and

where he died after lingering in agony. Within a stone’s throw is the

White House; and I would say that the historian lived in the centre

of Washington’s Belgravia, had not the British Minister’s residence,

with an attraction stronger than centripetal, drawn around it a

social colony whose claims must be at least debated before judgment

is pronounced. In front of Mr. Bancroft’s house is a small courtyard

in which, in spring-time, beds of hyacinths blooming in sweet and

close communion show his love of flowers. When conversing with the

historian, it was impossible to ignore the retrospect of a life so

full of interest, for imagination persists in picturing the boyish

graduate of Harvard; the ambitious student at Gottingen and Berlin;

the inquisitive and ever-acquiring traveler; the pupil returned to

the bosom of his Alma Mater and promoted to a Fellowship with her

Faculty--preacher, teacher, poet and translator, before his calling

and election as his country’s historian was sure; his entrance into

the arena of politics and rapid advance to the line of leadership; his

membership in Mr. Polk’s Cabinet; his subsequent Mission to England;

his much later Mission to Berlin, where he succeeded in obtaining from

Bismarck a recognition of the “American doctrine” that naturalization

is expatriation, and negotiated a treaty which endeared him to the

German-American heart, since the Fatherland may now be visited without

the risk of compulsory service in the army.

When he first went abroad, an American was an object of curiosity to

Europeans, and we may compare his reception among German scholars to

that of Burns by the metaphysicians, philosophers and social leaders

of Edinburgh--first surprise, and then fraternal welcome. Two years

were spent at Gottingen, and half a year at Berlin. During this

period he was the pupil and companion of the great philologist Wolf,

of whom Ticknor’s delightful Memoirs contain such an entertaining

account; he studied under Schlosser, who so frequently appears in the

pages of Crabb Robinson’s Memoirs; he was a favorite with Heeren,

whose endorsement of his history was the _imprimatur_ of a literary

Pope. In his subsequent wanderings through France, Switzerland, and

over the Alps into Italy, he experienced the friendly offices of

men distinguished in literature, famous in history, and foremost

in politics. Some time was spent in Paris. With Lafayette intimate

relations were established; so much so, that the champion of republican

principles enlisted the young and sympathetic American in his too

sanguine schemes. Manuscript addresses were entrusted to Mr. Bancroft

to be published and disseminated at certain places along his Italian

journey. But the youthful lieutenant saw soon the impracticability of

the veteran’s hopes and plans.

It was a novel sensation to converse with one who survived so many

famous men of many lands with whom he came in contact; one who

discussed Byron with Goethe at Weimar, and Goethe with Byron at

Monte Nero; who, seventy years ago, went to Washington and dined at

the White House with the younger Adams; who since mingled with the

successive generations of American statesmen; witnessed the death of

one great political party, and the birth of another, but himself clung

with conservative consistency to the principles he espoused in early

manhood. Yet neither his years nor his tastes exiled him from the

enjoyment of a congenial element of society at the capital. But his

circle rarely touched the circumference which surrounds the gay and

ultra-fashionable coteries of a Washington season.

Mr. Bancroft had a warm sympathy for youth and childhood, and took

pleasure in the occasions that brought them around him. His habits

were those of one who early appreciated the fact that time is the most

reliable and available tool of the worker. It was for years his custom

to rise to his labors at five o’clock. After a noon-luncheon, he took

the exercise which contributed so much to his physical and intellectual

activity. He covered considerable distances daily on foot or horseback,

for he was both pedestrian and rider of the English type; or, if the

weather did not favor these methods of laying in a supply of oxygen, he

might have been seen reclining in a roomy two-horse phaeton.

Two generations intervened between the youthful visitor at the capital

and the venerable statesman and historian, who in his last days,

beneath his own vine and fig-tree, “crowned a youth of labor with an

age of ease.” Yet the preacher, teacher, poet, essayist, translator,

philologist, linguist, statesman, diplomat, historian, pursued with

tempered ardor his literary avocations. Readers of _The North American

Review_ had the pleasure of perusing, some years ago, his valuable

paper on Holmes’s “Emerson.” He published more recently (in 1886) a

brochure on the Legal Tender Acts and Decisions; but nothing was ever

allowed to interfere with the revision of his _opus major_, the History

of the United States, the sixth and last volume of the new edition of

which was issued by the Appletons in February, 1885.

As an octogenarian is not, strictly speaking, a contemporary, I

venture to enter the realm of biography, and refer to what renders

Mr. Bancroft the most interesting of American authors. His translation

from the path of pedagogy, from the dream-land of poetry, from the

atmosphere of theology, and the arena of party strife and the novelty

of official life, was a transition from extreme to extreme. Yet he

brought with him into his new fields the best fruits of his experience

in the old. He did not inflame the passions of the masses at the

hustings, but instructed their judgment. When he assumed the office of

Collector of the Port of Boston, he exhibited a capacity for business

which would have silenced the modern Senator who not only characterized

scholars as “them literary fellers,” but prefixed an adjective which

may not be repeated to ears polite. How many Cabinet officers are

remembered for any permanent reform or progressive movement they have

accomplished or initiated? But to Mr. Bancroft the country owes the

establishment of the Naval School at Annapolis; and science is indebted

to his fostering care for the contributory usefulness of the National

Observatory, which languished until he took the Naval portfolio. When

at the Court of St. James he negotiated America’s first postal treaty

with Great Britain; while allusion has been made to the important

service rendered at the German capital. In politics Mr. Bancroft was

always a Democrat. He was one of those who angered fanatics by their

love for the Constitution, and enraged secessionists by their devotion

to the Union,--who labored to avert the War, but whom the first gun

fired at Fort Sumter rallied to the support of Mr. Lincoln. And when

the last great eulogy of the martyred President was to be pronounced,

Mr. Bancroft was chosen to deliver it.

On the approach of summer, Mr. Bancroft led the exodus which leaves the

capital a deserted village. July found him domiciled at Newport, in

an old, roomy house, which faces Bellevue Avenue and is surrounded by

venerable trees, beneath whose wide-spreading shade the visitor drives

to the historian’s summer home. The view of the ocean is one of the

accidental charms of the spot, but the historian’s own hand dedicated

an extensive plot to a garden of roses--the flower which was nearest to

his heart. At Newport he led a life similar to that in Washington. He

rose early and saw the sun rise above the sea; he devoted a portion of

his time to literary pursuits, and entered into the social life of the

place, without taking part in its gayeties. In October he struck his

tent, and returned to his other home in time to enjoy the beauties of

our Indian summer.

B. G. LOVEJOY.

GEORGE H. BOKER

GEORGE H. BOKER

IN PHILADELPHIA

Like Washington Irving, Bancroft, Hawthorne, Lowell, Motley, Bayard

Taylor, and Bret Harte, George H. Boker may be counted among those

American authors who have been called upon to serve their country in

an official capacity abroad. But the greater part of his life was

spent in Philadelphia, where he was born in 1823. The house stands in

Walnut Street; a building of good height, with a facing of conventional

brown-stone, and set in the heart of the distinctively aristocratic

quarter. For Mr. Boker was born to the inheritance of wealth and a

strong social position, and it is natural that the place and the

face of his house should testify to this circumstance. In fact, he

was so closely connected with the society which enjoys a reputed

leisure, that when as a young man he declared his purpose of making

authorship and literature his life-work, his circle regarded him as

hopelessly erratic. Philadelphians, in those days, could respect

imported poets, and no doubt partially appreciated poetry in books,

as an ornamental adjunct of life. But poetry in an actual, breathing,

male American creature of their own “set,” was a different matter. The

infant industry of the native Muse was one that they never thought of

fostering.

It was soon after graduating at Nassau Hall, Princeton, that Boker made

known his intention of becoming an author. From what I have heard,

I infer that his resolve caused his neighbors to look upon him with

somewhat the same feeling as if he had suddenly been deposited on their

decorous doorsteps in the character of a foundling. Nevertheless, he

persisted quietly; and he succeeded in maintaining his position as

a poet of high rank and an accomplished man of the world, who also

took an active part in public affairs. He takes place with Motley on

our roll of well-known authors, as a rich young man giving himself to

letters; and it is even more remarkable that he should have cultivated

poetry in Philadelphia, where the conditions were unfavorable,

than that Motley should have taken up history in Boston, where the

conditions were wholly propitious. Boker’s house bears the impress

of his various and comprehensive tastes. To this extent it becomes

an illustration of his character, and the illustration is worth

considering.

The first floor, as one enters from the hallway, contains the

dining-room at the back, and a long, stately drawing-room fitted

up with old-time richness and imbued with an atmosphere of courtly

reception. But the library or study is above, on the second floor.

It has two windows looking out southward over the garden in the rear

of the house, and the whole effect of the room is that of luxurious

comfort mingled with an opulence of books. The walls are hung with

brown and gilded paper, and the visitor’s feet press upon a heavy

Turkish carpet, brought by the poet himself from Constantinople,

suggesting the quietude of Tennyson’s “hushed seraglios.” The chairs

and the lounges are covered with yellow morocco. On the wall between

the two windows hangs a copy of the Chandos portrait of Shakspeare; and

below this there is a large writing-table, provided with drawers and

cupboards, where Mr. Boker kept his manuscripts. His work, however, was

not done at this desk, for in the centre of the room there was a round

table under the chandelier, with a large arm-chair drawn up beside it.

In this chair, and at this round table, Mr. Boker wrote nearly all

his works; but, unlike most authors, he did not do his writing on the

table. A portfolio held in front of him, while he sat in the chair,

served his purpose; and it may also be worth while to note the fact

that his plays and his poems, composed in this spot, were first set

down in pencil.

The surroundings are delightful. On all sides the walls are filled with

book-cases reaching almost to the ceiling; the windows are hung with

heavy curtains decorated with Arabic designs; and in winter a fire of

soft coal burns in the large grate at one side of the apartment. The

books that glisten from the shelves are cased in bindings and covers of

the finest sort, made by the best artists of England and France. As to

their contents, the strength lies in a collection of old English drama

and poetry and a complete set of the Latin classics. It must be said

here, however, that Mr. Boker’s books are by no means confined to the

library. The presence of books is visible all through the house, and

one can trace at various points the fact that the owner of these books

has always aimed to collect the best editions. In later days Mr. Boker

has, in a measure, been exiled from the companionship of the choicest

books in his study; because, in order to obtain uninterrupted quiet,

he has been obliged to retire to a small room on the floor above his

library, where he is more secure from disturbance.

The dining-room is a noteworthy apartment, not only because many

distinguished persons have been entertained in it, but also because it

is beautifully finished with a ceiling and walls of black oak, framing

scarlet panels, that set off the buffets and side-cases full of silver

services. If any one fancies, however, that the appointments of the

dining-room and the library indicate a too Sybaritic taste, he should

ascend to the top floor of the house, where Mr. Boker had a workshop

containing a complete outfit for a turner in metals. Mr. Boker always

had a taste for working at what he called his “trade” of producing

various articles in metal, on his turning-lathe. In younger days it

used to be his boast that he could go into the shop of any machinist,

take off his coat, and earn his living as a skilled workman. He still

practiced at the bench in his own workshop, at the age of sixty-five.

It seems to me that he was unique among American authors, in uniting

with the grace and fire of a genuine poet the diversions of a rich

society man, the functions of a public official, and a capacity for

practical work as a mechanic.

We must bear in mind, also, that this skilled laborer, this man of

social leisure and amusement, and this poet, was also a man of intense

action in the time of the Civil War, when he organized the Union League

of Philadelphia, which consolidated loyal sentiment in the chief city

of Pennsylvania, at the time when that city was wavering. All the

Union Leagues of the country were patterned after this organization

in Philadelphia. Moreover, when Mr. Boker undertook and carried on

this work, his whole fortune was in danger of loss, from a maliciously

inspired law-suit. With the risk of complete financial ruin impending,

he devoted himself wholly to the cause of patriotism, and poured out

poem after poem that became the battle-cry of loyalists throughout the

North. His character and services won the friendship of General Grant;

and after the War, he was appointed United States Minister to Turkey;

from which post he was promoted to St. Petersburg. The impression

he made at that capital was so deep that, when he was recalled,

Gortschakoff received his successor with these words: “I cannot say I

am glad to see you. In fact, I’m not sure that I see you at all, for

the tears that are in my eyes on account of the departure of our friend

Boker.” In both of these places he rendered important services. Among

the dramas which were the fruit of his youth, “Calaynos” and “Francesca

da Rimini” achieved a great success, both in England and in this

country. The revival of “Francesca da Rimini” at the hands of Lawrence

Barrett, and its run of two or three seasons, thirty years after its

production, is one of the most remarkable events in the history of the

American stage. Nor should it be forgotten that Daniel Webster valued

one of Boker’s sonnets so much, that he kept it in memory to recite;

and that Leigh Hunt selected Boker as one of the best exponents of

mastery in the perfect sonnet.

An early portrait of Mr. Boker bears strong resemblance to Nathaniel

Hawthorne in his manly prime. But passing decades, while they did not

bend the tall, erect figure, whitened the thick, military-looking

moustache and short curling hair that contrasted strikingly with a

firm, ruddy complexion. His commanding presence and distinguished

appearance were as well known in Philadelphia as his sturdy personality

and polished manners were. For many years he continued to act as

President both of the Union League and of the old, aristocratic, yet

hospitable, Philadelphia Club. These two clubs, his home occupations

and his numerous social engagements occupied much of his leisure during

the winter; and his summers were usually spent at some fashionable

resort of the quieter order. How he contrived to find time for reading

and composition it is hard to guess; but his pencil was not altogether

idle even in his last years. When a man had so consistently held his

course and fixed his place as a poet, a dramatist, a brilliant member

of society, an active patriot and a diplomatist, it seems to me quite

worth our while to recognize that he did this under circumstances of

inherited wealth which usually lead to inertness. It is worth our

while to observe that a rich American devoted his life to literature,

and did so much to make us feel that he deserved to be one of the few

American authors who enjoyed a luxurious home.

GEORGE PARSONS LATHROP.

JOHN BURROUGHS

JOHN BURROUGHS

AT ESOPUS ON THE HUDSON

When the author of “Winter Sunshine” comes to town, it is over the

most perfectly graded track and through the finest scenery about New

York. Returning he is carried past Weehawken and the Palisades, through

the Jersey Meadows, in and out among the West Shore Highlands, under

West Point, and past Newburg factories and Marlborough berry farms. He

leaves the train at West Park, mounts a hill through a peach-orchard,

crosses a grassy field, and the high-road when he reaches the top,

opens a rustic gate, and is at home. From the road, you look down upon

the roofs and dormers and chimneys of the house, about half covered

with the red and purple foliage of the Virginia creeper. The ground

slopes quite steeply, so that the house is two stories high on the

side next the road and three on the side toward the river, which winds

away between high, wooded banks to the Catskills, twenty miles to the

north, and to the Highlands, thirty miles to the south. The slope, in

the rear of the house, to the river, is laid out in a grapery and an

orchard of apple and peach trees. Between the house and the road the

steep hillside is tufted with evergreens and other ornamental trees.

At the foot of the hill, the gray roofs of a big ice-house are seen.

Squirrels, that have their nests in the sawdust packing, clamber

around the walls. Near the house, to the left, there is a substantial

store-house, and a carriage-shed and stable. There are two other

dwellings on the farm. The country immediately about is all very much

alike, nearly half of it in ornamental plantations surrounding neat

country houses; the other half, where it is not occupied by rocks,

being covered with fruit, or corn, or grass. The opposite shore of the

Hudson is of the same character, varied with clumps of timber, villas

and farm-houses of the style that was in vogue before the introduction

of the so-called Queen Anne mode of building; a few cultivated

fields and many wild meadows and out-cropping ridges of slate rock

intervening. But the interior country, on the hither-side, back of

the railroad which cuts through the slate hills like a hay-knife,

is a perfect wilderness--rugged, barren, and uninhabited. A number

of little lakes lie behind the first range of hills, the highest of

which has been named by Mr. Burroughs Mount Hymettus, because it is a

famous place for wild bees and sumac honey. From one of these ponds, an

exemplary mountain stream--model of all that a mountain stream should

be--makes its way by a series of cascades into the valley, where it

forms deep pools, peopled by silvery chub and black bass, brawls over

ledges, sparkles in the sun, and sleeps in the shadow, and performs

all the recognized and traditional brook “business” to perfection. Its

specialty is its bed of black stones and dark green moss, which has

gained it its name of Black Creek. At one spot, where it passes under a

high bank overhung by hemlocks, it has communicated its dark color to

the very frogs that jump into it, and to the dragonflies that rid it of

mosquitoes.

The road between West Park and Esopus crosses this brook near a ruined

mill, whose charred rafters lie in the cellar, and whose wheel-buckets

are filled with corn-shucks. The ruby berries of the nightshade hang

in over its window-sills. This is the most varied two miles of road

that I can bring to mind. Starting with a fine view up and down the

river, it soon dips into the valley, between walls of slate and rows

of tall locusts. The locusts are succeeded by the firs and pines of

a carefully kept estate. Then comes the stream, spanned by a rustic

bridge; the ruined mill, and the new rise of ground which, beyond the

railroad, reaches up into summits covered with red oaks and flaming

orange maples. A tree by the roadside, now torn in two by a storm, is

pointed out by Mr. Burroughs as the former home of an old friend of

his--a brown owl who, in the course of a ten years’ acquaintanceship,

as if dreading the contempt that familiarity breeds, never showed an

entire and unhesitating confidence in him. The bird would slink out of

sight as he approached--slowly and by imperceptible degrees; wisely

effacing himself rather than that it should be said he was too intimate

with a mere human. Esopus contains a tavern, a post-office, a bank,

a blacksmith-shop, and one or two houses; and yet--like an awkward

contingency--one never suspects its existence until he has got fairly

into it. From the railroad station it is invisible; it cannot be seen

from the river; and the road, which runs through it, knows nothing of

it before or after.

Mr. Burroughs’s portrait must be drawn out of doors. He is of a medium

height, but being well-built and having a fine head, he gives the

impression of being by no means a middling sort of a man, physically.

His skin is well tanned by exposure to all sorts of weather. He has

grisly hair and beard. The eyes and mouth have a somewhat feminine

character; the eyes are humid, rather large, and they are half closed

when he is pleased; the lips are full, the line between them never

hard, and the corners of the mouth are blunt. The nose would be Roman,

if it were a trifle longer. I make no apology for giving so short a

description of a man whom it would be well worth while to paint. It is

unnecessary to sketch his mental features, for he has unconsciously

placed them on record, himself, in the delightful series of essays

which he has added to the treasures of the English language.

Authors at home: Personal and biographical sketches of well-known American writers · 第 1 / 17 段