DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

It has been established that wolves hunting Dall sheep (Murie 1944),

caribou (Crisler 1956), moose (Mech 1966a), and other species usually

have a low percentage of success. In the case of a pack of 15 wolves

hunting moose on Isle Royale during winter, only 4.6 percent of all the

moose detected by the pack were killed; considering only the moose that

the wolves caught up to or held at bay, the kill rate was 7.6 percent

(Mech 1966a).

What little evidence there is about wolves hunting deer indicates that

the success rate is also low with this prey species, at least in

winter. The senior author has now observed a total of 14 deer being

chased by wolves in northeastern Minnesota, mostly by packs of five,

seven or eight wolves (Mech 1966b, and see Mech _et al._, p. 1). In

only one case (6.7 percent) did the wolves (a pair) succeed in catching

their prey.

Low hunting success rates imply that the circumstances influencing

hunts are seldom favorable enough, or the prey animals encountered are

seldom vulnerable enough for the wolves to succeed. When the evidence

cited earlier that most wolf-killed animals are inferior members of

their populations is considered, the most cogent explanation for the

low hunting success of wolves is that relatively few prey animals are

vulnerable.

_Table 8.--Incidence of various abnormalities and pathological

conditions in wolf-killed deer compared with that in hunter-killed

deer_

#: _Number_

%: _Percent_

---------------------:----------------:----------------:-------------

: Wolf-kills : Hunter-kills :

:------:---------:------:---------: Level of

Condition : Deer : Deer : Deer : Deer : significance

: in : with : in : with :

:sample:condition:sample:condition:

---------------------:------:---------:------:---------:-------------

# # % # # % %

Ecological Studies of the Timber Wolf in Northeastern Minnesota · 第 47 / 69 题